The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Samuel Taylor Coleridge to Robert Southey, 20 October 1809
“. . . . . What really makes me despond is the daily
confirmation I receive of my original apprehension, that the plan and execution
of The
Friend is so utterly unsuitable to the public taste as to
preclude all rational hopes of its success. Much, certainly, might have been
done to have made the former numbers less so, by the interposition of others
written more expressly for general interest; and, if I could attribute it
wholly to any removable error of my own, I should be less dejected. I will do
my best, will frequently interpose tales and whole numbers of amusement, will
make the periods lighter and shorter; and the work itself, proceeding according
to its plan, will become more interesting when the foundations have been laid.
Massiveness is the merit of a foundation; the gilding, ornaments, stucco-work,
conveniences, sunshine, and sunny prospects will come with the superstructure.
Yet still I feel the deepest conviction that no efforts of mine, compatible
with the hope of effecting any good purpose, or with the duty I owe to my
permanent reputation, will remove the complaint. No real information can be
conveyed, no important errors radically extracted, without demanding an effort
of thought on the part of the reader; but the obstinate, and now contemptuous,
aversion to all energy of thinking is the mother evil, the cause of all the
evils in politics, morals, and lite-
260 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 35. |
rature, which it is
my object to wage war against; so that I am like a physician who, for a patient
paralytic in both arms, prescribes, as the only possible cure, the use of the
dumb-bells. Whatever I publish, and in whatever form, this obstacle will be
felt. The Rambler, which, altogether,
has sold a hundred copies for one of the Connoisseur, yet, during its periodical appearance, did not sell
one for fifty, and was dropped by reader after reader for its dreary gravity
and massiveness of manner. Now, what I wish you to do for me—if, amid
your many labours, you can find or make a leisure hour—is, to look over
the eight numbers, and to write a letter to The Friend in a lively
style, chiefly urging, in a humorous manner, my Don Quixotism in expecting that
the public will ever pretend to understand my lucubrations, or feel any
interest in subjects of such sad and unkempt antiquity, and contrasting my
style with the cementless periods of the modern Anglo-Gallican style, which not
only are understood beforehand, but, being free from all connections of logic,
all the hooks and eyes of intellectual memory, never oppress the mind by any
after recollections, but, like civil visitors, stay a few moments, and leave
the room quite free and open for the next comers. Something of this kind, I
mean, that I may be able to answer it so as, in the answer, to state my own
convictions at full on the nature of obscurity, &c. . . . .
“God bless you!
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
The Rambler. (1750-1752). A twice-weekly periodical conducted and mostly written by Samuel Johnson that extended to
208 numbers; in contrast to most earlier periodicals it was deliberately
sententious.
The Spectator. (1711-1714). Essays from the
Spectator, conducted by Addison and Steele, were
collected in five volumes and frequently reprinted.