Samuel Rogers and his Contemporaries
Lord Brougham to Samuel Rogers, [16 June 1850]
‘Sunday [16th June, 1850].
‘My dear R.,—I went to meet the Nepaul Embassy by
invitation of the East India Company. The dinner was splendid, and we had a
gallery of ladies to see the jewels and dress of the Indians and to hear our
speeches.
‘The chief Indian spoke a long distinct speech in his
own tongue, which half the company, having been in the
| LORD BROUGHAM’S LETTERS | 357 |
East, understood, and said it was much
better than the interpreter made it. It pleased the East India Company much,
for it lavishly promised all the Nepaul resources to us, and to stand by us
against China. Hobhouse spoke as if
mightily contented with the Indian Prince, and said the Embassy would return
home impressed with the benefits and beauties of our free constitution! This I
thought strong, considering that the Prince had just dethroned, or at least
subdued, his Master, and really reigned in his stead, and that he had forcibly
brought away with him the leaders of the opposition to his
usurpation—which leaders he did not suffer to dine with him, but they
were at another table. By the way, all of them dined in a room by themselves
and joined us after dinner. I hear that one of them, being asked how he liked
our rifles, said he had one which he had used to kill a servant, and that it
answered very well.
‘When it came to my turn to speak (called upon to return
thanks for the judges and bar), I said that justice was everything, politics
nothing. But I must say one word on that, too; and I said that, with the other
lessons learnt, I hoped the Indians would carry back a most positive assurance
that the Government here, and the people, and above all our hosts the East
India Company, never would dream of extending their dominions by one acre, or
of lessening by one inch the short distance which, we were just told, separates
our Eastern Frontier from the Western Frontier of China (that distance being
Nepaul); but that the world would see we had at length discovered the wisdom
and the justice of never breaking the peace nor suffering others unpunished to
break it.
358 | ROGERS AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES | |
This was really a right thing to say, and it
was very well received—much better than might be expected.
‘Such was our Nepaul banquet. The ladies were, I doubt
not, disappointed, for the Princes had not their jewels, and the speeches were
as dull as possible.
‘Yours very affectionately,
‘Lyndhurst goes
on well. Mind, I continue my interdict against your writing. Send only
verbally how you go on.’
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
John Singleton Copley, baron Lyndhurst (1772-1863)
The son of the American painter; he did legal work for John Murray before succeeding Lord
Eldon as lord chancellor (1827-30, 1834-35, 1841-46); a skilled lawyer, he was also a
political chameleon.
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).