The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey to Robert Gooch, 18 December 1825
“I cannot refer you to any other account of the Sisters
of Charity than is to be found in Helyot’s Histoire des Ordres Monastiques, a very
meagre but useful book;—compared to what a history ought to be, it is somewhat
like what a skeleton is to the body. When I was first in the Low Countries I
endeavoured
238 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 51. |
to collect what information I could concerning
the Beguines, and got into their principal establishment at Ghent. Their
history is curiously uncertain, which I found not only from themselves but from
pursuing the subject in books; and as I have those books at hand, I can at any
time tell you what is not known about them, for to that the information which
they contain amounts. The Beguines are as much esteemed in the Low Countries as
the Soeurs de la Charite in France, but I have incidentally learnt from books
that scandal used to be busy with them. A profession of religion naturally
affords cover for hypocrisy, and it is therefore to be expected that scandal
should sometimes arise, and more frequently be imputed; but the general utility
of the institution is unquestionable; and I do not know that there is anything
to be set against it, for they are bound by no vows, nor to any of those
observances which are at once absurd and onerous. I will have the notes which I
made concerning them at Ghent transcribed for you. As your adventures were in
Flanders, not in France, have you not mistaken the Beguines for the Sisters of
Charity?
“It is not surprising that your letters in Blackwood should have produced so much
impression. The subject comes home to everybody, and that Yarmouth story is one
of the most touching incidents I ever remember to have heard. As an example to
prove how much a principle of humanity is wanting, look by all means for an
account of the Foundling Hospital at Dublin, where the most damnable inhumanity
of its kind upon record was practised by the
Ætat. 51. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 239 |
nurses for a
course of years. The mortality was monstrous. I think it appeared that these
wretches who dealt in infant suffering used sometimes to murder the children by
sitting upon them in the carts wherein they conveyed them from the hospital to
the country.
“The change of ministry in the Quarterly Review is the only change of such a
kind which could have affected me for evil and for good.
“As for my importance to the Review, it is very little. Just at this juncture
I might do harm by withdrawing from it; but at any other time I should be as
little missed as I shall be, except in my own family and in some half-a-dozen
hearts besides, whenever death shakes hands with me. The world closes over one
as easily as the waters. Not, however, that I shall sink to be forgotten.
“But as for present effect, the reputation of the Review is made, and papers of less
pith and moment than mine would serve the bookseller’s purpose quite as
well, and amuse the great body of readers, who read only for amusement or for
fashion, more.
“God bless you!
Yours affectionately,
R. Southey.”
Robert Gooch (1784-1830)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was obstetric physician and lecturer in midwifery at
St Bartholomew's Hospital, a friend of Robert Southey and contributor to
Blackwood's and the
Quarterly Review.
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine. (1817-1980). Begun as the
Edinburgh Monthly Magazine,
Blackwood's assumed the name of its proprietor, William Blackwood after the sixth
number. Blackwood was the nominal editor until 1834.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.