The Creevey Papers
Thomas Creevey to James Currie, 8 November 1802
“Great Cumberland Place, 8th Nov., 1802.
“. . The Grenvilles are in great spirits; the Morning Post, and Morning
Chronicle too, are strongly suspected of being in their pay,
and to-day it is said Tom Grenville is
to be started as Speaker against Abbott.
Great are the speculations about Pitt: it
is asserted that he is fonder of his relations [the
Grenvilles] than the Doctor,* but I hear of no authority for this opinion. I, for
one, if they try their strength in the choice of a Speaker, tho’ I detest
Abbott, will vote for him or anybody else supported by
Addington, in opposition to a
Grenville or a Pittite. I am affraid of this damned
Addington being bullied out of his pacific
disposition. He will be most cursedly run at, and he has neither talents to
command open coadjutors, nor sufficient skill in intriguing to acquire private
ones. Still I think we cannot surely be pushed again into the field of battle.
“Now for France—all the world has been there,
and various is the information imported from thence.
* The Right Hon. Henry
Addington, created Viscount
Sidmouth in 1805. He was nicknamed “the
Doctor” because his father was a physician. |
1793-1804.] | PARIS UNDER THE CONSULATE. | 5 |
Whishaw was my first historian, and I
think the worst. He was at Paris only a fortnight, but he travelled through
France. I apprehend, either from a scanty supply of the language or of proper
introductions, he has been merely a stage coach traveller. He has seen soldiers
in every part of his tour, and superintending every department of the
Government . . . and has returned quite scared out of his wits at the dreadful
power and villainy of the French Government. . . . Romilly* is my next relator, and much more amusing. His private
friends were the Liancourts, de la Rochefoucaults,
&c., and he dined at different times with Talleyrand, Berthier,
and all the other Ministers at their houses. Ministers, however, and statesmen
are alike in all countries; they alone are precluded from telling you anything
about the country in whose service they are, and emigrants are too insecure to
indulge any freedom in conversation. Romilly’s
account, therefore, as one might suppose, makes his society of Paris the most
gloomy possible. He says at Talleyrand’s table,
where you have such magnificence as was never seen before in France, the Master
of the House, who as an exile in England without a guinea was the pleasantest
of Men, in France and in the midst of his prosperity sits the most melancholy
picture apparently of sorrow and despair. Romilly sat next
to Fox at
Talleyrand’s dinner, and had all his
conversation to himself; but not a word of public affairs—all
vertu and French belles lettres.
Romilly would not grace the court of Buonaparte, but left Paris with as much
detestation of him and his Government as Whishaw, and with
much more reason.
“But the great lion of all upon the subject of Paris
is Mackintosh.† He has really seen
most entertaining things and people. He, too, dined with Ministers, and has
held a long consultation with the Consul‡
* Samuel Romilly,
K.C., entered Parliament in 1806, appointed
Solicitor-General, and was knighted. An ardent Reformer, and father of
the first Lord Romilly, he committed suicide in 1818. † Sir James
Mackintosh [1765-1832], barrister, philosopher, and
politician. ‡ Bonaparte.
|
6 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. I. |
upon the Norman and English laws; but his means of living
with the active people of France has far exceeded that of any other English. I
think his most valuable acquaintance must have been Madame de Souza. She is a Frenchwoman, was a widow, and is now
the wife of the Portuguese ambassador. She is the friend and companion and
confidante of Madame Buonaparte, and
satisfied all Mackintosh’s enquiries respecting her
friend and her husband the Consul. Her history to
Mackintosh (confirmed by Madame
Cabarenne, late Madame
Tallien) of Madame Buonaparte and her
husband is this.—Madame Buonaparte is a woman nearly
fifty, of singular good temper, and without a little of intrigue. She is a
Creole, and has large West India possessions. On these last accounts it was
that she was married by the Viscount
Beauharnois—a lively nobleman about the old Court; and
both in his life and since his death his wife remained a great favorite in
Paris.
“Immediately previous to the directorial power being
established in 1795, the Sections all rose upon the Convention or Assembly,
whatever it was, in consequence of an odious vote or decree they had made. At
this period, no general would incur the risque of an unsuccessful attack upon
the Sections; Buonaparte alone, who was
known only from having served at the siege of Toulon, being then in Paris, said
if any General would lend him a coat, he would fight the Sections. He put his
coat on; he peppered the Sections with grape shot; the establishment of the
Directory was the consequence to them, and to him in return they gave the
command of the army of Italy.* He became, therefore, the fashion, and was asked
to meet good company, and he was asked to Tallien’s to put him next the widow Beauharnois, that he might vex Hoche, who was then after her and her fortune.
Madame Tallien did so, and the new
lovers were
* Napoleon’s
own report upon the suppression of the Sections places the
responsibility of the act upon Barras, who employed him merely as a good artillery
officer. Before being appointed to the command of the army in Italy, in
1796, Bonaparte was rewarded, in 1795, for his
action against the Sections by succeeding Barras
in command of the army of the Interior. |
1793-1804.] | ACTORS IN THE REVOLUTION. | 7 |
married in ten days. She never
was Barras’ mistress;
Madame Cabarenne (Tallien that
was) told Mackintosh that was calumny,
for that she herself was his mistress at that very time.* Madame de Souza says no one but
Madame Buonaparte could live with the Consul; he is
subject to fits of passion, bordering upon derangement, and upon the appearance
of one of these distempered freaks of his, he is left by all about him to his
fate and to the effects of time. It is a service of great danger, even in his
milder moments, to propose anything to him, and it is from his wife’s
forbearance in both ways that she can possibly contrive to have the respect she
meets with from him.
“Every wreck of the different parties in France for
the last ten years that is now to be found in Paris, Mackintosh met and lived familiarly
with—La Fayette, [illegible],
Jean Bon Saint-Andre, Barthelemy, Camille Jourdan, Abbé Morelaix, Fouche, Boissy
Danglas, &c., &c. Tallien† no one visits of his countrymen; his
conversations with Mackintosh, if one had not his authority, surpass belief.
His only lamentation over the revolution was its want of success, and that it
should be on account of only half measures having been adopted. He almost shed
tears at the mention of Danton, whom he styled bon enfant, and as a man of
great promise.
“Mackintosh
dined at Barthelemy’s the banker—the brother
of the ex-director—with a pleasant
party. The ex-director was there, and next to him sat Fouché—now a senator—but who
formerly, as Minister of Police, actually deported the ex-director to Cayenne.
There was likewise a person there who told M. he had seen
Fouché ride full gallop to preside at some celebrated
massacre, with a pair of human ears stuck one on each side of his hat.‡
The conversation of
* The beautiful Madame de
Tallien, previously Comtesse de Fontenay, was as fickle
as she was frail, for she was also the mistress of the rich banker
Ouvrard. Tallien obtained a divorce in 1802,
and she married the Prince de
Chimay. † Jean Lambert
Tallien, one of the chief organisers and bloodiest
agents of the Terror, leader in the overthrow of Robespierre. ‡ Joseph
Fouché, afterwards Duc
d’Otranto, had as yet but accomplished half his
cycle of cynical tergiversation, which brought him to |
8 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. I. |
this notable assembly was as charming as the performers
themselves; it turned principally upon the blessings of peace and humanity,
“All the others whom I have mentioned above have no
connection with Fouché or Tallien, and are reasonable men, perfectly
unrestrained in their conversation, quite anti-Buonapartian, and as much
devoted to England. To such men Fox has
given great surprise by his conversation, as he has given offence to his
friends here. He talks publicly of Liberty being asleep in France, but dead in
England. He will be attacked in the House of Commons certainly, and I think
will find it difficult to justify himself. He has been damned imprudent.”
Charles Abbot, first baron Colchester (1757-1829)
Educated at Westminster and Christ Church, Oxford, he was Tory MP for Helston in Cornwall
(1795) and Speaker of the House of Commons (1802-16).
Charles James Fox (1749-1806)
Whig statesman and the leader of the Whig opposition in Parliament after his falling-out
with Edmund Burke.
Thomas Grenville (1755-1846)
The third son of George Grenville; he was a Whig MP and follower of Charles James Fox who
was first lord of the Admiralty (1806-07) and bequeathed a collection of 20,000 volumes to
the British Library.
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
Lazare Hoche (1768-1797)
French general responsible for pacifying the Vendée (1794-96) and planning an invasion of
Ireland (1796).
Camille Jordan (1771-1821)
French royalist politician who objected to Napoleon in
Vrai sens du
vote national pour le consulat à vie (1802).
Empress Joséphine (1763-1814)
Consort of Napoleon, whom she married in 1796 after her first husband was guillotined;
she was divorced in 1809.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Gabriel-Julien Ouvrard (1770-1846)
French financier and regent of the Bank of France who had a son by Madame Tallien and
died impoverished in England.
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
Sir Samuel Romilly (1757-1818)
Reformer of the penal code and the author of
Thoughts on Executive
Justice (1786); he was a Whig MP and Solicitor-General who died a suicide.
Jean-Bon Saint-André (1749-1813)
French Jacobin politician; he was he was president of the Convention and a member of the
Committee of Public Safety (1793).
Jean-Lambert Tallien (1767-1820)
French journalist and Jacobin politician; he survived the Terror only to lose influence
under Napoleon and, separated from his famous wife Madame Cabarrus, spent his later years
in poverty.
John Whishaw (1764 c.-1840)
Barrister, educated at Trinity College, Cambridge; he was Secretary to the African
Association and biographer of Mungo Park. His correspondence was published as
The “Pope” of Holland House in 1906.
Morning Chronicle. (1769-1862). James Perry was proprietor of this London daily newspaper from 1789-1821; among its many
notable poetical contributors were Coleridge, Southey, Lamb, Rogers, and Campbell.
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.