Memoir of John Murray
John Cam Hobhouse to John Murray, 7 December 1817
Venice, December 7th, 1817.
As I find you have been good enough to remember me in sundry
letters to these parts of the world, and as it may be possible that my repeated
acknowledgments may have been, in the press of matter, put off, like Dr. Drowsy’s sermons, to a better
opportunity, I have discovered at last an excuse for writing to you, without
having anything to tell which can interest you, or to be of any other service
than the disburdening of my conscience by duly registering the above thanks for
your attentions. I verily believe
| MR. HOBHOUSE’S TOUR IN ITALY. | 389 |
this place to be the dullest in
Christendom, and yet, from congenial qualities perhaps, I have been here and
about here since last August. The Italian is at no time the gayest of his
species or the most approachable, and although the Venetians, time out of mind,
have been the fondest of strangers of any of their fellow Cis-alpines, yet
their present disasters and the weight of German depression (for it is not
oppression) have made them as little inviting in all senses of the word as can
easily be imagined. I should not presume to say this much if I did more than
copy their own confessions. As for the Austrians, they are amiable nowhere but
at Vienna. Their inaptitude for these latitudes is beyond all expression or
belief. Doubtless Lord B. told you of the order of the Aulic Council for the
Archbishop of Aquileia to go to St. Mark’s in a coach and six; as if the
Lord Mayor were ordered to go to St. James’s Palace in a gondola. The
other day they sank a considerable sum in sinking for a well in one of the
artificial islands here. ’Twas in vain that the Venetians assured them
that springs never had been, were, or would be found in soil made out of
basketfuls of earth thrown upon stakes and pebbles. They delved and dived, and
were not to be persuaded by the salt water spirting in their faces at every
blow. I don’t know that they have abandoned their researches even now.
They bought the great Cornaro palace here the other year for 100,000
francs—about one-tenth of the value—the architecture of Sansovino, and one of the chief ornaments of
the Great Canal. They put a German commissioner and a German stove into their
new purchase, and between one and the other burnt it down.
If any one writes a book of travels without telling the truth
about the masters and the subjects in this most unfortunate country, he
deserves more than damnation and a dull sale, and I trust you will take care he
has a niche—forgive the word—in your temple of infamy, the Quarterly. I
heard that Champion Scott* was
collecting five hundred pounds worth of news for Longman in these parts. If
390 | MEMOIRS OF JOHN MURRAY | |
any but a gentleman and a scholar, and an accomplished man
in every way, presumes to hazard such an undertaking, “be ready,”
Mr. Murray, “with all your
thunderbolts: dash him to pieces!”
I saw this the moment I crossed the Alps, and, in spite of bad
and inveterate habit, shut my journal at once. There is a wide field of glory
open for any and for all answering the above description; but it would perhaps
be almost impossible to find the requisite variety of acquirement and talent in
one individual. The work should be done, like a cyclopede dictionary, by
departments. I don’t mean North and South, East and West, though that is
no bad plan, but by subjects—literature, antiquities, manners, politics,
&c. We have nothing, really nothing, except Mr.
Forsyth’s , which, so far as it goes, is a most extraordinary
performance. I have tried it by the best test—that is, by putting it into
the hands of one or two Italians, who owned, with a sigh, indeed, the unhappy
resemblance.
A word or two on my own movements, because they interest you.
I shall set out with your ‘Childe’ in about three weeks, from Venice, and shall proceed
as fast as bad roads and surly postillions will allow, to Milan, Turin. Lyons,
Paris, Calais, according to the post book, to London.
Your new acquisition is a very fine finish to the three cantos
already published, and, if I may trust to a taste vitiated—I say it
without affectation—by an exclusive attention and attachment to that
school of ancient and obsolete poetry of which your friend Mr. Gifford furnished us with the last
specimen in his ‘Baviad,” it is the best of all his lordship’s
productions. The world will not, to be sure, find that freshness and novelty
which is to be discovered only at the opening of a mine. The metal, whatever
may be its quantity or quality, must in some degree cease to surprise and
delight as it continues to be worked, and nothing more can be hoped than that
it should not become less valuable by being more plentiful. In spite of
similes, however, it is possible that all other readers may agree with my
simple self in liking this fourth
canto better than anything Lord B. has ever written. I must confess
I feel an affection for it more than ordinary, as part of it was begot, as it
were, under my own eyes; for some of the stanzas owe their birth to our morning
| THORWALDSEN’S BUST OF BYRON. | 391 |
walk or evening
ride at La Mara. I shall conclude with telling you about Lord B.’s bust.
It is a masterpiece by Thorwaldsen* who
is thought by most judges to surpass Canova in this branch of sculpture. The likeness is perfect:
the artist worked con amore, and told
me it was the finest head he had ever under his hand. I would have had a wreath
round the brows, but the poet was afraid of being mistaken for a king or a
conqueror, and his pride or modesty made him forbid the band. However, when the
marble comes to England I shall place a golden laurel round it in the ancient
style, and, if it is thought good enough, suffix the following inscription,
which may serve at least to tell the name of the portrait and allude to the
excellence of the artist, which very few lapidary inscriptions do:— “In vain would flattery steal a wreath from fame, And Rome’s best sculptor only half succeed, If England owned no share in Byron’s name Nor hailed the laurel she before decreed.” |
Of course you are very welcome to a copy—I don’t mean of the
verses, but of the bust. But, with the exception of Mr. Kinnaird, who has applied, and Mr. Davies, who may apply, no other will be granted. Farewell,
dear Sir.
Ever yours truly obliged,
Antonio Canova (1757-1822)
Italian neoclassical sculptor who worked at Rome.
Scrope Berdmore Davies (1782-1852)
Byron met his bosom friend while at Cambridge. Davies, a professional gambler, lent Byron
funds to pay for his travels in Greece and Byron acted as second in Davies' duels.
Joseph Forsyth (1763-1815)
Scottish schoolmaster who spent much of the Napoleonic era exiled or imprisoned in
France; he wrote
Remarks on Antiquities, Arts, and Letters, during an
Excursion in Italy (1813).
William Gifford (1756-1826)
Poet, scholar, and editor who began as a shoemaker's apprentice; after Oxford he
published
The Baviad (1794),
The Maeviad
(1795), and
The Satires of Juvenal translated (1802) before becoming
the founding editor of the
Quarterly Review (1809-24).
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).
Thomas Norton Longman (1771-1842)
A leading London publisher whose authors included Southey, Wordsworth, Scott, and
Moore.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
John Scott (1784-1821)
After Marischal College he worked as a journalist with Leigh Hunt, edited
The Champion (1814-1817), and edited the
London
Magazine (1820) until he was killed in the duel at Chalk Farm.
Bertel Thorwaldsen (1770-1844)
Danish sculptor who with Canova led the neoclassical school at Rome.
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine. (1817-1980). Begun as the
Edinburgh Monthly Magazine,
Blackwood's assumed the name of its proprietor, William Blackwood after the sixth
number. Blackwood was the nominal editor until 1834.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.