The Creevey Papers
Henry Brougham to Thomas Creevey, [January] 1828
“[January] 1828.
“. . . Don’t be alarmed, but endeavour to
receive with equanimity, and if possible with fortitude, the painful
intelligence that your beloved Sovereign has
been most dangerously ill, and is still in a very precarious state. He lost in
all 120 ounces of the blood-Royal in the course of about ten days. The
complaint was inflammation, I suppose of the bladder, for they say it was owing
to some illness of the prostate gland. I am told he is very far indeed from
rallying as he used to do when bled formerly, and that all the loyal subjects
near his person are in much consternation.
“The Parlt. is likely to open in a very
‘unsatisfactory’ state—as our friend Castlereagh (God rest his soul) was wont to say. The chief
‘feature’—I mean Peel—will find it quite impossible to calculate on a majority
on any one question, except perhaps a motion for turning them out or reforming
the Parlt.; and how
1827-28.] | GENERAL DISTRESS IN THE COUNTRY. | 147 |
he is even to get thro’ the forms of a debate, if he is opposed by all
the parties not in office, seems inconceivable, for even Vesey is not there, being laid on the shelf for
some months. The Ultras are in great force, and the
Huskissons full of faction. As a proof of the kind of
steps the Tories are taking, I may say that your friend Lord Lonsdale has, in a letter which I have a
copy of, been encouraging the Cumberland county meeting, advising them to lay
the state of distress before Parlt., because the
Beau desires it; and adding that they should not point out any
remedies, but only ascribe it to the burthens upon agricultural produce and the
reduced currency. . . . Lonsdale then seems to have
thought that it might be said—‘How happens your son Billy to be in office while you are thus
mischievously embarrassing H.M. Government?’ so he adds,
awkwardly enough, that he is convinced Lord
Lowther’s first consideration
is the interest of the country, and that he never would keep office if he
thought, &c., &c., &c.
“I find that the worthy Laureate, Southey, is to move or second the resoln. that
the distress is within the power of the Legislature; and a cousin of the family
(H. Lowther), who holds one of their livings, is to
move another. Meanwhile, the Beau stands
firm and says ‘he will keep his position;’ meaning, of
course, without any change. But unfortunately it is Peel whose position will be to keep; so then, they say,
the Beau adds—‘he shall bring forward
measures, and if the Parlt. won’t support him, he can’t help
it.’ His strength is no doubt in the Ultras, whom no one can wish
well to, and the Huskissons, whom few will trust, after
what happened two years ago. But this feeling won’t carry the said
Beau thro everything, and I am quite
confident he reckons without his host if he counts on it to the extent
I hear.”
William Vesey Fitzgerald, second Baron Fitzgerald and Vesey (1783 c.-1843)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a Tory MP for Ennis (1808-12, 1813-18,
1831-32), County Clare (1818-28), Newport (1829-30), and Lostwithiel (1830); he was
chancellor of the Irish Exchequer (1812-16) when engaged with the scandals involving Mary
Ann Clarke.
William Lowther, second earl of Lonsdale (1787-1872)
The son of the first earl (d. 1844); educated at Harrow and Trinity College, Cambridge,
he was a Tory MP for Cockermouth (1808-13), and Westmorland (1813–31, 1832-41).
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).