The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey, “Memoir: Poetical Efforts,” 29 June 1824
June 29th, 1824.
In a former letter I have mentioned Mrs.
S——, who had been Miss
Tyler’s school-mistress. My aunt kept up an acquaintance
with her as long as she lived, and after her death with her two daughters, who
lived together in a house on Redclift Parade, the pleasantest situation in
Bristol if there had been even a tolerable approach to it. One of these sisters
was unmarried; the other a widow with one son, who was just of my age:
Jem Thomas was his name. Mr.
Lewis, the clergyman under whom I was placed
114 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
at the end of 1786 or the beginning of 1787, lodged and boarded with these
sisters. He had been usher at the grammar school; and, having engaged to
educate this boy, was willing to take a few more pupils, from the hours of ten
till two. When I went to him, he had two others, C—— and
R——, both my seniors by three or four years. The
former I used to call Caliban: he might
have played that character without a mask, that is, supposing he could have
learnt the part; for the resemblance held good in mind as well as in
appearance, his disposition being somewhat between pig and baboon. The latter
was a favourite with Lewis; his father had formerly
practised in Bristol as a surgeon, but had now succeeded to an estate of some
value. He was little and mannish, somewhat vain of superficial talents, and
with a spice of conceit both in his manners and in his dress; but there was no
harm in him. He took an honorary Master’s degree at the Duke of Portland’s installation in 1793,
which was the only time I ever saw him after we ceased to be fellow-pupils. He
married about that time, and died young.
Caliban had a sister whom I shall not libel when I call
her Sycorax. A Bristol tradesman, a great
friend of S. T. C.’s, married her
for her money; and the only thing I ever heard of Caliban
in after-life was a story which reached me of her everywhere proclaiming that
her brother was a very superior man to Mr. Coleridge, and
had confuted him one evening seven-and-twenty times in one argument. The word
which Coleridge uses as a listener when he is expected to
throw in something,
with or without meaning, to show that
he is listening, is, or used to be, as I well remember—undoubtedly. The foolish woman had understood this expletive in its
literal meaning, and kept account with her fingers that he pronounced it
seven-and-twenty times, while enduring the utterance of an animal in comparison
with whom a centaur would deserve to be called human, and a satyr rational.
Jem Thomas was a common-place lad, with a fine handsome
person, but by no means a good physiognomy, and I cannot remember the time when
I was not a physiognomist. He was educated for a surgeon, and ruined by having
at his disposal, as soon as he came of age, something between two and three
thousand pounds, which his grandmother unwisely left to him at once, instead of
leaving it to his mother for her life. This he presently squandered; went out
professionally to the East Indies, and died there. So much for my three
companions, among whom it was not possible that I could find a friend. There
came a fourth, a few weeks only before I withdrew; he was a well-minded boy,
and has made a very respectable man. Harris was his name:
he married Betsy Petrie, who was one of my
fellow-travellers in Portugal.
I profited by this year’s tuition less than I should
have done at a good school. It is not easy to remedy the ill effects of bad
teaching; and the farther the pupil has advanced in it, the greater must be the
difficulty of bringing him into a better way. Lewis, too,
had been accustomed to the mechanical movements of a large school, and was at a
loss how to
116 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
proceed with a boy who stood alone. I began
Greek under him, made nonsense-verses, read the Electa ex Ovidio et Tibullo
and Horace’s Odes, advanced a little
in writing Latin, and composed English themes.
C’est le premier pas qui coute.
I was in as great tribulation when I had the first theme to write, as when
Williams required me to produce a letter. The text of
course had been given me; but how to begin, what to say, or how to say it, I
knew not. No one who had witnessed my perplexity upon this occasion would have
supposed how much was afterwards to be spun from these poor brains. My aunt, at
last in compassion, wrote the theme for me. Lewis
questioned me if it was my own, and I told him the truth. He then encouraged me
sensibly enough; put me in the way of composing the common-places of which
themes are manufactured (indeed he caused me to transcribe some rules for
themes, making a regular receipt as for a pudding); and he had no reason
afterwards to complain of any want of aptitude in his scholar, for when I had
learnt that it was not more difficult to write in prose than in verse, the ink
dribbled as daintily from my pen as ever it did from John Bunyan’s. One of these exercises I
still remember sufficiently well to know that it was too much like poetry, and
that the fault was of a hopeful kind, consisting less in inflated language than
in poetical imagery and sentiment. But this was not pointed out as a fault, and
luckily I was left to myself; otherwise, like a good horse, I might have been
spoilt by being broken in too soon.
It was still more fortunate that there was none to direct
me in my favourite pursuit, certain as it is that any instructor would have
interfered with the natural and healthy growth of that poetical spirit which
was taking its own course. That spirit was like a plant which required no
forcing, nor artificial culture; only air and sunshine, and the rains and the
dews of heaven. I do not remember in any part of my life to have been so
conscious of intellectual improvement as I was during the year and half before
I was placed at Westminster: an improvement derived, not from books or
instruction, but from constantly exercising myself in English verse; and from
the developement of mind which that exercise produced, I can distinctly trace
my progress by help of a list, made thirty years ago, of all my compositions in
verse, which were then in existence, or which I had at that time destroyed.
Early as my hopes had been directed toward the drama, they
received a more decided and more fortunate direction from the frequent perusal
of Tasso, Ariosto, and Spenser. I
had read also Mickle’s Lusiad and Pope’s Homer. If you add to these an extensive
acquaintance with the novels of the day, and with the Arabian and mock-Arabian
tales, the whole works of Josephus (taken in
by me with my pocket-money in three-score sixpenny numbers, which I now
possess), such acquaintance with Greek and Roman history as a schoolboy picks
up from his lessons and from Goldsmith’s abridged histories, and such acquaintance
with their fables as may be learnt from Ovid,
from the old Pantheon, and
above all from
118 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
the end of Littleton’s Dictionary, you will
have a fair account of the stock upon which I began. But Shakespeare, and Beaumont and Fletcher,
must not be forgotten; nor Sidney’s
Arcadia; nor Rowley’s Poems, for
Chatterton’s history was fresh
in remembrance, and that story, which would have affected one of my disposition
anywhere, acted upon me with all the force of local associations.
The first of my Epic Dreams was created by Ariosto. I meant to graft a story upon the
Orlando Furioso, not
knowing how often this had been done by Italian and Spanish imitators. Arcadia was to have been the title and the scene;
thither I meant to carry the Moors under Marsillus after their overthrow in France, and there to have
overthrown them again by a hero of my own, named Alphonso, who had caught the Hippogrlff. This must have been
when I was between nine and ten, for some verses of it were written on the
covers of my Phædrus. They were in the
heroic couplet. Among my aunt’s books was the first volume of Bysshe’s Art of Poetry, which, worthless as it is,
taught me at that age the principle upon which blank verse is constructed, and
thereby did me good service at a good time. I soon learnt to prefer that metre,
not because it was easier than rhyme (which was easy enough), but because I
felt in it a greater freedom and range of language, because I was sensible that
in rhyming I sometimes used expressions, for the sake of the rhyme, which were
far-fetched, and certainly would not have occurred without that cause. My
second subject was the Trojan Brutus: the defeat and death
of King Richard and the Union
of the two Roses was my third. In neither of these did I
make much progress; but with the story of Egbert I was more persevering, and partly transcribed several
folio sheets. The sight of these was an encouragement to proceed, and I often
looked at them with delight in the anticipation of future fame. This was a
solitary feeling, for my ambition or vanity (whichever it may deserve to be
called) was not greater than the shyness which accompanied it. My portfolio was
of course held sacred. One day, however, it was profaned by an acquaintance of
my aunt’s who called to pay a morning visit. She was shown into the
parlour, and I, who was sent to say my aunt would presently wait upon her,
found her with my precious Egbert in her
hand. Her compliments had no effect in abating my deep resentment at this
unpardonable curiosity; and, though she was a good-natured woman, I am afraid I
never quite forgave her. Determining, however, never to incur the risk of a
second exposure, I immediately composed a set of characters for my own use.
In my twelfth and thirteenth year, besides these loftier
attempts, I wrote three heroic epistles in rhyme: the one was from Diomede to Egiale; the second from Octavia to Mark Anthony;
the third from Alexander to his father
Herod, a subject with which Josephus supplied me. I made also some
translations from Ovid, Virgil, and Horace; and composed a satirical description of English
manners, as delivered by Omai, the
Taheitean, to his countrymen on his return. On the thirteenth anniversary of my
birth, supposing (by an error which appeared to be common enough at the
120 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
end of the century) that I was then entering the first
year of my teens instead of completing it, and looking upon that as an aweful
sort of step in life, I wrote some verses in a strain of reflection upon
mortality grave enough to provoke a smile when I recollect them. Among my
attempts at this time were two descriptive pieces entitled Morning in the Country, and Morning in
Town, in eight-syllable rhymes, and in imitation of Cunningham. There was also a satirical peep
into Pluto’s dominions, in rhyme. I
remember the conclusion only, and that because it exhibits a singular
indication how strongly and how early my heart was set upon that peculiar line
of poetry which I have pursued with most ardour. It described the Elysium of
the Poets, and that more sacred part of it in which Homer, Virgil, Tasso, Spenser,
Camoens, and Milton were assembled. While I was regarding them, Fame came
hurrying by with her arm full of laurels and asking in an indignant voice if
there was no poet who would deserve them? Upon which I reached out my hand,
snatched at them, and awoke.
One of these juvenile efforts was wholly original in its
design. It was an attempt to exhibit the story of the Trojan War in a dramatic
form, laying the scene in Elysium, where the events which had happened on earth
were related by the souls of the respective heroes as they successively
descended. The opening was a dialogue between Laodamia and Protesilaus,
in couplets: the best rhymes which I had yet written. But I did not proceed
far, probably because the design was too difficult, and this would
have been reason enough for abandoning it even if I had
not entered with more than usual ardour upon a new heroic subject, of which
Cassibelan was the hero. I finished
three books of this poem, and had advanced far in the fourth before I went to
Westminster. All this was written fairly out in my own private characters, and
in my best writing, if one may talk of calligraphy in an unknown hand which
looked something like Greek, but more like conjuration, from the number of
trines and squares which it contained. These characters, however, proved fatal
to the poem, for it was not possible for me to continue it at school, for want
of privacy; disuse made the cypher so difficult that I could not read it
without almost spelling as I went on; and at last, in very vexation, I burnt
the manuscript.
I wonder whether Spurzheim could, at that time, have discovered an organ of
constructiveness in my pericranium. The Elysian drama might seem to indicate
that the faculty was there, but not a trace of it was to be found in any of the
heroic poems which I attempted. They were all begun upon a mere general notion
of the subject, without any prearrangement, and very little preconception of
the incidents by which the catastrophe was to be brought about. When I sat down
to write, I had to look as much for the incidents, as for the thoughts and
words in which they were to be clothed. I expected them to occur just as
readily; and so indeed, such as they were, they did. My reading in the old
chivalrous romances has been sufficiently extensive to justify me in asserting
that the greater number of
122 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
those romances were written
just in the same way, without the slightest plan or forethought; and I am much
mistaken if many of the Italian romantic poems were not composed in the same
inartificial manner. This I am sure,—that it is more difficult to plan
than to execute well; and that abundance of true poetical power has been
squandered for want of a constructive talent in the poet. I have felt this want
in some of the Spanish and Portuguese writers, even more than their want of
taste. The progress of my own mind towards attaining it (so far as I may be
thought to have attained it) I am able to trace distinctly; not merely by the
works themselves, and by my own recollections of the views with which they were
undertaken and composed, but by the various sketches and memoranda for four
long narrative poems, made during their progress from the first conception of
each till its completion. At present, the facility and pleasure with which I
can plan an heroic poem, a drama, and a biographical or historical work,
however comprehensive, is even a temptation to me. It seems as if I caught the
bearings of a subject at first sight; just as Telford sees from an eminence, with a glance, in what direction
his road must be carried. But it was long before I acquired this
power,—not fairly, indeed, till I was about five or six and thirty; and
it was gained by practice, in the course of which I learnt to perceive wherein
I was deficient.
There was one point in which these premature attempts
afforded a hopeful omen, and that was in the diligence and industry with which
I endeavoured to acquire all the historical information within my
reach, relating to the subject in hand. Forty years ago, I
could have given a better account of the birth and parentage of Egbert, and the state of the Heptarchy during his
youth, than I could do now without referring to books; and when Cassibelan was my hero, I was as well acquainted
with the division of the island among the ancient tribes, as I am now with the
relative situation of its counties. It was, perhaps, fortunate that these
pursuits were unassisted and solitary. By thus working a way for myself, I
acquired a habit and a love for investigation, and nothing appeared
uninteresting which gave me any of the information I wanted. The pleasure which
I took in such researches, and in composition, rendered me in a great degree
independent of other amusements; and no systematic education, could have fitted
me for my present course of life, so well as the circumstances which allowed me
thus to feel and follow my own impulses.
Ludovico Ariosto (1474-1533)
Italian poet, author of the epic romance
Orlando Furioso
(1532).
Francis Beaumont (1585-1616)
English playwright, often in collaboration with John Fletcher; author of
The Knight of the Burning Pestle (1607).
John Bunyan (1628-1688)
Dissenting preacher and autobiographer; he published
Grace Abounding to
the Chief of Sinners (1666) and
Pilgrim's Progress
(1678).
Edward Bysshe (1714 fl.)
The author of a handbook,
The Art of English Poetry (1702), which
made his name a byword for mechanical versification.
Luis de Camoens (1524 c.-1580)
Portuguese poet, author of the national epic,
The Lusiads
(1572).
Thomas Chatterton (1752-1770)
The “marvelous boy” of Bristol, whose forgeries of medieval poetry deceived many and
whose early death by suicide came to epitomize the fate neglected genius.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
John Cunningham (1729 c.-1773)
Dublin-born provincial actor who worked in England and Scotland; he was a popular poet in
the 1760s and 70s.
John Fletcher (1579-1625)
English playwright, author of
The Faithful Shepherdess (1610) and
of some fifteen plays in collaboration with Francis Beaumont.
Oliver Goldsmith (1728 c.-1774)
Irish miscellaneous writer; his works include
The Vicar of
Wakefield (1766),
The Deserted Village (1770), and
She Stoops to Conquer (1773).
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
Horace (65 BC-8 BC)
Roman lyric poet; author of
Odes,
Epistles, Satires, and the
Ars Poetica.
Flavius Josephus (37-100 c.)
Jewish historian, author of
Bellum Iudaicum and
Antiquitates Iudaicae.
William Julius Mickle (1735 c.-1788)
Scottish poet and essayist; his most successful work was his translation of Camoens,
The Lusiad, or, The Discovery of India (1776).
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
Omai (1753 c.-1780 c.)
The first Tahitian to visit England where he spent two years before returning with
Captain Cook.
Ovid (43 BC-17 AD c.)
Roman poet famous for his erotic
Art of Love and his mythological
poem,
The Metamorphoses.
Phaedrus (15 BC c.-50)
Roman freedman in the household of Augustus who composed five books of fables.
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Richard III, king of England (1452-1485)
He assumed the throne after the murder of Edward V. in 1483 and ruled until he was killed
at the battle of Bosworth in 1485.
Sir Philip Sidney (1554-1586)
English poet, courtier, and soldier, author of the
Arcadia (1590),
Astrophel and Stella (1591) and
Apology for
Poetry (1595).
Edmund Spenser (1552 c.-1599)
English poet, author of
The Shepheards Calender (1579) and
The Faerie Queene (1590, 1596).
Johann Gaspar Spurzheim (1776-1832)
German physician who with Joseph Gall was a leading proponent of the pseudo-science of
phrenology.
Torquato Tasso (1554-1595)
Italian poet, author of
Aminta (1573), a pastoral drama, and
Jerusalem Delivered (1580).
Thomas Telford (1757-1834)
Civil engineer who did innovative work with roads, canals, and bridges; he was a friend
of Archibald Alison, Thomas Campbell, and Robert Southey.
Elizabeth Tyler (1739-1821)
Robert Southey's aunt, his mother's elder half-sister, with whom he spent much time as a
child.
Virgil (70 BC-19 BC)
Roman epic poet; author of
Eclogues,
Georgics, and the
Aenead.
Sir Philip Sidney (1554-1586)
Arcadia. (London: William Ponsonbie, 1593). The “New Arcadia“ consisting of the text as Sidney left it; the “Old
Arcadia“ containing additional episodes was not published until the twentieth
century.