The Creevey Papers
Thomas Creevey to Eleanor Creevey, 2 February 1811
“Great George St., Saty., Feby. 2nd, 1811.
“I came home at half-past four that I might have time
to write to you, and Whishaw came
instantly after and has staid with me till five. . . . I went to dine at
Hutchinson’s and after all he
never came. He was kept at Carlton House till twelve at night, so Lord Donoughmore and I dined together, and he
was, as he always is, very pleasant. At Brooks’s I found Sheridan just arrived from Carlton House,
where the conclave has just broken up, and the Prince had decided against the pressing advice of all present
not to dismiss the Government. Sheridan was just sober,
and expressed to me the strongest opinion of the injurious tendency of this
resolution to the Prince’s character. Lord
Hutchinson said the same thing to me to-day, and added that
never man had behaved better than Sheridan. I said all I
thought to both Hutchinson and
Sheridan in vindication of
Prinny, but I presume I am wrong, as I stand single in
this opinion. I went, however, to Mrs.
Fitzherbert at twelve to-day, an appointment I made with her
yesterday in the street, and she and I were agreed upon this subject. The
Prince has written to Perceval a letter
which is to be sent to-morrow, stating to him his intention, under
1811.] | WHITBREAD’S PROPOSALS. | 139 |
the present opinion of
the physicians respecting his father, not to change the Government at present,
and at the same time expressing the regret he feels at being thus compelled to
continue a Government not possessing his confidence, and his determination of
changing it should there be no speedy prospect of his Majesty’s recovery
after a certain time.
“Now I do not see, under all the monstrous
difficulties of his situation, any great impropriety of his present resolution,
particularly as he means to have his letter made publick.
“Mrs. Fitz is
evidently delighted at the length and forgiving and confidential nature of
Prinny’s visits. She goes
to-morrow and will tell you, no doubt, how poor Prinny was
foolish enough to listen to some idle story of my having abused his letter to
both Houses, and how she defended me. Poor fellow, one should have thought he
had more important concerns to think of. I went from her to Whitbread, and he again conjured me to attach
myself to the new Government by taking some situation, and went over
many—the Admiralty Board again—Chairman of the Ways and Means,
&c. I was very guarded, and held myself very much up, and said I would take
nothing for which there was not service to be done—nothing like a
sinecure, which I considered a seat at the Admiralty Board to be; but of course
I was very good-humoured. He repeated the conversation between him and
Lord Grey about me. He said my name was
first mentioned by Miss Whitbread, and,
having been so, Lord Grey replied—‘Although
I think Creevey has acted unjustly
to me, and tho’ in the session before last he gave great offence to
many of my friends by something like a violation of confidence, yet on his
own account, on that of Mrs. Creevey
and of anybody connected with them, I had always intended, without you
mentioning him, to express my wishes that he might be included in the
Government.’ Upon which Whitbread stated
from his own recollection of my speech that gave offence, his perfect
conviction of its being no breach of confidence; and so the thing ended with
their united sentiment in favor of my having some office.
“I am affraid you will be hurt at not seeing any
immediate provision for me in this new Government,
140 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VII. |
should
it take place; but I beg you to give way to no such sentiment. . . . They are
upon a new tack in consulting publick opinion. Lord Grey and Lord Grenville have most unequivocally refused to accede to a
proposal of the Prince of Wales, and which
was stated to be nearest to his heart, viz. to reinstate the Duke of York as Commander-in-chief. What think you
of this in Grey? and his language to Whitbread is they must no longer be taunted
with ‘unredeemed pledges.’ I mention these things to shew you they
are on their good behaviour, and that, with such views, they must do what they
ought by me. I am perfectly satisfied with the state of things—this is,
supposing a Government to be formed—and perfectly secure of any wishes of
mine being accomplished.”
Eleanor Creevey [née Branding] (d. 1818)
The daughter of Charles Branding (1733-1802); in 1779 she married William Ord (d. 1789)
and in 1802, the politician and diarist Thomas Creevey.
Thomas Creevey (1768-1838)
Whig politician aligned with Charles James Fox and Henry Brougham; he was MP for Thetford
(1802-06, 1807-18) Appleby (1820-26) and Downton (1831-32). He was convicted of libel in
1813.
Maria Anne Fitzherbert [née Smythe] (1756-1837)
The consort of the Prince of Wales whom she married in 1785 as her third husband; the
marriage was regarded as illegitimate since she was a Catholic.
Frederick Augustus, Duke of York (1763-1827)
He was commander-in-chief of the Army, 1798-1809, until his removal on account of the
scandal involving his mistress Mary Anne Clarke.
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
Richard Brinsley Sheridan (1751-1816)
Anglo-Irish playwright, author of
The School for Scandal (1777),
Whig MP and ally of Charles James Fox (1780-1812).
Elizabeth Waldegrave [née Whitbread] (1791-1843)
The daughter of Samuel Whitbread; in 1812 she married Vice-Admiral William Waldegrave,
who in 1846 would become the eighth earl of Waldegrave.
John Whishaw (1764 c.-1840)
Barrister, educated at Trinity College, Cambridge; he was Secretary to the African
Association and biographer of Mungo Park. His correspondence was published as
The “Pope” of Holland House in 1906.
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.