The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Mark Robinson to Robert Southey, 13 January 1824
“Beverley, Jan. 13. 1824.
“Sir,
“I am encouraged by the representations I have received
of your affability and willingness to afford information to those who apply to
you, to lay before you a matter which has given me no little concern; and in
the hope that you will favour me with your views upon the subject, I will
proceed without further introduction.
“It has for several years appeared to me, and several
respectable friends of mine, who, as well as myself, are all members of the
Wesleyan Methodist Society, in which we have for many years filled official
situations, that the rapid dissent which we believe the travelling preachers
have been chiefly instrumental in effecting in the society from the Established
Church, is much to be lamented, and that in the same proportion in which the
society have departed from the original plan of Methodism, in the same
proportion they have missed their way. We think that a secession from the
Church has engendered a sectarian spirit, and given to the preachers a kind of
influence over the people which, we fear, in many of its consequences, will be
injurious both to their piety and liberty, leading them to exchange the former
for party zeal, and the latter for a too ready acquiescence in all the measures
of the preachers. We lately opened a correspondence with the Church Methodists
in Ireland, from which we learn
162 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 50. |
—what you, Sir, are probably
already acquainted with—that, in 1817, the Methodist Conference in Ireland,
after exciting the societies throughout the country to petition them for the
sacraments, determined upon giving them to all who should desire it. In
consequence, 7000 amongst them, amongst whom were many of the most respectable
members in Dublin and other principal places, withdrew from the Conference
connection and established a separate itinerancy, and that they have now about
14,000 in close connection with them. We learn also that the Bishop of Waterford called together the clergy
of his diocese, and sent for one of the itinerant preachers of the connection,
who so fully satisfied his lordship and the clergy, that they all, without one
dissenting voice, promised to give the Church Methodists countenance and
support. What particularly satisfied this meeting was the declaration of the
preachers that the Society had settled their chapels on trustees conditionally, that if they should ever leave the
Church, these chapels should go to the crown. They hold no meetings in
canonical hours, and receive the sacrament at the hands of the clergy. The
bishop and many of his clergy have contributed to the erection of the Waterford
chapel, and not only numbers of the Church people attend the chapel on the
Sunday evenings, but also the clergy themselves.
“This correspondence we have named to several, both of
the evangelical and orthodox clergy, none of whom raise any objection to it,
and most of whom are its warm advocates. I lately received an invitation from
the evangelical clergy in Hull to meet
Ætat. 50. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 163 |
them in this
business; and, in company with M. T. Sadler,
Esq., of Leeds, who is one of our most able coadjutors, I
attended the meeting. The clergy were unanimously of opinion that Church
Methodism would meet with general support throughout the country, and that the
pious clergy would give it their support. It has also been named in a private
way to many of our magistrates and other respectable gentlemen, who profess to
think well of it. We feel confident that there is an intention in the minds of
some of the leading conference preachers to get up, not so much a plan of
regular dissent as a rival Church. This we think
strongly indicated by the introduction of baptism, of the Lord’s supper,
burial of the dead, the reading the church service, vergers with their uniform
and wands, and especially the preachers having in the two last conferences
attempted to introduce episcopal ordination: the leading
preachers to be bishops, and the remainder regular clergymen. We are also of
opinion that the preachers holding a regular conference or convocation, from
which they exclude all the people, may in the end, not only endanger the
liberties of their own people but of the country at large. Pray, Sir, is there
any good precedent for such a meeting? Did not the proctors make part of the
conference or convocation of the English clergy, and are not all the
ecclesiastical laws subject to the control of his Majesty in Chancery, and of
the Civil Courts? We have it in contemplation to petition the next conference
to admit a fair representation of the people, and to beg that they will
deliberate measures 164 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 50. |
for the gradual return of the
societies to Church Methodism.
“Mr. Sadler is
perhaps known to you as the author of an excellent pamphlet addressed to Walter Fawkes, Esq.,
late member for the county of York, in which he has refuted that
gentleman’s arguments in favour of a reform in Parliament. I had
forgotten to say that if the conference will not listen to our request at all,
we purpose applying to our Irish friends to send over some efficient preachers,
which we believe they will do.
“I may add, that your excellent conclusion of the Life of Wesley has also
contributed to induce me to take the liberty of troubling you on this subject,
conceiving that our plan is not very dissimilar to what you refer to. . . . .
We shall highly value your opinion and advice, and shall feel much obliged by
as early a reply as you can conveniently favour us with.
I am, for myself and friends, Sir,
Your most obedient servant,
Mark Robinson (1832 fl.)
A linen-draper of Beverley in Yorkshire, church-Methodist, and controversial
writer.
Michael Thomas Sadler (1780-1835)
Tory MP for Newark (1828-32) and political economist; largely self-educated, he was a
protectionist and paternalist who published
The Law of Population 2
vols, (1830).