The Creevey Papers
Thomas Creevey to Eleanor Creevey, 1 February 1811
“Great George St., 1st Feby., 1811.
“I was very much provoked at being detained so long on
the road yesterday that I was just too late for the last Bill, so I eat my
mutton chops and drunk a bottle of wine, and then tea, and then sallied forth
to Mrs. Taylor’s; but alas, she
was dining out, so on I went to Brooks’s, where I found Mr. Ponsonby and others; and then came
Whitbread, Sheridan, and Lord
Hutchinson, the latter of whom insisted upon my coming to dine
with him tête-à-tête to-day, as he
had so much to say to me. He had been dining yesterday with the Prince, and was to be with him again this morning.
You may suppose I intend accepting his invitation; for to-day
Whitbread was deeply involved in private conversation
with these gentry; but, before he left the room, he came up to the table where
I was, and said—‘Creevey,
call upon me to-morrow at twelve if it is not inconvenient to
you;’ and, having left the room, Ward, who was there, said—‘There! Mr.
Under-Secretary, you are to be tried as to what kind of a hand you write,
&c., &c., before you are hired;’ and then we walked home
together, and he told me he had
142 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VII. |
been offered to be a Paymaster of the Forces, and that he
had refused it, and that he was sure this notice of
Whitbread was to offer me an under-secretaryship in
his office. I went accordingly to Sam this morning, but
quite armed, I am certain, against all disappointment, and with all the air of
an independent man. He began by giving me his opinion that the Prince would not
change the Government, and that he was playing a false, hollow, shabby game. He
said the Queen had written him a letter
evidently dictated by Perceval, [illegible] most cursedly, and that he had been quite
taken in by it. He expressed himself strongly of opinion that he [the Prince]
ought instantly to change the Government; that after all that had passed
between him, the Prince and Lords Grenville
and Grey, it would be a breach of honour not
to overthrow the ministers instantly. I confess I was more penetrated, upon
this part of the conversation, with Sam’s anxiety to
be in office than I was with the weight of his arguments against the Prince. At
the same time, it is due to him to add that Sheridan and
Lord Hutchinson insist openly that the Prince, in
justice to his character, is bound to make this change; and again, there
certainly is nothing to make the Prince expect any rapid amendment of the
King. . . . Well, this opinion of
Whitbread being advanced and maintained by him as
aforesaid, he proceeded to say that, in the event of the change taking place,
he was very anxious to know from myself what I should look to—that he and
Lord Grey had talked over the subject
together—that the latter had spoken of me very handsomely, and said that,
tho’ I had in the session before last, fired into the old Government in a
manner that had given great offence to several persons, yet that he was very
desirous I should form part of the new Government.
Whitbread added his own opinion that it was of great
importance I should be in the Government, and then added—‘The
worst of it is there are so few places suited to you that are consistent
with a seat in Parliament; but what is there you should think of
yourself?’ So I replied that was rather a hard question to
answer; that though I was a little man compared to him in the country, yet that
the preservation of my own character and consistency was the first object with
me; that I 1811.] | CREEVEY’S CONDITIONS. | 143 |
could go as a
principal into no office—that was out of the question—and I would
not go into any office as a subaltern, where the character of the principal did
not furnish a sufficient apology for my serving under him; that with these
views I certainly had looked to going with him into any office he might have
allotted to him. He said such had always been his wish, and then
said—‘You know by the Act of Parliament that created the
third Secretary of State, viz., that for the Colonies, neither of the
Under-Secretaries of State can sit in Parliament, and that was what I meant
when I said there were so few places consistent with a seat in
Parliament.’ He said Grey and he had taken
for granted I would not go back to my old place, or a seat at that board, after
firing as I had done into the East I. Company; to which I replied they were
quite right, and I added that, whenever I might be in office or out, I reserved
to myself the right of the free exercise of my opinion upon all Indian
subjects. He then said, with some humility, would I take a seat at the
Admiralty Board; that Lord Holland would be
there, and that he, of course, would have every disposition to consult my
feelings. I said my first inclination was certainly against it; at the same
time, I begged nothing might be done to prevent Lord
Holland making an offer of any kind to me; that he was a person
I looked up to greatly on his own account, as well as his uncle’s;* that in all my licentiousness in
Parliament I had never profaned his uncle’s memory; it had been
exclusively directed against his enemies; that I would take a thing from
Lord Holland that nothing should induce me to do from
any Grenvilles; at the same time, I was giving no opinion
further than this, that I begged Whitbread not to prevent
Lord Holland from making me an offer—let it be
what it may. . . .”
Queen Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (1768-1821)
Married the Prince of Wales in 1795 and separated in 1796; her husband instituted
unsuccessful divorce proceedings in 1820 when she refused to surrender her rights as
queen.
Thomas Creevey (1768-1838)
Whig politician aligned with Charles James Fox and Henry Brougham; he was MP for Thetford
(1802-06, 1807-18) Appleby (1820-26) and Downton (1831-32). He was convicted of libel in
1813.
Charles James Fox (1749-1806)
Whig statesman and the leader of the Whig opposition in Parliament after his falling-out
with Edmund Burke.
Henry Richard Fox, third baron Holland (1773-1840)
Whig politician and literary patron; Holland House was for many years the meeting place
for reform-minded politicians and writers. He also published translations from the Spanish
and Italian;
Memoirs of the Whig Party was published in 1852.
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
George Ponsonby (1755-1817)
The son of John Ponsonby (d. 1787); he was speaker of the Irish House of Commons, lord
chancellor of Ireland in the Fox-Grenville ministry (1806) and succeeded Lord Grey as
leader of the Whigs in the British House of Commons.
Richard Brinsley Sheridan (1751-1816)
Anglo-Irish playwright, author of
The School for Scandal (1777),
Whig MP and ally of Charles James Fox (1780-1812).
Frances Ann Taylor [née Vane] (d. 1835)
Whig hostess, the daughter of Sir Henry Vane, first baronet (1729–1794); in 1789 she
married the politician Michael Angelo Taylor.
John William Ward, earl of Dudley (1781-1833)
The son of William Ward, third Viscount Dudley (d. 1823); educated at Edinburgh and
Oxford, he was an English MP, sometimes a Foxite Whig and sometimes Canningite Tory, who
suffered from insanity in his latter years.
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.