“On my return here from Lord
Oxford’s, I found your obliging note, and will thank you to retain
the letters, and any other subsequent ones to the same address, till I arrive in town to
claim them, which will probably be in a few days. I have in charge a curious and very
long MS. poem, written by Lord Brooke (the friend of Sir Philip
Sidney), which I wish to submit to the inspection of Mr. Gifford, with the following queries;—first, whether
it has ever been published, and, secondly (if not), whether it is worth publication? It
is from Lord Oxford’s library, and must have escaped or been
overlooked amongst the MSS. of the Harleian
Miscellany. The writing is Lord Brooke’s, except a
different hand towards the close. It is very long, and in the six-line stanza. It is not
for me to hazard an opinion upon its merits; but I would take the liberty, if not too
troublesome, to submit it to Mr.
| 384 | NOTICES OF THE | A. D. 1812. |
“Now for a less agreeable and important topic.—How came Mr. Mac-Somebody, without consulting you or me, to prefix the Address to his volume* of ‘Dejected Addresses?’ Is not this somewhat larcenous? I think the ceremony of leave might have been asked, though I have no objection to the thing itself; and leave the ‘hundred and eleven’ to tire themselves with ‘base comparisons.’ I should think the ingenuous public tolerably sick of the subject, and, except the Parodies, I have not interfered, nor shall; indeed I did not know that Dr. Busby had published his Apologetical Letter and Postscript, or I should have recalled them. But I confess I looked upon his conduct in a different light before its appearance. I see some mountebank has taken Alderman Birch’s name to vituperate Dr. Busby; he had much better have pilfered his pastry, which I should imagine the more valuable ingredient—at least for a puff.—Pray secure me a copy of Woodfall’s new Junius, and believe me, &c.”
