LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

The Creevey Papers
Thomas Creevey to Elizabeth Ord, 1 September 1820
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Introduction
Vol. I. Contents
Ch. I: 1793-1804
Ch. II: 1805
Ch. III: 1805
Ch. IV: 1806-08
Ch. V: 1809
Ch. VI: 1810
Ch. VII: 1811
Ch. VIII: 1812
Ch. IX: 1813-14
Ch X: 1814-15
Ch XI: 1815-16
Ch XII: 1817-18
Ch XIII: 1819-20
Vol. II. Contents
Ch I: 1821
Ch. II: 1822
Ch. III: 1823-24
Ch. IV: 1825-26
Ch. V: 1827
Ch. VI: 1827-28
Ch. VII: 1828
Ch. VIII: 1829
Ch. IX: 1830-31
Ch. X: 1832-33
Ch. XI: 1833
Ch. XII: 1834
Ch XIII: 1835-36
Ch XIV: 1837-38
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
“House of Lords, 2 o’clock, 1st Sept., 1820.

The chienne Demont† turns out everything one could wish on her cross-examination. Her letters have been produced written to her sister living still in the Queen’s service. . . . They contain every kind of panegyric upon the Queen, and she often writes of a journal or diary she has kept of everything that has occurred during the whole of her service and travels

* George IV. was hereditary sovereign of Hanover as well as of Great Britain and Ireland.

† Former femme-de-chambre to the Princess of Wales (Queen Caroline), an important witness for the prosecution.

1819-20.]LOUISE DEMONT.315
with the Queen; the object of such journal being, as she says, to do the Queen justice, and to show how she was received, applauded, cherished, wherever she went. At length she writes—‘Judge of my astonishment at an event that happened to me the other day. A person called upon me at Lausanne, and said he wished to speak to me alone. I brought him up into my chamber: he gave me a letter: I broke the seal. It was a request that I would come immediately to England under the pretext of being a governess: that I should have the first protection: that it would make my fortune. True it is, there was no signature to the letter, but as a proof of its validity I had an immediate credit given me on a banker.’ The
Attorney-General here objected to this evidence. . . .”

“½ past 3.

“The House put a question to the Judges whether these letters could be read in evidence, and they decided they could not unless Demont admitted them to be her handwriting. They have just been put into her hands, and she has admitted them all to be hers. . . .”

“5 o’clock.

“Adjourned . . . a most infernally damaging day for the prosecution. . . .”