Samuel Rogers and his Contemporaries
Henry Luttrell to Samuel Rogers, 20 September [1809]
‘Brocket Hall: Wednesday, Sept. 20 [1809].
‘My dear Rogers,—It is singular enough that just as your letter was
put into my hands, I had determined to write to you by this day’s post.
Now, and at all times, I feel flattered and happy to be associated in any
scheme of amusement or any arrangement of society with you, and I was, with
this object in view, preparing to communicate my autumnal movements and to
inquire into yours. I am desired, on the part of Lord and Lady Cowper, to
say that they will be most happy to receive you at Panshanger as soon as they
remove there, which will be very early in the next month. Our intended progress
in the meantime is as follows. From hence to town on Friday, on Monday next to
Woolbeding for four or five days, and thence to Petworth for two or three,
after which the Cowpers certainly return to Panshanger,
where they will remain for the rest of October. Now what I should like, if it
suits you, would be to meet you at the Deepdene on my return from Petworth,
and, having paid our visit there, return with you to London for a couple of
days. We might then start together for Panshanger. I hold myself in a manner
pledged to Hope, deeming it as ungracious
not to accept as not to
give a second invitation, as the natural conclusion to
be drawn from both is the same, that, on trial, the parties have not been
pleased with each other. Yet I should not choose to encounter him alone, as the
apprehension of his embarrassment would embarrass me. As it is possible I may
be in town even to-morrow, pray let a few lines be deposited in my letter-box
at Albany to say how far the arrangement I here propose can be made to square
with your convenience. If it should not suit, I am, after the Woolbeding and
Petworth visits are spun off my reel, quite at your disposal for any other that
may be more agreeable to you.
‘I hope you have not quite abandoned your intention of
a trip to Tunbridge, before the possibility of fine weather is extinct, as I
have a most longing desire to see the lions of the Pantiles under your
auspices. This I would do either after or before Panshanger at your option. God
bless you, and believe me, my dear Rogers,
‘Ever most truly yours,
‘Am I justified or no in considering the
occasional address attempted to be spoken at the opening of C. G.
Theatre1 as the very worst copy of verses in
any language, and the following line—
Solid our building, heavy our expense— |
1 The new theatre was opened on Monday the
17th of September. The address was spoken by John Kemble in the midst of an
uproar which made it entirely inaudible. It contained fifty lines.
The last four were: ‘Solid our building, heavy our expense, We rest our claim on your munificence— What ardour plans a nation’s taste to raise, A nation’s liberality repays.’ |
|
64 | ROGERS AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES | |
as the worst in it, and consequently the worst in the
world, as I am inclined to do, nisi quid tu
docte Trebati dissentis’?
Emily Mary Cowper, countess Cowper [née Lamb] (1787-1869)
Whig hostess, the daughter of Sir Peniston Lamb, first Viscount Melbourne; she married
(1) in 1805 Sir Peter Leopold Louis Francis Nassau Cowper, fifth Earl Cowper, and (2) in
1839, her long-time lover, Henry John Temple, third Viscount Palmerston.
Thomas Hope (1769-1831)
Art collector and connoisseur, the son of a wealthy Amsterdam merchant and author of the
novel
Anastasius (1819) which some thought to be a work by Byron.
His literary executor was William Harness.
John Philip Kemble (1757-1823)
English actor renowned for his Shakespearean roles; he was manager of Drury Lane
(1783-1802) and Covent Garden (1803-1808).
Henry Luttrell (1768-1851)
English wit, dandy, and friend of Thomas Moore and Samuel Rogers; he was the author of
Advice to Julia, a Letter in Rhyme (1820).
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).