The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey to the Editor of the Courier, 28 February 1817
“Allow me a place in your columns for my ‘last
words’ concerning Wat
Tyler.
“In the year 1794, this manuscript was placed by a
friend of mine (long since deceased)
in Mr. Ridgeway’s hands. Being
shortly afterwards in London myself for a few days, I called on Mr.
Ridgeway, in Newgate, and he and Mr.
Symonds agreed to publish it. I understood that they had changed
their intention, because no proof sheet was sent me, and acquiescing readily in
their cooler opinion, made no inquiry concerning it. More than two years
elapsed before I revisited London; and then, if I had thought of the
manuscript, it would have appeared a thing of too little consequence to take
the trouble of claiming it for the mere purpose of throwing it behind the fire.
That it might be published surreptitiously at any future time, was a wickedness
of which I never dreamt.
“To these facts I have made oath. Mr. Winterbottom, a dissenting minister, has
sworn, on the contrary, that Messrs. Ridgeway and Symonds
having declined the publication, it was undertaken by himself and Daniel Isaac Eaton; that I gave them the copy
as their own property, and gave them, moreover, a fraternal embrace, in
gratitude for their gracious acceptance of it; and that he the said
Winterbottom verily believed he had a right now,
Ætat. 43. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 253 |
after an interval of three-and-twenty years, to publish
it as his own.
“My recollection is perfectly distinct, notwithstanding
the lapse of time; and it was likely to be so, as I was never, on any other
occasion, within the walls of Newgate. The work had been delivered to Mr. Ridgeway; it was for him that I inquired,
and into his apartments I was shown. There I saw Mr. Symonds, and there I saw Mr.
Winterbottom also, whom I knew to be a dissenting minister. I never saw Daniel Isaac Eaton in my life; and as for the story of the embrace, every person who
knows my disposition and manners, will at once perceive it to be an impudent
falsehood. Two other persons came into the room while I was there; the name of
the one was Lloyd,—I believe he had been an officer
in the army; that of the other was Barrow. I remembered
him a bishop’s boy at Westminster. I left the room with an assurance that
Messrs. Ridgeway and Symonds were to
be the publishers; in what way Winterbottom might be
connected with them, I neither knew nor cared, and Eaton I never saw. There is no earthly
balance in which oaths can be weighed against each other; but character is
something in the scale; and it is perfectly in character that the man who has
published Wat Tyler under the
present circumstances, should swear—as Mr.
Winterbottom has sworn.
“Thus much concerning the facts. As to the work itself,
I am desirous that my feelings should neither be misrepresented nor
misunderstood. It contains the statement of opinions which I have long
254 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 43. |
outgrown, and which are stated more broadly because of
this dramatic form. Were there a sentiment or an expression which bordered upon
irreligion or impurity, I should look upon it with shame and contrition; but I
can feel neither for opinions of universal equality, taken up as they were
conscientiously in early youth, acted upon in disregard of all worldly
considerations, and left behind me in the same straightforward course as I
advanced in years. The piece was written when such opinions, or rather such
hopes and fears, were confined to a very small number of the educated classes;
when those who were deemed Republicans were exposed to personal danger from the
populace; and when a spirit of anti-Jacobinism prevailed, which I cannot
characterise better than by saying that it was as blind and as intolerant as
the Jacobinism of the present day. The times have changed. Had it been
published surreptitiously under any other political circumstances, I should
have suffered it to take its course, in full confidence that it would do no
harm, and would be speedily forgotten as it deserved. The present state of
things, which is such as to make it doubtful whether the publisher be not as
much actuated by public mischief as by private malignity, rendered it my duty
to appeal for justice, and stop the circulation of what no man had a right to
publish. And this I did, not as one ashamed and penitent for having expressed
crude opinions and warm feelings in his youth (feelings right in themselves,
and wrong only in their direction), but as a man whose life has been such that
it may set slander at defiance, and who is unremit-Ætat. 43. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 255 |
tingly
endeavouring to deserve well of his country and of mankind.
Daniel Isaac Eaton (1753-1814)
London publisher and radical active in the London Corresponding Society.
Robert Lovell (1771-1796)
Quaker poet who published with Robert Southey and fell in with the Pantisocratic scheme;
after his early death his wife Mary Fricker Lovell lived with the Southeys.
James Ridgway (1745-1838)
London bookseller who began trading in 1784; he was imprisoned in 1793 for printing
Thomas Paine's
Rights of Man.
Henry Delahoy Symonds (d. 1816)
Radical bookseller who was prosecuted in 1793 for publishing Thomas Paine; his shop was
in Paternoster Row (1787-1808).
William Winterbotham (1763-1829)
Originally a silversmith, he was assistant preacher at How's Lane Baptist Church,
Plymouth when convicted of sedition in 1793. On one account, Robert Southey visited him in
prison and left him the manuscript of
Wat Tyler which was
surreptitiously transcribed from his copy in 1817.
The Courier. (1792-1842). A London evening newspaper; the original proprietor was James Perry; Daniel Stuart, Peter
Street, and William Mudford were editors; among the contributors were Samuel Taylor
Coleridge and John Galt.