The Creevey Papers
Henry Brougham to Thomas Creevey, 14 January 1816
“Temple, Jany. 14, 1816.
“. . . You naturally must be desirous of learning
what appearances there are of work for the session. I augur very well. Whether
Snoutch* comes over or not, I can’t tell; but in
the event of his not coming, I have communicated to Grey the wishes of many of the party including the
Mountain,† that Lord G. Cavendish
should be our nominal leader, with something like a house opened to harbour the
party in. In fact, a house of rendezvous is more wanted than a leader. But if
Snoutch comes, indeed whether he does or not, our
merry men are on the alert, and we shall see that no half measures prevail. I
really wd. fain hope that Tierney and
Abercromby at length will see the folly
of their temporising plans, and will act always and systematically as they did
during part of last session. But nothing must be left to chance, and
248 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch XI. |
—‘speaking as an humble
individual’*—I am quite determined (tho’ ready to meet them
half way for peace and union sake) that the game of the country and the people
shall be played in good earnest—if not with their help, without
it—by God’s blessing.
“The plan of campaign which presents itself to me on
a review of the state of affairs and the temper of men’s minds is of this
description. As to foreign affairs—to act as a corps of observation and
take advantage of all openings, not very much courting debates on those matters
which the country never feels at all, and on which recent events tend greatly
to discredit the Opposition; but ready always to expose the enemy’s
blunders. E.g., the d——d absurd plan of the
peace, which sows the seeds of war broadcast—the systematic plans of
interference, &c. Above all, the grievous proceedings of our Ferdinand† agt. the very allies we had
fought with in his behalf. . . . As to home politics—here we should make
our main stand; and the ground is clearly Retrenchment—in all ways, with
ramifications into the Royal family, property tax, jobs of all sorts,
distresses of the landed interest, &c. In short, it is the richest mine in
the world. A text has been put forth in the Edinr.
Review, to which I refer you. . . . Last of all, but not least, the
proposal of measures and inquiries unconnected with ordinary party topics,
whereby much immediate real good is done to the country, and great credit
gained by the party, as well as, ultimately, a check secured to the Crown and
to abuses generally. For example—prison reform—education of the
poor—tithes—above all the Press, with which last I think of leading
off immediately, having long matured my plan. . . . It embraces the whole
subject—of allowing the truth to be given in evidence—limiting the
ex officio powers, both by
filing informations and other privileges possessed by the Crown, and abolishing
special juries in cases of libel, or rather misdemeanour generally. . . . But
the material point is—won’t you come over to our assistance? You
are more wanted than my regard
* A sarcastic allusion to Tierney’s style in speaking. † King Ferdinand
VII., who was availing himself of his restoration to the
throne of Spain to indulge in harsh and tyrannical despotism. |
1815-16.] | BROUGHAM STARTLES HIS FRIENDS. | 249 |
for your modesty will
allow me to say. Really you must come. . . . There are many uncomfortable
things, beside the dreadful one of our irreparable loss of poor
Sam [Whitbread]—now to be really felt.
Nothing, for instance, can be more unpropitious than the plan of carrying on
the party by a coterie at Lady
Holland’s elbow, which cannot be submitted to for a
moment, even, I shd. think, by those who belong to her coterie; at least I know
no one but the Coles, Horner* and the
Pope† (who are of her household) who can bear it. Do,
then, let us hear that you mean to come over. . . .”
James Abercromby, first baron Dunfermline (1776-1858)
The son of Lt.-Gen Sir Ralph Abercromby; he was MP for Midhurst (1807), Calne (1812-30)
and Edinburgh (1832), judge-advocate general (1827) and speaker of the House of Commons
(1835-39); he was raised to the peerage in 1839.
George Cavendish, first earl of Burlington (1754-1834)
The son of William Cavendish, fourth Duke of Devonshire; he was a Whig MP for
Knaresborough (1775-80), Derby borough (1780-97), and Derbyshire (1797-1831); he was raised
to the peerage in 1831.
King Ferdinand VII of Spain (1784-1833)
The son of Charles IV, king of Spain; after his father's abdication and the defeat of the
French in the Peninsular War he ruled Spain from 1813 to 1833.
Elizabeth Fox, Lady Holland [née Vassall] (1771 c.-1845)
In 1797 married Henry Richard Fox, Lord Holland, following her divorce from Sir Godfrey
Webster; as mistress of Holland House she became a pillar of Whig society.
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
Francis Horner (1778-1817)
Scottish barrister and frequent contributor to the
Edinburgh
Review; he was a Whig MP and member of the Holland House circle.
George Tierney (1761-1830)
Whig MP and opposition leader whose political pragmatism made him suspect in the eyes of
his party; he fought a bloodless duel with Pitt in 1798. He is the “Friend of Humanity” in
Canning and Frere's “The Needy Knife-Grinder.”
John Whishaw (1764 c.-1840)
Barrister, educated at Trinity College, Cambridge; he was Secretary to the African
Association and biographer of Mungo Park. His correspondence was published as
The “Pope” of Holland House in 1906.
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.