The Life and Correspondence of Robert Southey
Robert Southey, “Memoir: Westminster School,” 29 August 1824
August 29th, 1824.
The business of placing me at Westminster afforded
my aunt an excuse for going to London; Miss Palmer was
easily persuaded to accompany her and to hire a carriage for the season, and we
set off in February 1788. I had never before been a mile from Bath in that
direction, and when my childish thoughts ever wandered into the terra incognita which I was one day to
explore, this had been the road to it, simply because all the other outlets
from that city were familiar to me. We slept at Marlborough the first night; at
Reading the second, and on the third day we reached Salt Hill. Tom and Charles
Palmer were summoned from Eton to meet their aunt there, and we
remained a day for the purpose of seeing Windsor, which I have never seen
since. Lodgings had been engaged in a small house in Pall Mall, for no
situation that was less fashionable would content Miss Tyler, and she had a reckless prodigality at fits and
starts, the effects of which could not be counteracted by the parsimony and
even penuriousness of her usual habits. Mr.
Palmer was at that time comptroller of the Post Office, holding
the situation which he had so well
134 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
deserved, and from
which he was not long afterwards most injuriously displaced. We visited him,
and the Newberrys, and Mrs. Dolignon, and went often to the theatres;
and my aunt appeared to be as happy as if she were not incurring expenses which
she had no means of discharging. My father had given her thirty pounds for the
journey, a sum amply sufficient for taking me to school and leaving me there,
and moreover as much as he could afford; but she had resolved upon passing the
season in town, as careless of all consequences as if she had been blind to
them.
About six weeks elapsed before I was deposited at my place
of destination. In the interval I had passed a few days with the Newberrys at Addiscombe, and with the
Miss Delamares at Cheshunt; at the latter place I was
happy, for they were excellent women, to whom my heart opened, and I had the
full enjoyment of the country there, without any drawback. London I very much
disliked: I was too young to take any pleasure in the companies to which I was
introduced as an inconvenient appendage of my aunt’s; nor did I feel half
the interest at the theatres, splendid as they were, which I had been wont to
take at Bath and Bristol, where every actor’s face was familiar to me,
and every movement of the countenance could be perceived. I wished for
Shad, and the carpentry, and poor
Phillis, and our rambles among the woods and
rocks. At length, upon the first of April (of all ominous days that could be
chosen), Mr. Palmer took me in his
carriage to Dean’s Yard, introduced me to Dr.
Smith, entered my name with him, and, upon his recommendation,
placed me
at the boarding-house, then called Otly’s,
from its late mistress, but kept by Mrs. Farren; and left
me, there, with Samuel Hayes, the usher
of the house, and of the fifth form, for my tutor.
Botch Hayes, as he was denominated, for
the manner in which he mended his pupil’s verses, kept a smaller
boarding-house next door; but at this time a treaty of union between the two
houses was going on, which, like the union of Castille and Aragon, was to be
brought about by a marriage between the respective heads of the several states.
This marriage took place during the ensuing Whitsun-holydays; and the smaller
flock was removed in consequence to our boarding-house, which then took the
name of Hayes’s, but retained it only a few months,
for Hayes, in disgust at not being appointed under-master,
withdrew from the school: his wife of course followed his fortunes, and was
succeeded by Mrs. Clough, who migrated thither with a few
boarders from Abingdon Street. But as Botch Hayes is a person who must make his
appearance in the Athenæ Cantabrigienses (if my
lively, happy, good-natured friend Mr. Hughes carries into
effect his intention of compiling such a work), I will say something of him
here.
He was a man who, having some skill and much facility in
versifying, walked for many years over the Seatonlan race-ground at Cambridge,
and enjoyed the produce of Mr.
Seaton’s Kislingbury estate without a competitor. He was,
moreover, what Oldys describes Nahum Tate to have been,—“a
free, good-natured fuddling companion;” to all which qualities
his countenance bore witness. With better conduct and
136 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
better fortune, Hayes would have had learning and talents
enough to have deserved and obtained promotion. His failings were so notorious,
and the boys took such liberties with him (sticking his wig full of paper darts
in school, and, indeed, doing or leaving undone whatever they pleased, in full
reliance upon his easy and indolent good-nature), that it would have been a
most unfit thing to have appointed him under-master, in course of seniority,
when Vincent succeeded Dr. Smith. Perhaps he would not have taken
offence at being passed by, if a person thoroughly qualified had been chosen in
his stead; but he could not bear to have an inferior usher, who was a man of no
talents whatever, promoted over him, and therefore, to the great injury of his
worldly affairs, which could ill bear such a sacrifice, he left the school
altogether. Hayes it was who edited those sermons which Dr. Johnson is supposed to have written for
his friend Dr. Taylor.
I was placed in the under fourth, a year lower than I
might have been if I could have made Latin verses, and yet more than a year too
high for being properly trained to make them. The manner of introducing a boy
into the ways of the school was by placing him for a week or ten days under the
direction of one in the same remove, who is called his substance, the new comer
being the shadow; and, during this sort of noviciate, the shadow neither takes
nor loses place by his own deserts, but follows the substance. A diligent and
capable boy is, of course, selected for this service; and Smedley, the usher of the fourth, to my great
joy, picked out George Strachey,
the very individual on whom my physiognomical eyes would
have rested if I might have made a choice throughout the whole school.
Strachey and I were friends at first sight. But he
boarded at home; and it is in the boarding-house, more than in the school, that
a friend is wanted: and there, God knows, I had for some time a solitary heart.
The present Lord
Amherst was head of the house; a mild, inoffensive boy, who
interfered with no one, and, having a room to himself (which no other boy had),
lived very much to himself in it, liked and respected by every body. I was
quartered in the room with ——, who afterwards married that
sweet creature, Lady ——, and never was woman of a
dove-like nature more unsuitably mated, for ——, when in
anger, was perfectly frantic. His face was as fine as a countenance could be
which expressed so ungovernable and dangerous a temper; the finest red and
white, dark eyes and brows, and black curling hair; but the expression was
rather that of a savage than of a civilized being, and no savage could be more
violent. He had seasons of good-nature, and at the worst was rather to be
dreaded than disliked; for he was plainly not master of himself. But I had
cause to dread him; for he once attempted to hold me by the leg out of the
window; it was the first floor, and over a stone area: had I not struggled in
time, and clung to the frame with both hands, my life would probably have been
sacrificed to this freak of temporary madness. He used to pour water into my
ear when I was a-bed and asleep, fling the porter-pot or the poker
138 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
at me, and in many ways exercised such a capricious and
dangerous tyranny, merely by right of the strongest (for he was not high enough
in the school to fag me), that at last I requested Mr. Hayes to remove me into another chamber. Thither he
followed me; and, at a very late hour one night, came in wrapt in a sheet, and
thinking to frighten me by personating a ghost, in which character he threw
himself upon the bed, and rolled upon me. Not knowing who it was, but certain
that it was flesh and blood, I seized him by the throat, and we made noise
enough to bring up the usher of the house, and occasion an inquiry, which ended
in requiring ——’s word that he never would again
molest me.
He kept his word faithfully, and left school a few months
afterwards, when he was about seventeen or eighteen, and apparently full
grown,—a singularly fine and striking youth; indeed, one of those figures
which you always remember vividly. I heard nothing of him till the Irish
rebellion: he served in the army there; and there was a story, which got into
the newspapers, of his meeting a man upon the road, and putting him to death
without judge or jury, upon suspicion of his being a rebel. It was, no doubt,
an act of madness. I know not whether any proceedings took place (indeed, in
those dreadful times, anything was passed over); but he died soon afterwards,
happily for himself, and all who were connected with him.
Miss Tyler returned to Bristol before
the Whitsun-holydays, having embarrassed herself, and had recourse to shifts of
which I knew too much. To
spare the expense of a journey
so soon after my entrance at school, I was invited for the holydays by the good
Miss Delamares to Cheshunt. I passed three weeks there
very happily, having the use of an excellent microscope, and frequently taking
my book into the greenhouse, and reading there for the sake of the temperature
and the odour of the flowers. During part of the time there were two other
guests in the house. The one was a nice good-humoured warmhearted girl, in the
very flower of youth and feeling, who was engaged to a French or Swiss
clergyman, Mercier by name. Her own was La
Chaumette. She was of Swiss extraction, and, having passed the
preceding year among her relations in the Pays de Vaud, had brought home
something like a maladie du pays, if
that phrase may be applied to a longing after any country which is not our own:
it was, however, a very natural affection for one who was compelled to exchange
Lausanne for Spitalfields. I used to abuse Switzerland as a land of bears and
wolves, and ice and snow, for the sake of seeing the animation with which she
defended and praised it. Not long afterwards she married to her heart’s
content—and, to the very great regret of all who knew her, died in her
first child-bed. Poor Betsey La Chaumette! after a lapse
of nine and-twenty years, I thought of her in Switzerland, and, when I was at
Echichens with the Awdrys, met with a
Swiss clergyman who knew her and remembered her visit to that country.
I have heard her mother relate an anecdote of herself
which is well worthy of preservation, because of another personage to whom it
relates also. She was
140 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
a most lively, good-humoured,
entertaining woman; and her conversation was the more amusing because it was in
broken English, intermingled plentifully with French interjections. In person
she was strong-featured, large, and plain even to ugliness, if a countenance
can be called ugly which was always brightened with cheerfulness and
good-nature. There was a Mr.
Giffardiere, who held some appointment in the Queen’s
household (I think he used to read French to her), and was one of those persons
with whom the royal family were familiar. Mrs. La
Chaumette was on a visit to him at Windsor; and it was insisted
upon by the Giffardieres that she must have one of the
Lunardi bonnets (immortalized by Burns)
which were then in fashion, it being the first age of balloons. This she
resisted most womanfully, pleading her time of life and ugliness with
characteristic volubility and liveliness, but to no purpose. Her eloquence was
overruled; and as nobody could appear without such a bonnet, such a bonnet she
had. All this went to the palace; for kings and queens are sometimes as much
pleased at being acquainted with small private affairs as their subjects are in
conversing upon great public ones. Mrs. La
Chaumette’s conversation was worth repeating, even to a
king; and she was so original a person, that the King knew her very well by character, and was determined to see
her. Accordingly he stopped his horse one day before
Giffardiere’s apartments, and, after talking a
while with him, asked if Mrs. La Chaumette was within, and
desired she might be called to the window. She came in all the agitation or fluster that such a summons was
likely to excite. The King spoke to her with his wonted good-nature, asked her
a few questions, hoped she liked Windsor, and concluded by saying he was glad
to hear she had consented at last to have a Lunardi bonnet. Trifling as this
is, it is a sort of trifling in which none but a kind-hearted king would have
indulged; and I believe no one ever heard the story without liking George III.
the better for it: I am sure this was the effect it produced in the circle of
her acquaintance. How well do I remember the looks, and tones, and gestures,
and mon Dieus! with which she
accompanied the relation.
James Beresford was the other visitor at
Cheshunt, an unsuccessful translator of the Æneid into blank verse, but the very successful
author of the Miseries of Human
Life. He was then a young man, either just in orders, or on the
point of being ordained. This story was then remembered of him at the Charter
House: that he had been equally remarkable when a boy for his noisiness and his
love of music; and having one day skipped school to attend a concert, there was
such an unusual quietness in consequence of his absence, that the master looked
round, and said “Where’s Beresford? I am
sure he cannot be in school!” and the detection thus brought
about cost poor Beresford a flogging. Him also, like
Betsey La Chaumette, I never saw after that visit;
and, with all his pleasantness and good-nature, he left upon me an unpleasant
impression, from a trifling circumstance which I remember as indicative of my
own moral temper at that time. Our holydays’ exercise was to compose a
certain number of Latin verses from any part
142 | LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE | |
of Thomson’s Spring. I did my task doggedly, in such a
manner that it was impossible any exercise could have been more unlike a good
one, and yet the very best could not more effectually have proved the diligence
with which it had been made. There was neither a false quantity, nor a
grammatical fault, nor a decent line in the whole. The ladies made me show it
to Beresford; and he, instead of saying, in good-natured
sincerity, “You have never been taught to make verses, but it is plain
that you have taken great pains in making these, and therefore I am sure
the usher will give you credit for what you have done,” returned
them to me, saying, “Sir, I see you will be another Virgil one of these days.” I knew
that this was neither deserved as praise nor as mockery; and I felt then, as I
have continued through life to do, that unmerited censure brings with it its
own antidote in the sense of injustice which it provokes, but that nothing is
so mortifying as praise to which you are conscious that you have no claim.
Smedley spoke to me sensibly and kindly
about this exercise, and put me in training as far as could then be done. He
had no reason to complain of my want of good-will, for before the next holydays
I wrote about fifty long and short verses upon the death of Fair Rosamund, which I put into his hands. The
composition was bad enough, I dare say, in many respects; but it gave proofs of
good progress. They were verses to the ear as well as to the fingers; and I
remember them sufficiently to know that the attempt was that of a poet. It is
worth remembering as being the only Latin poem that I ever composed
voluntarily.
For there my ambition ended. When I was so
far upon a footing with the rest of the remove, that I could make verses decent
enough to pass muster, I was satisfied. It was in English, and not in heathen
Latin, that “The sacred Sisters for their own Baptized me in the springs of Helicon;” |
and I also knew, though I did not know Lope de
Vega had said it, that “Todo paxaro en su nido Natural canto mantiene, En que ser perfeto viene: Porque en el canto aprendido Mil imperfeciones tiene.” |
William Pitt Amherst, first earl Amherst (1773-1857)
The nephew and heir of Jeffrey Amherst, first Baron Amherst; educated at Westminster and
Christ Church, Oxford, he was envoy to Peking (1816-17), governor-general of India
(1823-28), created earl of Amherst in 1826.
John Awdry (1766-1844)
Of Notton House, Chippenham in Wiltshire; educated at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a
magistrate and deputy-lieutenant for Wiltshire.
James Beresford (1764-1840)
Educated at Charterhouse and Merton College, Oxford, he was rector of Kibworth Beauchamp,
Leicestershire, and author of
The Miseries of Human Life, or, the last
Groans of Timothy Testy and Samuel Sensitive, 2 vols, (1806-7).
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
Elizabeth Dolignon [née Delamare] (1745-1802)
The daughter of Isaac Delamere; she married the wine merchant John Dolignon (d. 1776) and
was a friend of Robert Southey's Aunt Tyler; as a widow she lived with her sisters at
Theobalds.
Charles de Guiffardiere (1740-1810)
He was prebendary of Salisbury, rector of St. Mary, Newington, and the Queen's reader in
French.
Samuel Hayes [Botch Hayes] (1749-1795)
Educated at Westminster School and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was winner of Seatonian
Prizes and usher at Westminster School (1770-88) in Robert Southey's time.
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
English man of letters, among many other works he edited
A Dictionary
of the English Language (1755) and Shakespeare (1765), and wrote
Lives of the Poets (1779-81).
Francis Newbery (1743-1818)
The son of John Newbury; educated at Merchant Taylors' School, Trinity College, Oxford,
and Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge, he carried on the family book-selling business, wrote
poems, and pursued music.
William Oldys (1696-1761)
English antiquary whose anecdotes of early writers preserved much valuable information
about seventeenth-century poets.
Charles Palmer (1777-1851)
The son of postal-reformer John Palmer, he was educated at Eton College and at Oriel
College, Oxford; afterwards he was aide-de-camp to the prince regent (1811), major-general
(1825), and Whig MP for Bath (1808-26, 1830-37).
John Palmer (1742-1818)
Theater manager in Bath and Bristol; he devised a system of mail-coaches adopted by
William Pitt to great effect.
Thomas Palmer (1776 c.-1795 fl.)
The son of the postal reformer John Palmer; he was educated at Eton and Trinity College,
Cambridge, admitted to Lincoln's Inn in 1794.
Thomas Seaton (1684-1741)
Educated at Clare College, Cambridge, he was vicar of Ravenstone, Buckinghamshire; he
willed his estate to Cambridge to fund the Seatonian prize for the best poem in English on
the attributes of the supreme being.
Edward Smedley the elder (1750 c.-1825)
Educated at Westminster and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was usher at Westminster
School (1774-1820) and author of
Erin. A Geographical and Descriptive
Poem (1810).
Samuel Smith (1732 c.-1808)
Educated at Westminster and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was headmaster at Westminster
(1764-88) and prebendary of Peterborough (1787-1808).
George Strachey (1776-1849)
The son of John Strachey (d. 1818); educated at Westminster and Trinity College,
Cambridge, he pursued a legal and civil service career in the East India Company before his
retirement in 1824.
Nahum Tate (1652 c.-1715)
Poet, dramatist and adapter of Shakespeare; he was made poet laureate in 1692.
John Taylor (1711-1788)
Born in Lichfield, he was an early friend of Samuel Johnson; he was educated at Christ
Church, Oxford, and was Prebendary of Westminster (1746). Johnson anonymously wrote sermons
for him.
James Thomson (1700-1748)
Anglo-Scottish poet and playwright; while his descriptive poem,
The
Seasons (1726-30), was perhaps the most popular poem of the eighteenth century,
the poets tended to admire more his Spenserian burlesque,
The Castle of
Indolence (1748).
Elizabeth Tyler (1739-1821)
Robert Southey's aunt, his mother's elder half-sister, with whom he spent much time as a
child.
Lope Félix de Vega Carpio (1562-1635)
Spanish poet and playwright who claimed to have written 1500 plays, of which several
hundred exist.
William Vincent (1739-1815)
Educated at Westminster and Trinity College, he was headmaster of Westminster School
(1788); his
A Defence of Public Education (1801) ran to three
editions. He was Dean of Westminster (1803-15).
Virgil (70 BC-19 BC)
Roman epic poet; author of
Eclogues,
Georgics, and the
Aenead.
Shadrach Weeks (1774 c.-1795 fl.)
The boyhood friend of Robert Southey; he was the servant of Southey's Aunt Tyler,
afterwards recruited for the Pantisocracy project.
Virgil (70 BC-19 BC)
Aeneid. (1st cent. BC). Latin epic in twelve books relating the conquest of Italy by the Trojan Aeneas; it was
usually read in the English translation by John Dryden (1697).