A Memoir of the Reverend Sydney Smith
Letters 1813
Sydney Smith to Francis Jeffrey, [April 1810]
Heslington. No date: supposed about 1813.
My dear Jeffrey,
It is with great concern that I hear of your illness, and
should be much obliged to you, if you have leisure, to write me a line to say
how you are. I need not say how very happy we should be to see you here; and I
wish you seriously to consider whether some time passed in the country will not
tend more than anything else to establish your health. I know it is the season
of law business, but Editoris salus, suprema
lex.
I have been passing some weeks of dissipation in London;
and was transformed by Circe’s cup,
not
| MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | 107 |
into a brute, but a beau. I am now eating the herb
moly in the country. Near as the time approaches to the Review, I should not have been an idle
contributor, but that I am forced to do many things for my brother Cecil, who has come from India in consequence
of a quarrel with Sir G. Barlow, and who
has much to arrange and settle with respect to the state of affairs there, and
of Indian intrigues here. If I send you one or two light and insignificant
articles, it will be all that I can possibly contribute. Do you mean to send me
the lucubrations of Playfair and
Knight touching Mr. Copplestone?
I am sure you will excuse me for saying that I was struck
with nothing in your ‘State of Parties’ but its extreme temerity, and with the
incorrectness of its statements. I was not struck with the good writing,
because in you that is a matter of course; but I believe there never was so
wrong an exposition of the political state of any country: to say we are
approximating towards it, may be true; and so is a child just born
approximating to old-age. I believe you take your notions of the state of
opinion in Britain, from the state of opinion among the commercial and
manufacturing population of your own country; overlooking the great mass of
English landed proprietors, who, leaning always a little towards the Crown,
would still rally round the Constitution and moderate principles, whenever the
state of affairs came to be such as to make their interference necessary. If
this notion of your review were merely my own, I should send it with more of
apology, but it is that of the most sensible men I have met.
And why do you not scout more that pernicious
108 | MEMOIR OF THE REV. SYDNEY SMITH. | |
cant, that all men are equal? As politicians, they do not
differ, as Locke thinks they do; but
they differ enough to make you and all worthy men sincerely wish for the
elevation of the one, and the rejection of the other.
God bless you, my dear Jeffrey! Get well; come here to do so. Accept my best wishes,
and believe me affectionately yours,
Edward Copleston, bishop of Llandaff (1776-1849)
Educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was a fellow of Oriel, Oxford Professor of
Poetry (1802-12), dean of St. Paul's (1827-1849), and bishop of Llandaff (1827-49); he
published
Three Replies to the Calumnies of the Edinburgh Review
(1810-11).
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
Richard Payne Knight (1751-1824)
MP and writer on taste; in 1786 he published
An Account of the Remains
of the Worship of Priapus for the Society of Dilettanti; he was author of
The Landscape: a Didactic Poem (1794),
An
Analytical Inquiry into the Principles of Taste (1805) and other works.
John Locke (1632-1704)
English philosopher; author of
Essay concerning Human
Understanding (1690) and
Some Thoughts Concerning Education
(1695).
John Playfair (1748-1819)
Professor of Mathematics at Edinburgh University and Whig man of letters who contributed
to the
Edinburgh Review.
Cecil Smith (1772-1813)
The younger brother of Sydney Smith; educated at Eton College, he served in the Madras
Civil Service, 1789-1813.