Samuel Rogers and his Contemporaries
Uvedale Price to Samuel Rogers, August 1814
‘Sunning Hill: Wednesday (August 1814).
‘My dear Sir,—I think myself very unlucky during
my two excursions to town, short as they were, to have seen you only once, and
that in a crowd. It was not my fault. I called upon you several times, and at
all hours, but you were not stirring, or just gone out earlier than usual, or
not returned; in short, never to be found. On Friday, the day before I left
town, I made a last attempt and the most unfortunate of them all. In spite
154 | ROGERS AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES | |
of the rain I set out across the Park, but when I came to
the passage the door was locked. I determined to go round by the stable yard,
but on coming to the end of your garden I perceived that the path was railed
across and a sentinel posted there. As I saw a gentleman walking that way I
stopped to see what happened; he got upon a low rail and climbed over the high
one close to the sentinel; I thought I might climb too, advanced boldly and had
put one foot on the low rail, when the sentinel told me I must not get over; I
pleaded the precedent I had just seen, he only said he must stop somewhere, and
that I should not pass. Not feeling quite equal to scaling the palisade and
knocking down the sentinel, I sorrowfully turned back, cursing these warlike
effects of peace.1 My next recourse was the door by the
canal; that too was fast; and after having traced back my steps to Hyde Park
Corner, I had not the courage to begin my journey again with the uncertainty of
catching you at home. I wish this history were as interesting as it is long and
melancholy, but Dogberry could not be more
determined to bestow all his tediousness. I wished very much to have found you
at home on various accounts. I wanted to thank you for “Jacqueline,” which,
indeed, George Ellis had already shown
me. I have read it more than once, and with great pleasure. There were a few
very trifling remarks that occurred to me, not worth putting down, but which,
if I had seen you, I should have mentioned. I also wanted to take my revenge,
if it can be so called, and, after having received so much pleasure from your
poetry, to torment you with some of 1 A reference to the preparations for the
fireworks in the Park. |
my prose. You probably shudder at this
and think of the famous lines on the Metromane— ‘tous mes sens se glacent à
l’approche Du griffonnage affreux, qu’il a toujours en poche. |
‘You have not quite escaped, and, seriously, as the
whole of this griffonage does not amount to more than a dozen pages, I should
be very glad if you would take the trouble of looking it over. The subject, I
think, is curious, and I rather believe it has not been treated; it is on the
application of the terms that answer to beautiful in ancient and modern
languages; that is in those with which I am at all acquainted. I have shewn it
to a few learned and ingenious critics, who have liked it more than I expected,
and have thought the argument drawn from it very convincing. My knowledge of
Greek, as you know, is very scanty indeed, and my reading as confined. The
examples I have given are chiefly from Homer, the only book in the language with which I am even
tolerably acquainted; they are, however, the most material of any. Now, I could
wish for some others from later poets and from the prose writers, or at least
to be assured whether in them there are any applications of the word that
essentially differ from those in Homer. I believe you are
well acquainted with Dr. Burney, with
whom my acquaintance is but slight, and it would be a great piece of service to
me if you could induce him to look over and consider what I have written;
supposing that after you have read it yourself you should think it at all worth
his notice. I feel that I am imposing a heavy task on you, and shall not be
surprized or in the
156 | ROGERS AND HIS CONTEMPORARIES | |
least offended if you should beg to
decline it altogether. Let me hear from you, however, and if you can make up
your mind to receive it, and to read it yourself at least, I will send it you
when I have copied it, for at present I have not a very fair copy. We set out
for Foxley on Monday. I wish there were any chance of seeing you here or there,
and all here most heartily join in the same wish.
‘Most truly yours,
‘I shall not be in any hurry to have the MS.
returned, and it may be sent to Foxley in two or three covers.’
Charles Burney the younger (1757-1817)
Son of the musicologist; after a scandalous youth he became a noted scholar, book
collector, and schoolmaster at Greenwich. His collection of newspapers is now in the
British Library.
George Ellis (1753-1815)
English antiquary and critic, editor of
Specimens of Early English
Poets (1790), friend of Walter Scott.
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
Sir Uvedale Price, first baronet (1747-1829)
Of Foxley in Herefordshire; he was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, and
published
Essay on the Picturesque (1794).