Memoirs of the Rev. Samuel Parr
Ch. XXVII. 1801-1803
CHAPTER XXVII.
A.D. 1801—1803.
Offer to Dr. Parr of the living of Winterbourne—His letter
to Lord Chedworth on that occasion—His recommendation of the
Rev. James Eyre to his Lordship’s notice—His evidence on the
question of the validity of his Lordship’s will—His request of some memorial of his
Lordship’s friendship—Offer of the living of Graffham from Sir Francis
Burdett—Letters on that occasion—Offer from Mr. Coke of
the living of Buckingham—Large increase of income from Dr.
Parr’s prebendal estates.
All the preferment, which Dr.
Parr had hitherto obtained, consisted of the rectory of Waddenhoe, worth
about 120l. a year, and the prebendary of St. Paul’s, at that
time of only nominal value. But in 1801, he received an offer from Lord Chedworth of the living of Winterbourne, in Wiltshire, entirely
without any solicitation on his part, and accompanied with the most respectful and obliging
expressions, on the part of his Lordship. As that living was of no higher value than
Waddenhoe, and not tenable with it, after due consideration, he thought proper to decline
the generous offer. In a letter, written on this occasion, he thus gave utterance to the
feelings of a grateful heart:—
“My Lord—I tell you the real sentiments of my soul, when I declare
to you, that scarcely any event of my life gave me such exquisite delight, or so much
honest pride, as I felt from the perusal of your Lordship’s letter. To the last
moment of my existence, I shall remember your Lordship’s
kindness; and in that remembrance, I shall find a pure and perpetual source of
gratification to my best moral feelings, and of solace under the infirmities of
approaching old age.”—Then, after stating the reasons which oblige him to
decline the offered gift, he adds—“To your injunction of secresy, I shall pay a
temporary, but I am quite incapable of yielding an unqualified and unlimited obedience.
My gratitude, my pride, my sense of propriety and justice, will not suffer me to
conceal for ever from the world, that Lord
Chedworth has been pleased to consider me not unworthy of his
protection; and permit me, my Lord, to own to you yet farther, that in the account,
which they, who come after me, may probably be inclined to give of my pursuits as a
scholar, of my principles as a religionist, and of my fortune as an ecclesiastic, I
shall not only be desirous, but ambitious of having it recorded that you were my
patron. Pardon me for reserving this tribute to the disinterested friendship, to the
intellectual attainments, to the literary, political, and moral sympathies of a
nobleman, whom I have long been accustomed to respect.”
But whilst he thus declined for himself the offered gift, at the same time,
he ventured to propose, to the benevolent consideration of his noble friend, the case of a
neighbouring clergyman—by whom, indeed, the intended patronage was scarcely less deserved,
and by whom it was even more needed. Thus he continues:
“It is with mingled feelings of reluctance and confidence, that I
venture to throw myself upon your candour, for excusing the very great and very
unusual liberty, which I am about to take, in submitting to your
Lordship’s consideration that which follows. I can have little doubt that your
Lordship will, in the circle of your own acquaintance, find a proper object for your
patronage; and nothing can be more adverse to that which I ought to do, or more remote
from what I wish to do, than to interfere in any measure you mean to take, about the
living of Winterbourne. You will, therefore, have the goodness to consider me, not as
urging a request, but as stating a case, when I say that in my neighbourhood there is a
clergyman, whose personal deserts and personal misfortunes have long interested me, in
his worldly interests. He has the care of a small country school, with a tolerable
house, and an annual salary of about 80l. He was educated at
Oxford. He is more than fifty years old. He has for many years served two curacies,
very distant from each other, for a stipend, which, with the surplice-fees, amounts
nearly to 60l. a year; and in consequence of sentiments, more
congenial to the true spirit of the constitution, than the miserable and merciless
prejudices of the day will tolerate, he has no chance of preferment. He is a very good
scholar. He is a sensible man: his principles are honest; his application to books is
extensive; and his conduct quite irreproachable. He has an excellent wife and six
children; and is not unlikely to have more. With an income so scanty as that for which
he toils, it is utterly impossible for him to make the smallest provision for so
numerous a family at his death; and with an aching heart have I known that, during the late season of distress, he has found it very
difficult to procure food and raiment for the passing day. My Lord, I am doing homage
to your wisdom and humanity, in that which I have just written about a beloved friend.
But I once more beseech your Lordship to acquit me of all intentions to embarrass you,
by solicitation; and once more, I will implore your pardon for troubling you with a
statement, which neither the experience I have found of your kindness, nor the trust I
can repose in your liberality, would suffer me to suppress.”
The writer is delighted to record that he was himself honoured with a place
in the friendly regards of the excellent clergyman, the late Rev. James Eyre, whose case is here so feelingly described; and he is
gratified to bear his testimony to the merits which are here, with so much fond affection,
depicted. But the strength of understanding, the integrity of principle, the ardour in the
pursuits of useful learning, and the activity in the discharge of laborious duties,
ascribed in this letter to Mr. Eyre, were accompanied, it may be truly
added, with fervour in a high degree of conjugal and parental affection, with a noble
candour of sentiment towards those of differing opinions, and with an uncommon warmth of
kind and generous feeling towards all men. Nor is it the least part of his due praise to
add yet further, that, under straitened and trying circumstances, he always maintained that
independence of spirit, and the dignity of deportment, which mark the gentleman, and adorn
the clergyman.
It will give pleasure to the reader to be told, that the appeal so
delicately and so forcibly urged, in the above letter, proved successful. Early in July,
1801, Mr. Eyre was inducted into the living of
Winterbourne; and the kindness of the patron was properly and gratefully acknowledged in a
letter, from which the following is an extract:—“Be assured, my Lord, that to the
last hour of my life, I shall remember with joy your intended patronage of myself, and
your noble protection of the man whom I recommended to your favour. He, his wife, his
children, his relations, his well-wishers, and eminently among them the writer of this
letter, will often recollect, and often pronounce with heartfelt satisfaction, the
honoured name of Lord Chedworth.”
By this generous act of seasonable and well-directed patronage, Mr. Eyre found the path of life considerably smoothed; and
yet it was still to him a rugged and difficult path. With a family of ten children, he
possessed no adequate means of providing for their suitable maintenance during life, and
none of making provision for their support at his death. It is deeply to be deplored that,
whilst enormous revenues are assigned to the higher and the dignified clergy, of which the
influence must be seriously injurious to their character as ecclesiastics; the laborious,
and by far the most useful and important members of the clerical body are, in too many
instances, left exposed to all the hardships of abject poverty. A more equal distribution
of its ample funds would be a most wise and happy measure for the church,
which the country, too, will, no doubt, imperiously demand, whenever
the public attention shall once be fixed on the enormity of the evil just referred to, and
on the mischievous consequences flowing from it, not to the clergy only, but to the whole
Christian and civil community. So thought Dr. Parr,
through all the later years of his life; and so must think every reasonable and reflecting
person, who wishes well to the honour, the interest, and the permanence of the national
establishment.
Early in 1813, Mr. Eyre died,1 and was soon followed to the grave by his beloved wife, and,
within no long time, by several of his children. Those that survived were, with his usual
ardour and activity-of benevolence, received by Dr.
Parr into his protection; and were all of them furnished by him, or through
his intercession, by his friends, with the means of gaining an honourable support. In his
will he has bequeathed to them legacies to a considerable amount.
The late Lord Chedworth, whom from this
time Dr. Parr proudly regarded as his patron and his
friend, possessed very considerable powers of mind, happily cultivated by early education
and subsequent study; and with these were united many of the best qualities of the heart.
But his conduct was marked with so many strange peculiarities, as
1 “On Friday last, March 13, 1813, died, in his
65th year, the Rev. James Eyre, master of
the free-school at Solihull. This most respectable man was equally
distinguished by the solidity of his understanding and the benevolence of his
heart. In his death, society has sustained a very great, and his numerous
family an irreparable loss. S. P.”—Warw. Advertiser, &c. |
might well create a suspicion of some unsoundness of intellect. For
many years he lived in a state of entire seclusion from society, in a private house, at
Ipswich; where, often labouring under extreme depression of spirits, he was cheered and
relieved by the frequent visits of Mr. Wilson and Mr.
Penrice—the one his legal adviser, the other his medical attendant. He
always warmly acknowledged himself indebted, for much of the ease and comfort of his life,
to the exertions of the former of these gentlemen, in the management and improvement of his
estates; and to the skill and attention of the latter, in the care of his mental and bodily
health. In return for these important services, he thought proper, at his death, to
bequeath to them a large proportion of his estates, by a will, which afterwards became the
subject of legal discussion, at the suit of the heir-at-law, who endeavoured to set it
aside, on the plea of mental incapacity in the testator.
On an issue from the Court of Chancery, the question was tried, and the
validity of the will confirmed, by the verdict of a jury, with the full concurrence of
Lord Ellenborough, the judge. Subsequently,
however, a new trial was moved for, before the Lord Chancellor
Erskine, on the ground of an affidavit, sworn to by Dr. Parr, declaring his firm belief “that the late
Lord John Chedworth, with great talents,
attainments, and virtues, united an understanding, not completely sound; and that an
hereditary propensity to insanity was increased by some unfortunate events of his
life.” But the affidavit produced no effect; the motion for a new
trial was rejected; and the validity of the will finally established.
It seems, upon the whole, sufficiently clear that the noble person whose case thus became
the subject of legal inquiry, was, indeed, liable to occasional aberration of mind; but
that—whether to such a degree as to incapacitate for making a will?—was a question fairly
left to be decided, and was, no doubt, justly decided, by the jury.
In the course of these proceedings Dr.
Parr was exposed to many severe reflections, in consequence of some letters,
written by himself to Lord Chedworth, and produced and
read at the trial, which contained many complimentary expressions on his Lordship’s
intellectual powers and literary acquirements, and which were supposed to give a direct
contradiction to the statements of the affidavit. In reality, however, there was no
inconsistency in the case; since it is well known that the finest minds are subject to the
saddest derangements; and that mental obliquity, in one respect, is often found to be
compatible with the full and vigorous exercise of the understanding in others.
Among the letters produced on this occasion, was one in which Dr. Parr expresses to Lord
Chedworth his desire of possessing some memorial of his friendship;
suggesting that a piece of plate, with a suitable inscription, would be such a memorial as
would be most of all acceptable to him. For this letter he became, though with little
reason, the object of ridicule to some, and of censure to others. It is, indeed, certain
that he was delighted to receive such testimonies of the esteem
and
affection of his friends, and especially of his pupils; and that he was always proud to
display, before the gaze of the visiters at his table, those which he possessed. Among the
rest, he was accustomed to point, with peculiar pleasure, to an epergne presented by
Lord Dartmouth, to a cup presented by Mr. Coke, to the very tureen now presented by Lord
Chedworth, and to two salvers presented, one by Dr. Alexander, bishop of Downe, the other by Dr.
Davy, head of Caius College, Cambridge. Two goblets also, held in high
estimation, with Greek inscriptions, which once belonged to the very learned Dr.
Taylor,1 were sure to be exhibited, with a sort of
reverential respect, especially to the learned and sometimes to the unlearned guest. But
if, in all this, there are those who can espy weakness; surely the foible is not such as
needs excite much of sneering contempt, or much of angry reproach. The writer is not aware
that these memorials of friendship were obtained by any act of degradation; unless, indeed,
it must be laid down peremptorily that it is in itself, under all circumstances, a
degrading act to prefer a request—even where the request, it is known, will excite no
feelings but those of complacency and delight, and where the pleasure of bestowing the
gift, it is certain, will at least equal the pleasure of receiving it.
On occasion of Lord Chedworth’s
gift, Dr. Parr was charged with another offence—that
of
1 These, from their late learned possessor have passed, by
his gift, into the possession of another learned divine, Dr. Butler, of Shrewsbury. |
writing an inscription laudatory of himself. But from this charge he
was completely exonerated, by the statement of Mr.
Eyre, which was given in a letter to the editor of the Gentleman’s Magazine. From that statement, it appears
that it was once, indeed, the intention of Dr. Parr to write the
inscription, which would then have been a simple expression of esteem and gratitude towards
the noble donor;1 that this intention was afterwards relinquished,
in consequence of the express desire of Lord Chedworth; and that the
inscription, such as it now is, was written by Mr. Eyre himself, in
the name, and in compliance with the request, of his Lordship, agreeably to the following
directions: “I wish,” said Lord Chedworth,
“the inscription to be short and simple; expressive of the reverential regard,2 which I bear to Dr. Parr, of which, it is my
wish, the plate should be considered as a sort of monamentum et
pignus. The qualities, which I most revere in our illustrious
friend, are his great abilities, his profound learning, his genuine zeal for liberty, his
devout attachment to revelation, his unassailable integrity, and especially his most active
and boundless benevolence.”3
But though Dr. Parr could not avail
himself of the kind intentions of Lord Chedworth, by
accepting the living of Winterbourne, another proposal soon followed, from Sir Francis Burdett, which led to happier results. This
was the generous offer communicated in the subjoined letter:—
1 “Condignum donum quali st qui donum
dedit.”—Plaut.
2 “Condignum donum qual st cui dono datu
est.”—Plaut.
3 Appendix, No. VI.
|
“Sir,—I am sorry it is not in my power to place you in a
situation which will become you—I mean in the episcopal palace at Buckden; but
I can bring you very near to it. For I have the presentation of a rectory, now
vacant, within a mile and a half from it, which is very much at Dr. Parr’s service. It is the rectory of
Graffham, at present worth 200l. a year; and, as I am
informed, may soon be worth 270l. a year; and I this
moment learn that the incumbent died last Tuesday.”—“Dr.
Parr’s talents and character might well entitle him to a
better patronage than this, from those, who know how to estimate his merits.
But I acknowledge that a great additional motive with me to the offer I now
make him is, that I believe I cannot do any thing more pleasing to his friends,
Mr. Fox, Mr. Sheridan, and Mr.
Knight; and I desire you, Sir, to consider yourself as obliged
to them only. I have the honour to be, with the greatest respect, &c.
The grateful acceptance of a gift so entirely unsolicited and unexpected,
is conveyed in the following letter:—
“Vicarage House, Buckden, Sept. 26, 1802.
“Dear Sir,—After rambling in various parts of Norfolk, I
went to Cambridge, and from Cambridge I yesterday came to the parsonage of my
most respectable friend, Mr. Maltby, at
Buckden, where I this morning had the honour of receiving your letter.
Mrs. Parr opened it last Friday at
Hatton; and I trust you will pardon the liberty she took in desiring your
servant to convey it to me in Huntingdonshire, where she knew that I should be,
as upon
this day.”—“Permit me, dear Sir, to
request that you would accept the warmest and most sincere thanks of my heart
for this unsolicited, but most honourable expression of your good-will towards
me. Nothing can be more important to my worldly interest than the service you
have done me, in presenting me to the living of Graffham. Nothing can be more
exquisitely gratifying to my very best feelings than the language in which you
have conveyed to me this mark of your friendship. Indeed, dear Sir, you have
enabled me to pass the years of declining life in comfortable and honourable
independence. You have given me additional and unalterable conviction, that the
firmness with which I have adhered to my principles has obtained for me the
approbation of wise and good men. And when that approbation assumes, as it now
does, the form of protection, I fairly confess to you, that the patronage of
Sir Francis Burdett has a right to
be ranked among the proudest, as well as the happiest events of my life. I
trust that my future conduct will justify you in the disinterested and generous
gift which you have bestowed upon me; and sure I am that my friends,
Mr. Fox,
Mr.
Sheridan, and
Mr. Knight,
will not only share with me in my joy, but sympathise with me in those
sentiments of respect and gratitude, which I shall ever feel towards
Sir Francis Burdett.”—“Most assuredly I
shall myself set a higher value upon your kindness, when I consider it as
intended to gratify the friendly feelings of those excellent men; as well as to
promote my own personal happiness.”—“I shall wait your pleasure
about the
presentation; and I beg leave to add, that I
shall stay at Buckden for one week only, and shall have reached Hatton about
this day fortnight, where I shall obey your commands. One circumstance, I am
sure, will give you great satisfaction, and, therefore, I shall beg leave to
state it. The living of Graffham will be of infinite value to me, because it is
tenable with a rectory I now have in Northamptonshire; and happy I am, that my
future residence will be fixed, and my existence closed upon that spot where
Sir Francis Burdett has given me the power of spending
my old age with comforts and conveniences quite equal to the extent of my
fondest wishes, and far surpassing any expectations I have hitherto ventured to
indulge.—I have the honour to be, with the greatest respect, &c.
In November, 1802, Dr. Parr went to
take possession of his new rectory; of which, writing to his friend, Mr. J. Parkes of Warwick, he gives some account in the
following letter:
“Dear Sir,—I thank you for the trouble you have, with
your usual kindness, taken in adjusting matters with Colonel
P—; and I am sure that you were very right in not writing for my
approbation or opinion—approbation, dear John, you could not fail to deserve and to obtain; and as to
opinion, any I might form would have been of little value, in opposition to
your own.”—“Last week I knelt before a bishop for institution; I
rang a bell upon induction; I read the Morning and Evening Services, with the
salutary appendages of Articles, &c. &c. Having now
passed through the whole circle of ecclesiastical forms, I have acquired
plenary possession of things spiritual and things temporal, as rector of
Graffham. The parsonage-house will be well repaired, but not enlarged. The farm
is about to be leased at an advanced rent. A farm-house must be built, with a
barn, for which materials are to be removed from the parsonage, under the
protection of a faculty; and a roost for hens and their amorous male
protectors, with three styes for pigs, &c. &c.”—“I shall
instruct my Waddenhoe flock on Sunday next; and then proceed to Northampton, on
my way home, &c. Believe me, dear Sir, your sincere wellwisher and obedient
servant,
S. Parr.”
November 29, 1802.
But the possession of this new benefice did not induce Dr. Parr to think of leaving his favourite residence at
Hatton; nor did even the offer of a still more valuable preferment, which occurred a few
years afterwards. This was the living of Buckingham, which, in the summer of 1808, was
tendered to his acceptance, by his kind and faithful friend, Mr.
Coke, of Holkham. It is a living of much higher value than either that of
Waddenhoe or Graffham; and might have been held in conjunction with one, but not both of
them. The writer well recollects Dr. Parr’s making a long
morning visit at Leam, for the express purpose of conversing on the subject of this new,
and in many respects alluring, offer: when all the reasons which, after much deliberation,
determined him to decline it, were carefully examined and weighed. These
reasons were the necessity of residing in Buckingham—the ruinous state of the
parsonage-house—the want of ground sufficient for rebuilding it—his growing attachment to
the place where he had so long lived, and the many agreeable connexions which he had formed
in its neighbourhood.
In a pecuniary point of view, indeed, further preferment was now become
less necessary to Dr. Parr, as, about the year 1804,
he was entitled to the full profits of the prebendal estate, to which he had been so long
looking. Thus exulting in the prospect of a happy independence, during the closing years of
his life, he wrote to Lord Chedworth, in a letter,
dated from Cambridge, March 18, 1803:—“You will be glad, aye, my Lord, you will be
very glad to hear that part of my errand to London, was to make arrangements about a
prebendal estate, which, next year, will come into my possession, and which will add
considerably to the comfort of my declining life. I am much harassed by business, and
sorely afflicted with a cold. I am vexed at not having seen you here, during my stay.
It is an awful time; but I have not abandoned all hopes of peace,” &c.
Though, at a subsequent period, the value of this prebendal estate was much
increased by the sale of land, at a high price, to the Regent Canal Company, as already
mentioned; yet, in consequence of allowing the tenant the large sum of 400l. a year for buildings and improvements, the whole amount was received by
Dr. Parr, only during about the five or six last
years of his life. By a
singular regulation, in the right of granting
leases, his family will continue to enjoy the benefit of this estate, though not without
some deductions, owing to the neglect of certain legal forms, for twenty years after his
decease.
Nathaniel Alexander, Bishop of Meath (1760-1840)
Educated by Samuel Parr at Harrow and Stanmore, and at Emmanuel College, Cambridge; he
was Bishop of Clonfert (1801), Down and Connor (1804), and Meath (1823). He was an Irish
privy councillor.
Sir Francis Burdett, fifth baronet (1770-1844)
Whig MP for Westminster (1807-1837) who was imprisoned on political charges in 1810 and
again in 1820; in the 1830s he voted with the Conservatives.
Samuel Butler, bishop of Lichfield (1774-1839)
The editor of Aeschylus; educated at Rugby School and St John's College, Cambridge, he
was headmaster of Shrewsbury (1798-1836) and bishop of Lichfield and Coventry
(1836).
Martin Davy (1763-1839)
English physician educated at Edinburgh University and Gonville and Caius College,
Cambridge; he was master of Caius and a vice-chancellor of the university.
Thomas Erskine, first baron Erskine (1750-1823)
Scottish barrister who was a Whig MP for Portsmouth (1783-84, 1790-1806); after defending
the political radicals Hardy, Tooke, and Thelwall in 1794 he was lord chancellor in the
short-lived Grenville-Fox administration (1806-07).
James Eyre (1748-1813)
English philologist educated at Trinity College, Oxford and at Gonville and Caius
College, Cambridge; he was headmaster of Solihull grammar school and vicar of Winterbourne
in Wiltshire (1801-13).
Charles James Fox (1749-1806)
Whig statesman and the leader of the Whig opposition in Parliament after his falling-out
with Edmund Burke.
John Howe, fourth Baron Chedworth (1754-1804)
Educated at Harrow and at Queen's College, Oxford, after inheriting the title from his
uncle in 1781 he refused to participate in polite society, preferring the company of
players. He wrote
Notes upon some of the Obscure Passages in
Shakespeare's Plays (1805).
Richard Payne Knight (1751-1824)
MP and writer on taste; in 1786 he published
An Account of the Remains
of the Worship of Priapus for the Society of Dilettanti; he was author of
The Landscape: a Didactic Poem (1794),
An
Analytical Inquiry into the Principles of Taste (1805) and other works.
William Legge, second earl of Dartmouth (1731-1801)
The son of George Legge, Viscount Lewisham, he was educated at Westminster and Trinity
College, Oxford, succeeded to the earldom in 1750, pursued a political career, and
patronised the poet William Cowper.
Edward Maltby, bishop of Durham (1770-1859)
Educated under Parr at Norwich and at Pembroke College, Cambridge, he was preacher at
Lincoln's Inn (1824-33), bishop of Chichester (1831) and of Durham (1836-56). Sydney Smith
described him as “a thoroughly amiable, foolish, learned man.”
John Parkes (1764 c.-1851)
Of Warwick, textile manufacturer and friend of Samuel Parr; he was the father of the
solicitor and election agent Joseph Parkes (1796-1865).
Jane Parr [née Marsingale] (1747-1810)
The daughter of Zechariah Marsingale of Carleton, Yorkshire, in 1771 unhappily married to
Samuel Parr.
Samuel Parr (1747-1825)
English schoolmaster, scholar, and book collector whose strident politics and assertive
personality involved him in a long series of quarrels.
Plautus (254 BC c.-184 BC)
Roman comic dramatist, author of
Amphitruo,
Menaechmi,
Miles gloriosus, and other plays.
Richard Brinsley Sheridan (1751-1816)
Anglo-Irish playwright, author of
The School for Scandal (1777),
Whig MP and ally of Charles James Fox (1780-1812).
The Gentleman's Magazine. (1731-1905). A monthly literary miscellany founded by Edward Cave; edited by John Nichols 1778-1826,
and John Bowyer Nichols 1826-1833.