A Memoir of the Reverend Sydney Smith
Chapter IV
Sydney Smith to Gerrard Andrews, [1806 or 1807]
“The principal objection which your letter con-
74 | MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | |
tained against the permission I requested, is the reluctance
you state yourself to feel to imposing an obligation on your successors. Would
you then object to give me leave to preach during your life, leaving it
entirely open, by such limited concession, to those who succeed you, to
continue or suspend the permission? Let me place myself entirely out of the
question, and put the argument to you:—if any new person whom you may allow to
preach in your parish, is a man very little calculated for such an office, it
is not probable that people will quit the Established places of worship to
resort to him; if he is, it is probable he will draw many to church, who would
not otherwise go, and that the mass of people who attend public worship in that
parish will be materially increased; which, I presume, is a consequence that
every parish minister sincerely wishes for and would make some effort to
obtain. I beg you to reflect, as I said in my last note (which crossed your
letter), that I am not asking you to let me open a place of worship in your
parish,—it is already open,—but I ask you to let me change the absurd and
disgraceful devotion which is going on there at present (and will go on there
still), for the devotion of the Church of England. I ask you to give me the
preference over a low and contemptible fanatic; and will you allow me, without
the slightest intention of offending you, to lay before you the seeming
inconsistency of your answer?
“You say, ‘I allow you have considerable talents
for preaching, I know you have been well educated, I
| MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | 75 |
am
sure you will be of great use, but I give a decided preference over you to
a very foolish and a very ignorant Methodist, whose extravagance is
debauching the minds of the lower class of my parishioners, and whom I
should be heartily glad to see driven out of my parish.’ Excuse
my freedom, but such are inevitably to be the consequences deduced from your
answer.
“I appeal to you again, whether anything can be so
enormous and unjust, as that that privilege should be denied to the ministers
of the Church of England which every man who has folly and presumption enough
to differ from it can immediately enjoy? I hope you will give these
observations some consideration, and, as soon as you have, return me your
answer upon them.
“You observe that what I ask is unnecessary, and that it
is an innovation; but I sincerely hope you would not refuse me so great an
advantage, unless it was pernicious as well as unnecessary; and that if the
plan I suggest is an improvement, you will not reject it merely because it is
an innovation.
“I thank you very kindly for all the good you say of me:
I will endeavour to deserve it.
“I am, my dear Sir, truly yours,
“Sydney Smith.”