A Memoir of the Reverend Sydney Smith
Letters 1804
9.] To Francis Jeffrey, Esq.
London, 1804.
My dear Jeffrey,
I can hardly believe my own eyes when they inform me that I
am up, dressed, and writing by eight o’clock in the morning; and as there
is nobody near by whose
* The loss of her infant son. |
| MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | 11 |
perceptions I can rectify my own, the fact will probably
be undecided through the whole of my letter. To put the question to an
intellectual test, I have tried an act of memory, and endeavoured to form a
distinct image of the editor of the
Edinburgh Review; but he appears to me of a stature so incredibly
small, that I cannot venture to say I am awake, and my mind in a healthy and
vigorous state: however, you must take me as you find me. Talking of the Edinburgh Review, I hardly think the
article on Dumont is much liked by those
whose praise I should be most desirous you should obtain; though it conciliates
the favour of men who are always ready to join in a declaration of war against
all works of speculation and philosophical enterprise; but when I speak in
dispraise of this article, I only contrast it with what you have done better;
for, in spite of its errors (if any such there be), it would make the fortune
of anybody else.
I certainly, my dear Jeffrey, in conjunction with the Knight of the Shaggy Eyebrows,* do protest against your
increasing and unprofitable scepticism. I exhort you to restrain the violent
tendency of your nature for analysis, and to cultivate synthetical
propensities. What is virtue? What’s the use of truth? What’s the
use of honour? What’s a guinea but a d—d yellow circle? The whole effort
of your mind is to destroy. Because others build slightly and eagerly, you
employ yourself in kicking down their houses, and contract a sort of aversion
for the more honourable, useful, and difficult task of building well yourself.
I think you ought to know Horner too well by this time to expect his article on Malthus before you see it.
12 |
MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. |
|
The satire against me I have not yet read. One of the
charges against me is, I understand, that I am ugly; but this is a mere
falsehood, and a plain proof that the gentleman never can have seen me. I
certainly am the best-looking man concerned with the Review, and this John Murray* has been heard to say behind my
back. Pray tell the said J. Murray that three ladies,
apparently much agitated, have been here to inquire his direction, calling him
a base, perfidious young man.
I am extremely sorry for poor Alison: he is a man of great delicacy, and will be hurt by the
attack of this scoundrel. Dumont is
certainly displeased with the Review. Most sincerely and affectionately yours,
10.] To Francis Jeffrey, Esq.
* * * * *
—— —— is here, and will certainly settle in Scotland next
winter. She is, for a woman, well-informed and very liberal: neither is she at
all disagreeable; but the information of very plain women is so inconsiderable,
that I agree with you in setting no very great store by it. I am no great
physiognomist, nor have I much confidence in a science which pretends to
discover the inside from the out; but where I have seen fine eyes, a beautiful
complexion, grace and symmetry, in women, I have generally thought them
ama-
* Now a Lord of Session, and one of the few early and
faithful friends of Sydney Smith
still surviving.—Ed. |
| MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | 13 |
zingly well-informed and extremely philosophical. In
contrary instances, seldom or ever. Is there any accounting for this?
John Playfair dined here yesterday, and
met Whishaw. We had a pleasant day,—at
least I had.
If I can meet with any one who I think will do for the
Review, I will certainly stimulate him. Such a man is Malthus,—but you have many workmen of that
stamp.
Tell Jus Thompson
that Miss Fox thinks his review of Darwin one of the
most sensible in the whole book. Exhort him also never to forget the battle of
Galen’s head, and that I shared
with him the danger. God bless you, dear Jeffrey!
Archibald Alison (1757-1839)
Scottish Episcopal clergyman and author of
Essays on the Nature and
Principles of Taste (1790).
Étienne-Pierre-Louis Dumont (1759-1829)
Jeremy Bentham's Swiss translator, associated with the Holland House circle; Thomas Moore
and John Russell spent the day with him 23 September 1819, on their way to Venice.
Hon. Caroline Fox (1767-1845)
The daughter of Stephen Fox, second Baron Holland of Foxley and niece of Charles James
Fox. Jeremy Bentham was among her admirers.
Galen (129-199 c.)
Greek physician who systematized the study of medical science.
Francis Horner (1778-1817)
Scottish barrister and frequent contributor to the
Edinburgh
Review; he was a Whig MP and member of the Holland House circle.
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834)
English political economist educated at Jesus College, Cambridge; he was author of
An Essay on the Principles of Population (1798; 1803).
John Playfair (1748-1819)
Professor of Mathematics at Edinburgh University and Whig man of letters who contributed
to the
Edinburgh Review.
Sydney Smith (1771-1845)
Clergyman, wit, and one of the original projectors of the
Edinburgh
Review; afterwards lecturer in London and one of the Holland House
denizens.
Thomas Thomson (1768-1852)
Scottish lawyer and man of letters; he was one of the projectors of the
Edinburgh Review and succeeded Sir Walter Scott as president of the Bannatyne
Club (1832-52).
Thomas Thomson (1773-1852)
Friend of James Mill and professor of chemistry at the University of Glasgow; he
contributed to the
Quarterly Review.
John Whishaw (1764 c.-1840)
Barrister, educated at Trinity College, Cambridge; he was Secretary to the African
Association and biographer of Mungo Park. His correspondence was published as
The “Pope” of Holland House in 1906.