William Godwin: his Friends and Contemporaries
Ch. XI. 1824-1832
Sir Walter Scott to William Godwin, 24 February 1831
“Abbotsford, Feb. 24, 1831.
“My dear Sir,—I received
your letter, which is a melancholy one, and I heartily wish it were in my power
to answer it as I might formerly have done. But you know that were I to apply
to any bookseller unconnected with myself to take a work in which he did not
see his immediate profit—and, if he did, my intervention would be useless—he
would naturally expect me in some way or other to become bound to make up the
risk. Now, I have no dealings with any except Cadell, nor can I have, as he has engaged great part of his
fortune in my publication. By the great bankruptcy of Constable in Edinburgh, and Hurst and Robinson in London, some years ago, I lost, I need hardly say,
more than all I was worth. I might have taken a commission of bankruptcy, or I
might by the assistance of
my son and other wealthy friends have made a very easy composition. I always,
however, thought commercial honour was to be preserved as unsullied as
personal, and I resolved to clear off my debt, being upwards of 100,000, part
of it borrowed from me when the principal parties knew bankruptcy was staring
them in the face. I therefore resolved to pay my debts in full, or to die a
martyr to good faith. I have succeeded to a large extent, more than half of the
whole, and I have current stock enough as will in two or three years be
realized, which will cover the whole. But in the meantime I cannot call any
part of a very considerable income my own, or transfer it to any purpose,
however meritorious, save that which it is allocated to pay. Now, you will see
that I can neither involve Cadell by making requests to
him in other gentlemen’s behalf, nor interfere in literary speculations
where I have nothing to engage me but my sincere good-will to the author. It is
therefore I fear out of my power to serve you in the way you propose. As the
sapient Nestor Partridge says, Non sum qualis
eram.
“Still, however, I have an easy income, and will
willingly join in any subscription to cover the expense of publication of any
work, not religious or political, which you choose to undertake. Suppose the
price a guinea, I mean I would subscribe for ten copies, for which I should
hold one sufficient. If a hundred, or even fifty gentlemen would subscribe in
the same proportion only to the merit of their own means, the urgency of the
occasion would be in some degree met. I cannot be further useful, for till a
month or two ago I had not a silver spoon which I could call my own, or a book
of my own to read out of a pretty good library, which is now my own once more
by the voluntary relinquishment of the parties concerned. I have been thus
particular in this matter, though not the most pleasant to write about, because
I wish you to understand distinctly the circumstances which leave me not at
liberty to engage in this matter to the extent you wish.
“I am, my dear sir, your very obedient, humble
servant,
Robert Cadell (1788-1849)
Edinburgh bookseller who partnered with Archibald Constable, whose daughter Elizabeth he
married in 1817. After Constable's death and the failure of Ballantyne he joined with Scott
to purchase rights to the
Waverley Novels.
Archibald Constable (1774-1827)
Edinburgh bookseller who published the
Edinburgh Review and works
of Sir Walter Scott; he went bankrupt in 1826.
Thomas Hurst (1770 c.-1842)
Originally a bookseller in Leeds, he began working in London late in the eighteenth
century; in 1804 he partnered with the firm of T. N. Longman. He died in the
Charterhouse.
George Ogle Robinson (1837 fl.)
London bookseller at one time in partnership with Thomas Hurst; they suffered bankruptcy
in the crash of 1825-26.