The Autobiography of William Jerdan
Ch. 18: Mr. Perceval
|
MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL. |
133 |
CHAPTER XVIII.
MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL.
Murder most foul, as at the best it is,
But the most foul, strange, and unnatural.—Hamlet.
|
A meditated and contrived murder.—Henry V.
|
A murder which I thought a sacrifice.—Othello.
|
My narrative of this catastrophe, which I hope may not be
without its moral,—teaching the best-intentioned to take heed how they stand lest they
fall,—has occupied so much space that I must open a new chapter for the second, and far
more important event, which I announced as having befallen within the sphere of my personal
action. I allude to the murder of Mr. Perceval, on
the 11th of May, 1812, the full and exact particulars of which have never yet been laid
before the public; though the broad facts have been truly stated, and even the details,
generally, communicated with so near an approach to accuracy, that were it not desirable to
have so momentous a piece of History free from all error, I should hardly deem it necessary
to re-write, with some additions, the narrative published from my pen, in Fisher’s National Portrait
Gallery.*
About 5 o’clock of the tragical day referred to, I had
* See Life of the Rt. Hon. Spencer
Perceval, vol. i. 1830. |
walked down to the House to listen, in my turn, to the interminable
debates in Committee on the Orders in Council, which were very briefly reported in the
newspapers. On ascending the broad flight of steps which led to the folding door of the
lobby, I perceived the minister, with whom I had the honour of a slight acquaintance,
immediately behind me, with his light and lithesome step following in the same direction. I
saluted him, and was saluted in return, with that benevolent smile which I was so instantly
destined to see effaced for ever, and pushing open and holding back the half door, to allow
the precedence of entering, I of course made way for him to go in.
He did enter, and there was an instant noise, but as a physical fact it is
very remarkable to state that, though I was all but touching him, and if the ball had
passed through his body it must have lodged in mine, I did not hear
the report of the pistol. It is true it was fired in the inside of the lobby, and I was
just out of it; but, considering our close proximity, I have always found it difficult to
account for the phenomenon I have noticed. I saw a small curling wreath of smoke rise above
his head, as if the breath of a cigar; I saw him reel back against the ledge on the inside
of the door; I heard him exclaim, “Oh God!” or “Oh my God!” and
nothing more or longer (as reported by several witnesses), for even that exclamation was
faint; and then making an impulsive rush, as it were, to reach the entrance to the house on
the opposite side for safety, I saw him totter forward, not half way, and drop dead between
the four pillars which stood there in the centre of the space, with a slight trace of blood
issuing from his lips. All this took place ere with moderate speed you could count five!
Great confusion, and almost as immediately great alarm ensued. Loud cries were uttered, and
rapidly
| MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL. | 135 |
conflicting orders and remarks on every hand made a perfect
Babel of the scene; for there were above a score of people in the lobby, and on the instant
no one seemed to know what had been done, or by whom. The corse of Mr. Perceval was lifted up by Mr. William Smith, the member for Norwich, assisted by Lord Francis Osborne, a Mr. Phillips,
and several others, and borne into the office of the Speaker’s Secretary, by the
small passage on the left hand, beyond and near the fire-place.—It must have been, pallid
and deadly, close by the murderer; for in a moment after Mr. Eastaff,
one of the clerks of the Vote Office, at the last door on that side, pointed him out, and
called “That is the murderer!” Bellingham moved slowly to a bench on the hither side of the fire-place,
near at hand, and sat down. I had in the first instance run forward to render assistance to
Mr. Perceval, but only witnessed the lifting of his body, followed
the direction of Mr. Eastaff’s hand, and seized the assassin by
the collar, but without violence on one side, or resistance on the other. Comparatively
speaking, a crowd now came up, and among the earliest Mr.
Vincent Dowling, Mr. John Norris, Sir Charles Long, Sir Charles
Burrell, Mr. Henry Burgess, and, in a
minute or two, General Gascoigne from a committee
room up stairs, and Mr. Hume, Mr. Whitbread, Mr.
Pole, and twelve or fifteen members from the House. Meanwhile
Bellingham’s neckcloth had been stripped off, his vest
unbuttoned, and his chest laid bare. The discharged pistol was found beside him, and its
companion was taken, loaded and primed, from his pocket. An opera-glass, papers, and other
articles were also pulled forth, principally by Mr. Dowling, who was
on his left, whilst I stood on his right hand; and except for his frightful agitation, he
was as passive as a child. Little was said to him. General
Gascoigne on coming up and getting a glance through the surrounding
spectators observed that he knew him at Liverpool, and asked if his name was
Bellingham, to which he returned no answer, but the papers
rendered farther question on this point unnecessary. Mr. Lynn, a
surgeon in Great George Street, adjacent, had been hastily sent for, and found life quite
extinct, the ball having entered in a slanting direction from the hand of the tall
assassin, and passed into his victim’s heart. Some one came out of the room with this
intelligence, and said to Bellingham, “Mr.
Perceval is dead! Villain, how could you destroy so good a man, and make
a family of twelve children orphans?” To which he almost mournfully replied,
“I am sorry for it.” Other observations and questions were addressed
to him by by-standers; in answer to which he spoke incoherently, mentioning the wrongs he
had suffered from government, and justifying his revenge on similar grounds to those he
used, at length, in his defence at the Old Bailey.
I have alluded to Bellingham’s “frightful agitation” as he sat on the
bench, and all this dreadful work was going on; and I return to it to describe it as far as
words can convey an idea of the shocking spectacle. I could only imagine something like it
in the overwrought painting of a powerful romance writer, but never before could conceive
the physical suffering of a strong muscular man, under the tortures of a distracted mind.
Whilst his language was cool, the agonies which shook his frame were actually terrible. His
countenance wore the hue of the grave, blue and cadaverous; huge drops of sweat ran down
from his forehead, like rain on the window-pane in a heavy storm, and, coursing his pallid
cheeks, fell upon his person where their moisture was distinctly visible; and from the
| MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL. | 137 |
bottom of his chest to his gorge, rose and receded, with almost every
breath, a spasmodic action, as if a body, as large or larger than a billiard-ball, were
choking him. The miserable wretch repeatedly struck his chest with the palm of his hand to
abate this sensation, but it refused to be repressed.
All the doors had by this time been locked and bolted, and all the avenues
examined and scoured. Nothing of accomplices was discovered, as, in fact, there were none,
and the deed was a solitary act of blood and vengeance. The disorder, however, began to be
resolved into form, though the consternation and anxieties of the parties engaged in these
movements seemed rather to augment than to diminish. In a few minutes when the nature of
the calamity was ascertained, the murderer was conveyed to the bar of the House, escorted
by messengers, and with my hold never relaxed from his collar till he stood there; and the
speaker having taken the chair the proceedings were initiated and carried through. It was
found that the Commons could not take cognizance of the matter, and the House was
accordingly adjourned in order that the magistrates present, Mr. M. Angelo Taylor, Mr. Alderman
Combe and others, might investigate the circumstances and pronounce on the
course to be adopted. Before them, in a room up stairs, Bellingham was arraigned, witnesses examined, and the prisoner, who hardly
spoke, committed, with due precautions, to Newgate to take his trial for the murder. It is
my hope that the depositions and examinations on this preliminary inquiry may be preserved,
in extenso, as they will furnish a more
accurate account of the whole transaction for future history, than can be extracted from
the meagre and law-shaped statements which were found to be sufficient for conviction on
the trial, but by no means
satisfy the plain, simple truth as it
relates to the appalling tragedy I have described. And I am the more desirous of this in
order to have justice done to my own individual share in the sad affair; for though there
is little to boast of in having seized an unresisting man, yet as others chose to plume
themselves on the courageous act (which required no courage, but which they did not
perform), and to speak mysteriously of the dangers to be eschewed from the loaded pistol, I
consider it due to myself to assert that no hand was laid upon the assassin in the lobby,
except my own, and Mr. Dowling’s for a few
moments, till he relinquished it to go in front, and empty the pockets of the criminal,
handing the papers to Mr. Hume, who identified them
by his initials, J. H., to be produced in evidence when wanted.
The minutes of the Grand Jury, if such are fully kept, might also throw a
light on some particular parts; and I the rather allude to this possibility, to have an
opportunity of expressing my strong opinion upon the evils of the system supported by this
branch of our criminal jurisprudence. The precognition in Scotland, as it is conducted by
the public prosecutor, contributes admirably to the pure and satisfactory administration of
justice, between the country and the accused; but as the business is transacted within the
province of the Grand Jury, nothing can tend more distinctly to the perversion of facts and
the poisoning of the stream at the fountain-head. As in this momentous case, the witnesses
are assembled in the Grand Jury waiting-room, comparing notes, and talking of what they
said or did. Unconsciously, or through vanity, there is a too common aptitude in many
persons to appropriate to themselves the doings or merits of which fellow-witnesses have
informed them, and generally speaking there is (especially
| MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL. | 139 |
in
difficult questions, of which this was not an example) a disposition to fill up, and, as it
were dove-tail the circumstances, in order to make them all consistent and without flaw for
the opposite side to employ in defeating the process. Although not at variance with the
main and obvious features of this murder, there was a good deal of odd transposition and
concoction between the 11th of May and the 15th, when the criminal was tried and doomed to
die. Upon this inconsistency, at the time, I consulted Sir Charles
Long, one of the earliest witnesses in the lobby; and I may note that it was
one of the first things which recommended me to his cordial friendship (lasting to the day
of his death, as will appear in some, I trust, publicly interesting documents in a future
volume) that I forbore to publish a plain and truthful statement of the whole catastrophe,
for which he could vouch; because in the alarm and agitation which pervaded the country, it
might produce a dangerous effect to call in question any of these erroneous impressions,
seeing that, though false as regarded persons and smaller acts, they were substantially
true as regarded the perpetration of the crime and its condign punishment.
The judicial ordeal in the committee-room up-stairs was attended by some
accessions of eminent statesmen and members of Parliament, some of them intimate friends of
the deceased, who were deeply affected by the solemn and painful proceedings. For myself I
was so shaken by the awfulness of the event, that I was leaning on the stair-balluster for
support, and believe I should have fainted but for the kindness of Mr. (now Sir Charles) Burrell, who procured a draught of
water for me, and himself administered it to my parched lips. I have a grateful remembrance
of this relief of forty years ago! Without
being so revived I could
not have had power to give my evidence. Mr. Boys, a solicitor from
Margate, who was in the lobby with several witnesses from that place, in support of a bill
for improving the pier, played a conspicuous part on the occasion, but was not called on
the trial; where, indeed, other witnesses answered for him as they did for me.
The committal was formally made out about nine o’clock, and the
prisoner sent, securely guarded, to Newgate. The wonderful speed with which the
intelligence spread over London and the suburbs is almost incredible—one might have
supposed there were electric telegraphs, so unaccountable was the rapid diffusion of the
information, and the alarm it occasioned throughout the populous circle, as if a revolution
had broken out, and been commenced with a foul murder, unparalleled for national concern
since Felton’s assassination of the Duke of Buckingham.
On my weary return home to Old Brompton, I found that the news had
penetrated that retirement, and excited great uneasiness, which was only dissipated by my
arrival with the striking proofs of Bellingham’s pre-determined resolution, and the mortal means by which
he executed it. I had with me a manuscript copy of his petition to government, to
“remunerate his losses, and give compensation for his personal
sufferings:” it is written and signed “John
Bellingham,” in a bold mercantile hand, and marked, as I have noticed,
with the initials of Mr. Hume. This document I had
afterwards bound, and with a plan of the lobby and its occupants, and a facsimile of the
fatal pistol, presented to my much-valued friend Sir Francis
Freeling.* I had also the pair of pistols, and kept them till the day of the
trial; when there was a prodigious struggle for their possession among the official persons
engaged in the prose-
| MURDER OF MR. PERCEVAL. | 141 |
cution and the lawyers; and to whose lot they fell after I gave them
up, I am ignorant. I, however, laid them down on a sheet of paper, and traced their
size—not three inches in the barrel, hut a rather wide bore, and very strong in every part.
The only other remarkable article, which, however, I still retain, was a plain but powerful
opera-glass in a red case; and it was important, as it had frequently been seen, during the
fortnight before, in the assassin’s hands in the gallery of the House of Commons,
whence he surveyed the members below, and ascertained surely by asking the reporters which
was Mr. Perceval. There can, therefore, be no doubt
but that he had long fixed upon his victim; and given up the idea, if he ever entertained
it, of murdering Lord Leveson Gower, whom he accused of
traversing his commercial course in Russia.
I received my subpoena on Thursday, the 14th, attended at the Grand Jury
and the Old Bailey on Friday, the 15th, but was not examined; and the wretched being
expiated, as far humanly as such guilt can be expiated, his atrocious crime, in front of
Newgate on Monday, the 18th; one week having sufficed to fulfil this memorable tragedy.
John Bellingham (1770-1812)
The bankrupt tradesman who assassinated the prime minister Spencer Perceval in the House
of Commons 11 May 1812; unrepentant, he was tried and executed within a week. Byron
witnessed his execution.
Henry Burgess (1781-1863)
Quaker cloth merchant and financial journalist opposed to free trade.
Sir Charles Merrik Burrell, third baronet (1774-1862)
Educated at Westminster and Cambridge, he was a Conservative MP for New Shoreham
(1806-62), known as “father of the House of Commons.” Robert Southey was his classmate at
Westminster.
Harvey Christian Combe (1752-1818)
He was a wealthy brewer, friend of Charles James Fox, alderman, and Whig MP for London
(1796-1817).
Vincent George Dowling (1785-1852)
Journalist who worked as a reporter for
The Star and
The Day and from 1824 was editor of
Bell's Life in
London.
John Felton (1595 c.-1628)
The disgruntled soldier who murdered the unpopular Duke of Buckingham at Portsmouth,
becoming a hero of ballad poetry.
Sir Francis Freeling, first baronet (1764-1836)
Postal reformer and member of the Roxburghe Club; he was secretary to the General Post
Office. He was a friend of William Jerdan and Sir Walter Scott.
Isaac Gascoyne (1763 c.-1841)
After service in the Coldstream Guards he was a Conservative MP for Liverpool (1796-1831)
who opposed abolition of the slave trade.
George Granville Leveson- Gower, first duke of Sutherland (1758-1833)
The son of the first marquess of Stafford (d. 1803); he was one of the wealthiest men in
Britain with an annual income of £200,000; his program for Scottish clearances and
resettlement was widely unpopular. He was created duke in 1833.
Joseph Hume (1777-1855)
After service in India he became a radical MP for Weymouth (1812), Aberdeen (1818-30,
1842-55), Middlesex (1830-37), and Kilkenny (1837-41); he was an associate of John Cam
Hobhouse and a member of the London Greek Committee. Maria Edgeworth: “Don't like him
much; attacks all things and persons, never listens, has no judgment.”
Charles Long, baron Farnborough (1760-1838)
Tory politician, connoisseur, and advisor to George IV on matters of taste; he was
paymaster general 1807-26, and raised to the peerage in 1826.
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
William Smith (1756-1835)
Educated at the dissenting academy at Daventry, he was a Whig MP for Sudbury (1784-90,
1796-1802), Camelford (1790-96), and Norwich (1802-30), a defender of Joseph Priestley and
follower of Charles Fox. His 1817 speech in Parliament denouncing Robert Southey attracted
much attention.
Michael Angelo Taylor (1757 c.-1834)
Educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was MP (1784-34) for a variety of
constituencies; originally a Tory he gravitated to the Whigs over the course of his long
career.
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.