The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey to John May, 19 September 1829
“Keswick, Sept 19. 1829.
“My dear Friend,
“. . . . . I will tell you Murray’s opinion of the Colloquies. The sale, he says, would have
been tenfold greater if religion and politics had been excluded from them! The
profits, I dare say, will be very little. . . . .
“My third volume of the War is in the press, and my hand has
been only taken from it for a short interval, that I might do the needful work
of reviewing, by which alone does it seem practicable for me to keep clear with
the world. I have written for the London
Review a short, but very interesting account of Lucretia Davidson, an American poetess, killed, like Kirke White, by over-excitement, in her
seventeenth year. It is a most affecting story. There have been three papers of
mine in that work; in the first, second, and fifth numbers; and, as they
promise that there shall be no farther delay in payment, I should not like to
withdraw from it. . . . .
“I might be paid at the same rate for Sharpe’s London Magazine; but, when that was converted into a
magazine, it passed from the hands of Allan
Cunningham into those of Theodore
Hook and Dr.
M’Ginn, with neither of whom did I wish to associate myself. .
. . .
“But I am looking forward with much satisfaction
74 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 55. |
to next year, as setting me free from the Peninsular War, and
thereby leaving me at liberty to commence printing the History of Portugal. I shall be able to live by reviewing, and yet
win time enough from that employment to compose this history from the materials
which have been so long in preparation, and to carry it through the press. And
I shall get by it something better than money: the profits, indeed, cannot be
so small as to disappoint me, or to make me in the slightest degree indisposed
to the task.
“The best news I can send you of myself must be
something like an echo of your own letter,—that I go on working steadily,
with little to hope, but cheerfully, and in full belief that the situation in
which I am placed is that which is best for me. Had I kept the path wherein I
was placed, I might have been a bishop at this day,—probably should have
been; and therefore I bless God even for having gone astray, since my
aberrations have ended in leading me to a happier, a safer, and (all things
considered) a more useful station.
“If there be a later history of Bristol than Barrett’s, it must be a better one;
there is no earlier. I do not know the spot which you call the Furies’
Parlour by that name; but I could show you some haunts of mine upon those
Downs, and in that neighbourhood, which I know not whether I should have most
pain or pleasure in revisiting. Henry
Coleridge and his bride
are now lodging in Keswick: her mother
departs next week, and then we part after six-and-twenty years’ residence
under the same roof.
Ætat. 55. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 75 |
All change is mournful, and, if I
thought of myself only, I should wish to be in a world where there will be
none. . . . .
“I want to finish the biographical letter in my desk;
but you would pity me if you knew what I have in head, and in hand, and at
heart, and saw the continual interruptions which cut up my time in large
slices, or fritter it away. Withal I have the blessing of being sound in body
once more, and can ascend the mountains with something like the strength, and
all the spirits of youth. I had more to say of projects, and of approaching
evils and dangers; of which we are likely to see the beginning, but not the
end. I was born during the American Revolution, the French Revolution broke out
just as I grew up, and my latter days will, in all likelihood, be disturbed by
a third revolution, more terrible than either. God bless you, my dear friend!
Yours most affectionately,
R. S.”
William Barrett (1727 c.-1789)
Bristol surgeon and antiquary who, having been duped by Chatterton's forgeries,
incorporated them into his
History and Antiquities of Bristol
(1789).
Henry Nelson Coleridge (1798-1843)
The nephew and literary executor of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; he was a barrister and
reviewer for the
British Critic and
Quarterly
Review.
Sara Coleridge (1802-1852)
The daughter of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; in 1829 she married Henry Nelson Coleridge
(1798-1843); she translated, edited her father's works, and wrote for the
Quarterly Review.
Allan Cunningham [Hidallan] (1784-1842)
Scottish poet and man of letters who contributed to both
Blackwood's and the
London Magazine; he was author of
Lives of the most Eminent British Painters, Sculptors, and
Architects (1829-33).
Lucretia Maria Davidson (1808-1825)
American poet born in Plattsburgh, New York who died of consumption at the age of
sixteen; her writings were edited with a biography by Catharine Maria Sedgwick.
Thomas Hookham (d. 1846)
London bookseller who operated a circulating library in Bond Street; presumably the
father of the bookseller Thomas Hookham (d. 1867).
William Maginn (1794-1842)
Irish translator, poet, and Tory journalist who contributed to
Blackwood's and
Fraser's Magazines under a variety of
pseudonyms.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
John Sharpe (1777-1860)
London bookseller active 1801-1830 who published illustrated editions of
British Classics,
Sharpe's British Theatre,
and
British Poets.
Henry Kirke White (1785-1806)
Originally a stocking-weaver; trained for the law at Cambridge where he was a
contemporary of Byron; after his early death his poetical
Remains
were edited by Robert Southey (2 vols, 1807) with a biography that made the poet
famous.
The London Magazine. (1820-1829). Founded by John Scott as a monthly rival to
Blackwood's, the
London Magazine included among its contributors Charles Lamb, John Clare, Allan Cunningham,
Thomas De Quincey, and Thomas Hood.
London Review. (1809). Edited by Richard Cumberland; only two numbers appeared; in a departure from usual
practice the reviews were signed.
London Review. (1829). A quarterly publication edited by Blanco White; only two numbers appeared.