THE LIFE
OF
PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY.
It was late in the autumn of 1820, when, at Shelley’s invitation to pass the winter with him, I
reached Pisa. I was not aware that he had gone to the Baths of St. Julian, and on enquiring
for him, was referred for information to Lady
Mount-Cashel, a lady whose retirement from the world was not unprofitable,
for perhaps it was devoted to one of the best works on the Education of Children which we possess. She was one of the few
persons with whom the Shelleys were intimate. She had been in early
life the friend of Mary Wolstone-
craft, and this was the tie between them. An interesting and amiable person was
Mrs. Mason, as she called herself, and from her I gained the
desired intelligence, and the next day Shelley came to my hotel, the
Trè Donzelle.
It was nearly seven years since we had parted, but I should immediately
have recognised him in a crowd. His figure was emaciated, and somewhat bent, owing to
near-sightedness, and his being forced to lean over his books, with his eyes almost
touching them; his hair, still profuse, and curling naturally, was partially interspersed
with grey; but his appearance was youthful, and his countenance, whether grave or animated,
strikingly intellectual. There was also a freshness and purity in his complexion that he
never lost. I accompanied him to the baths, then, owing to the lateness of the season, (it
was November,) quite deserted,—for they are completely a summer resort; and there I
had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of Mrs.
Shelley, and saw Percy, their little
son, then an
infant. Their house was immediately on the banks of the
Serchio, and on the very day of my arrival, that little, rapid river, or rather the canal
that branches from it, overflowed its banks; no uncommon circumstance. It ran into the
square, and formed a flood that threatened to cut off the communication with the main road
to Pisa. Mrs. Shelley speaks of the event. Well do I remember the
scene, which I stood with
Shelley at the window to
admire. The Contadine bore torches, and the groups of cattle, and the shouts of the
drivers, the picturesque dresses of their wives, half immersed in the water, and carrying
their children, and the dark mountains in the background, standing out in bold relief,
formed a singular spectacle, well worthy of a painter’s study.
Shelley wished me to sketch it, but it was far beyond my powers of
delineation,—besides that I had no colours. The next morning, the inundation having
still continued to increase, the first floor was completely under water, and barring all
egress, we were obliged to get a boat
from the upper windows, and drove
to Pisa, where Shelley had already taken an apartment—a Terreno
in the Casa, next door to the Marble Palace, with the enigmatical inscription,
“Alla Giornata,” an inscription that has
puzzled much the antiquary to explain, and with which title a Novel has been written, which
I have never seen. Perhaps there is no mystery in “Alla
Giornata,” which means, erected by day-work, instead of
contract, the usual mode of building in Italy. But Shelley was
inclined to think that there was some deep and mystical meaning in the words, and was but
little satisfied with this prosaic interpretation, and deemed it was a tribute to the East,
where the proprietor had past his best days, and made his colossal fortune. I have
mentioned this magnificent palace, in order to identify the house where
Shelley lived, the name of which has escaped me.
We here fixed ourselves for the winter, if such an expression be applicable
to the divine climate of that gifted city, “where autumn
merges into spring, after but a few days of bleaker weather.”
I was suffering from the effects of my abode in the East, and placed myself
under the hands of the celebrated Vacca, of whom
Shelley and Lord
Byron both speak with deserved praise.
During a long and severe attack of illness, aggravated by the fatigues of
my journey from Geneva, Shelley tended me like a
brother. He applied my leeches, administered my medicines, and during six weeks that I was
confined to my room, was assiduous and unintermitting in his affectionate care of
me,—care I shall never forget; most ungrateful should I indeed be, were it not
indelibly stamped on my memory.
During this imprisonment, it was, that I first had an opportunity of
reading his works, with many of which I was unacquainted. The delight they afforded me
often disarmed pain. I loved to trace in them, from our crude attempts at rhyme, his
earliest thoughts, associated as they were with the recollections of our boy-
hood; to follow the development of his genius. Nor was it only from his
printed poems that I learned to estimate his surpassing talents, he lent me a MS. volume,
containing his
Ode to Liberty,
The Sensitive Plant, the exquisite
Arethusa and Peneus, and many
other of his lyrics, which I devoured, and enthusiastically admired. He was surprised at my
enthusiasm, and said to me,—“I am disgusted with writing, and were it not
for an irresistible impulse, that predominates my better reason, should discontinue so
doing.” On such occasions, he fell into a despondent mood, most distressing
to witness, was affected with a prostration of spirits that bent him to the earth, a
melancholy too sacred to notice, and which it would have been a vain attempt to dissipate.
At other times perhaps, however, his features, that bore the impress of
suffering, might have been false interpreters of the state of his mind, and his spirit
might be lost in reverie, of which state it has been well said, that those subject to
it, are dissolved into the surrounding atmosphere, or feel as if the
surrounding atmosphere were dissolved into their being. Something of this, I have more than
once remarked in
Shelley, as we stood watching from
my open window in the upper part of the house, the sunsets of Pisa, which are gorgeous
beyond any I have ever witnessed; when the waters, the sky, and the marble palaces that
line the magnificent crescent of the Lung’ Arno, were glowing with crimson—the
river a flood of molten gold,—and I seem now to follow its course towards the
Ponte al Mare, till the eye rested on the
Torre
del Fame, that frowned in dark relievo on the horizon. On such occasions, after
one of these reveries, he would forget himself, lost in admiration, and
exclaim,—“What a glorious world! There is, after all, something worth living
for. This makes me retract the wish that I had never been born.”
Other feelings, besides those of disappointment, had tended at this time to
wound his
sensitive spirit. Had it been the
Quarterly Reviewer’s object, as it undoubtedly was, to place
Shelley under a ban—to drive him from the
pale of society, he could not have adopted a course more suited to his diabolical purpose.
From the time of the appearance of this
article, if his friends did not forsake altogether, they, with few exceptions,
fell off from him; and with a lacerated heart, only a few months after the appearance of
the number, he writes:—“I am regarded by all who know, or hear of me, except
I think on the whole
five individuals, as a rare prodigy of
crime and pollution, whose look even might infect. This
five is
a large computation, and I don’t think I could name more than
three.” Who these exceptions were, he does not mention.
To show what the feeling of the English abroad was against him, in
consequence of this vile attack, I will here repeat an anecdote, which I have already given
to the world, and which must have highly gratified the re-
spectable
contributor to the
Quarterly. But a few weeks
had elapsed, when a singular and dastardly outrage had been committed on
Shelley. He was at the Post-office, asking for his
letters, addressed, as is usual in Italy,
Poste-restante, when a stranger in a military cloak, on hearing him
pronounce his name, said, “What, are you that d——d atheist,
Shelley?” and without more preamble, being a tall,
powerful man, struck him such a blow that it felled him to the ground, and stunned him. On
coming to himself, Shelley found the ruffian had disappeared.
Raving with the insult, he immediately sought his friend, Mr. Tighe, the son of the renowned Psyche Tighe, who lost no time in taking measures to
obtain satisfaction. Mr. Tighe was some time in discovering where the
cowardly aggressor had put up; but at length tracked him to the Trè Donzelle. There were
but few travellers then in the city, and the description of the man tallied exactly with
that of an officer in
the Portuguese service, whose name I have now
forgotten. He had, however, started without delay for Genoa, whither Mr.
Tighe and Shelley followed, but without being able to
overtake him, or learn his route from that city.
This anecdote may suggest to the reader the fanaticism which nearly proved
fatal to Spinosa, who has been branded everywhere
but in Germany as an Atheist and Epicurean, but whom Novalis calls a god-intoxicated man, and whose epicureanism is best
disproved by his spending only twopence halfpenny a day on his food.
One evening as Spinosa was coming
out of the theatre, where he had been relaxing his overtasked mind, he was startled by the
fierce expression of a dark face thrust eagerly before his. The glare of blood-thirsty
fanaticism arrested him; a knife gleamed in the air, and he had barely time to parry the
blow. It fell upon his chest, but fortunately deadened in its force, only tore his coat.
The assassin escaped—Spinosa walked home thoughtful.
The author of the Biography of Philosophy, one of the
most acute and candid works I ever met with, compares Shelley and Spinosa together, and
does ample justice to their characters. Speaking of Shelley’s
ostracism, he says,—“Like the young and energetic
Shelley, who afterwards imitated him, he found himself an
outcast in the busy world, with no other guides through its perplexing labyrinths than
sincerity and self-dependence. Two or three new friends soon presented themselves, men
who warred against their religion, as he had warred against his own; and a bond of
sympathy was forged out of the common injustice. Here again we trace a resemblance to
Shelley, who, discountenanced by his relations, sought among a
few sceptical friends, to supply the affection he was thus deprived of. Like
Spinosa, he too had only sisters with whom he had been brought
up. No doubt, in both cases, the consciousness of sincerity, and the pride of
martyrdom, were great shields in the combat with society. They are
always so, and it is well they are so, or the battle would never be fought; but they
never entirely replace the affections. Shut from our family, we may seek a brotherhood
of apostacy, but the new and precarious intellectual sympathies are no compensations
for the loss of the emotive sympathies, with all the links of association and all the
memories of childhood. Spinosa must have felt this, and as
Shelley in a rash marriage endeavoured to fill up the void of
his yearning heart, so Spinosa must, we think, swayed by the same
feeling, have sought the daughter of his friend and master, Vander
Ende, as his wife.”
This anecdote (to return to it) will show what animosity the malice of
Shelley’s enemies had roused against him
in the hearts of his compatriots; but the time is happily past, when Quarterlies can deal
forth damnation, and point out as a mad dog, to be knocked on the head, every one who does
not subscribe to the Thirty-nine Articles.