The Creevey Papers
Ch. VIII: 1829
CHAPTER VIII.
1829.
The successive stages in the conversion of the Tory Government
to Roman Catholic Emancipation have been abundantly discussed without bringing home to the
apprehension of most people that, in truth, there were no such stages. The circumstances
have been obscured by the recall of the pro-Catholic Lord Lieutenant, Anglesey, and the appointment of the anti-Catholic
Lieutenant, Northumberland, but that had really no
bearing upon the question. Anglesey had acted in what his old chief,
the Duke of Wellington, considered an insubordinate
manner, and was treated as relentlessly as Norman
Ramsay had been dealt with after Vittoria. There was no question of
ministerial policy involved; the puzzle arises out of the Prime Minister acting with a
total want of that ambiguity which usually envelopes ministerial acts. The victory of
Daniel O’Connell and the Catholic
Association over Vesey FitzGerald, appointed President
of the Board of Trade, in the election for County Clare, had convinced
Wellington that relief could no longer be withheld from the
Catholics. The position held by the Government ever since the question had driven Pitt out of office in 1801 must be abandoned; but he was
too old a campaigner to allow the enemy
194 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VIII. |
to know the hour and order of
evacuation. Peel was to be converted and the
King be forced to consent, before the orders should
be issued which, he knew, would breed mutiny in his own ranks. No sign should betray his
purpose till all was prepared: the accustomed guards should be mounted—the regular
sentries posted—till the very last moment. The appointment of the Duke of
Northumberland in succession to Lord Anglesey was in
accord with the spirit of a General Order which had never been suspended or
revoked—No indulgence to Roman Catholics. It is the secrecy and suddenness of
Wellington’s movements which have perplexed historians,
accustomed to the more tentative and tortuous ways of politicians.
Mr. Creevey to Miss Ord.
“Whitehall, Feby. 3, 1829.
“. . . Every one was up with the news of the day
—that Wellington had decided to let
the Catholics into Parliament. . . . I have always, you know, been convinced
that the Beau must and would do something upon this
subject, and what it is to be we now must very shortly know. . . .”
“5th.
“Our only visitor last night was Sefton, who arrived about 12, bringing with him
the correspondence between the Duke of
Wellington and Lord
Anglesey, which the latter had lent to Sefton
to be returned the next morning at 11. He read it to Mrs. Taylor and me, and it was ½ past one
before he had done. The Beau, according to custom, writes
atrociously, and his charges against Lord Anglesey are of
the rummest kind, such as being too much addicted to popular courses, going to Lord Cloncurry’s, being too civil to Catholic
leaders, not turning Mr. O’Gorman
Mahon out of the commission of the peace, &c., &c. There
are letters full of such stuff, and Lord
1829.] | CATHOLIC EMANCIPATION. | 195 |
Anglesey in his answers beats him easy in all ways. . . .
The Whigs are quite as sore as the Brunswickers at this victory of
the Beau over
Prinney and his Catholic prejudices. They had arranged the most
brilliant opposition for the approaching session, and this coup of the
Duke’s has blown up the whole concern.
“At Brooks’s last night the deceased poet
Rogers came up to beg I would meet
Brougham at dinner at his house on
Wednesday.”
“6th.
“. . . It does Wellington infinite honor; the only drawback to his fame on
this occasion is his silence to Anglesey as
to his intentions; but he has been jealous of his brother soldier playing the
popular in Ireland, and so has sacrificed the man, while adopting his
opinions.”
“7th.
“Here is little Twitch, alias Scroop, alias Premier
Duke, Hereditary Earl Marshal, who is sitting by my side and who reckons
himself sure of franking a letter for you before the session closes. The
removal of Catholic disabilities would permit the Duke of Norfolk to take his seat in the Lords.”
“11th.
“. . . ‘Ra-ally,’ as Mrs. Taylor would say, Peel makes a great figure.* His physick for the
[Catholic] Association is as mild as milk, and for a year
only. It is such a new and important feature in this Tory Revolution
to have no blackguarding or calling names of any one. There begins to be an
alarm about the Lords, but I have no doubt without foundation. It is clear to
me from the Duke of Rutland’s speech
that he will ultimately support the Beau,
and I have my doubts whether the Bishop of
London† won’t do so likewise. . . . Lord Sefton has broke the bank at Crockford’s two nights following. He
tells me he carried off £7000.”
* As Home Secretary, Peel was
responsible for the government of Ireland, which was then administered from the Home
Office.
† C. J. Blomfield.
|
196 |
THE CREEVEY PAPERS |
[Ch. VIII. |
“Brooks’s, Feb. 14.
“. . . There is nothing going forward except this
reported visit of the Duke of . . . Are
you aware that Captain Garth is the son of this Duke by
Princess ——.* General Garth, at the suit of the old King, consented to pass for the father of this
son. The latter, in every way worthy of his villainous father, has shown all
the letters upon this occasion, including one of the King’s. The poor
woman has always said that this business would be her death. Garth asks £30,000 for the letters, and, to
enhance their value, shews the worst part of them.”
“18th.
“. . . The Whigs are as sore as be damned at
Wellington distinguishing himself and
at Lord Grey’s just panegyrick upon
Peel the other night. A neat figure
they [the Whigs] would have cut in such a storm; but, to do them justice, they
would never have attempted it. . . .”
“March 2nd.
“Now I wonder if Ogg† is to be depended on. Our Whigs, who hate the Beau and Peel and Grey with all their
hearts, and are mad to the last degree that the two former have taken the
Catholick cause out of their own feeble and perfidious hands, and who are
always croaking about the projected Bill as being sure to contain some
conditions and provisions that will be quite inadmissible to the dear
Liberals—the said Whigs are to-day more chopfallen than ever upon the
visits that have been taking place the last two
* One should hesitate to withdraw the veil from this
ugly affair, were it not that it has been freely discussed and made
public property in the recently published letters of Madame de Lieven. † Lord
Kensington. |
1829.] | THE GARTH SCANDAL. | 197 |
days by the
Beau and
Chancellor to
Windsor, and then the Beau waiting upon the
D. of Cumberland as soon as he came back. In
short, it is settled amongst them that the
Dutchess of
Gloucester and D. of Cumberland have made
such an impression upon
Prinney against the
Pope, that he is considered as quite certain to be upon the jib; and such is
the supposed consternation of the Ministers, that
Tommy Tyrrwhitt told me he had seen with his own eyes to-day
Lord Ellenborough come into the Court
of Chancery twice, go upon the Bench to the Chancellor, put his mouth close
under his wig, and keep it there at least five minutes at a time.
“So, having just met old
Ogg in the street in spectacles, he having lost an eye since I
last saw him, and after hearing an account of the different calamities
affecting his life, property and character, we got to this Windsor gossip. So
says Ogg in his accustomed manner—‘Damme! I
know exactly what it is all about, and if you promise never to mention my
name, I’ll tell you.’ I need not observe that the condition
he imposed upon me I should have gratuitously adopted, as the disclosure would,
with most, destroy my story. However, he swore he knew the facts of his own
knowledge, and they are these.
“Knight, a barrister of the
Court of Chancery, has been advertising the Chancellor lately that on this day he should move for an
injunction against Sir Herbert Taylor
about Garth’s letters, which have
been placed in his hands under some agreement with Garth,
and which the latter or his creditors wish to make more favorable for
themselves; £3000 a year for life and £10,000 in hand were the considerations,
but it is sought to make it £16,000 in hand. Ogg adds that
it is the fear of all this being made publick that has caused all these
mutinies between the Beau and Prinney and Chancellor and D. of Cumberland. Ogg says, too, that he knows all the contents of these letters,
and stated quite enough of them to account for all this Windsor hurry-scurry. .
. .
“Well, I had a really charming dinner at old
Sally’s* yesterday. Lady Sefton and her 2 eldest
198 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VIII. |
daughters, the
young Lady
Salisbury,
Lord Arthur
[Hill],
Sefton,
Henry [Molyneux], a
Talbot, Hy. de loos,
Montgomery and
Sebright. . . . Upon my word I was wrong about
Lady Lyndhurst. She has beautiful eyes and such a
way of using them that quite shocked
Lady
Louisa and me. . . .
Old
Clare fairly rowed me last night, or affected to do so, for not
coming to see her in Ireland. You know her
son and his
wife are
parted, the latter giving as her reason for wishing it that she had only
married him to please her
mother, and that
now she was dead there was no use in going on together. He has given her back
every farthing of her fortune, which was £50,000 or £60,000.”
“3rd.
“. . . I saw a good deal of young Lady Emily Cowper,* who is the leading favorite
of the town so far. She is very inferior to her fame for
looks, but is very natural, lively, and appears a good-natured young
person.”
“6th.
“Well, the Whig croaking must end now. The Beau is immortalised by his views and
measures as detailed by Peel last night.
I certainly, for one, think it an unjust thing to alter the election franchise
from 40s. to £10; but considering the perfection of
every other part and the difficulty there must have been in bringing Prinney up to this mark, I should, were I in
Parliament, swallow the franchise thing without hesitation; and so I am happy
to find a meeting of our Whigs at Burdett’s to-day have agreed to do. . . . Only think of
the old notion of the Veto being just abandoned. . .
.”
“10th.
“Well, our ‘very small and early party’
last night [at Lady Sefton’s] was
quite as agreeable as ever; but I must be permitted to observe that,
considering the rigid virtue of Lady Sefton and the
profound darkness in which her daughters of from 30 to 40 are brought up as to
even the existence of vice,
1829.] | A PARTY At LADY SEFTON’S. | 199 |
the party was as
little calculated to protract the delusion of these innocents as any collection
to be made in London could well be. There were Mrs. F——
L—— and
Lord
Chesterfield, who came together and sat together all night;
Lady E—— and the Pole or Prussian or
Austrian—whichever he is—whom they call
‘Cadland’ because he beat the Colonel
(Anson).* Anything so impudent as she, or so barefaced
as the whole thing, I never beheld;
Princess
Esterhazy and Lady ——,
Lady —— and [Lord]
Palmerston—in short, by far the most
notorious and profligate women in London. . . . With respect to how
Lord Grey and other people take the Catholic Bill
or Pill, there is an increasing satisfaction in all the friends to the measure,
and the ranks of the bigots are thinning. There is one damned thing, if it is
persisted in, which is that
O’Connell is not to be let into his present seat, but
sent back to a new election under the new Bill. . . . When I was at
Grey’s on Sunday, he told me
Burdett had just been with him upon this
subject, and had urged him to speak to the
Duke of
Wellington about it. Not amiss in
O’Connell and Burdett,
considering that they had never consulted Grey before on
any of their Catholic cookery. However, his answer was that he should do no
such thing, for that, altho’ there could be no doubt as to the abominable
injustice of this case, yet as the Duke had never shown any disposition to
communicate with him upon this measure, it was not for him—Lord
Grey—to begin any such communication. So much for
Sefton and others, who will have it that
Lord Grey must and will come into office. . . .
Wellington was blooded yesterday, but is out to-day,
and gone to face
Winchilsea in the
Lords.”
“Sulby, March 18.
“Rather stiffish to-day, my dear; it can’t, of
course, be age! but going four and twenty miles on a
hard road at a kind of hand gallop is rather shaking, you know, to those not
used to it. . . . The men we have had here are principally Pytchley, which, in
dandyism, are very second-rate to the Quorn or Melton men. . . .
200 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VIII. |
Osbaldeston himself, tho’ only 5
feet high, and in features like a cub fox, is a very funny little chap; clever
in his way, very good-humored and gay, and with very good manners. . . . I am
very fond of all these lads being dressed in scarlet in the evening. It looks
so gay.”
“19th.
“. . . Does your paper ever give you any light upon
the old affair of Garth? Did it contain
his affidavit? You see it is now established in proof in a suit in Chancery
that Sir Herbert Taylor had agreed to
give Garth £3000 a year for his life, and to pay his
debts; and that, upon this being done, certain letters were to be given up to
Taylor. In the meantime they were deposited in
Snow’s bank in the joint holding of the said bankers and Mr. Westmacott, the editor of the Age newspaper. . .
. There is quite enough in this—Taylor being the
purchaser and the price so monstrous, to make it quite certain the letters must
contain great scandal affecting very great parties. . . . General Garth is still alive, and it was when
he was extremely ill and thought himself quite sure of dying, that he wrote to
young Garth, telling him who he was, explaining the part
he—the General—had been induced to act out of respect and deference
to the royal family. . . . General Garth recovered
unexpectedly, and applied to young Garth for the document;
but, I thank you! they had been seen and read and deemed much too valuable to
be given back again.”
Earl of Sefton to Mr. Creevey.
“Arlington St., . . . March 25th.
“. . . The King
was delighted with the duel* and said he should have done the same—that
gentlemen must not stand upon their privileges. . . .”
“Stoke, 11th April.
“. . . The King
was very angry at the large majority [for the Catholic Relief bill] and did not
1829.] | INTRIGUES IN THE OPPOSITION. | 201 |
write the D. a line in
answer to his express telling him of it.
The
Beau’s troubles are not over yet. The distress in the
country is frightful. Millions are starving, and I defy him to do anything to
relieve them.”
Mr. Creevey to Miss Ord.
“Whitehall, May 28th.
“. . . I went to the Park, but the review was over,
so we only learnt that the Beau had had a
fall from his horse, but was not hurt; and in coming home here a little later
who shd. I meet riding in a little back street near Coventry Street but the
said Duke. So he stopt and shook hands. . . . I said:—‘Well,
upon my soul, you are the first of mankind to have accomplished this Irish
job as you have done, and I congratulate you upon it most sincerely. . . .
You must ave had tough work to get
thro’.’—‘Oh terrible, I assure
you,’ said he, and so we parted.”
“June 1st.
“. . . It is a well known fact that Lord Durham is doing all he possibly can to make
Lord Grey act a part that shall force
him into the Government, meaning in that event to go snacks himself in the
acquisition of power and profit; which, considering that he got his peerage by
deserting Grey and by helping Canning to defeat Wellington, is consistent and modest enough! So after dinner
[at Lord William Powlett’s] the levee
being mentioned, Grey said in the most natural manner he
would never go to another; upon which Lambton
[Lord Durham] remonstrated with him most severely and
pathetically, and George Lamb thought
Grey was wrong; but Grey held out
firm as a rock—said that it was quite against his own opinion going the
last time, but that he had been quite persecuted into it—that this last
personal insult from the King in never
noticing him was only one of a series of the same kind, and that for the future
he should please himself by avoiding a repetition of them. You may easily fancy
the amiability of Lambton’s face at his avowal. . .
. You see these impertinent and base
202 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VIII. |
renegade young Whigs
have had their appetites for office if possible sharpened at present by
Lord Rosslyn having just accepted the
Privy Seal. . . . Rosslyn told me of it himself in the
street on Saturday. . . . I know that he accepted with Lord
Grey’s concurrence, but I am equally sure, from
Lord Grey’s manner, that he thinks he ought not
to have done so.”
“August 20th.
“. . . As you see only the Morning Post, I am afraid
you are quite in the dark as to what is going on in France. . . . All are
furious against the new Ministry, and with great reason. To think of making
Bourmont the War Minister! He is the
man who deserted from Bonaparte and came
over to us the night before the battle of Waterloo.* General Gérard recommended him to
Nap as a General of Division on that occasion, and
said that he would pledge his life for his honor.† The deserter is now to
be Minister for War, and will have to face Gérard as a
member of the Chamber of Deputies! . . . Even the old Ultras think the
experiment puts the throne of Charles Dix
in danger.”
“Knowsley, 26th September.
“. . . I am half way thro’ the 3rd volume of
Bourrienne. Although my interest
about Nap is greatly lessened by his
wholesale use and destruction of mankind—not for the sake or defence of
France, but for some ‘lark’ of his own, to be like Cæsar or Alexander, and for his damned nonsensical posterity that he is
always after—then again he comes over me again by his talents, and by a
kind of simplicity, and even drollery, behind the curtain whilst he is so
successfully bamboozling all the world without. Don’t suppose I am
partial to him because when Bourrienne
* It was on the morning of the 15th June, three days
before Waterloo, that Bourmont
deserted; and he went to Blücher, not to Wellington. † The expression Gérard used was that he would pledge his head: so when
Gérard reported Bourmont’s treachery, the Emperor tapped
Gérard playfully on the cheek,
saying:—“Cette têtê, donc, e’est
à moi, n’est ce pas?” adding more
gravely, “mais j’en ai trop
besoin.” |
1829.] | FIRST TRIP ON THE RAILWAY. | 203 |
read poetry to him in
Egypt he always fell asleep! or because that at school he never was a scholar,
Bourrienne beating him easily in Latin and Greek, but
in mathematics he was first; nor because no one spelt worse than he did, having
always a professed contempt for that noble art. Yet his compositions are of the
first order.”
The Liverpool and Manchester Railway, the promotion of which Creevey had so stoutly opposed in committee of the House
of Commons, was nearly finished, and about to be opened for traffic.
Mr. Creevey to Miss Ord.
“Knowsley, Nov. 1st, 1829.
“. . . You have no doubt in your paper reports of
Huskisson’s return to office.
Allow me to mention a passage which Lord
Derby read to me out of a letter to himself from Lady Jane Houston, who lives very near
Huskisson. . . . ‘Houston saw Huskisson yesterday, who
talked to him of his return to office as of a thing quite certain, and of
Edward Stanley doing so too.
Indeed he spoke of the latter as quite the Hope of the Nation!’
As the Hope of the Nation was present when this was read, it would not have
been decent to laugh; but the little Earl gave me a look that was quite
enough.”
“Croxteth, 7th.
“. . . I left little Derby devouring Bourrienne with the greatest delight, and he is particularly
pleased with the exposure of the ignorance of ‘that damned fellow
Sir Walter Scott.’ The
Stanley and Hornby party were
rather shocked at the great bard and novelist being called such names, but the
peer said he was a ‘damned impertinent fellow’ for presuming
to write the life of
Bonaparte.”
“14th.
“. . . To-day we have had a lark of a very high order. Lady
Wilton sent over yesterday from Knowsley to say that the Loco
Motive machine was to be
204 | THE CREEVEY PAPERS | [Ch. VIII. |
upon the railway at such a place
at 12 o’clock for the Knowsley party to ride in if they liked, and
inviting this house to be of the party. So of course we were at our post in 3
carriages and some horsemen at the hour appointed. I had the satisfaction, for
I can’t call it
pleasure, of taking a trip of five
miles in it, which we did in just a quarter of an hour—that is, 20 miles
an hour. As accuracy upon this subject was my great object, I held my watch in
my hand at starting, and all the time; and as it has a second hand, I knew I
could not be deceived; and it so turned out there was not the difference of a
second between the coachee or conductor and myself. But observe, during these
five miles, the machine was occasionally made to put itself out or
go it; and then we went at the rate of 23 miles an hour,
and just with the same ease as to motion or absence of friction as the other
reduced pace. But the quickest motion is to me
frightful: it is really flying, and it is impossible to divest
yourself of the notion of instant death to all upon the least accident
happening. It gave me a headache which has not left me yet.
Sefton is convinced that some damnable thing must
come of it; but he and I seem more struck with such apprehension than others. .
. . The smoke is very inconsiderable indeed, but sparks of fire are abroad in
some quantity: one burnt Miss de Ros’s cheek,
another a hole in
Lady Maria’s
silk pelisse, and a third a hole in some one else’s gown. Altogether I am
extremely glad indeed to have seen this miracle, and to have travelled in it.
Had I thought worse of it than I do, I should have had the curiosity to try it;
but, having done so, I am quite satisfied with my
first
achievement being my
last.’
“Croxteth, Nov. 18th.
“. . . I am sure you would not wish me to miss
Lady Foley. It is very nearly the
direct road to London. Then to see a noble novel-writer, who has never been
known in the midst of all their ruin to degrade herself by putting on either a
pair of gloves or a ribbon a second time, and who has always 4 ponies ready
saddled and bridled for any enterprise or excursion that may come into her
head! To say
1829.] | A SPENDTHRIFT PEER. | 205 |
nothing of
Foley, who, without a halfp’orth of income
keeps the best house and has planted more oak trees than any man in England,
and by the influence of his name and popularity returns two members for
Droitwich and one for the county. Then he is to get his next neighbour
Lord Dudley to meet me, so we shall have
Jean qui pleure et
Jean qui
rit—Ward [Lord
Dudley] being in a state of lingering existence under the
frightful pressure of £120,000 a year.”
Alexander the Great (356 BC-323 BC)
Macedonian conqueror; the son of Philip II, he was king of Macedon, 336-323 BC.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
Sir Francis Burdett, fifth baronet (1770-1844)
Whig MP for Westminster (1807-1837) who was imprisoned on political charges in 1810 and
again in 1820; in the 1830s he voted with the Conservatives.
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
King Charles I of England (1600-1649)
The son of James VI and I; as king of England (1625-1649) he contended with Parliament;
he was revered as a martyr after his execution.
Charles X, King of France (1757-1836)
He was King of France 1824-1830 succeeding Louis XVIII; upon his abdication he was
succeeded by Louis Philippe, duc d'Orléans.
Anthony Ashley- Cooper, seventh earl of Shaftesbury (1801-1885)
The son of the sixth earl (d. 1851); he was asocial reformer who introduced legislation
to relieve women and children laboring in coal mines and to limit the work-day for factory
laborers to ten hours.
John Singleton Copley, baron Lyndhurst (1772-1863)
The son of the American painter; he did legal work for John Murray before succeeding Lord
Eldon as lord chancellor (1827-30, 1834-35, 1841-46); a skilled lawyer, he was also a
political chameleon.
Thomas Creevey (1768-1838)
Whig politician aligned with Charles James Fox and Henry Brougham; he was MP for Thetford
(1802-06, 1807-18) Appleby (1820-26) and Downton (1831-32). He was convicted of libel in
1813.
William Crockford (1776-1844)
Originally a fishmonger, he made a fortune as the proprietor of a gambling club,
Crockford's.
King Ernest Augustus, of Hanover (1771-1851)
The fifth and last surviving son of George III; he was king of Hanover 1837-1851. Though
acquitted, he was thought to have murdered his valet, Joseph Sellis.
William Vesey Fitzgerald, second Baron Fitzgerald and Vesey (1783 c.-1843)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a Tory MP for Ennis (1808-12, 1813-18,
1831-32), County Clare (1818-28), Newport (1829-30), and Lostwithiel (1830); he was
chancellor of the Irish Exchequer (1812-16) when engaged with the scandals involving Mary
Ann Clarke.
John Fitzgibbon, second earl of Clare (1792-1851)
A Harrow friend of Byron's, son of the Lord Chamberlain of Ireland; he once fought a duel
with Henry Grattan's son in response to an aspersion on his father. Lord Clare was Governor
of Bombay between 1830 and 1834.
Thomas Foley, third baron Foley (1780-1833)
Whig peer, the son of the second baron (d. 1793); educated under Samuel Parr at Hatton
and at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a privy councillor and Lord-Lieutenant of
Worcestershire (1831-33).
Thomas Garth (1744-1829)
Military officer, the son of John Garth MP; there were rumors abroad to the effect that
his son, Thomas Garth (1800–1875), had been fathered by Ernest Augustus, son of George III,
and that the mother was his sister, Princess Sophia.
Thomas Garth (1800-1875)
Military officer, the son of General Thomas Garth and Princess Sophia; he claimed to have
letters proving that his father was the Duke of Cumberland with which he tried to blackmail
the government.
Étienne Maurice Gérard (1773-1852)
A division commander under Napoleon, he was minister of war and served as Prime Minister
of the July Monarchy.
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
Lady Jane Houston [née Maitland] (1769-1833)
The daughter of James Maitland, seventh Earl of Lauderdale; in 1787 she married Samuel
Long, and in 1808 General Sir William Houstoun.
Bernard Edward Howard, twelfth duke of Norfolk (1765-1842)
Educated at the English College at Douai, in 1815 he succeeded his third cousin, Charles
Howard, eleventh duke (d. 1815), and took his seat in Parliament after passage of the Roman
Catholic Relief Bill of 1829.
William Huskisson (1770-1830)
English politician and ally of George Canning; privately educated, he was a Tory MP for
Morpeth (1796-1802), Liskeard (1804-07), Harwich (1807-12), Chichester (1812-23), and
Liverpool (1823-30). He died in railway accident.
George Lamb (1784-1834)
Lawyer and Whig MP for Westminster (1819) and Dungarvan (1822-34), he was the son of
Elizabeth Lamb Viscountess Melbourne, possibly by the Prince of Wales. He was author of a
gothic drama,
Whistle for It (1807) and served with Byron on the
management-committee of Drury Lane. His sister-in-law was Lady Caroline Lamb.
Valentine Browne Lawless, second baron Cloncurry (1773-1853)
The son of the first baron (d. 1799), he was educated at Trinity College, Dublin and was
imprisoned for treason in 1799; upon his release in 1801 he entered Irish politics as a
supporter of Catholic Emancipation.
Henry Luttrell (1768-1851)
English wit, dandy, and friend of Thomas Moore and Samuel Rogers; he was the author of
Advice to Julia, a Letter in Rhyme (1820).
James Patrick Mahon [The O'Gorman Mahon] (1800-1891)
Irish politician and adventurer, educated at Trinity College Dublin; as an Irish MP for
Ennis (1847-52), Clare (1879-85), and Carlow (1887-91) he was an ally of Charles Stewart
Parnell.
Henry Richard Molyneux (1800-1841)
The third son of the second earl of Sefton; he was lieutenant-colonel of the 60th Rifles,
and died of a disease contracted in India.
Lady Maria Molyneux (d. 1872)
The daughter of William Philip Molyneux, second Earl of Sefton; she died
unmarried.
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Daniel O'Connell (1775-1847)
Irish politician, in 1823 he founded the Catholic Association to press for Catholic
emancipation.
Elizabeth Ord (1789-1854 c.)
Of Rivenhall in Essex, the daughter of William Ord of Fenham and younger sister of
William Ord MP (1781-1855); she was the step-daughter and correspondent of Thomas Creevy.
Her will was made and proved in 1854.
George Osbaldeston (1786-1866)
The son of George Osbaldeston (d. 1793); educated at Brasenose College, Oxford, he was a
Whig MP for East Retford (1812-18) and high sheriff for Yorkshire (1829) but remembered for
his horseracing exploits.
Henry William Paget, first marquess of Anglesey (1768-1854)
Originally Bayly, educated at Westminster and Christ Church, Oxford; he was MP
(1790-1810), commander of cavalry under Sir John Moore, lost a leg at Waterloo, and raised
to the peerage 1815; he was lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1828-29, 1830-33).
Hugh Percy, third duke of Northumberland (1785-1847)
The son of the second duke (d. 1817), he was educated at Eton and St John's College,
Cambridge, and before succeeding to the title was a Tory MP for Buckingham (1806),
Westminster (1806), Launceston (1806-07), and Northumberland (1807-12). He was
lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1829-30).
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
William Norman Ramsay (1782-1815)
Educated at Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, he commanded a cavalry battery in the
Peninsular War and was killed at Waterloo.
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).
Arthur Moyes William Sandys, second baron Sandys (1792-1860)
Irish military officer; he was the second son of Arthur Hill, second Marquess of
Downshire and Mary Sandys, Baroness Sandys; educated at Eton, he was MP for County Down
(1817-36) before he succeeded to the title.
Sir John Saunders Sebright, seventh baronet (1767-1846)
Son of the sixth baronet (d. 1794), he was educated at Westminster School and after
military service was an independent Whig MP for Hertfordshire (1807-34). Maria Edgeworth
described him as “quite a new character ... strong head, and warm heart, and oddity
enough for ten.”
Princess Sophia (1777-1848)
The fifth daughter of George III. and Queen Charlotte.
Lord Robert Spencer (1747-1831)
Of Woolbeding in Sussex; the youngest son of the second Duke of Marlborough, he was Whig
MP for Woodstock (1768-71, 1818-20), Oxford City (1771-90), Wareham (1790-99), and
Tavistock (1802-07). He was a friend of Charles James Fox.
Frances Ann Taylor [née Vane] (d. 1835)
Whig hostess, the daughter of Sir Henry Vane, first baronet (1729–1794); in 1789 she
married the politician Michael Angelo Taylor.
Sir Herbert Taylor (1775-1839)
He was aide-de-camp and private secretary to the duke of York, afterwards to George III
and William IV; he was MP for Windsor (1820-23) and published
Memoirs of
the Last Illness and Decease of HRH the Duke of York (1827).
Henry John Temple, third viscount Palmerston (1784-1865)
After education at Harrow and Edinburgh University he was MP for Newport (1807-11) and
Cambridge University (1811-31), foreign minister (1830-41), and prime minister (1855-58,
1859-65).
Sir Thomas Tyrwhitt (1762-1833)
The nephew of the scholar of the same name; he was educated at Eton and Christ Church,
Oxford, and was MP for Okehampton (796-1802), Portarlington (1802-06) and Plymouth
(1806-12), private secretary to the Duke of Clarence, and Black Rod.
William John Frederick Vane, third duke of Cleveland (1792-1864)
The son of Sir William Henry Vane, first Duke of Cleveland; he assumed the name of
Powlett. He was educated at Brasenose College, Oxford, and was a Whig MP for Winchelsea
(1812-15), Durham County (1815-31), St. Ives (1846-52), and Ludlow (1852-57).
John William Ward, earl of Dudley (1781-1833)
The son of William Ward, third Viscount Dudley (d. 1823); educated at Edinburgh and
Oxford, he was an English MP, sometimes a Foxite Whig and sometimes Canningite Tory, who
suffered from insanity in his latter years.
Charles Molloy Westmacott (1788 c.-1868)
The illegitimate half-brother of the sculptor Richard Westmacott; he was educated at St
Paul's School and pursued a career as a Tory satirist, first with the
Gazette of Fashion (1822) and then with
The Age
(1827-38).
The Age. (1825-1843). A Tory newspaper that dealt in scandal, owned and edited by Charles Molloy
Westmacott.
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.