The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey to Grosvenor C. Bedford, 5 May 1807
“When I wished you never to read the Classics again it
was because, like many other persons, you read nothing
else, and were not likely ever to get more knowledge out of them than
you had got already, especially as you chiefly (I may say exclusively) read
those from whom least is to be got, which is also another sin of the age. Your
letter contains the usual blunders which the ignorance of the age is
continually making, and upon which, and nothing else, rests the whole point at
issue between such critics as Jeffrey
and myself: you couple Homer and Virgil under the general term of classics, and
suppose that both are to be admired upon the same grounds. A century ago this
was better understood; the critics of that age did read what they wrote about,
and understood what they read, and they knew that whoever thought the one of
these
Ætat. 33. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 87 |
writers a good poet must upon that very principle
hold the other to be a bad one. Greek and Latin poets,
Grosvenor, are as opposite as French and English
(excepting always Lucretius and Catullus), and you may as well suppose it possible
for a man equally to admire Shakspeare
and Racine as Homer
and Virgil; that is, provided he knows why and wherefore
he admires either. Elmsley will tell you
this, and I suppose you will admit him to be authority upon this subject.
“You ask me about the Catholic question. I am against
admitting them to power of any kind, because the immediate use that would be
made of it would be to make proselytes, for which Catholicism is of all
religions best adapted. Every ship which had a Catholic captain would have a
Catholic chaplain, and in no very long time a Catholic crew: so on in the army;
just as every rich Catholic in England at this time has his mansion surrounded
with converts fairly purchased,—the Jerningham
family in Norfolk for instance. I object to any concessions, because no
concession can possibly satisfy them; and I think it palpable folly to talk or
think of tolerating any sect (beyond what they already enjoy) whose first
principle is that their church is infallible, and, therefore, bound to
persecute all others. This is the principle of Catholicism everywhere, and when
they can they avow it and act upon it.
“If our statesmen (God forgive me for degrading the
word),—if our traders in politics,—had better information of how
things are going on abroad, they would not talk of the distinction between
Catholic
88 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 33. |
and Protestant as political parties being
extinct. But for that distinction Prussia could not have retained its conquests
from Austria; and that distinction Bonaparte is at this time endeavouring to profit by. There is a
regular conspiracy,—a system carrying on to propagate popery in the North
of Germany, of which Coleridge could
communicate much if he would, he knowing the main directors of the new
propaganda at Rome. The mode of doing it is curious,—they bring the
people first to believe in Jacob Behmen,
and then they may believe in anything else. All fanaticism tends to this point.
You will hear something that bears upon this subject from Espriella when he makes his
appearance; and you will also see more of the present history of enthusiasm in
this country than any body could possibly suspect who has not, as I have done,
cast a searching eye into the holes and comers of society, and watched its
under currents, which carry more water than the upper stream.
“I have a favour to ask of Horace,—which is, that he will do me the kindness to send
me the titles of such Portuguese manuscripts as are in the Museum. There cannot
be so many as to make this a thing of much trouble; and there are some of great
value, which were, I believe, part of the plunder of
Osorio’s library carried off from Sylvas by
Sir F. Drake. I wish to know what
they are, for the purpose of ascertaining how many among them are not to be
found in their own country, and either taking myself, or causing to be taken,
if a fit transcriber can be found, copies to present to some fit library at
Lisbon:
Ætat. 33. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 89 |
in so doing I shall render the literature of that
country a most acceptable service, which it would most highly gratify me to do,
and for which I should receive very essential services in return. There are, I
believe, in particular, some papers of Geronimo
Lobos concerning Abyssinia, and a MS. of which Vincent has made some use. I am particularly desirous of
effecting this, not merely because I could do nothing which would be more
essentially useful to my own views there, but also because of the true and
zealous love which I feel for Portuguese literature, in which I am now as well
versed as in that of my own country, and into which (whenever the reign of
priestcraft is at an end) I hope to be one day adopted.
“I pray you remember that what I think upon the
Catholic question by no means disposes me in favour of the new ministry. I,
Mr. Bedford, am, as you know, a
court pensioner, and have, as you well know, deserved to be so for my great and
devoted attachment to the person of His Majesty and the measures of his
government. Nevertheless, Mr. Bedford, his ministers are
men of tried and convicted incapacity; they have always
been the contempt of Europe; whether they can be more despised than their
predecessors have uniformly and deservedly been, I know not. I cannot tell how
far below nothing the political barometer can sink till it has been tried.
“God bless you!
Grosvenor Charles Bedford (1773-1839)
The son of Horace Walpole's correspondent Charles Bedford; he was auditor of the
Exchequer and a friend of Robert Southey who contributed to several of Southey's
publications.
Horace Walpole Bedford (1773-1807)
The younger brother of Grosvenor Charles Bedford; he attended Westminster School, worked
at the British Museum, and corresponded with Robert Southey. He contributed poems to the
Monthly Magazine and the
Annual
Anthology.
Jacob Behmen (1575-1624)
German mystic much read in England.
Catullus (84 BC c.-54 BC)
Roman lyric poet who addressed erotic verses to a woman he calls Lesbia.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
Sir Francis Drake (1540-1596)
The first Englishman to circumnavigate the globe (1577-80) in expeditions against the
Spanish, and who participated in the destruction of the Armada (1588).
Peter Elmsley (1774-1825)
Classical scholar educated at Christ Church, Oxford, who published in the
Edinburgh Review and
Quarterly Review.
Southey described him to W. S. Landor as “the fattest under-graduate in your time and
mine.”
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
Jerónimo Lobo (1593-1678)
Portuguese Jesuit missionary who traveled to Ethiopia in 1624 and left an account
translated into English by Samuel Johnson.
Lucretius (99 BC.-55 BC c.)
Roman poet, author of the verse treatise
De rerum natura.
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Jean Racine (1639-1699)
French neoclassical playwright, author of
Andromaque (1667),
Bajazet (1672),
Mithridate (1673) and Phèdre
(1677).
William Vincent (1739-1815)
Educated at Westminster and Trinity College, he was headmaster of Westminster School
(1788); his
A Defence of Public Education (1801) ran to three
editions. He was Dean of Westminster (1803-15).
Virgil (70 BC-19 BC)
Roman epic poet; author of
Eclogues,
Georgics, and the
Aenead.