The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Ch. XVII. 1812
314 |
LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE |
Ætat. 38. |
CHAPTER XVII.
SCOTT’SVISION OF DON RODERICK.—ADVICE TO A YOUNG FRIEND ON GOING
TO CAMBRIDGE.—BELL AND LANCASTER
CONTROVERSY.—PLAN OF THE BOOK OF THE CHURCH.—WISHES TO ASSIST
MR. W. TAYLOR IN HIS DIFFICULTIES.—PROSPECT OF BEING
SUMMONED TO THE BAR OF HOUSE OF COMMONS.—SHELLEY AT KESWICK.—UGLY
FELLOWS.——OXFORD.—HERBERT MARSH.—TESTAMENTARY LETTER.—APPLICATION
FOR THE OFFICE OF HISTORIOGRAPHER.—CATHOLIC CONCESSIONS.—MURDER OF MR.
PERCEVAL.—STATE OF ENGLAND.—EDINBURGH ANNUAL
REGISTER.—EXCURSION INTO DURHAM AND YORKSHIRE.—VISIT TO ROKEBY.—THE QUARTERLY REVIEW.—THE
REGISTER.—MORALISED SKETCH OF THALABA.
1811—1812.
To Walter Scott, Esq.
“You will have thought me very remiss in not thanking
you sooner for the Vision, if
you did not remember that I had been travelling from Dan to Beersheba, and take
into consideration how little opportunity can be found for the use of pen and
ink in the course of a series of runaway visits, during a journey of nine
hundred miles. It was given me at the Admiralty the very day that it arrived
there. I opened it on the spot, discovered that a letter to Polwhele had been inclosed to me, in time for
Croker to rectify the mistake by
making a fair exchange, and thus saving mine from a journey to the Land’s
End. If, however, I have not written to you about D.
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 315 |
Roderick, I have been talking to every body
about him. The want of plan and unity is a defect inherent in the very nature
of your subject, and it would be just as absurd to censure the Vision for such a defect, as it is to condemn
Kehama because all the agents
are not human personages. The execution is a triumphant answer to those persons
who have supposed that you could not move with ease in a metre less loose than
that of your great poems. To me it appears, on the whole, better written than
those greater works, for this very reason—you have taken fewer licences
of language, and have united with the majesty of that fine stanza (the most
perfect that ever was constructed) an ease which is a perfect contrast to the
stiffness of
Gertrude of
Wyoming.
“It is remarkable that three poets should at once have
been employed upon Roderick. I have a tragedy of Landor’s in my desk, of which Count Julian is the hero: it contains some of the
finest touches, both of passion and poetry, that I have ever seen. Roderick is also the pre-eminent personage of my
own Pelayo, as far as it
has yet proceeded. Differing so totally as we do in the complexion and
management of the two poems, I was pleased to find one point of curious
comparison, in which we have both represented Roderick in the act of confession, and both finished the
picture highly. Our representations are so totally different, as to form a
perfect contrast; yet each so fitted to the temper in which the confession is
made, that it might be sworn, if you had chosen my point of time, you could
have written as I have done, and that if I had written of the unrepentant king,
I should have conceived of him
316 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
exactly like yourself. I
copy my own lines, because I think you will be gratified at seeing a parallel
passage, which never can be produced except to the honour of both:—
“‘Then Roderick knelt
Before the holy man, and strove to speak:
“Thou see’st,” he cried; “thou
see’st”—but memory
And suffocating thoughts represt the word,
And shudderings, like an ague fit, from head
To foot convulsed him. Till at length subduing
His nature to the effort, he exclaimed,
Spreading his hands, and lifting up his face,
As if resolved in penitence to bear
A human eye upon his shame,—“Thou see’st
Roderick the Goth.” That name would have sufficed
To tell its whole abhorred history.
He not the less pursued—“the ravisher!
The cause of all this ruin!” Having said,
In the same posture motionless he knelt,
Arms straightened down, and hands dispread, and eyes
Rais’d to the monk, like one who from his voice
Expected life or death.’”
|
“I saw but little of Gifford in town, because he was on the point of taking wing for
the Isle of Wight when I arrived. The Review seems to have shaken the credit of the Edinburgh, and might shake it still more. The way
to attack the enemy with most effect is to take up those very subjects which he
has handled the most unfairly, and so to treat them as to force a comparison
which must end in our favour. I am about to do this upon the question of Bell and Lancaster—a
question on which —— has grossly committed himself.
“You may well suppose that three months’ idleness
has brought upon me a heavy accumulation of business. Meantime good materials
for the third year’s Register have reached me from Cadiz, and I have collected others
respecting Sicily and the Ionian Islands. I saw the last volume on my road, and
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 317 |
there I could trace your hand in a powerful, but too
lenient essay, upon
Jeffrey’s journal.
Believe me,
Yours very truly,
R. Southey.”
To Mr. James White.
“By this time you are settled at Pembroke, know your
way to your rooms, the faces of your fellow collegians, and enough I dare say
of a college life to find its duties less formidable, and its habits less
agreeable than they are supposed to be. Those habits are said to have undergone
a great reformation since I was acquainted with them;—in my time they
stood grievously in need of it; but even then a man who had any good moral
principles might live as he pleased if he dared make the trial; and however
much he might be stared at at first for his singularity, was sure ere long to
be respected for it.
“Some dangers beset every man when he enters upon so
new a scene of life; that which I apprehend for you is low spirits . . . . .
Walk a stated distance every day; and that you may never want a motive for
walking, make yourself acquainted with the elements of botany during the
winter, that as soon as the flowers come out in the spring you may begin to
herbalize. A quarter of an hour every day will make you master of the elements
in the course of a very few months. I prescribe for you mentally also, and this
is one of the pre-
318 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
scriptions; for it is of main
importance that you should provide yourself with amusement as well as
employment. Pursue no study longer than you can without effort attend to it,
and lay it aside whenever it interests you too much: whenever it impresses
itself so much upon your mind that you dream of it or lie awake thinking about
it, be sure it is then become injurious. Follow my practice of making your
latest employment in the day something unconnected with its other pursuits, and
you will be able to lay your head upon the pillow like a child.
“One word more and I have done with advice. Do not be
solicitous about taking a high degree, or about college honours of any kind.
Many a man has killed himself at Cambridge by overworking for mathematical
honours; recollect how few the persons are who after they have spent their
years in severe study at this branch of science, ever make any use of it
afterwards. Your wiser plan should be to look on to that state of life in which
you wish and expect to be placed, and to lay in such knowledge as will then
turn to account. . . . .
Believe me, my dear James,
Your affectionate friend,
R. Southey.”
To John May, Esq.
“Nov. 2. 1811.
“My dear Friend,
“. . . . . Since our return a larger portion of my time
than is either usual or convenient has been
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 319 |
taken up by
the chance society of birds of passage; this place abounds with them during the
travelling season; and as there are none of them who find their way to me
without some lawful introduction, so there are few who have not something about
them to make their company agreeable for the little time that it lasts.
“You have seen my article upon Bell and the Dragon in the Quarterly. It is decisive as to the
point of originality, and would have been the heaviest blow the Edinburgh has ever received if all
the shot of my heavy artillery had not been drawn before the guns were fired. I
am going to reprint it separately with some enlargement, for the purpose of
setting the question at rest, and making the public understand what the new
system is, which is very little understood, and doing justice to Dr. Bell, whom I regard as one of the greatest
benefactors to his species. . . . . The case is not a matter of opinion, but
rests upon recorded and stated facts. I tread, therefore, upon sure ground, and
taking advantage of this, I shall not lose the opportunity of repaying some of
my numerous obligations to the Edinburgh Review. . .
. .
“Probably you have seen the manner in which the Edinburgh Annual Register is twice
noticed* in their last number. . . . . When the first year’s volume
appeared it was not even suspected who was the historian; and Jeffrey, a day or two after its publication,
went for the first time into the publisher’s shop expressly to tell him how much he
admired the history, saying that though he differed from the
* It was recommended for government
prosecution. |
320 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
writer on many, indeed on most points, he nevertheless
must declare that it was liberal, independent and spirited throughout, the best
piece of contemporary history which had appeared for twenty years. When the
second volume appeared he knew who was the author!
Believe me,
Very affectionately yours,
R. Southey.”
To the Rev. Herbert Hill.
“Dec. 31. 1811.
“My dear Uncle,
“The hint which I threw out concerning our English
martyrs in writing upon the evangelical sects is likely to mature into
something of importance. I conceived a plan which Dr. Bell and the Bishop of
Meath took up warmly, and the former has in some degree bound me
to execute it by sending down Fox’s Book of Martyrs as soon as he reached London. The
projected outline is briefly this—Under the title of the Book of the Church, to give what should
be at once the philosophy and the anthology of our church history, so written
as to be addressed to the hearts of the young and the understandings of the
old; for it will be placed on the establishment of the national schools. It
begins with an account of the various false religions of our different
ancestors, British, Roman, and Saxon, with the mischievous temporal
consequences of those superstitions, being the evils from which the country was
delivered by its conversion to Christianity. 2dly, A picture of popery and the
evils from which the Reformation delivered us.
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 321 |
3dly,
Puritanism rampant, from which the restoration of the church rescued us.
Lastly, Methodism, from which the Establishment preserves us. These parts to be
connected by an historical thread, containing whatever is most impressive in
the acts and monuments of the English church. How beautiful a work may be
composed upon such a plan (which from its very nature excludes whatever is
uninviting or tedious) you will at once perceive. The civil history would form
a companion work upon a similar plan, called the Book of the
Constitution, showing the gradual but uniform amelioration of
society; and the direct object of both would be to make the rising generation
feel and understand the blessings of their inheritance. . . . .
“I am well stored with materials, having all the
republished chronicles and Hooker—the only controversial work which it will be at all
necessary to consult. The other books which I want I have ordered: they are
Burnett and the Church Histories of
Fuller, and of the stiff old
non-juror, Jeremy Collier. I will send
the manuscript to you before it goes to the press, for it will require an
inspecting eye. Meantime, if any thing occur to you which would correct or
improve the plan, such as you here see it, do not omit to communicate your
advice and opinion. I have a strong persuasion that both these works may be
made of great, extensive, and permanent usefulness. . . . .
322 |
LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE |
Ætat. 38. |
To Dr. Gooch.
“I have a letter from William Taylor, of a dismal character. After stating the sum of
their losses, he says, ‘we cannot subsist upon the interest of what
remains. The capital will last our joint lives, but I shall be abandoned to
a voluntary interment in the same grave with my parents. O! that nature
would realise this most convenient doom!’
“Now, my reason for transcribing this passage to you
is, because it made a deep impression on me, and haunts me when I lie down at
night. You know more of Norwich than I do, and more of William Taylor’s connections. Who is
most in his confidence? is it ——? I thought of writing
directly to him. . . . . But what I would say to the person who may be most
likely to enter into my wishes is, that William
Taylor’s friends should raise such an annuity as would
secure him from penury, and at once relieve his mind from the apprehensions of
it; either raising a sum sufficient to purchase it (the best way, because the
least liable to accidents), or by yearly contributions; Dr. Sayers (or any other the fittest person)
receiving, and regularly paying it; and he never knowing particularly from
whence it comes, but merely that it is his. The former plan is the best,
because, in that case, there would be only to purchase the annuity, and put the
security into his hands; and this might be done without any person appearing in
it, the office transmitting him the necessary documents. This, of course, is a
thing upon which the very wind must not blow. Ten
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 323 |
years
hence—or, perhaps, five—if the least desirable of these plans
should be found most practicable, you and
Harry may be able to co-operate in it. I am ready now, either
with a yearly ten pounds, or with fifty at once. If more were in my power, more
should be done: but, if his friends do not love him well enough to secure him
at least 100
l. a year, one way or other, the world is
worse than I thought it.
“You do not say whether you have seen Sharon Turner. That introduction was the best
I could give you, because I think it would give you a friend. You could not
fail to esteem and love Turner when you knew him. He is
the happiest man I have ever known; and that could not be the case if he were
not a very wise as well as a very good one.
“God bless you!
It has been already noticed that the Edinburgh Review had recommended the Annual Register for government prosecution, on account of the
boldness of its language on the Spanish question, and also, especially, with respect to
some remarks on Mr. Whitbread. It appears that there
was some likelihood of this “friendly” hint being taken, and to this the
following letter refers.
To Grosvenor C. Bedford, Esq.
“Concerning Whitbread, I believe, in every instance, the text of his speech
will justify the comment.
324 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
You have heard of taking the
wrong sow by the ear: he had better take a wild boar by the ear than haul me up
to London upon this quarrel. I should tell him it was true that I had said his
speeches were translated into French, and circulated through all the
departments of France, but I had not said—what has since come to my
knowledge—that, when they were thus circulated, nobody believed them
genuine; nobody believed it possible that such speeches could have been uttered
by an Englishman. I should ask the House (that is, his side of the House; and,
of course, in that humble language becoming a person at the bar) at what time
they would be pleased to let their transactions become matter for history; and
I should give the party a gentle hint not to delay that time too long, for
reputations, like every thing else, find their level; and if he, and such as
he, do not get into history soon, they may run a risk of not getting into it at
all. I should speak of the situation in which Spain and England stand to each
other, and contrast my own feelings with those which he has continually
expressed. I should appeal to the whole tenour of the book whether the design
of the writer was to vilify Parliament, or to bring the Government into
contempt. And, as an Englishman, a man of letters, and an historian, I should
claim my privileges.
“Phillidor has made his appearance, and shall be
returned in the first parcel, with the reviewal of Azara. Out of pure conscience, I have promised Gifford to take all these South American
travellers myself, because I cannot bear that the Edinburgh should gain credit upon this subject,
when I am so much better versed in it than any other man in
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 325 |
England possibly can be. I am heartily glad the state of
South America is in
Blanco’s hands; it will be
highly useful to the Review, and, I hope, to himself also; for he works hard,
with little benefit, and, when he has once tried his strength in the Review, it
will not be difficult to find other appropriate subjects for him. I have a high
respect for this man’s moral and intellectual character, and earnestly
wish it were possible to obtain a pension, which never could be more properly
bestowed.
Canning has smitten the
Quarterly with a dead palsy upon the
Catholic Question, or else Blanco could supply such an
exposition upon that subject as would entitle him to anything that
Mr. Perceval could give.
“Here is a man at Keswick, who acts upon me as my own
ghost would do. He is just what I was in 1794. His name is Shelley, son to the member for Shoreham; with
6000l. a year entailed upon him, and as much more in
his father’s power to cut off. Beginning with romances of ghosts and
murder, and with poetry at Eton, he passed, at Oxford, into metaphysics;
printed half-a-dozen pages, which he entitled ‘The Necessity of Atheism;’ sent
one anonymously to Coplestone, in
expectation, I suppose, of converting him; was expelled in consequence; married
a girl of seventeen, after being turned
out of doors by his father; and here they both are, in lodgings, living upon
200l. a year, which her father allows them. He is
come to the fittest physician in the world. At present he has got to the
Pantheistic stage of philosophy, and, in the course of a week, I expect he will
be a Berkleyan, for I have put him
326 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
upon a course of
Berkeley. It has surprised him a
good deal to meet, for the first time in his life, with a man who perfectly
understands him, and does him full justice. I tell him that all the difference
between us is that he is nineteen, and I am thirty-seven; and I dare say it
will not be very long before I shall succeed in convincing him that he may be a
true philosopher, and do a great deal of good, with 6000
l. a year; the thought of which troubles him a great deal more at
present than ever the want of sixpence (for I have known such a want) did me. .
. . . God help us! the world wants mending, though he did not set about it
exactly in the right way. God bless you,
Grosvenor!
To Grosvenor C. Bedford, Esq.
“My household is affected with a complaint which I take
at this time to be epidemic,—the fear of ugly fellows. In Mrs. Coleridge, perhaps, this may have
originated in her dislike to you, but the newspapers have increased it. Every
day brings bloody news from Carlisle, Cockermouth, &c.; last night half the
people in Keswick sat up, alarmed by two strangers, who, according to all
accounts, were certainly ‘no beauties,’ and I was obliged to take
down a rusty gun and manfully load it for the satisfaction of the family. The
gun has been properly cleaned to-day, and woe betide him who may be destined to
receive its contents. But, in sober
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 327 |
truth, the ugly
fellows abound here as well as in London; we are indebted for them partly to
the manufactories at Carlisle, and partly to that distinguished patriot
——, who encourages the importation of Irishmen. I am
looking for a dog, and I want you to provide me with more convenient arms than
this old Spanish fowling piece. Buy for me, therefore, a brace of pistols, the
plainer and cheaper the better, so they are good; that is, so they will stand
fire without danger of bursting. Sights and hair-triggers may be dispensed
with, as they are neither for show nor for duelling. And I have leave from my
governess—nay, more than that, she has desired me—to send for
Think of that,
G. C.
B.!!!—think of that!—designed by her to give the alarm
when the ugly fellows come. But oh, Grosvenor, the
glorious tunes, the solos and bravuras, that I shall play upon that noble
musical instrument before any such fellow makes his appearance.* God bless you!
To Mr. James White.
“I was glad to hear from Neville that you were comfortably settled, and growing attached
to college; and glad to hear afterwards from yourself that you
* These musical anticipations were fully realised,
and the performance of them was one of the amusements of my childhood.
|
328 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
begin to feel your ground. There is no part of my own
life which I remember with so little pleasure as that which was passed at the
university; not that it has left behind it any cause of self-reproach, but I
had many causes of disquietude and unhappiness,—some imaginary, and some,
God knows, real enough. And I cannot think of the place without pain, because
of the men with whom I there lived in the closest intimacy of daily and almost
hourly intercourse; those whom I loved best are dead, and there are some whom I
never have seen since we parted there, and possibly never shall see more. It is
with this feeling I believe, more or less, that every man who has any feeling
always remembers college. Seven years ago I walked through Oxford on a fine
summer morning, just after sunrise, while the stage was changing horses: I went
under the windows of what had formerly been my own rooms; the majesty of the
place was heightened by the perfect silence of the streets, and it had never
before appeared to me half so majestic or half so beautiful. But I would rather
go a day’s journey round than pass through that city again, especially in
the day-time, when the streets are full. Other places in which I have been an
inhabitant would not make the same impression; there is an enduring sameness in
a university like that of the sea and mountains. It is the same in our age that
it was in our youth; the same figures fill the streets, and the knowledge that
they are not the same persons brings home the sense of change which is of all
things the most mournful.
“I see your name to the Bible Society, concerning which
I have read Herbert
Marsh’s—pamphlet
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 329 |
and
Dr.
Clarke’s reply. Marsh may possibly be fond of
controversy, because he knows his strength. He is a clear logical writer, and
in these days a little logic goes a great way, for of all things it is that in
which the writers of this generation are most deficient. His reasoning is to me
completely satisfactory as to these two points,—that where Christians of
all denominations combine for the purpose either of spreading Christianity or
distributing Bibles in other countries, the cause of the general church is
promoted thereby; but that when they combine together at home, as that
condition can only be effected by a concession on the part of the churchmen, by
that concession the Church of England is proportionally weakened. Nothing can
be clearer. But though the Margaret Professor is perfectly right in his views,
and his antagonists are mere children when compared to him, I think he has been
injudicious in exciting the controversy, because upon that statement of the
case which his opponents will make, and which appears at first sight to be a
perfectly fair one, everybody must conclude him to be in the wrong, and very
few persons will take the trouble of looking farther. And I think his object
might have been effected by a little management without much
difficulty,—by an arrangement among the Church members of the Society
that the Liturgy should be appended to the Bibles which they distributed at
home, or by a Prayer-book Society. A man should be very careful how he engages
in a controversy, in which, however right he may be, he is certain to appear
wrong to the multitude; and he ought to be especially careful, when he thus
exposes
330 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
not his own character alone but that of the body
to which he belongs. Besides, the mischief which Marsh
perceives is not very great, because I apprehend that at least nine tenths of
the business of B. Society relates to foreign countries. But I agree with him
entirely as to the mischief that lurks under the name of liberality; by which
is meant not an indulgence to the opinions of other communities, but an
indifference to your own.
“Do you attend the Divinity Lectures? Herbert Marsh is likely to be a good lecturer,
being a thorough master of his subject, and a reasoner of the old school.
“Give me a letter when you feel inclined; and believe
me,
My dear James,
Your affectionate friend,
Robert Southey.”
To C. W. W. Wynn, Esq.
“Keswick, April 15. 1812.
“What a number of recollections crowd upon me when I
think of ——! Of all our school companions, how very few of
them are there whose lots in life have proved to be what might have been
expected for them. You and Bedford have
gone on each in your natural courses, and are to be found just where and what I
should have looked to find, if I had waked after a Nourjahad sleep of twenty years. The same thing might be said
of me, if my local habitation were not here at the end of the map. I am
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 331 |
leading the life which is convenient for me, and
following the pursuits to which, from my earliest boyhood, I was so strongly
predisposed. A less troubled youth would probably have led to a less happy
manhood. I should have thought less and studied less, felt less and suffered
less. Now, for all that I have felt and suffered, I know that I am the better;
and God knows that I have yet much to think, and to study, and to do. It is now
eighteen years since you and I used to sit till midnight over your claret in
Skeleton Corner,—half your life and almost half mine. During that time we
have both of us rather grown than changed, and accident has had as little to do
with our circumstances as with our character. “Your godson,
Herbert, who is just old enough to be
delighted with the Old Woman of Berkeley, tells me he means, when he is a man,
to be a poet like his father. It will be time enough ten years hence, if we
live so long, to take thought as to what he shall be; the only care I need take
at present, is, what should be done, in case of my death, for the provision of
my family. I have insured my life for 1000
l. I had
calculated upon my copyrights as likely to prove valuable when it would become
the humour of the day to regret me; but to my great surprise, I find the
booksellers interpret the terms of their taking the risk and sharing the
profit, as an actual surrender to them of half the property in perpetuity.
Townsend, the traveller, who was as
much deceived in this case as I have been, was about to try the point with
them. I know not what prevented him. . . . . This is a flagrant and cruel
injustice . . . . . If I live, and preserve my health and faculties, I
332 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
have no doubt of realising a decent competency in twenty
years; but twenty years is almost as much as my chances of life would be
reckoned at in tables of calculation. . . . .
“One thing which I will do whenever I can afford
leisure for the task, will be, to write and leave behind me my own Memoirs:
they will contain so much of the literary history of the times, as to have a
permanent value on that account. This would prove a good post obit, for there
can be no doubt I shall be sufficiently talked of when I am gone.
“Such are my ways and means for the future; but if I
should not live to provide more than the very little which is already done,
then, indeed, the exertion of some friends would be required. An arrangement
might be made with Longman to allow of a
subscription edition of my works: this would be productive in proportion to the
efforts that were used. I should hope, also, in such a case, that the
continuance of my pension might be looked for from either of the present
parties in the state, through Perceval,
or Canning, or yourself.
“This is a sort of testamentary letter. It is fit there
should be one; and to whom, my dear Wynn,
could it so properly be addressed? By God’s blessing, I may yet live to
make all necessary provision myself. My means are now improving every year. I
am up the hill of difficulty, and shall very soon get rid of the burthen which
has impeded me In the ascent. I have some arrangements with Murray, which are likely to prove more
profitable than any former speculations; and should I succeed In obtaining the
office which the old Frenchman fills at
present
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 333 |
so properly,—and which is the only thing
for which I have the slightest ambition,—it would soon put me in
possession of the utmost I could want or wish for, inasmuch as I could lay by
the whole income, and the title would be, in a great degree, productive.
“Hitherto I have been highly favoured. A healthy body,
an active mind, and a cheerful heart are the three best boons nature can
bestow; and, God be praised, no man ever enjoyed them more perfectly. My skin
and bones scarcely know what an ailment is, my mind is ever on the alert, and
yet, when its work is done, becomes as tranquil as a baby; and my spirits
invincibly good. Would they have been so, or could I have been what I am, if
you had not been ‘for so many years my stay and support? I believe not;
yet you had been so long my familiar friend, that I felt no more sense of
dependence in receiving my main, and at one time sole, subsistence from you,
than if you had been my brother: it was being done to as I would have done.
The appointment of Historiographer, to which my father refers in the
letter, appears to have fallen vacant almost immediately. Application was at once made for
it in his behalf in several influential quarters; but it seems to have been filled up with
extraordinary haste, having been bestowed upon Dr. Stanier
Clarke, Librarian to the Prince Regent. It turned out ultimately that there
was no salary attached to the office, the appointment being merely honorary.
The next letter was written immediately on hearing of the murder of
Mr. Perceval.
334 |
LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE |
Ætat. 38. |
To Grosvenor C. Bedford, Esq.
“In spite of myself I have been weeping; this has
relieved the throbbings of my head; but my mind is overcharged and must pour
itself out. I am going to write something upon the state of popular feeling,
which will probably appear in the Courier, where it will obtain the readiest and widest circulation.
Enough to alarm the people I shall be able to say; but I would fain alarm the
Government, and if this were done in public they would think it imprudent, and,
indeed, it would be so.
“I shall probably begin with what you say of the
sensation occasioned by this most fatal event, and then give the reverse of
your account as I have received it from Coleridge; what he heard in a pothouse into which he went on
the night of the murder, not more to quench his thirst than for the purpose of
hearing what the populace would say. Did I not speak to you with ominous truth
upon this subject in one of my last hasty letters? This country is upon the
brink of the most dreadful of all conceivable states—an insurrection of
the poor against the rich; and if by some providential infatuation, the
Burdettites had not continued to insult the soldiers, the existing government
would not be worth a week’s purchase, nor any throat which could be
supposed to be worth cutting, safe for a month longer.
“You know, Grosvenor, I am no aguish politician, nor is this a sudden
apprehension which has seized me. Look to what I have said of the effect of
Mrs. Clarke’s
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 335 |
business upon the public in the last year’s
Register, and look to the remarks
upon the tendency of manufactures to this state in
Espriella, written five years ago.
Things are in that state at this time that nothing but the army preserves us:
it is the single plank between us and the red sea of an English
Jacquerie,—a Bellum Servile; not provoked, as both
those convulsions were, by grievous oppression, but prepared by the inevitable
tendency of the manufacturing system, and hastened on by the folly of a
besotted faction, and the wickedness of a few individuals. The end of these
things is full of evil, even upon the happiest termination; for the loss of
liberty is the penalty which has always been paid for the abuse of it. But we
must not now employ our thoughts upon the danger of our own victory, there Is
but too much yet to be done to render the victory certain.
“The first step should be the immediate renewal of
associations for the protection of our lives and properties, and of the British
constitution; with the re-establishment to the utmost possible extent of the
volunteers,—as effective a force against a mob of united Englishmen as
they would be inefficient in the first shock of an invasion. This may be safely
said and pressed upon the Government and the people; what I dare not say
publicly, is that there is yet danger from the army,—that horrid
flogging, for the abolition of which Burdett has been suffered to appear as the advocate! Oh that
Perceval had prevented this
popularity, by coming forward himself as the soldier’s friend! He has
good works enough for his good name, as well as for his soul’s rest; but
this would have remained for his colleagues and for the country.
336 |
LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE |
Ætat. 38. |
“This of course cannot be touched upon immediately,
for it would be too obviously an act of fear; but if I knew the ministers, I
would urgently press upon them the wisdom of granting some boon to the
soldiers,—something which, at little cost to the nation, would yet come
home to the feelings of every individual in the army. The mere institution of
honorary rewards would do this,—fifty pounds in copper medals would go
farther than as many thousands in bounties towards recruiting it hereafter. But
I would couple it with something more; for instance, ten or twenty of the
oldest men, or oldest soldiers, in every regiment which distinguished itself in
the two late assaults, should have their discharge, with full pay for life, or
an increase of pay if they chose to serve on. Do not think that these things
are inefficacious or beneath the notice of statesmen. Why is it that poets move
the heart of men, but because they understand the feelings of men, and it is by
their feelings that they may be best governed. Look at the agitators; they
address themselves to the passions of the mob, and who does not perceive with
what tremendous effect!
“I wish you would read this to Gifford or to Herries, because I am sure that these cheap and easy measures
would go far toward winning the affections of the soldiers at these perilous
times. Other topics I shall speak of elsewhere—the establishment of a
system of parochial education, and the necessity of colonial schemes as opening
an issue in the distempered body politic. This will be for the Quarterly. Vigorous measures, I
trust in God, will be taken while the feelings of the sound class are in a
state
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 337 |
to favour them. This murder, though committed
publicly by a madman, has been made the act and deed of the populace. Shocking
as this appears, so it is and so it must be considered. With timely vigour, the
innocent blood which has been shed may prove an acceptable sacrifice and save
us; otherwise it is but the opening of the flood-gates.
“I thought of poor Herries as soon as I could think of any thing. The loss which
the country has sustained I can scarcely dare to contemplate. There seems
nothing to look to but the Wellesleys, with Canning, Huskisson for Chancellor of the Exchequer, and in all
likelihood Sir James Mackintosh, who is
sure to take the strongest side, and his talents will make him a powerful
support to any party. Yet in this train there seems to follow a long catalogue
of dangers: Catholic concessions, and next, by aid of all the admitted enemies
of the Church, the sale of tithes to supply the necessities of the Government;
a measure which will be as certainly popular as it will be ultimately ruinous
to the Church and most fatal to the country. There will be a glorious war to
console us; but under such circumstances I shall look to that war with the
painful thought that we may be repaid for our services to the Spaniards by
finding an asylum in Spain when England will have lost all that our fathers
purchased for us so dearly!
“God bless you!
“Tell Gifford I shall be ready for him with the French Biography, which
will be a sketch of the Revolution, introducing an examination of our own
state
338 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
as tending towards the same gulf. Would to God
it were not so well timed! What has passed seems like a dream to me—a
sort of nightmare that overlays and oppresses my thoughts and
feelings.”
To Grosvenor C. Bedford, Esq.
“I have myself so strong a sense of Mr. Perceval’s public merits, that I
cannot help writing to you to say how much I wish that a statue might be
erected to him. This could only be done by subscription; but surely such a
subscription might soon be filled, if his friends think it advisable. Suggest
this to Herries; and if the thing should
be begun, when the list has the proper names to begin with, put mine down for
five guineas, which could not at this time be better employed.
“The fit place for this statue would be the spot where
he fell. Permission to place it there would no doubt be obtained, and the
opposition made to it would only recoil upon his political enemies.
“I have often been grieved by public events, but never
so depressed by any as by this. It is not the shock which has produced this;
nor the extent of private misery which this wretched madman has occasioned,
though I can scarcely refrain from tears while I write. It is my deep and
ominous sense of danger to the country, from the Burdettites on one hand, and
from Catholic concessions on the other. You know I am no high-church bigot; it
would be impossible for me to subscribe to the Church Ar-
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 339 |
ticles. Upon the mysterious points I rather withhold assent than refuse it;
not presuming to define in my own imperfect conceptions what has been left
indefinite. But I am convinced that the overthrow of the Church establishment
would bring with it the greatest calamities for us and for our children. If any
man could have saved it, it was
Mr.
Perceval. The repeal of the Test Act will let in Catholics, and
invite more Dissenters. When the present
Duke of
Norfolk dies, you will have Catholic members for all his
boroughs. All these parties will join in plundering the Church. No man is more
thankful for the English Reformation than I am; but nearly a century and a half
elapsed before the evils which it necessarily originated had subsided.
“As for conciliating the wild Irish by such
concessions, the notion is so preposterous, that when I know a man of
understanding can maintain such an opinion, it makes me sick at heart to think
upon what sandy foundations every political fabric seems to rest!
“I have strayed on unintentionally. Go to Herries, and if he will enter into my feelings
about the statue, let no time be lost. God bless you!
To Grosvenor C. Bedford, Esq.
“I received a note from Lord
Lonsdale on Saturday, enclosing a reply from Lord Hertford to his
340 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
application; which reply states that a previous arrangement had been made for
the office of historiographer. Thinking you would be likely to know this as
soon as myself, I did not write to you. My interest was better than I expected.
Upon Lord Lonsdale I had reckoned; but
Scott wrote for me to
Lord Melville, and seemed to depend upon success. I have now
done with the state lottery. Of all things possible I most desired an
appointment at Lisbon; if it had been given me when it was desired, and when it
would have been honourable in
Fox so to
have given it, knowing as he did my motive for wishing it, it would have
involved me (owing to the subsequent troubles) in pecuniary difficulties which
perhaps I should never have surmounted. That hope having failed, I looked to
that good ship the Historiographer, believing myself better qualified for the
post than most men, and, more than any other man, ambitious of fulfilling its
duties; but that good ship, it seems, is still destined to be so ill manned as
to be perfectly useless.
“This evening I have a letter from Canning, couched in the most handsome and
friendly terms. He does not know that the office is disposed of, but hints at
difficulties in the way of his obtaining it (even supposing he were in power),
which Gifford has explained. He
concludes with expressions and professions of good will, which I doubt not are
sincere. But there is nothing to which I can look forward.
“Say to Gifford
that I must beg him to end with my article instead of beginning with it. I am close pressed with the
Register, which this week will
bring,
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 341 |
I hope and trust, to a conclusion.
Mr. Ballantyne’s historiographer is well
paid, but the office is no sinecure.
“I wish you were here to see the country in full
beauty. Your godson has just learnt to
read Greek, and I expect in my next parcel a grammar and vocabulary for him. He
promises well, if it please God that he should live. God bless you!
To J. Rickman, Esq.
“The fate of poor Perceval has made me quite unhappy ever since I heard of it,
not merely from the shock and the private misery which it is quite impossible
to put out of mind, but from the whole train of evils to which this is but the
beginning. I would fain have believed the report that Mr. Abbott was to take his place in the House of Commons,
because, if he could have found tongue, I knew where whatever else might have
been wanting was to be found. But it was not likely that he should quit a
better situation for one of so much anxiety and labour.
W—— and C——, I doubt not, ratted
upon the Catholic question because they expected the Prince upon that ground
would eject Perceval, and then they should have a better
chance than the Early Friends. If they come in, as I
fear they will, we may have the war carried on, but we shall have Catholic
concessions, after which the Church property is not worth seven years’
purchase; they will sell
342 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
the tithes; and the next step
will be to put up the Establishment to sale in the way of contracts; the minds
of the people (which, God knows, need no further poison) will then be totally
unsettled, and the ship will part from her last cable on a lee shore in the
height of the storm. At this moment the army is the single plank between us and
destruction; and I believe the only thing doubtful is whether we shall have a
military despotism
before we go through the horrors of a
bellum servile, or
after it. This I am certain of, that nothing but an
immediate suspension of the liberty of debate and the liberty of the press can
preserve us. Were I minister, I would instantly suspend the Habeas Corpus, and
have every Jacobin journalist confined, so that it should not be possible for
them to continue their treasonable vocation. There they should stay till it
would be safe to let them out, which it might be in some seven years. I would
clear the gallery whenever one of the agitators rose to speak, and if the
speech were printed, I would teach him that his privilege of attempting to
excite rebellion did not extend beyond the walls of Parliament; that he might
talk treason to those walls as long as he pleased, but that if he printed
treason he was then answerable to the vengeance of his country. I did not
forget* the main question about reading. One
* “What shall I say of the unhappy event
which has happened here? I expected Mr.
Perceval to be murdered; but I had expected it from
the Burdettites and others rendered infuriate by the poison they
imbibe from sixteen newspapers, emulous in violence and mischief.
In reading your little
book about Lancaster, I do not find that you discuss the main
question, whether the mob can be conveniently taught reading while
the liberty of the press exists as at present. Every one who reads
at all reads a Sunday newspaper, not the
|
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 343 |
mouth suffices for a dozen or a score pair of ears in
the tap-rooms and pot-houses, where
Cobbett and
Hunt are read
as the evangelists of the populace. There is no way of securing the people
against this sort of poison but by the old receipt of
Mithridates,—dieting them from their childhood
with antidotes, and making them as ready to die for their church and state as
the Spaniards. We are beginning to attempt this when it is too late. A judicial
fatuity seems to have been sent among us. Romanists, sectarians of every kind,
your liberality men, and your philosophers of every kind and of every degree of
folly and emptiness, are united for the blessed purpose of plucking up old
principles by the roots, each for their own separate ends, but all sure of
meeting with the same end if they are successful. We who see this danger have
no power to prevent it, and they who have the power cannot be made to see it. .
. . .
“This is a melancholy strain. We must, however, work
the ship till it sinks; and a vigorous minister might take advantage of the
feelings of the sound part of the country at the moment, and the avowal which
the Burdettites have made for strong measures of prevention. . . . . I would
give the poor gratuitous education in parochial schools,—a boon which all
among them who care for their children would rightly estimate; and if the work
of coercion kept pace with that of conciliation, we
Bible; and if any man before doubted the efficacy of
that prescription, the behaviour of the mob upon Mr. P.’s death may teach them
better knowledge.”—J.
R. to R. S., May 16. 1812.
|
344 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
might hold on till our battle in Spain ended in the
overthrow of the enemy. But where is the dictator who is to save the
commonwealth?
Perceval had a character
which was worth as much as his talents. The only statesman who has these
advantages in any approaching degree is
Lord
Sidmouth, but he wants those abilities which in
Perceval seemed always to grow according to
the measure of the occasion. Yet he would be the best head of a ministry, for
the weight which his good intentions would give him.
Vansittart would do for Chancellor of Exchequer, if there were
any other efficient minister in the Commons.
“I am going to write upon the French Revolution for the Quarterly Review,—a well-timed subject: the
evil is, that it is writing to those readers who are in the main of the same
way of thinking. Our contemporaries read, not in the hope of being instructed,
but to have their own opinions flattered.
The only recreation my father permitted himself during this summer
consisted of an excursion into the neighbouring county of Durham, where he had now two
brothers residing; and a pedestrian tour from thence home through part of Yorkshire. His
account of a visit to Rokeby will be read with interest.
To Mrs. Southey.
“We left St. Helen’s after an early breakfast on
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 345 |
Tuesday, with
Tom in company; looked at Raby and Bernard Castle, and made our
way to the porter’s lodge at Rokeby. . . . . A sturdy old woman, faithful
to her orders, refused us admittance, saying that if we were going to the Hall
we might go in, but if not we must not enter the grounds; nor would she let us
in till we had promised to call at the Hall. Accordingly, against the grain, in
observance of this promise, to the house I went, and having first inquired if
Walter Scott was there, requested
permission to see the grounds.
Mr.
Morritt was not within, but the permission was granted; and in
ten minutes after, the footman came running to say we might see the house also,
and we might fish if we pleased. I excused myself from seeing the house, saying
we were going on, and returning a due number of thanks, &c. But presently
we met Mr. and
Mrs.
M. in the walk by the river side, and were, as you may suppose,
obliged to dine and sleep there; their hospitality being so pressed upon us
that I could not continue to refuse it without rudeness. Behold the lion, then,
in a den perfectly worthy of him, eating grapes and pears and drinking claret.
The grounds are the finest things of the kind I have ever seen. A little in the
manner of Downton, more resembling Lowther, but the Greta at Rokeby affords
finer scenery than either. There is a summerhouse overlooking it, the inside of
which was ornamented by
Mason the poet:
one day he set the whole family to work in cutting out ornaments in coloured
paper from antique designs, directing the whole himself. It is still in good
preservation, and will, doubtless, be preserved as long as a rag re-
346 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
mains. This river, in 1771, rose in the most
extraordinary manner during what is still called the great flood. There is a
bridge close by the summer-house at least sixty feet above the water; against
this bridge and its side the river piled up an immense dam of trees and
rubbish, which it had swept before it; at length down comes a stone of such a
size that it knocked down Greta Bridge by the way, knocked away the whole mass
of trees, carried off the second bridge, and lodged some little way beyond it
upon the bank, breaking into three or four pieces.
Playfair the other day estimated the weight of this stone at
about seventy-eight tons; the most wonderful instance, he said, he had ever
heard of of the power of water. Before this stone came down, one of the trees
had blocked up an old man and his wife who inhabited a room under the
summer-house; the branches broke their windows, and a great bough barred the
door, meantime the water, usually some twenty feet below, was on a level with
it. The people of the house came to their relief, and sawed the bough off to
let them out, and the windows remain as they were left, a memorial of this most
extraordinary flood.
“Mr. Morritt’s
father bought the house of Sir
Thomas Robinson, well known in his day by the names of
Long Robinson and Long Sir
Thomas. You may recollect a good epigram upon this man:—
It shall be witty,—and it sha’nt be long.’ |
Long Sir Thomas found a portrait of
Richardson in the house: thinking
Mr. Richardson a very unfit personage to be suspended
in effigy among lords,
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 347 |
ladies, and baronets, he ordered
the painter to put him on the star and blue riband, and then christened the
picture
Sir Robert Walpole. You will
easily imagine
Mr. Morritt will not
suffer the portrait to be restored. This, however, is not the most
extraordinary picture in the room. That is one of Sir
T.’s intended improvements, representing the river, which
now flows over the finest rocky bed I ever beheld, metamorphosed by four dams
into a piece of water as smooth and as still as a canal, and elevated by the
same operation so as to appear at the end of a smooth shaven green.
Mr. M. shows this with great glee. He has brought
there from our country the stone fern and the Osmunda regalis.* Among his
pictures is a Madonna by
Guido; he
mentioned this to a master of a college, whose name I am sorry to say that I
have forgotten, for the gentleman in reply pointed to a picture above
representing an aunt of Mr. Morritt’s (I believe),
dressed in the very pink of the mode, and asked if that lady was the Madonna!
“I am sorry, too, that I forgot to ask if this was the
lady whose needle-work is in the house. Mr.
M. had an aunt who taught
Miss Linwood. Wordsworth thought her pictures quite as good.
In one respect they may be better, for she made her stitches athwart and
across, exactly as the strokes of the original pictures. Miss
L. (Mr. M. says) makes her stitches all in
one way. This lady had great difficulty about her worsted, and could only suit
herself by buying damaged quantities, thus obtaining shades
* The largest of the fern tribe, growing to the
height of five and six feet—a rare plant even in its own
districts. The finest specimens are on the river Rotha. |
348 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
which would else have been unobtainable. The colours
fly, and, in order to preserve them as long as possible, prints are fitted in
the frames to serve as skreens. The art cost her her life though at an advanced
age; it brought on a dead palsy, occasioned by holding her hands so continually
in an elevated position working at the canvas. Her last picture is hardly
finished; the needle, Mr. M. says, literally dropt from
her hands,—death had been creeping on her for twelve years. God bless
you!
To John May, Esq.
“Keswick, Aug. 14. 1812.
“My dear Friend,
“Let me trouble you with a commission which, if it be
successful, will essentially enrich my store of historical documents. I have
just learnt, by accident, that there is in High Holborn a set of Muratori’s great collection of the
Italian historians, which, wanting one volume, is on that account offered for
sale at a very low price—some five or six pounds, for a collection which
I should joyfully purchase at the price of five-and-twenty, were it entire. . .
. The three great works which I want are the Acta Sanctorum, the Byzantine
Historians, and Muratori; and it would be folly not to
purchase this set, notwithstanding it is imperfect, when the loss of one volume
so materially diminishes the price, without lessening the utility of the other
volumes. I should think it, at half a guinea a volume, a cheap purchase.
“My article
upon the French Revolutionists in the—last Quarterly is a good deal the worse for the
muti-
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 349 |
lation which, as usual, it has undergone, but
which I regard less than I do the alteration of one single word. Speaking of
‘the pilot that weathered the storm,’ I wrote
‘whatever may have been his merits,’ and this word is
altered into ‘transcendant as,’—an alteration of which
I shall certainly complain. Had the article been printed entire, it would have
done me credit: the hint with which it concludes relates to an essay upon the
state of the lower classes, which I have undertaken for the last number.
“I had yesterday the pleasure of cutting open the last
volume of the Register,—a
greater delight to me than it will be to any other person, I dare be sworn.
This is the last and greatest of an author’s pleasures. The London
proprietors urge an alteration in the plan, and want it to be brought out in a
single volume, like the London Annual
Register; the Edinburgh proprietors very wisely negative this
proposal, and determine to carry it on upon the present plan, even if they are
left to themselves. The change, I think, would have been fatal to the work;
whether perseverance may preserve it, is very doubtful. I go to work, however,
upon the year 1811, with great good will. You will find, in the second part of
this new volume, a life of
Lope de Aguirre, written as a
chapter for the history of Brazil, but cut out as an excrescence, for which
room could not be afforded. The narrative is an extraordinary piece of history,
whole and entire of itself, and so little connected with that of any other
country, that it would appear equally as an excrescence in the history of Peru,
or of Venezuela as in that of Brazil; so it is as well where it is as it could
be anywhere else.
350 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
. . . . . The
ballad of the Inchcape Rock, in the same
volume, is mine also, written many years ago, when I was poet to the
Morning Post. I know not to whom it
is obliged for its present situation, neither do I know who has been tinkering
it. It lay uncorrected among my papers, because I had no use for it, unless I
should ever publish a miscellaneous volume of verse. The
Life of Nelson is sent to the press. I
expect the first proof every day, and hope to finish the manuscript by the
beginning of next month. Since my return from my late excursion, I have made
good progress with Pelayo, or rather with
Roderick, as the poem ought to be called.
It pleases me so well, that I begin to wish other persons should be pleased
with it as well as myself.
Believe me, ever,
Your affectionate friend,
Robert Southey.”
The “sketch” referred to in the following letter was a very
curious production. It consisted of a series of parallelisms between the events and
characters in Thalaba and certain
portions of the Scriptures, drawn out with great ingenuity, and at considerable length. The
view taken was as if the poem had been intended as an allegorical representation of the
power and virtues of Faith.
“I am truly sensible. Sir, of the honour you have
conferred upon me by your letter of October 29th,
Ætat. 38. | OF ROBERT SOUTHEY. | 351 |
and
shall be still farther gratified by a communication of the sketch which is
there mentioned. My aim has been to diffuse through my poems a sense of the
beautiful and good (το καλόν καί άγαθόν) rather than to aim at the
exemplification of any particular moral precept. It has, however, so happened
that both in
Thalaba and
Kehama, the nature of the story led
me to represent examples of faith. At a very early age, indeed, when I was a
schoolboy, my imagination was strongly impressed by the mythological fables of
different nations. I can trace this to the effect produced upon me when quite a
child, by some prints in the Christian’s
Magazine, copied, as I afterwards discovered, from the great work of
Picart. I got at
Picart when I was about fifteen, and soon became as
well acquainted with the gods of Asia and America, as with those of Greece and
Rome. This led me to conceive a design of rendering every mythology, which had
ever extended itself widely, and powerfully influenced the human mind, the
basis of a narrative poem. I began with the religion of the Koran, and
consequently founded the interest of the story upon that resignation, which is
the only virtue it has produced. Had Thalaba been
more successful, my whole design would, by this time, have been effected; for
prepared as I was with the whole materials for each, and with a general idea of
the story, I should assuredly have produced such a poem every year. For popular
praise,
quoad praise, I cared
nothing; but it was of consequence to me, inasmuch as it affected those
emoluments with which my worldly circumstances did not permit me to dispense.
The sacrifice, therefore, was made to prudence, and it was
352 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | Ætat. 38. |
not made without reluctance. Kehama lay by me in
an unfinished state for many years, and but for a mere accident, might,
perhaps, for ever have remained incomplete.
“Whether the design may ever be accomplished, is now
doubtful. The inclination and the power remain, but the time has passed away.
My literary engagements are numerous and weighty, beyond those of any other
individual; and though, by God’s blessing, I enjoy good health,
never-failing cheerfulness, and unwearied perseverance, there seems to be more
before me than I shall ever live to get through. . . . .
Believe me. Sir,
Yours, with due respect,
Robert Southey.
“My next mythological poem, should I ever write
another, would be founded upon the system of Zoroaster. I should represent
the chief personage as persecuted by the evil powers, and make every
calamity they brought upon him the means of evolving some virtue, which
would never else have been called into action. In the hope that the fables
of false religion may be made subservient to the true, by exalting and
strengthening Christian feelings.”
END OF THE THIRD VOLUME.
London:
Spottiswoodes and Shaw,
New-street-Square.
Charles Abbot, first baron Colchester (1757-1829)
Educated at Westminster and Christ Church, Oxford, he was Tory MP for Helston in Cornwall
(1795) and Speaker of the House of Commons (1802-16).
Lope de Aguirre (1510 c.-1561)
Treacherous Spanish conquistador who navigated the Amazon in search of El Dorado.
Félix de Azara (1742-1821)
Spanish officer and naturalist who published
Voyage dans l'Amerique
meridionale depuis 1781 jusqu'en 1801 (1809).
James Ballantyne (1772-1833)
Edinburgh printer in partnership with his younger brother John; the company failed in the
financial collapse of 1826.
Grosvenor Charles Bedford (1773-1839)
The son of Horace Walpole's correspondent Charles Bedford; he was auditor of the
Exchequer and a friend of Robert Southey who contributed to several of Southey's
publications.
Andrew Bell (1753-1832)
Scottish Episcopalian educated at St. Andrews University; he was the founder of the
“Madras” system of education by mutual instruction; Robert Southey was his
biographer.
George Berkeley, bishop of Cloyne (1685-1753)
Bishop of Cloyne and philosopher; author of
A New Theory of Vision
(1709, 1710, 1732),
A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human
Knowledge (1710, 1734), and
Three Dialogues between Hylas and
Philonous (1713, 1725, 1734).
Sir Francis Burdett, fifth baronet (1770-1844)
Whig MP for Westminster (1807-1837) who was imprisoned on political charges in 1810 and
again in 1820; in the 1830s he voted with the Conservatives.
Gilbert Burnet, bishop of Salisbury (1643-1715)
Educated at Marischal College, Aberdeen, he was professor of divinity at Glasgow (1669);
a supporter of William III, he was made bishop of Salisbury (1689). His
History of his own Times was posthumously published (1723-34)
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
Edward Daniel Clarke (1769-1822)
English traveler and collector, the younger brother of James Stanier Clarke; he was
professor of mineralogy at Cambridge (1808) and university librarian (1817). He published
Travels in various Countries of Europe, Asia and Africa
(1810-23) and corresponded with Byron.
James Stanier Clarke (1765 c.-1834)
Naval chaplain and librarian to the Prince of Wales; author of
Naufragia, or, Historical Memoirs of Shipwrecks, 2 vols (1805) and
The Life of Admiral Lord Nelson, 2 vols (1809); he corresponded with
Jane Austen.
Mary Anne Clarke (1776 c.-1852)
Having married a Joseph Clarke, she was mistress to the Duke of York (1803-06) and
involved with selling government offices, as came to light in an 1809 House of Commons
investigation. She spent her later years living in Paris.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
Jeremy Collier (1650-1726)
Educated at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge; a non-juring clergyman, he made
himself notorious with the publication of
A Short View of the Immorality
and Profaneness of the English Stage (1698).
Edward Copleston, bishop of Llandaff (1776-1849)
Educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was a fellow of Oriel, Oxford Professor of
Poetry (1802-12), dean of St. Paul's (1827-1849), and bishop of Llandaff (1827-49); he
published
Three Replies to the Calumnies of the Edinburgh Review
(1810-11).
John Wilson Croker (1780-1857)
Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's
Life of
Johnson (1831).
Louis Dutens (1730-1812)
Huguenot diplomat and writer who edited Leibnitz (6 vols, Geneva, 1768). The author of
Mémoires d'un voyageur qui se repose (1806), he was a book
collector and historiographer to the king.
Charles James Fox (1749-1806)
Whig statesman and the leader of the Whig opposition in Parliament after his falling-out
with Edmund Burke.
Thomas Fuller (1608-1661)
English divine and biographer whose
Worthies of England was
posthumously published in 1662.
William Gifford (1756-1826)
Poet, scholar, and editor who began as a shoemaker's apprentice; after Oxford he
published
The Baviad (1794),
The Maeviad
(1795), and
The Satires of Juvenal translated (1802) before becoming
the founding editor of the
Quarterly Review (1809-24).
Robert Gooch (1784-1830)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was obstetric physician and lecturer in midwifery at
St Bartholomew's Hospital, a friend of Robert Southey and contributor to
Blackwood's and the
Quarterly Review.
John Charles Herries (1778-1855)
Educated at Cheam and Leipzig University, he was private secretary to Spencer Percival,
auditor of the civil list (1816), and MP for Harwich (1823-41) and Stamford
(1847-53).
Herbert Hill (1750-1828)
Educated at St. Mary Hall, and Christ Church, Oxford; he was Chancellor of the Choir of
Hereford Cathedral, chaplain to the English factory at Lisbon (1792-1807) and rector of
Streatham (1810-28). He was Robert Southey's uncle.
Richard Hooker (1554-1600)
English theologian whose
Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Politie
(1593, 1597) became a foundational Anglican text.
Henry Hunt [Orator Hunt] (1773-1835)
Political radical and popular agitator who took part in the Spa Fields meeting of 1816;
he was MP for Preston (1830-33).
William Huskisson (1770-1830)
English politician and ally of George Canning; privately educated, he was a Tory MP for
Morpeth (1796-1802), Liskeard (1804-07), Harwich (1807-12), Chichester (1812-23), and
Liverpool (1823-30). He died in railway accident.
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
Joseph Lancaster (1778-1838)
Founder of the Lancastrian system of education; he published
Improvements in Education (1803).
Walter Savage Landor (1775-1864)
English poet and man of letters, author of the epic
Gebir (1798)
and
Imaginary Conversations (1824-29). He resided in Italy from 1815
to 1835.
Mary Linwood (1755-1845)
Maker of pictures in needlework which she exhibited in her museum at Leicester
Square.
Thomas Norton Longman (1771-1842)
A leading London publisher whose authors included Southey, Wordsworth, Scott, and
Moore.
John Martyn Longmire (1781-1854)
Of Winkfield Green, Wiltshire; educated at Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, he was
rector of Hargrave, Northampton, and curate of Westwood (1841-54). He was the nephew of
Thomas Martyn, the Cambridge biologist.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
William Mason (1725-1797)
English poet, the friend and biographer of Thomas Gray; author of
Odes (1756),
Elfrida (1752), and
The
English Garden (4 books, 1772-81).
John May (1775-1856)
Wine merchant and close friend of Robert Southey; after the failure of the family
business in Portuguese wines he was a bank manager in the 1820s.
Anne Morritt (1826-1797)
Needlework designer; she was the aunt of Walter Scott's friend John Bacon Sawrey Morritt
of Rokeby.
John Sawrey Morritt (1738 c.-1791)
Of Rokeby, son of Bacon Morritt; educated at Christ's College, Cambridge, he purchased
Rokeby Park in 1769 and was High Sheriff of Yorkshire, 1778-1779. He was a friend of the
poet William Mason.
Katherine Morritt [née Stanley] (d. 1815)
The daughter of the Reverend Thomas Stanley, rector of Winwick in Lancashire; in 1803 she
married John Morritt of Rokeby.
Ludovico Antonio Muratori (1672-1750)
Italian historian and man of letters, the author of
Rerum italicarum
scriptores, 25 vols (1723-51) and
Annali d'Italia, 12 vols
(1745-49).
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Thomas Lewis O'Beirne, bishop of Meath (1749-1823)
After a Catholic education he converted and took his degree from Trinity College,
Cambridge; he published political pamphlets and was bishop of Ossory (1795) and Meath
(1798).
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
Bernard Picart (1673-1733)
French Hugenot engraver who worked in Amsterdam.
John Playfair (1748-1819)
Professor of Mathematics at Edinburgh University and Whig man of letters who contributed
to the
Edinburgh Review.
Richard Polwhele (1760-1838)
Cornish clergyman, poet, antiquary, and correspondent of Walter Scott; he was author of
The Influence of Local Attachment (1796) and satires on Jacobins
and Methodists.
Guido Reni (1575-1642)
Of Bologna; Italian baroque painter.
Samuel Richardson (1689-1761)
English printer and novelist; author of
Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded
(1739) and
Clarissa, or the History of a Young Lady
(1747-48).
John Rickman (1771-1840)
Educated at Magdalen Hall and Lincoln College, Oxford, he was statistician and clerk to
the House of Commons and an early friend of Charles Lamb and Robert Southey.
Sir Thomas Robinson, first baronet (1702 c.-1777)
English architect, architect, connoisseur, MP, governor of Barbados, and friend of Lord
Chesterfield. He sold the family estate at Rokeby in 1769.
Frank Sayers (1763-1817)
Of Norwich; after medical study at Edinburgh University, he became a poet and translator,
publishing
Dramatic Sketches of the Ancient Northern Mythology
(1790).
Harriet Shelley [née Westbrook] (1795-1816)
Shelley's first wife, with whom he eloped in 1811 and who committed suicide after he had
transferred his affections to Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin.
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)
English poet, with Byron in Switzerland in 1816; author of
Queen
Mab (1813),
The Revolt of Islam (1817),
The Cenci and
Prometheus Unbound (1820), and
Adonais (1821).
Edith Southey [née Fricker] (1774-1837)
The daughter of Stephen Fricker, she was the first wife of Robert Southey and the mother
of his children; they married in secret in 1795.
Henry Herbert Southey (1783-1865)
The younger brother of Robert Southey; educated at Edinburgh University, he was physician
to George IV, Gresham Professor of Medicine, and friend of Sir Walter Scott.
Thomas Southey (1777-1838)
The younger brother of Robert Southey; he was a naval captain (1811) and afterwards a
Customs officer. He published
A Chronological History of the West
Indies (1828).
William Taylor of Norwich (1765-1836)
Translator, poet, and essayist; he was a pupil of Anna Letitia Barbauld and correspondent
of Robert Southey who contributed to the
Monthly Magazine, the
Monthly Review, the
Critical Review, and
other periodicals.
Joseph Townsend (1739-1816)
Educated at Clare College, Cambridge and Edinburgh University, he was a member of the
Countess of Huntingdon's circle, a Wiltshire clergyman, and author of
Journey through Spain in the Years 1786 and 1787 (1791).
Sharon Turner (1768-1847)
Attorney, historian, and writer for the
Quarterly Review; he wrote
History of the Anglo-Saxons, 4 vols (1799-1805).
Nicholas Vansittart, first Baron Bexley (1766-1851)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a Pittite MP for Hastings (1796-1802), Old
Sarum (1802-12), East Grinstead (1812), and Harwich (1812-23); he was Chancellor of the
exchequer (1812-23).
Robert Walpole, first earl of Orford (1676-1745)
English politician whose management of the financial crisis resulting from the South Sea
Bubble led to his commanding career the leader of the Whigs in Parliament (1721-42).
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.
James White (1793 c.-1885)
The younger brother of Henry Kirke White; educated at Pembroke College, Cambridge, he was
curate of St George's Manchester (1826-42), rector of Stalham, Norfolk (1846-52) and Sloley
Norfolk (1852-85).
John Neville White (1785 c.-1845)
The elder brother of Henry Kirke White; after working in medicine he was educated at
Peterhouse College, Cambridge, and was rector of Rushall (1828) and Tivetshall in Norfolk
(1832-45). The rumor that he died a suicide was denied in the
Gentleman's
Magazine.
Joseph Blanco White (1775-1841)
Emigrated to England from Seville in 1810, studied at Oxford and was tutor to Lord
Holland's son Henry; he wrote for the
New Monthly Magazine and
published on theology.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
Charles Watkin Williams Wynn (1775-1850)
The son of Sir Watkin Williams Wynn, fourth baronet; educated at Westminster and Christ
Church, Oxford, Robert Southey's friend and benefactor was a Whig MP for Old Sarum (1797)
and Montgomeryshire (1799-1850). He was president of the Board of Control (1822-28).
The Courier. (1792-1842). A London evening newspaper; the original proprietor was James Perry; Daniel Stuart, Peter
Street, and William Mudford were editors; among the contributors were Samuel Taylor
Coleridge and John Galt.
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.