Memoirs of William Hazlitt
Chap. I 1778-1811
MEMOIRS, &c.
Book I.—1778-1811.
CHAPTER I.
1778-90.
The Foundations—The Hazlitts in Ireland—Migration from the North—John Hazlitt
of Shrone-Hill—His family and pursuits—Early years of William Hazlitt.
In the reign of his Majesty King George
the First there migrated from the North of Ireland, and from the county of
Antrim (as it is traditionally reported), two Irish Protestants. They came to settle in
Tipperary, and near the town of Tipperary, namely at Shronell (so pronounced, but spelled
Shrone-Hill), they found a new home, where, perhaps, they were enabled to pursue their
respective vocations more peacefully than they had done farther northward.
One of these persons was a flax-factor; of the other, the precise
occupation has not been handed down. The name of the flax-factor was John
Hazlitt; the name of his companion was John Damer.
They were both young men when they came to Shronell, I collect; for
John Hazlitt, at all events,
2 | POINTS OF EARLY FAMILY HISTORY. | |
could scarcely have been married when he set up
this flax business. His eldest son was born at Shronell on the 18th of April, 1737, and was
named William. He had a second son
James, who appears to have been William’s junior by some
years. Whether there were other sons, I cannot find; but there were several daughters, of
whom two were christened Sara and Maria.
The registers of Shronell are so imperfect, and the
Hazlitts of Ireland have been so negligent in preserving records
of their family history, that I despair of discovering farther particulars of
John Hazlitt of Shronell. He lies buried in the churchyard of that
place, and with him are some of his children, and that John Damer who
had accompanied him from his native town.
I assume that the affairs of Mr. Hazlitt of
Shronell (as I must call him for the sake of distinction) progressed not unfavourably, and
that he was a person of somewhat superior views. It was his wife’s particular
ambition, too, that William should be brought up to the Church.
Accordingly, in 1756, in his nineteenth year, William
Hazlitt of Shronell was sent to the University of Glasgow,* where he had the
good fortune to
* The expenses of an education at Glasgow at that period were about
20l. of our money, and a person could live very fairly
at Glasgow upon seven or eight shillings a week. The presence of two of his sons at
the University, therefore, by no means necessarily implies that Mr.
Hazlitt of Shronell was the possessor of large means; but it does
seem to imply that he wished his children to reap certain advantages of mental
culture not to be had nearer home in his day, and to get a step higher in the world
than he was. |
| POINTS OF EARLY FAMILY HISTORY. | 3 |
be contemporary with Adam Smith. He matriculated on the 13th November the same
year, and the following are the exact terms of the original entry in the university books:—
“Nov. 13, 1756—Logic Class.
Prof. James Clow, A.M. Gulielmus Hazelitt, filius natus maximus
Joannis, mercatoris in comitatu de Tipperary.”
The books of graduates from 1730 to 1762 have disappeared, and it cannot
therefore be ascertained with similar precision when he took his degree of Artium Magister. But it must have been about 1761.
His brother James was also educated at Glasgow. He
matriculated on the 13th November, 1762, and got his A.M. on the 21st May, 1767. I am
tempted to furnish the entries as they stand:—
“Nov. 13, 1762.—Logic Class. Prof. James Clow. Jacobus Hazelitt,
filius natus secundus Joannis, mercatoris in par. de Shronhill in com.
Tipperary.”
“[A. M.] Jacobus Hazelitt,
Hibernus, Maii 21mo. 1767.”*
Having graduated at Glasgow, as we may with a certainty of not being far
from the truth assume, in 1761, William Hazlitt
joined the Unitarians, and crossed over to England—the first of the race and name who had
tried to find a home on English ground.
He was a man of inflexible probity, solid erudition, equal charity of
feeling and practice, and of a decidedly
* The descendants of James Hazlitt, William’s younger brother, still remain in
Tipperary, but they have left Shrone-Hill, and are settled at Featherd, three miles
away. James lived by the proceeds of a tan-yard, which he kept
at Shrone-Hill. |
intellectual bent of mind, but of peculiarly
unaspiring temperament, humble in his tastes, as he was in his fortunes: a very fair
pattern of an old English pastor. He delighted to “browse upon folios of the
Fathers,” and to walk in his garden, looking after his turnips and brocoli,
and watering his peas; and sometimes he strolled into the adjoining fields. For nearly all
his long life was passed in the country, in charge of Unitarian congregations here or
there. For a short time, about 1785, I find him living in or near the metropolis.
If ever there was a career which was blameless, placid, and consoling in
retrospect, it was this poor and good old man’s. I shall beg to reserve for another
opportunity, and a greater pen than this, the task of more closely and graphically
delineating his character, and of picturing him for us as he was.
His first appointment to the ministry was at Wisbeach, in Cambridgeshire,
whither he proceeded in 1764, being then twenty-seven years of age. He made here the
acquaintance of Mr. Loftus, a farmer in the neighbourhood, towards
whose daughter Grace he gradually formed an attachment. The liking seems to have been
reciprocal, and in 1766 they were married. Miss
Loftus was nine years his junior. She was a very handsome girl, bred and
brought up in an unpretending way, and proved an affectionate wife and parent.
Even before his marriage he had resigned his charge at Wisbeach, and was
transferred to Marshfield, in Gloucestershire, where a son was born to him in 1767.
This son was christened John, perhaps after John Hazlitt of Shrone-Hill.
The Hazlitts remained at Marshfield till 1770-1,
when they shifted their quarters once more, this time to Maidstone, in Kent. The family
threatened to be a grave incumbrance on the minister’s scanty income; a daughter,
Peggy, had been born since
John, and other children succeeded in the fulness of time. The
latter however died young, with a single exception, and it was an important one.
It was their youngest of all, who, with John and Peggy, was spared to them.
They called him William, after his father, and he was born in Mitre Lane, Maidstone, on the
10th April, 1778.
They remained at Maidstone two years longer, and Mr. Hazlitt appears during his residence in the town to
have been highly respected for his virtues and his learning. He enjoyed the acquaintance of
Dr. Franklin. He corresponded with Dr. Priestley and with Dr.
Priestley’s friend, Dr. Price.
The Rev. Dr. Caleb Fleming was also a friend of his
at the same period.
He left Maidstone in 1780 to return to Ireland, where he had accepted a
preferment; it was to preside over a congregation of Unitarians at Bandon, in the county of
Cork. He was settled here three years—“during which time,” observes a
writer in the Monthly
Repository “(as he had always shown himself a zealous advocate
for American independence) he exerted himself in behalf of the American prisoners
confined at Kinsale, near that town. . . .”
“On the conclusion of the war with America,” continues
the same authority,* “he removed from Bandon to New York, with his wife and family,
where he arrived in May, 1783, and soon proceeded to Philadelphia; and on his way to that
city, the Assembly of the States-General for New Jersey, then sitting at Burlington, sent a
deputation to invite him to preach before them, with which he complied. At Philadelphia he
stayed fifteen months,”and besides preaching occasionally at various places of
worship there, he delivered during the winter, in the college, a course of Lectures on the
Evidences of Christianity. . . .”
Mr. Hazlitt made a short stay at Boston, where be
founded the first Unitarian Church, and here he declined the proffered diploma of D.D. He
returned to England in 1786-7, and took up his abode at Wem, in Shropshire. His son
John was now rising into manhood, and had chosen
the life of an artist in miniature,† William was a
child of eight or nine. There is a very small likeness of him on ivory, painted in the New
World, in the early morning of American freedom, and representing a beautiful little boy,
with blue eyes, and long rich brown hair falling over his shoulders. This lets us see what
William Hazlitt was at an age when most children have no formed
expression; and even
* The Rev. G. P. Hinton. He
had the best opportunity of knowing the truth, for his memoir of the Rev. W. Hazlitt was founded on information
supplied to him by the family. † Peggy Hazlitt was also a
successful essayist in oils, and was a good flower-painter. If she had had
instruction she would have made an artist. |
then there are promising symptoms in the turn of
the mouth and inarticulate eloquence of the eyes.
Wem was the earliest English home of which little William had any personal recollection. It seems to have
been from there that the earliest specimen of his correspondence was directed to the
Rev. W. Hazlitt, who was temporarily at a
friend’s house in London. The writer could not have been more than eight when he
penned this precocious epistle:—
“12 of Nov. [1786?]
“My dear Papa,
“I shall never forget that we came to america. If we
had not came to america, we should not have been away from one and other,
though now it can not be helped. I think for my part that it would have been a
great deal better if the white people had not found it out. Let the [others]
have it to themselves, for it was made for them. I have got a little of my
grammar; sometimes I get three pages and sometimes but one. I do not sifer any
at all. Mamma Peggy and Jacky are all very well, and I am to—
“I still remain your most
“Affectionate Son,
“William Hazlitt.
“The Rev. Mr. Hazlitt, London.
“To the care of Mr. David
Lewes.”
He was carefully educated under his father’s roof at Wem, during
his tender years, and he proved a docile pupil. The recollection of their visit to America
8 | CORRESPONDENCE OF WILLIAM HAZLITT. | |
haunted him ever so long
afterwards, as witness these words of his, written down five-and-thirty years later:—
“The taste of barberries, which have hung out in the snow during
the severity of a North American winter, I have in my mouth still, after an interval of
thirty years; for I have met with no other taste, in all that time, at all like it. It
remains by itself, almost like the impression of a sixth sense.”
John Hazlitt, the elder brother, had in the mean
time studied under Sir Joshua Reynolds, and had
finally established himself as a miniature painter in London. He lived in apartments at No.
288, High Holborn; and in 1788, being then only a youth of nineteen, he had the
gratification of seeing two articles of his hung at the Royal Academy—a frame with four
miniatures, and a portrait of A Lady. To him his brother William addressed from Wem a letter of news and congratulation:—
“Wem, Saturday morning,
“March —, 1788,
“Dear Brother,
“I received your letter this morning. We were all glad
to hear that you were well, and that you have so much business to do. We cannot
be happy without being employed. I want you to tell me whether you go to the
Academy or not, and what pictures you intend for the exhibition. Tell the
exhibitioners to finish the exhibition soon, that you may soon come and see us.
You must send your picture to us directly. You want to know what I do. I am a
busybody, and do many
| CORRESPONDENCE OF WILLIAM HAZLITT. | 9 |
silly things; I drew eyes and noses till about a fortnight ago. I have drawn a
little boy since, a man’s face, and a little boy’s front face,
taken from a bust. Next Monday I shall begin to read ‘
Ovid’s Metamorphoses’ and ‘
Eutropius.’ I shall like to know all the
Latin and Greek I can. I want to learn how to measure the stars. I shall not, I
suppose, paint the worse for knowing everything else. I begun to cypher a
fortnight after Christmas, and shall go into the rule of three next week. I can
teach a boy of sixteen already who was cyphering eight months before me; is he
not a great dunce? I shall go through the whole cyphering book this summer, and
then I am to learn
Euclid. We go to school
at nine every morning. Three boys begin with reading the Bible. Then I and two
others show our exercises. We then read the ‘
Speaker.’ Then we all set about our
lessons, and those who are first ready say first. At eleven we write and
cypher. In the afternoon we stand for places at spelling, and I am almost
always first. We also read, and do a great deal of business besides. I can say
no more about the boys here: some are so sulky they wont play; others are
quarrelsome because they cannot learn, and are fit only for fighting like
stupid dogs and cats. I can jump four yards at a running jump and two at a
standing jump. I intend to try you at this when you come down. We are not all
well, for poor
Peggy has a great cold.
You spelled Mr. Vaughan’s name wrong, for you
spelled it Vaughn. Write soon again. I wish I could see
all those paintings that you see, and that Peggy had a good
10 | A LETTER FROM LIVERPOOL. | |
prize. I don’t want your old clothes.
I shall go to dancing this month. This is all I can say.
“I am your affectionate brother,
“William Hazlitt.”
Two years afterwards William
Hazlitt paid a visit to Liverpool, where he was received at the house of a
friend of the family—I imagine Mr. Railton—of whom
more will be said hereafter:—
“Saturday, March —, 1790.
“Dear Father,
“I now sit down to spend a little time in an
employment, the productions of which I know will give you pleasure, though I
know that every minute that I am employed in doing anything which will be
advantageous to me, will give you pleasure. Happy, indeed unspeakably happy,
are those people who, when at the point of death, are able to say, with a
satisfaction which none but themselves can have any idea of—‘I have
done with this world, I shall now have no more of its temptations to
struggle with, and praise be to God I have overcome them; now no more
sorrow, now no more grief, but happiness for evermore!’ But how
unspeakably miserable is that man who, when his pleasures are going to end,
when his lamp begins to grow dim, is compelled to say,—‘Oh that I had
done my duty to God and man! oh that I had been wise, and spent that time
which was kindly given me by Providence, for a purpose quite contrary to
that which I employed it to, as I should
| A LETTER FROM LIVERPOOL. | 11 |
have done; but it is now gone; I cannot
recal time, nor can I undo all my wicked actions. I cannot seek that mercy
which I have so often despised. I have no hope remaining. I must do as well
as I can—but who can endure everlasting fire?’ Thus does the
wicked man breathe his last, and without being able to rely upon his good, with
his last breath, in the anguish of his soul, says, ‘Have mercy upon me a
sinner, O God!’—After I had sealed up my last letter to you,
George asked me if I were glad the Test Act was not
repealed? I told him, No. Then he asked me why? and I told him because I
thought that all the people who are inhabitants of a country, of whatsoever
sect or denomination, should have the same rights with others.—But, says he,
then they would try to get their religion established, or something to that
purpose.—Well, what if it should be so?—He said that the Church religion was an
old one.—Well, said I, Popery is older than that.—But then, said he, the Church
religion is better than Popery.—And the Presbyterian is better than that, said
I. I told him I thought so for certain reasons, not because I went to chapel.
But at last, when I had overpowered him with my arguments, he said he wished he
understood it as well as I did, for I was too high learned for him. I then went
to the concert. But as I am now going with George to a
Mrs. Cupham, I must defer the rest of my letter till
another time. I have gotten to the 36th verse, 15th chapter.
“Monday morning.—I was very
much pleased at the concert; but I think Meredith’s
singing was worth all
12 | A LETTER FROM LIVERPOOL. | |
the
rest. “When we came out of the concert, which was about nine
o’clock, we went to Mrs. Chilton’s, at whose
house we slept. It rained the next morning, but I was not much wet coming home.
George was very much wet, and the colour of his coat
was almost spoiled. On Wednesday Mr. Clegg did not come,
as he was confined to his bed. On Wednesday evening Mr.
Dolounghpryeé came, to whom I was very attentive. I was sorry
Mr. Clegg did not come on Saturday, but I hope he will
come on Wednesday next. Saturday afternoon I and George,
with Miss Avis, went to a Mrs.
Bartton’s, who appeared to be an unhospitable English prim
‘lady,’ if such she may be called. She asked us, as if she were
afraid we should accept it, if we would stay to tea. And at the other English
person’s, for I am sure she belongs to no other country than to England,
I got such a surfeit of their ceremonial unsociality, that I could not help
wishing myself in America. I had rather people would tell one to go out of the
house than ask one to stay, and, at the same time, be trembling all over, for
fear one should take a slice of meat, or a dish of tea, with them. Such as
these require an
Horace or a
Shakspeare to describe them. I have not yet
learned the gamut perfectly, but I would have done it if I could. I spent a
very agreeable day yesterday, as I read 160 pages of
Priestley, and heard two good sermons; the
best of which, in my opinion, was Mr. Lewin’s, and
the other Mr. Smith’s. They both belong to
Benn’s Gardens Chapel. Mr. Nicholls called last
night, who informed me that he sent the note by his boy, who left
| A LETTER FROM LIVERPOOL. | 13 |
it with the servant, and that
when he went again, Mr. Yates had not received it; so that
I have not yet received the books, which I am very sorry for. I forgot to tell
you, Winfield and all the other part of the family are
very well, and that Mrs. Tracey said, I said my French
task very well last Saturday. I am now almost at the end of my letter, and
shall therefore answer all questions in your letter, which I received this
morning, which I have not already answered. And in the first place. I have not
seen Mr. Kingston since. I am glad that you liked my
letter to Joe, which I was afraid he had not received, as
you said nothing about it. Does he intend to answer me? Miss
Shepherd will go on Monday, I believe, and I shall go with her.
I have not seen Mr. Yates since I wrote last. I do not
converse in French; but I and Miss Tracey have a book,
something like a vocabulary, where we get the meanings of words. Miss
Tracey never does accompts, but I take an hour or two every
other day. I will follow your Greek precept. Give my best love to mamma, and
tell her I shall write to her next time, and hope she will write to me in
answer to it. Give my respects to Mr. and Miss Cottons,
and to every other inquirer, not forgetting Kynaston. I
wish people made larger paper. I shall put this into the post-office to-night,
Monday evening.”
“I am your affectionate son,
“William Hazlitt.”
John Hazlitt was much pleased at his little
brother’s
14 | A LETTER OF ADVICE AND NEWS. | |
letter, and wrote to
his father, expressing this satisfaction. This produced the following:—
“Wem, March —, 1790.
“My dear William,
“Your brother said that your letter to him was very
long, very clever, and very entertaining. On Wednesday evening, we had your
letter, which was finished on the preceding Monday. The piety displayed in the
first part of it was a great refreshment to me. Continue to cherish those
thoughts which then occupied your mind; continue to be virtuous, and you will
finally be that happy being whom you describe; and, to this purpose, you have
nothing more to do than to pursue that conduct which will always yield you the
highest pleasures even in this present life. But he who once gives way to any
known vice, in the very instant hazards his total depravity and total ruin. You
must, therefore, fixedly resolve never, through any possible motives, to do
anything which you believe to be wrong. This will be only resolving never to be
miserable; and this I rejoicingly expect will be the unwavering resolution of
my William. Your conversation upon the
Test Act did you honour. If we only think justly, we shall always easily foil
all the advocates of tyranny. The inhospitable ladies whom you mention, were,
perhaps, treated by you with too great severity. We know not how people may be
circumstanced at a particular moment, whose disposition is generally friendly.
They may, then, happen to pass under a cloud, which unfits them for social
intercourse.
| A LETTER OF ADVICE AND NEWS. | 15 |
We must see
them more than once or twice to be able to form a tolerable judgment of their
characters. There are but few, like Mrs. Tracey, who can
always appear what they really are. I do not say, however, that the English
ladies whom you mentioned are not exactly as you described them. I only wish to
caution you against forming too hasty a judgment of characters, who can seldom
be known at a single interview. I wish you, if you can, to become master of the
gamut while you are there. I am glad that you have made so great a progress in
French, and that you are so very anxious to hear Mr.
Clegg’s lectures. It is a pity that you cannot have
another month at the French, &c. But, as matters are, I hope you will be
soon able to master that language. I am glad that you employed the last Sunday
so well, and that the employment afforded you so much satisfaction. Nothing
else can truly satisfy us, but the acquisition of knowledge and virtue. May
these blessings be yours more and more every day! On Thursday morning we had a
letter from Mr. Boatt, written at Boston, 24th of June,
just five weeks before we received it. He was forty-six days on his passage
from England, with agreeable company. They had sometimes very heavy weather,
and so extremely cold, that the sails were frozen to the yards. The last winter
was very extraordinary, and very unhealthy in America. Consequently, many
persons died in Boston, and in other parts of the country. He says, concerning
you, ‘I read Billy’s letter to
Fanny, and she was delighted with it. She sends
her love to him; but
16 | A LETTER OF ADVICE AND NEWS. | |
Fanny has lost the recollection of her little
playfellow. The letter does Billy much credit. He has
uncommon powers of mind; and, if nothing happens to prevent his receiving a
liberal education, he must make a great man.’ This compliment, I
know, will not make you proud, or conceited, but more diligent. He also desires
his and Mrs. Boatt’s affectionate regards to
Billy. You see how careful I am to transmit to you all
the news in my power. I must, now, give you some information and directions
concerning your return home. Before you leave Liverpool you will not neglect to
call upon all persons who have shown you any particular civilities. You will
thank Mr. Nicholls for the trouble you have given him, and
especially your masters for their attention to you, and Mr.
Yates for his books, which you will be careful to return in the
good order in which you received them. You will give my respects to
Mr. Yates. I wish that he, amongst his friends, could
procure for your brother engagements for about a score of pictures at Liverpool
this summer, that we might have the pleasure of seeing him here. Your mother
gives her love; and she unites with me in affectionate regards to Mrs. and all
the Miss Traceys. I am, my dear
William, your truly affectionate father,
“W. Hazlitt.
“Wednesday, March, 1790.”
Here is another Liverpool letter, answering the last:—
|
A SECOND LIVERPOOL LETTER. |
17 |
“Monday, 18th March.
“Dear Papa,
“I this morning received your affectionate letter,
and, at the same time, one from my brother and sister, who were very well when
they wrote. On Wednesday I received a lexicon, which I was very glad of. I
have, since that time, gotten to the 12th verse of the 14th chapter, which is
39 verses from the place I was in before. Mr. Clegg came
last Wednesday, and employed the time he staid in showing the Miss
Traceys how to find the latitude and longitude of any place,
which I can now do upon the globes with ease. Whilst he was here I was as
attentive as I could be. He came again on Saturday, and I came in a few minutes
after he came. I drank tea at his house the Thursday before, when he asked me
to prepare the map of Asia, which Miss Traceys were at
that time getting. I answered that I had already gotten it. I said it to him on
Saturday, with Miss Traceys, without missing a single
word. He, when he had finished with us, bid me have the map of Africa ready by
the next time he should come, which I have done. He also asked me to read a
dialogue with him, which I did. I should think he intends to teach me geography
while I stay. On Thursday he took me and George, with his
two brothers, to the glass-house, and then we went to the new fort. On Friday I
went to the play with Mr. Corbett, at whose house I dined
and drank tea. The play was ‘Love in many Masks,’ and the farce, ‘No Song, no Supper.’ It was very
entertaining, and was performed by some of
18 | A SECOND LIVERPOOL LETTER. | |
the best players in London, as for
instance,
Kemble,
Suett,
Dignum, the famous singer, Mrs. Williams,
Miss Hagley,
Miss Romanzini, and others.
Suett, who acted in the character of ‘Ned Blunt,’ was enough to make any one
laugh, though he stood still; and Kemble acted admirably
as an officer. Mr. Dignum sang beautifully, and
Miss Hagley acted the country-girl with much
exactness. Mr. Corbett says he will take us to another
play before we go. So much for last week. I have been writing an hour now.
Yesterday I went to Meeting by myself in the morning, where we had a very good
discourse on the 10th of the 2nd chapter of Thess. 2nd—‘With all
deceiveableness of unrighteousness.’ From this he drew several
conclusions of the false pretences which are made by sin to her followers to
happiness; how people are drawn away, by imperceptible degrees, from one degree
of sin to another, and so on to greater. I sent a note to Mr.
Yates this morning, requesting him to send me a dictionary and
‘
Horace.’ Was it right to
express myself in this manner? —‘Mr. Hazlitt
sends his compliments to Mr. Yates, and would be much
obliged to him if he would send him a dictionary and an
“Horace.”’
“‘P.S. Papa desired me to remember him to
you.’
“On Sunday, after I had come from Meeting, I went,
but not willingly, to Mrs. Sydebotham’s to
dinner. In the afternoon we went to church, for the first time I ever was
in one, and I do not care if I should never go into one again. The
clergyman, after he had gabbled
| A SECOND LIVERPOOL LETTER. | 19 |
over half a dozen prayers, began his
sermon, the text of which was as follows:—Zachariah, 3rd chapter, 2nd verse, latter part—‘Is not
this a brand plucked out of the fire?’ If a person had come
in five minutes after he began, he would have thought that he had taken his
text out of Joshua. In short, his sermon had
neither head nor tail. I was sorry that so much time should be thrown away
upon nonsense. I often wished I was hearing Mr. Yates;
but I shall see I do not go to church again in a hurry. I have been very
busy to day; I got up at seven and wrote a note for Mr.
Yates; and called on Mr. Nicholls with
it, who was at breakfast. I then went to the post-office, and there I
stayed a good while waiting for my letter, but as they told me the letters
were gone to Richmond, I came home to my breakfast. After breakfast I went
with George, to buy some paper, down to Mr.
Bird; when I came home I sat down to my French, but as
Mrs. Tracey wanted some riband, I went to
Mr. Bird’s for some; but, as you may
suppose, I was not a long time going there. I had almost forgotten to tell
you that I wrote to
Joseph Swanwick
last week. I have everything ready for Mr.
Dolounghpryeé, who comes this evening. I have also made
myself perfect in the map of Africa. As I have now given you all the news I
can, I shall lay by for the present, and to-morrow, for my observations and
reflections. Tell Kynaston I have done the first sum,
and understand it quite well. I cannot play any tune on the harpsichord but
‘God save the King.’—Farewell for
the present.
20 |
A SECOND LIVERPOOL LETTER. |
|
“I shall have satis pecuniae, dum tu
habeas opportunitatem, mittendi aliquam partem mihi.*
“Tuesday morning.
“I have this morning gotten my French for
to-morrow, and thirteen verses of the ‘Testament;’ I have also
written out the contractions, and can tell any of them. I said my lessons
very well last night; I had only one word wrong in my fable, and not any
one in my two verbs. I am to go to the concert to-night. I have written two
verbs, and translated my French task. How ineffectual are all pleasures,
except those which arise from a knowledge of having done, as far as one
knew, that which was right, to make their possessors happy. The people who
possess them, at night, lie down upon their beds, and after having spent a
wearisome right, rise up in the morning to pursue the same
‘pleasures.’ or, more properly, vain shadows of pleasure,
which, like Jacks with lanthorns, as they are called, under a fair outside,
at last bring those people who are so foolish as to confide in them into
destruction, which they cannot then escape. How
different from them is a man who wisely ‘in a
time of peace, lays up arms, and such like necessaries in case of a
war.’ Mrs. Tracey desires me to
give her respects.”
* I apprehend that the opportunitates of my great-grandfather were neither large nor
frequent at this or any other period of his honest, unambitious career. To what precise
extent he was enabled to supply his son William
with funds, during the absences of the latter from home, I have no means of knowing;
but I should surmise that frugality was among his virtues, whether he would or no.
|
Maria Bland [née Romanzini] (1769-1838)
English singer of Italian-Jewish origins; she performed at Drury Lane, Sadler's Wells,
and Vauxhall Gardens, marrying the actor George Bland in 1790.
James Clowe (d. 1788)
He was educated at Glasgow University where he was Professor of Logic and Rhetoric at the
University from 1752 until 1787.
Charles Dignum (1765 c.-1827)
English tenor trained by Thomas Linley who performed for several decades at Drury
Lane.
Euclid (300 BC fl.)
Greek mathematician who lived in Alexandria; his
Elements forms
the basis of geometry.
Eutropius (363 fl.)
Roman historian; author
Breviarm ad urbe condita in ten
books.
Caleb Fleming (1698-1779)
Dissenting preacher, political radical, and publisher of controversial tracts; he was
pastor of Pinner Hall in London (1753-77).
Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
American printer, scientist, writer, and statesman; author of
Poor
Richard's Almanack (1732-57).
Miss Hagley (1794 fl.)
Actress and singer who trained under Thomas Linley and performed at Drury Lane 1789-92; a
Jewess, she converted to Christianity at the time of her marriage to a Mr. Allen, Liverpool
sailmaker.
Grace Hazlitt [née Loftus] (1746-1837)
The daughter of Thomas Loftus of Wisbech, ironmonger; in 1766 she married the elder
William Hazlitt.
John Hazlitt (1767-1837)
Miniaturist and portrait painter who studied under Joshua Reynolds, the elder brother of
the essayist. A radical and alcoholic, the
Gentleman's Magazine
reported that he “was, like his brother, of an irritable temperament.”
Margaret Hazlitt [Peggy] (1770-1841)
The daughter of William Hazlitt (1737–1820) and elder sister of the critic; her journal
was published in 1967.
William Hazlitt (1737-1820)
Born in Ireland and educated at University of Glasgow, he was a Unitarian minister and
father of the essayist.
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
English essayist and literary critic; author of
Characters of
Shakespeare's Plays (1817),
Lectures on the English Poets
(1818), and
The Spirit of the Age (1825).
George Pulleyn Hinton (d. 1864)
Unitarian minister at Crediton where he knew the elder William Hazlitt; he contributed to
the
Monthly Repository while minister of Marshfield in Bristol, and
was afterwards a lawyer at Bristol and minister of Frenchay near Bristol (1858-64).
Horace (65 BC-8 BC)
Roman lyric poet; author of
Odes,
Epistles, Satires, and the
Ars Poetica.
John Philip Kemble (1757-1823)
English actor renowned for his Shakespearean roles; he was manager of Drury Lane
(1783-1802) and Covent Garden (1803-1808).
Ovid (43 BC-17 AD c.)
Roman poet famous for his erotic
Art of Love and his mythological
poem,
The Metamorphoses.
Richard Price (1723-1791)
Dissenting divine, philosopher, and political radical who was the target of Burke's
remarks in
Reflections on the Revolution in France; he published
Review of the Principal Questions and Difficulties in Morals
(1758).
Joseph Priestley (1733-1804)
Dissenting theologian, schoolmaster, and scientist; he was author of
The History and Present State of Electricity, with Original Experiments
(1767).
Mr. Railton (1803 fl.)
William Hazlitt's Liverpool patron. If Hazlitt's editor Sikes is correct about the names,
this would be Joseph Benn Railton (b. 1773)—brother, not father, of Frances-Ann (1769-1840)
who Hazlitt admired and who married William Wentworth Deschamps in 1796. Their father,
Joseph Railton, was a London attorney who died a suicide in 1797.
Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792)
English portrait-painter and writer on art; he was the first president of the Royal
Academy (1768).
Adam Smith (1723-1790)
Friend of David Hume and professor of logic at Glasgow University (1751); he wrote
Theory of the Moral Sentiments (1759) and
The
Wealth of Nations (1776).
Richard Suett (1755-1805)
English comic actor and singer who made his Drury Lane début in 1780; Charles Lamb was
fond of him.
Joseph Swanwick (1777-1841)
After study with the elder William Hazlitt at Wem he attended New College, Hackney; he
was a manufacturer in Chester.
The Monthly Repository. (1806-1838). Continued for three decades under various titles; Leigh Hunt was editor in
1837-38.