The Autobiography of William Jerdan
Ch. 15: Learned Societies
‣ Ch. 15: Learned Societies
CHAPTER XV.
FORMATION OF THE ZOOLOGICAL AND FOUNDATION OF THE ROYAL GEOGRAPHICAL
SOCIETIES—THE FOREIGN LITERARY
GAZETTE—TALLEYRAND—INTRAMURAL SEPULCHRE—CEMETERIES—THE
GARRICK CLUB.
“Quorum pars * * * fui.*”
|
From personal sketching, I shall alternate to a glance at public
affairs, in which the “Gazette”
took a prominent interest, and to which I devoted myself with much assiduity. With
Mr. Vigors, in the establishment of the
Zoological Society, I co-operated zealously, and was rewarded with the compliment of a
perpetual ivory ticket, which I still retain, though I can very seldom use it. To this
succeeded the formation of the Royal Geographical Society, the merit of originating which I
claim for the “Literary Gazette” and its Editor.
The first idea and suggestion ever breathed for such an institution
appeared in the “Literary Gazette”
of the 24th of May, 1828, when, in answer to a correspondent, I wrote and published the
following paragraph:—
“With regard to the hint that a Geographical Society
* A word illegible. It seems something like mag! Perhaps magna.—Quære, by Printer. |
| ORIGIN OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY. | 267 |
would be an excellent
institution in England, we perfectly agree with our correspondent A. C.
C. It is a great desideratum among our literary and scientific
associations. Our numerous travellers returning home would continually bring novelty
and information; and the meetings could not fail to be of the most agreeable and
instructive kind. We are persuaded it only needs three or four active and influential
persons to originate such a plan, in order to ensure its perfect success. * * * We
trust to see this matter taken up by efficient hands.”
From the egg thus dropt, the Royal Geographical Society was hatched;
though a little time was spent in the incubation; for it was not until four months after,
viz., the 20th of September, that the following appeared in No. 609 of the “Gazette”:—
“After your favourable mention in the ‘Literary Gazette’ of the 24th
of May, of the hint relating to the establishment of a Geographical Society, I
confidently expected that some of your correspondents would immediately discuss
the formation of such an institution. My expectations having, however, been
disappointed, and fearing that the answer to your correspondent may have
escaped the notice of those who feel desirous of promoting geographical
knowledge, I request you will spare me a small portion of your columns to
direct or recall attention to this important subject.
“No country is so deeply interested as England in the
acquisition of a correct knowledge of the physical, moral, and political
geography of every part of the world; yet, while we have societies for the
cultivation of almost every other branch of knowledge, we have none for the
cultivation
of that science on which our political and
commercial prosperity so greatly depends.
“The non-existence of a geographical society in
England cannot, I am certain, be traced to the want of persons to institute it:
for no nation abounds so much as this country in voyagers and travellers; and
the reading public generally considers the study of geography not less
agreeable than instructive. Neither can its absence arise from the want of
means for effectually executing the purposes, for we have active and
intelligent countrymen either constantly visiting or residing in almost every
part of the habitable globe.
“As we enjoy the benefit and pleasure derived from
geography, and are better circumstanced, in reference to its cultivation than
any other European nation, it may be inquired why a geographical society has
not long since been established in England? It is simply because no person
possessing influence and energy has proposed its establishment. If the
formation of a geographical society was proposed, or zealously patronised by a
few distinguished individuals, there is no doubt that a society, which would
unite the suffrages of the politician, the man of letters, and the merchant,
would rapidly become eminent for its numbers and utility.
“It would be easy to enumerate the objects to which a
geographical society would direct its attention, and the means by which they
might be obtained; but I will limit myself by stating, that I think statistics,
the topography of the British empire, and history, so far as it is intimately
connected with geography, should be included among its objects; and that
furnishing travellers with topics of inquiry connected with the countries they
visit, and encouraging them by conferring honorary distinctions, or pecuniary
rewards, and by the publication of their observations, should be employed as
means of increasing our geographical knowledge.
|
FOUNDATION OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY. |
269 |
“In conclusion, I take the liberty of stating my
conviction of the strong probability that geography, through being honoured and
patronised, would be more generally and deeply studied, and thereby attain the
rank of a science, which it should, but does not at present possess in England.
Still, after thus moving the matter in various likely quarters, and
stimulating and negotiating, more than a year was spent before Mr. Huttmann, of the Asiatic Society, the writer of the foregoing letter,
Mr. Britton, and one or two other individuals
favourable to the project, with myself, and canvassed by him, viz., Captain (now Admiral)
Smyth, Francis
Baily, Lieut. Stratford, Colonel Colby, &c, succeeded in procuring the required
co-operation. In consequence of a communication from Mr. Britton, with
the first uncorrected proof of a Prospectus on the 8th of May, 1830 (“L. G.,” No. 694), I promulgated the following notice:—
“We are very glad to have received the prospectus of a plan for
forming a London Geographical Society, which we have long considered to be a great
desideratum among our learned and useful national institutions. The Geographical
Society of Paris has contributed, and is always contributing, much valuable information
to the world; and assuredly this maritime country, with colonies in every corner of the
earth, the most enterprising seamen, and the most zealous travellers, ought not to be
in the rear, where it has the means of being at the head of such interesting inquiries.
The prospectus for the establishment of the London Geographical Institution, after
remarking on the paramount consequence of geographical science, and the want of any
encouragement to its cultivation in England (of all the countries in the
world!!); and after describing the progress and beneficial
results of the Parisian association during the nine years of its existence, goes on to
propose the formation of a similar society in London, whose object shall be to collect
and register all the important facts comprehended under the two great divisions of
political and physical geography; those of physical geography, including mountains,
rivers, soil, climate, distribution of animals, vegetables, minerals, &c.; and
those of political geography, comprehending ancient and moral civil divisions of the
countries, sites of towns, both ancient and modern; nature of government; distribution
of languages; roads, canals, manufactures, population, education; the whole statistics
of a country, &c. A house or chambers; a library, to contain all the best books on
geography, with maps, charts, &c.; a correspondence to be formed with similar
societies and individuals in different parts of the world; prizes for the determination
of particular questions, and inquiries, which would extend our knowledge of
geographical facts, and the occasional publication, in a small and cheap form, of all
the useful results at which the society arrives, are among the leading features of this
plan, of the success of which we cannot entertain a doubt, and to the advancement of
which we shall be happy to contribute by every means in our power, especially as the
idea was originally thrown out and recommended in our columns more than twelve months
ago.”
I made some corrections and alterations in this prospectus, and it was
immediately printed and circulated among parties thought likely to approve of and promote
the design. The result was all that could be wished. The original suggestions of the
“Gazette” were adopted and
acted upon. The hints, if they did not immediately fructify, took root; and, at last, in
the summer of 1830, a meeting of the Raleigh
(Travelling) Club toot place, with Mr. (afterwards Sir John)
Barrow in the chair; than whom there could not be a more desirable person to
preside over the resolutions, seven in number, then and there agreed to, for
“Establishing a Geographical Society.” Farther, a potential provisional
committee of individuals, distinguished for scientific knowledge and extensive travel, was
appointed to frame the constitution of the society, and their names afforded to the public
a certain assurance of success; for I have but to mention Mountstuart Elphinstone, Sir Thomas
Brisbane, Sir A. de Capell Brooke,
Mr. Cam Hobhouse (now Lord
Broughton), Mr. Hay (of the Colonial
Office), Colonel Leake, Captain (now Admiral) Beaufort, Captain Basil
Hall, Sir John Franklin (alas!),
Admiral Smyth, Captain Mangles, Mr. Barrow, Colonel Colby, Mr. Robert
Brown, the great botanist, Mr. Henry
Ward, Major the Honourable G. Keppell,
Mr. Murdoch, Mr.
Greenough, and though last, assuredly not least (and. in the result, the
most ardent and efficient friend to the society), Mr. (now Sir) Roderick Murchison, in order to show that the work was now undertaken under
auspices which could not fail to bring it into extended action, and direct its course to
eminent utility and éclat. Captain
Maconochie was elected secretary, and his indefatigable character also
augured well for the infant association.
It is only justice to observe, that the parties who had stirred the
business to this public demonstration, enjoying the prospect of a fruitful issue to their
labours, displayed no petty jealousy on the occasion, but cordially joined, and gave their
best support to the distinguished band which had, at length, embarked in the cause, and
launched it with a wet sheet and a flowing sail on so bright a sea.* The
Dukes of Wellington and Bedford; Lords Melville,
Aberdeen, Bexley, and Prudhoe, Davies Gilbert; Sirs R.
Peel, George Murray, George Clerk, H.
Inglis, E. Parry, George Cockburn; the Right
Hon. C. Yorke, Mr. Wilson Croker,
Captain Beechey, Dr.
Roget, and many other men, eminent in the intellectual annals of their time,
were speedily enrolled as members; and this great maritime country witnessed at last the
foundation of an institute which has since done much for its honour and advantage, and
will, I trust, continue for centuries to come, to expand and enrich the wide-spread field
of its important labours.
Frequent meetings were now convened, the proceedings at which I had great
pleasure in making public, and in consequence of which above five hundred adhesions were
announced of noblemen and gentlemen of distinction in life and literature, such as I never
knew combined before at the commencement of any undertaking of any kind. Mr. Barrow in an admirable address took a comprehensive
view of the objects contemplated, and the ample means which a nation like England
possessed, with its vast colonies and fleets covering every sea, to accomplish them all in
a splendid manner. Before the end of the season Lord
Goderich (Earl of Ripon) was elected President, and the
Society entered fairly and fully upon the career of its imperial usefulness. There have
been periods of comparative languor since, but feeling, as I think I have a right to do,
somewhat in loco parentis, I take a papa’s
pride in believing that it is at the present day in as flourishing and beneficial a
condition as ever it was at any preceding date.
In this year I was, as previously told, one of the half-dozen founders of
the Melodists’ Club; but had a far more busy time of it in making preparations for
the issue of a new periodical, which required immense correspondence,
| STAFF &c., OF FOREIGN LITERARY GAZETTE. | 273 |
research, and application, yet which
I was not afraid to face with one colleague, in whose intelligence and spirit I had the
utmost confidence, and the alliance of others of great information and ability. This was no
other than the weekly publication of a journal as full of matter as the “Gazette,” of a similar form, and doing the
same for the literature, arts, and sciences of the rest of the world, as its elder brother
was doing for native land. The “Foreign
Literary Gazette” offered a seductive prospect of valuable matter and
promise of reputation and reward. My immediate associate was my friend Captain Williams, since and now so favourably known to the
public in the official capacity of Inspector of Prisons; and I am inclined to fancy that
the cultivation of his mind and practice of his pen in this literary pursuit may have had
some share in producing that sagacity which he has displayed in performing the difficult
duties of his office, and marked the lucidity which has imparted such high value to his
Blue-book Reports. There are few schools superior to the school of literary reviewing and
miscellaneous essay for developing the intellectual faculties and enlarging the
understanding. To write even indifferently men must learn something; to write well they
must study devotedly and learn a great deal, a certain degree of exercise and discipline of
the faculties is indispensable. My friend was no superficial reader, and had seen much of
the world to improve his natural qualifications. And so, we set to work upon the
“Foreign Literary Gazette,” of which thirteen
numbers from January 6, 1830, are now lying before me, and seem to me, on perusal, to be
most deservedly entitled to a warmer reception and a better fate than they met with either
from learned or popular circles.
Our Adjutant-General was Mr. H. Smith, an assistant
of
adequate calibre, a steady good hard-worker, who could go through
a great deal and perform the service very satisfactorily. As Secretary to King’s
College, London, he has evinced the possession of these sterling requisites. Mr. Lloyd of the Foreign Post-Office (my diligent and
laborious coadjutor in the “Gazette” for more than twenty years) and other allies formed a strong staff;
and correspondents were engaged from Petersburgh to Naples. Publishers in every quarter
were also enlisted, and in order to perfect the arrangements, Mr.
Smith travelled into Belgium, Holland, and Germany, and Captain Williams into France, whilst I, at-home, obtained
the ambassadorial patronage and co-operation of Prince
Lieven, Prince Esterhazy, Lord Burghersh (then at Florence), and other persons in
power who could facilitate our intercourse with distant countries, and help us in other
respects to a most convenient extent.
An imposing field was chalked out and a flattering vista opened. Messrs.
Longmans and Mr.
Colburn for a considerable time debated on taking £500 interests each,
but I believe it occurred to them that the task of editing would distract me too much from
the “Literary Gazette” (then a very
lucrative investment) and they threw cold water on the Novelty, from its concoction to its
finale; to the need for which latter end their discountenance, in great measure,
contributed. Mr. Murray did not coquette with my
proposal to him to join forces, and his note in answer is so characteristic, that—here it
is—
“Albemarle-street, December 23, 1829.
“My dear Jerdan,
“I have not been so inattentive to your former
applications respecting the ‘Foreign Literary Gazette,’ as it may have appeared to you;
for upon every occasion
| FOREIGN LITERARY GAZETTE. | 275 |
that I received a letter from you on this subject I wrote to or inquired of
Messrs.
Longman what they intended to
do; but I never could obtain a decisive or satisfactory answer.
“I decline joining in the ‘Foreign Literary Gazette,’ for no other
reason than the thorough knowledge of myself—that I should be a restless and
teasing partner—and indeed I can absolutely do nothing when I am obliged to act
with others.
“With most sincere thanks for your very kind offer,
and with the warmest wishes for the success of the undertaking (of which I have
not the smallest doubt),
“I remain,
“My dear Jerdan,
“Most faithfully yours,
It was, however, the stamp which defeated us. Some of the arrangements
are of literary curiosity enough to be mentioned. In Paris, Captain Williams found it expedient to salary a literary agent, to visit
all the booksellers’ shops from week to week, and collect the budgets they professed
themselves ready and desirous to forward for notice to England. The secretaries and
reporters of the literary and scientific societies engaged to send regular reports of their
proceedings. An eminent “hand” undertook the fine arts. A prospectus in French
was published with Galignani’s name at the
foot of it; as was another in Italian, for circulation in Italy, with the address of
Signor W. Jackson, of Rome, and recommended to the classics of
that Carbonari country by “suoi devotiss. Servitori i Redattori della Foreign Literary Gazette!”
In short Captain Williams’ Parisian arrangements were upon a
perfect scale, to secure
from persons of acknowledged talent in every
branch we sought to illustrate constant communications of a superior order.
Mr. Smith was equally assiduous and successful in his mission, and in
all the considerable places he visited, made engagements with such writers for instance as
De Reiffenberg and Quetelet, at Brussels; Dr. Blume, at
the Hague; got the assurance of my friend, Mr.
Bosworth’s best services; and at Berlin, Copenhagen, Leipzig, Breslau,
Dresden, Gottingen, Darmstadt, he, &c., &c., secured the co-operation of first-rate
celebrities.
I look back on the excitement of this affair with astonishment. The paper
was announced to be produced, but how? with already as much, or more on my head than I
could do justice to, the brain-seething of the plans and details did not allow me to take
into consideration. But it came out, with great novelty of information for English readers,
and a very pleasing and instructive Miscellany it was. It would require more room than I
can afford to attempt even a slight notice of its more important contents, but I rescue
from its sad oblivion a few anecdotes of Talleyrand,
which may not have crept out of it elsewhere.
“ANECDOTES OF TALLEYRAND.
“[Very many are the anecdotes recounted of the celebrated
Talleyrand; we do not remember a tithe of
those we have heard and read, which, like Lord
Norbury’s, sparkle and are partially forgotten; but the following
will, we trust, be found to be original, and pregnant enough for a half-page of relievo
in the ‘Foreign Literary
Gazette.’]
“Shortly after the affair of Pichegru and
Moreau, a banker who had been introduced to
Talleyrand, and
| ANECDOTES OF TALLEYRAND. | 277 |
admitted to the honour of several conferences with
him, wrote to his Excellency to solicit an audience, which was granted.
Talleyrand was at that time minister for foreign affairs. The
report of the death of George III. had just obtained
circulation throughout Paris, and was naturally suspected to produce a great sensation
on the stock exchange. The banker, who, like many of his financial brethren, wished to
make a good hit, and thought the present a favourable opportunity, had the indiscretion
to reveal to the minister the real object of his visit. Talleyrand
listened to him without moving a muscle of his phlegmatic visage, and at length replied
in a solemn tone:—‘Some say that the King of England is dead, others say that
he is not dead; but do you wish to know my opinion?’ ‘Most
anxiously, Prince!’ ‘Well then, I believe—neither! I mention
this in confidence to you; but I rely on your discretion: the slightest imprudence
on your part would compromise me most seriously.’
“Madame Flamelin one day reproached
M. de Moutrou with his attachment to Talleyrand. ‘Good God! madam,’
replied M. de Moutrou, with naïveté, ‘who could help liking him, he is so
wicked!’
“Talleyrand, speaking of
the members of the French Academy, observed—‘after all, it is possible they
may one day or other do something remarkable. A flock of geese once saved the
Capitol of Rome.’
“On a certain occasion, a friend was conversing with Talleyrand on the subject of Mademoiselle Duchenois, the French actress and another
lady, neither of them remarkable for beauty. The first happens to have peculiarly bad
teeth, the latter none at all. ‘If Madame S——,’ said
Talleyrand, ‘only had teeth she would be as ugly as
Mademoiselle Duchenois.’
“A distinguished personage once remarked to Talleyrand, ‘in the upper Chamber at least
are to be found men possessed of
consciences.’ ‘Consciences,’ replied
Talleyrand, ‘to be sure: I know many a peer who has
got two.’
“Madame de Staël,
speaking of Talleyrand, illustrates his
character in the following happy and familiar manner:—‘The good
Maurice is not unlike the mannikins with which children
play—dolls with heads of cork and legs of lead: throw them up which way you please,
they are sure to fall on their feet.’
“Talleyrand had a
confidential servant excessively devoted to his interests, but withal superlatively
inquisitive. Having one day intrusted him with a letter, the prince watched his
faithful valet from the window of his apartment, and with some surprise saw him reading
the letter en route. On the next day a similar commission was confided to the servant,
and to the second letter was added a postscript, couched in the following
terms:—‘You may send a verbal answer by the bearer; he is perfectly
acquainted with the whole affair, having taken the precaution to read this
previously to its delivery!’ Such a postscript must have been more
effective than the severest reproaches.”
But neither able reviews, interesting original papers, accounts of
important scientific discoveries, nor lighter matter and amusing anecdotes, could prevail
upon John Bull to disburse two shillings a week for two
literary journals (the Foreign was published every Wednesday), yet the circulation was
satisfactory, but the expenses (including considerable sums for expeditious translations
from several languages) were consuming, and the advertisements did not come in flush (my
partners in the “ould” L. G.
setting the example of retentiveness); and thus, in spite of gallant exertions, we found it
prudent to give up our arduous work
| BENEVOLENT INSTITUTIONS. | 279 |
at
the close of its first, and last, quarter. In bidding farewell, we stated that we had
entered into the speculation in the belief that a desire to possess a speedy acquaintance
with foreign literature and science was so prevalent in England, that a work of the kind
would be encouraged to such an extent as to remunerate the very great labour and expense
that must be incurred in carrying it on. Our brief experiment had convinced us we were
partially mistaken in our opinion. It was true, the journal had met with liberal support,
and most flattering testimonies of approbation; but the former had not been sufficient to
induce us, on a rational view of the case, to proceed with the design. We had enjoyed, as
our prospectus held out, regular contributions from the first men in Europe, and yet, great
as the cost was of printing nearly every syllable from MSS. in modern and ancient
languages, translated, we firmly believed that perseverance and the outlay of much capital,
would have established the publication.
Thus we closed our well-intended labours, after thirteen weeks’
incessant application, building on foundations expensively as well as extensively laid
down; and my friend and myself, on counting up our comforts, found that we had lost, as
nearly as possible, a hundred pounds per week on our foreign whistle.
Though losses and crosses Be lessons right severe, There’s wit there, ye’ll get there, Ye’ll find nae other where. |
So singeth the Ayrshire bard, but
whether I learnt anything worth while or not from this experiment, I always flatter myself
that it was the best, and ultimately the most beneficial and productive lesson my esteemed
colleague ever learnt.
The nature of my occupation, and the manifold connections to which it
led, brought me into contact with all the schemes that arose, from time to time, for
material and social improvement, or ameliorating the condition of such sections of the
community as were suffering distress or wrong from the constitution of our revolving
system, ever causing mutations, which, on the progress of events and the consequent
prosperity of individuals and classes, irresistibly tend to the misfortunes and adversity
of others. The general level is, no doubt, maintained; but, in preserving it, it is the
fate of some to rise and some to fall, by the certain force of circumstances, and neither
by error nor fault of their own. Works and efforts for the common good are almost
invariably attended by partial, and frequently by wide-spread, injuries.
The feeling conviction of this law, and the hardships which it inflicts,
is the origin of most of the benevolent institutions and charities which reflect so much
honour on British humanity, and especially abound in the metropolis of the Empire. A number
of these sprung up in my active time, and it is a source of heartfelt consolation to me
that my humble exertions were never withheld from their aid to the utmost of my power. I
can conscientiously lay the unction to my soul, that I was not one of the kind so
poignantly anathematised by my friend Martin
Tupper:—
Oh, but ’tis war to the knife man, Selfish and desperate strife, man, * * * * What do they care for your cares, man, Nobody heeds How the heart bleeds, Nor how a poor fellow fares, man. |
On the contrary, I ever took a lively interest even in the minor
propositions and processes devised for beneficial ends,
and in reviewing my life (with all its imperfections), I can safely
say that I did not neglect my duties towards my fellow-creatures, nor fail to contribute my
share of usefulness to the common weal. A refreshing evidence of this (recalling
long-forgotten things to my memory) has reached me since the publication of my preceding
volumes; and as the writer touches on improvements yet to be carried into execution, I beg
leave to add his letter, and a sample of its enclosure, in illustration of the things which
have since been done, and the things which it is still desirable to effect:—
“January 19, 1853.
“Dear Sir,
“In your first two volumes of amusing autobiography,
on referring to your editorial labours in the ‘Literary Gazette,’ you, with great truth,
take credit for its influence on public opinion, as evinced by many of the
hints scattered through its columns having been seized and acted on. You name
some instances; you might have taken credit for more.
“I was for some years, though at distant intervals, an
occasional contributor to its pages. The few prose compositions you may call to
mind were all headed ‘A Few Queries;’
many of these related to architectural subjects. They were all accepted, and to
one paper was assigned the post of honour, the first page. I have not a copy of
each by me, but I can recall them to your recollection by a transcript of one,
which I herewith enclose, and therein you will see the articles alluded to.
“I think, too, it was in one of these papers that the
monstrous superstructure then overhanging the Mansion House, in the City, and
since removed, was first brought into notice.
“It was there, too, that attention was first directed
to the utterly neglected condition of the Parks, particularly Hyde Park,* now
become undoubtedly one of the completest and finest promenades in Europe.
“You will make such use of these hints as you may
think proper, and, with the best wishes for the success of your work,
“I am, dear Sir,
“Yours,
“ALPHA.”
“Take this,”
“What’s this.”—Old
Play.
“Whether Mr. M. A.
Taylor, who undertook by his late bill to make steam-engines
consume their own smoke, would have any objection to stand any day, a
little before he dined, just for five minutes, on London Bridge,
particularly on the western side? and whether, if he did so, ho might not
by the operation save himself the expense of a dinner, deducting only the
necessary charge for a dose of physic, to clean out his inside after the
treat?
“Whether it is quite fair to be always reproaching
our Continental neighbours for commencing buildings which they never
finish, while we exhibit Somerset House (the finest and most central object
of our metropolis) with an entire wing yet unbuilt, and thus left for the
best part of a century?
“For how many years is it to happen in this
‘great nation,’ as we delight to call it, that whilst other
capitals boast of superb palaces for their national pictures, a foreigner
shall be directed, when inquiring for ours, to a paltry little house, No.
100, Pall Mall, where he will find them disposed
* I remember a ridiculous con. at the time.
“Why are the three parks like single men?—Because, if taken
in, they are done for!” |
in such rooms as many a retired
cheesemonger would be far from being proud of?
“Whether, in these refining times, when a
cowkeeper has named his cow-shed a Lactearium, the old-fashioned name of
the City-road, leading to it, might not be considered obsolete, and changed
to that of the Via Lactea?
“Why the great western door of St. Paul’s,
affording so fine a vista to the cupola, is never opened? Whether the Dean
and Chapter are afraid that, by letting in so much light and air to the
church, all the damp and mildew would be excluded? or whether it is
intended for the benefit of the bun trade, the little door opened being
built close against the pastry-cook’s shop?
“Why the numbers of the pictures at our annual
exhibition are so ingeniously placed as to make up just one-half of the
fatigue of the day, in finding them out? whether there is any joke in the
thing? and where the gist lies?
“When the opening into Lincoln’s-inn
Fields, begun twenty years ago, by the way of Pickett Place, shall be
completed? and whether, whenever that event shall occur, it would not be a
great treat to mark the astonishment of many of the neighbouring
inhabitants at first sight of that terra incognita? many thousands having,
from its always having been so carefully shut up, never so much as dreamed
of its existence!
“What can possibly be the reason that this, the
finest square in England (perhaps in Europe), should be so sedulously shut
up from all observation, as a thing to be ashamed of; and, although within
a few yards on each side of the two greatest thoroughfares of the
metropolis, no access let into it but by by-ways and alleys? Whether any
very atrocious act, any very horrible murder, has brought upon its
precincts this heavy doom, or whether the
only reason
it is deemed proper to conceal it is the great quantity of lawyers living
in it?
“Whether the taste for music is not sufficiently
spread to allow of the Italian Opera being thrown open to the public, at
something like the prices at which it is enjoyed in other capitals? and, as
under the present system of exclusion all who have anything to do in its
management have been invariably ruined, whether it might not (just by way
of experiment) be as well to try, in place of the patronage of the great,
what might be done by the admission of the many?
“Why, as we seem at length awakened in this,
‘the first capital of Europe,’ to the propriety of a few
statues here and there, one or two might not, just by way of change, be
exhibited of marble? and whether, through the smoke which prevails always,
and the fog which prevails often, those of bronze do not, at a very few
feet distance, look wonderfully like huge heaps of mud?
“Why, amongst the many improvements for regaining
land from the water, that great marsh within view of the Royal Palace,
called the Parade, in St. James’s Park, might not be advantageously
attempted? or whether, as among the numerous Government offices which
surround it, so many persons are presumed to be cooling their heels in
attendance within, it is deemed but fair and equitable that the crowd
should he allowed to cool their heels without?”
These and many other suggestions of a similar kind were perseveringly
enforced in the page of the “Literary
Gazette,” and among others there was no design in which (as I have already
noticed) I took a more zealous concern than in the proposal to prohibit intra-mural burial,
and provide cemeteries in fitting adjacent localities, where the dead might repose amid
beauties of external nature,
| CEMETERY ON PRIMROSE HILL. | 285 |
grateful
to the senses of those who lamented their loss; and be resolved into their mortal elements
without poisoning the health and shortening the existence of the living. This important
subject has been ardently taken up since I first moved in it, and is, I now hope, in the
act of being fully reformed. Kensal Green, Brompton, Norwood, Highgate, and other sites
bear testimony to the eligibility of such establishments, but the good derived from them is
as nothing when compared with the greater good of shutting up the gorged graveyards in
London, and the horrible Golgothas in the vaults of churches, where thousands have been
borne to “rot and rot,” in most disgusting abomination. At the period of which
I am now writing, I recollect one grand scheme which I warmly supported—it was for a
spacious national cemetery, somewhat of the same character as that of Père la Chaise
at Paris, intended to occupy a site of 150 acres about Primrose Hill, and to be divided
into three regions of tombs, with catacombs, mausoleums, temples—laid out in the fine style
of ornamental gardening, and adorned with rich and varied displays of architecture and
sculpture. The estimated expense was 400,000l., and it was
calculated that the 30,000 bodies annually deposited in the midst of the crowded capital,
could be solemnly interred here and remain undisturbed for generations, and until all that
once was man should be undistinguishable from his mother earth. The plan, however, fell to
the ground. The time was not yet ripe for so desirable a consummation.
But death and life, sadness and mirth sojourn next door to each other:
Festinat enim de currere velox Fiosculus angustte miserseque brevissima vitæ Portio; dum bibimus, dum serta, unguenta, puellas Poscimus, obstrepit non intellects senectus. |
I think the next matter that occupied my attention was the formation of
the Garrick Club. Accidentally meeting Lord Mulgrave in
the street (having missed the subjoined and preceding notes*) he told me he was going to
join a small party of friends and lovers of the drama at Mr.
Winston’s, in Charles-street, Covent Garden, in order to concert the
initiation of a club for the promotion of dramatic and general interest of the stage. His
Lordship at once put the imaginary shilling into my hand, and no recruit was ever a
heartier volunteer than I was. I accompanied him, and 150 eligible members were associated
on the broad principle that they would combine all the essentials of a club, limited to
200, with the advantages of literary society, by bringing together the patrons of the
drama, actors, and dramatic authors, and gentlemen who were most eminent in their
respective circles, and entertaining opinions congenial to the objects in view. The list of
200 was immediately filled up, the Duke of Sussex
elected patron, the Earl of Mulgrave, president, and Sir George Warrender, vice-president. Committee,
sub-committee, trustees, auditors, &c., were appointed, and the limitation of members
extended to 300. Many suggestions of ways ‘and means were offered, but finally
everything was left to the discretion of the committee, which was composed of noble
“I sent you a few lines the day before I left
town, to express to you the pleasure I should feel if you would consent
to be one of my confreres, to whom is confided the task of managing the
concerns of the Garrick club. My servant (who is an Italian) does not
seem very certain that he left the note at the right house. So I send
this, lest by any mistake of mine the committee should be deprived of
the benefit of your assistance during my absence from town. “Believe me,
“Yours, very
faithfully, “Mulgrave Castle, October 27.” |
and distinguished individuals, deemed most
likely to mould the undertaking into a successful shape. Probatt’s hotel, in
King-street, Covent Garden, was bought, and the interior skilfully and expeditiously
re-arranged according to club requisites, by Mr.
Beazeley, to the day of his death an active and pleasant member,
contributing his talent to the needful alterations, and his wit and humour to the social
enjoyment of the place. Into both these modes of doing my “possible” for the
new-born society, I also took a busy part in union with the president, vice-president,
Lord W. Lennox, Mr.
Frank Mills, and Mr. Beazeley (perhaps another or two)
in the choice of furniture, glasses, and other necessary articles, but particularly in the
selection of wines, whereon there hangs a tale.
Samples were sent in from various quarters, either recommended by friends
of the parties or ordered by the wine committee; and it so happened that Grove House was
the most convenient place to try and pronounce judgment on these candidates for the Garrick
custom. My coadjutors consequently did me the pleasure of dining several times at Brompton,
and the specialties of the occasion induced much merriment, and relished the more on
account of its difference from the formalities of set entertainments. The floor of one side
of the dining-room would be studded with an array of phials, vessels such as anchovy-sauce
or catsup are sold in, and bottles such as the parson stigmatised;
Ye gods avert from eyes divine, Such eyesores as a pint of wine. |
The whole, indeed, as the Yankees say, was “’larmin’ to look
at.” However, somehow or other, we got through our task (generally washed or blotted
it out by a cool bottle, of which the worth was known, from the
cellar), laid in for the club to begin with a sufficient quantity of what was most
approved, and suffered the rest to sink into vinous oblivion. So I fancied, but not so some
of the merchants who had been candidates for orders. Some months after I was rather
astonished by the appearance of a few “little bills” for the phials, anchovy,
and catsup and pint abortions alluded to. I remonstrated, in vain, and one after another as
they were delivered in, I paid the charges for these small temptations, without troubling
the club, as the club had not drank any; and not very reluctantly (except as to full price)
where the specimens exceeded the pintly modicum appeal to taste. By
accident I have yet one of these bills among my huddle of papers, and as its quantums
exceeded the wee measures, to pay for which, alone, I objected, I just copy the list to
show to what straits we were reduced in performing the dangerous service imposed upon us by
our unthinking confrères.
“1. Light old Port; 2. Stouter ditto; 3. Pale Sherry; 4. Brown
ditto; 5. West India Madeira; 6. East India ditto; 7. Hock; 8. ditto, red; 9. East India
Bucellas; 10. Sauterne; 11. Pale Champagne; 12. ditto, Brown; 13. Claret; 14. ditto; 15.
Whisky; 16. Pale Brandy; 17. Maraschino; 18. Noyeau Rouge; 19. ditto, Blanc; 20. Curacao;
and 21. Gold water”—the sum total of which caused my eyes to water (after my mouth
had), and a certain exchange of gold to pass from my pocket into that of the acute dealer,
who had not, unluckily for me, been deemed deserving of any commission.
It must have been an inspiration of such revels that I bore off the bell,
in a close competition, and linked my fame with that of the Garrick for ever, by devising
the symbol under which it flourishes, viz., the globe and legend in a garter, “All
the world’s a stage.” This was adopted
by
acclamation, and to give it more public celebrity, I had a wood-engraving cut, and with the
sanction and applause of the President and Committee printed it at the head of a series of
sixteen papers which adorned the light literature of the “Gazette” during the first half-year of the Club, in
whose library a letter-box was placed to receive contributions to illustrate dramatic
matters, and advance the interests of the theatrical world. In both instances, so cordially
did some of my “talented” colleagues second me, the proposed end was very
agreeably answered. In the first paper, after a beautiful translation of the chorus from
the “Seven before Thebes,”
of Æschylus, by Mr.
Frank Mills, the question agitated two years before in the “Gazette,” on the amendment of the law relative to dramatic
literary property (on Mr. G. Lamb’s motion in
the House of Commons), was again taken up and the cause, which has since been carried,
zealously advocated: and among the picked up facetiæ I see “I will never
marry a woman who can’t carve,” said M——.
“Why?” “Because she would not be a Help Meat for
me.” The next gave an account of the opening festival, at which the Duke of Sussex presided, and a charmingly appropriate song,
written by James Smith (“pleasantest of
pleasant men”) was admirably sung by Braham;
as were also a new glee, by a member, chaunted by the musical party, led by Sir George Smart, and a song composed and sung by
M. Sola. But it would lead me a Will o’ the Wisp chase to
pursue the scintillations of this meteor theme, and with all my liking for it, I must away;
only noting that farewell entertainments to Young
and Charles Kemble on their leaving the stage (the
former has retired from, the latter still graces the club with his gentlemanly manners and
long collected theatrical anecdote and intelligence) were very
interesting assemblies; and that the picture-gallery of Charles
Mathews (so exuberantly the delight of the Garrick) was purchased and
presented to it by its constant friend the late Mr.
Durrant, and is now one of the most interesting of the lions of London.
To finish this chapter agreeably to the spirit of its later pages, I have
only to add a jeu d’ esprit in which the initial letters stand
for James Smith and John
Robinson Planché.
Though not with lace bedizened o’er
From James’s and from Howell’s,
Ah! don’t despise us twenty-four
Poor consonants and vowels.
|
Though critics may your powers discuss,
Your charms applauding men see,
Remember you from four of us
Derive your X. L. N. C— J. S.
|
VESTRIS’S ANSWER TO THE ALPHABET.
Dear Friends! although no more a dunce
Than many of my betters,
I’m puzzled to reply at once
To four and twenty letters.
|
Perhaps you’ll think that may not he
So hard a thing to do,
For what is difficult to me,
Is A. B. C. to you.
|
However, pray dismiss your fears,
Nor fancy you have lost me,
Though many many bitter tears
Our first acquaintance cost me.
|
Believe me, till existence ends,
Whatever ill beset you,
My oldest literary friends,
|
Aeschylus (525 BC c.-456 BC c.)
Greek tragic poet, author of
Oresteia and
Prometheus Bound.
Francis Baily (1774-1844)
London stock-broker and astronomer; he was a founder and president of the Astronomical
Society and vice-president of the Geographical Society.
Sir John Barrow, first baronet (1764-1848)
English traveler, secretary of the Admiralty, and author of over two hundred articles in
the
Quarterly Review; he is remembered for his
Mutiny on the Bounty (1831).
Samuel Beazley (1786-1851)
Architect, playwright, and novelist; he contributed to the
New Monthly
Magazine and
Literary Gazette.
Sir Francis Beaufort (1774-1857)
Born in County Meath, he was naval lieutenant (1796) and hydrographer to the Navy
(1829-55). He was twice married.
Frederick William Beechey (1796-1856)
Son of the portrait painter Sir William Beechey; he was a naval officer and hydrographer
who published
Narrative of a Voyage to the Pacific and Berings Strait to
Co-operate with the Polar Expeditions, 1825-1828 (1831).
Joseph Bosworth (1788-1876)
Clergyman and Old English scholar, educated at the University of Aberdeen; he published
an
Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (1838).
John Braham (1777 c.-1856)
English tenor who began his career at the Covent Garden and Drury Lane theaters; he
assisted Isaac Nathan in setting Byron's
Hebrew Melodies.
Sir Thomas Makdougall Brisbane, baronet (1773-1860)
Educated at Edinburgh, he served under Wellington in the Peninsular War and was governor
of New South Wales (1821-25); he was president of the Royal Astronomical Society
(1828).
John Britton (1771-1857)
English autodidact, antiquary, and topographer; he published
Beauties
of Wiltshire (1801) and
Autobiography, 2 vols (1850,
1857).
Sir Arthur de Capell Broke, second baronet (1791-1858)
Educated at Magdalen College, Oxford, he succeeded his father in 1829 and pursued a
military career; he published travel books and was a founder of the Royal Geographical
Society.
Robert Brown (1773-1858)
Scottish botanist and friend of Mungo Park who sailed with Flinders on his Australian
expedition of 1801-05 and Parry on his polar expedition of 1819-20.
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
Sir George Cockburn (1763-1847)
After a long military career he published
A Voyage to Cadiz and
Gibraltar, up the Mediterranean to Sicily and Malta in 1810 and 1811 (1815) and
was a political supporter of Sir Robert Peel.
Henry Colburn (1785-1855)
English publisher who began business about 1806; he co-founded the
New
Monthly Magazine in 1814 and was publisher of the
Literary
Gazette from 1817.
Thomas Frederick Colby (1784-1852)
Educated at the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, he was an army officer and surveyor,
conducting the survey of Scotland, 1813-21.
John Wilson Croker (1780-1857)
Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's
Life of
Johnson (1831).
Robert Durrant (1835 fl.)
In 1835 he purchased from Charles Mathews a collection of 400 paintings and drawings of
theatrical subjects which he donated to the Garrick Club.
Mountstuart Elphinstone (1779-1859)
After education in the Edinburgh High School he was in the Bengal civil service (1796);
he was ambassador at Kabul (1808) and governor of Bombay (1819-27).
John Fane, eleventh earl of Westmorland (1784-1859)
The son of the tenth earl, educated at Harrow and Trinity College, Cambridge; after
service in the Napoleonic Wars he was a diplomat in Italy (1814-30) and ambassador to
Vienna (1851).
Sir John Franklin (1786-1847)
British explorer who led expeditions to the arctic in 1819-22 and 1825-27; he was lost
during an attempt to discover the Northwest Passage.
John Anthony Galignani (1796-1873)
Bookseller with his brother William; in 1821 they succeeded their father as publishers of
the Parisian newspaper
Galignani's Messenger..
Davies Gilbert (1767-1839)
Originally Giddy; born in Cornwall and educated at Pembroke College, Oxford, he was a
Whig MP for Helston (1804-06) and Bodmin (1806-32), and president of the Royal Society
(1827-30)
George Hamilton- Gordon, fourth earl of Aberdeen (1784-1860)
Harrow-educated Scottish philhellene who founded the Athenian Society and was elected to
the Society of Dilettanti (1805); he was foreign secretary (1841-1846) and prime minister
(1852-55).
George Bellas Greenough (1778-1855)
Originally Bellas; educated at Eton and Pembroke College, Cambridge, he acquired an
interest in geology while continuing his studies in Germany and was a founding member of
the Geological Society of London.
Captain Basil Hall (1788-1844)
Scottish seaman and traveler; after education at Edinburgh high school he entered the
Navy in 1802; he published
Fragments of Voyages and Travels
(1831-33) and other works.
Robert William Hay (1786-1861)
After education at Christ Church, Oxford, he was private secretary to Viscount Melville,
first lord of the Admiralty (1812) and permanent under-secretary of state for the colonies
(1825).
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).
William Huttmann (1844 fl.)
A contributor to the
Literary Gazette, he was secretary to the
Royal Asiatic Society until convicted of embezzlement in 1832, and a fellow of the Royal
Geographical Society in 1844.
Sir Robert Harry Inglis, second baronet (1786-1855)
The son of Sir Hugh Inglis, educated at Winchester, Christ Church, Oxford, and Lincoln's
Inn; he was a Tory MP for Dundalk (1824-26), Ripon (1828-29), and Oxford University
(1829-54), and president of the Literary Club.
William Jerdan (1782-1869)
Scottish journalist who for decades edited the
Literary Gazette;
he was author of
Autobiography (1853) and
Men I
have Known (1866).
Charles Kemble (1775-1854)
English comic actor, the younger brother of John Philip Kemble and Sarah Siddons.
George Thomas Keppel, sixth earl of Albemarle (1799-1891)
Son of the fourth earl (d. 1849); he left Westminster School to fight at Waterloo,
afterwards serving in the Ionian Islands and India; he published
Personal
Narrative of a Journey from India to England, 2 vols (1825) and was whig MP for
East Norfolk (1832-35) and was private secretary to Lord John Russell.
George Lamb (1784-1834)
Lawyer and Whig MP for Westminster (1819) and Dungarvan (1822-34), he was the son of
Elizabeth Lamb Viscountess Melbourne, possibly by the Prince of Wales. He was author of a
gothic drama,
Whistle for It (1807) and served with Byron on the
management-committee of Drury Lane. His sister-in-law was Lady Caroline Lamb.
William Martin Leake (1777-1860)
The British envoy to Ali Pasha in Albania; author of, among other titles,
Researches in Greece (1814),
Travels in the
Morea, 3 vols (1830) and
Travels in Northern Greece, 4 vols
(1835).
Lord William Pitt Lennox (1799-1881)
The fourth son of Charles Lennox, fourth duke of Richmond; after education at Westminster
School he pursued a military career, married an actress, and wrote for the popular press.
He published
The Story of my Life, 3 vols (1857).
Hannibal Evans Lloyd (1771-1847)
Stranded in Hamburg during the Napoleonic Wars, he returned to England in 1813, worked in
the Foreign Office, translated, and contributed to the
Literary
Gazette.
Thomas Norton Longman (1771-1842)
A leading London publisher whose authors included Southey, Wordsworth, Scott, and
Moore.
Alexander Maconochie (1787-1860)
After service in the navy under Sir Alexander Cochrane he was secretary to the Royal
Geographical Society, professor of geography at University College, London, and a prison
reformer.
James Mangles (1786-1867)
After naval service in the Napoleonic wars he toured Egypt, Syria, and Asia Minor and was
a member of the Royal Geographical Society; he published
The Floral
Calendar (1839) and other works.
Charles Mathews (1776-1835)
Comic actor at the Haymarket and Covent Garden theaters; from 1818 he gave a series of
performances under the title of
Mr. Mathews at Home.
Francis Mills (1793 c.-1854)
Connoisseur, writer, speculator in timber and railroads, and founder of the Garrick
Club.
Jean Victor Marie Moreau (1763-1813)
French general who defeated the Austrians at Hohenlinden (1800) and was later exiled by
Napoleon.
Thomas Murdock (1757 c.-1846)
Of Portand Place, London; FSA, FRS. He was an acquaintance of John Murray, and the father
of Sir Thomas William Clinton Murdock (1809-1891).
Sir George Murray (1772-1846)
The son of Sir William Murray, of Ochtertyre, fifth baronet; he was a general who served
under Wellington in the Peninsular War and was afterwards a Tory MP and commander-in-chief
in Ireland (1825-28).
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Francis Charles Parry (1780-1878)
Educated at Winchester, University College, Oxford, and the Middle Temple, he was
commissioner of bankrupts (1810-31) and a contributor to the
Edinburgh
Review.
Paul Anton III, Prince Esterházy (1786-1866)
Hungarian diplomat who after the Congress of Vienna was appointed as ambassador to the
United Kingdom (1815-42); he was foreign minister (1848).
Constantine Henry Phipps, first marquess of Normanby (1797-1863)
The son of Henry Phipps, first earl of Mulgrave; educated at Harrow and Trinity College,
Cambridge, he was a Whig MP, governor of Jamaica (1832-34), lord privy seal (1834),
lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1835), and ambassador at Paris (1846-52).
Charles Pichegru (1761-1804)
Revolutionary general in France who was murdered in prison after objecting to Napoleon
and becoming a Royalist.
James Robinson Planché (1796-1880)
Antiquary, herald, and playwright; he was manager at Vauxhall Gardens (1826-27) and the
Adelphi (1830); he wrote for the
Literary Gazette and published
History of British Costumes (1834).
Frederick John Robinson, first earl of Ripon (1782-1859)
Educated at Harrow and St. John's College, Cambridge, he was a Tory MP for Carlow
(1806-07) and Ripon (1807-27), Chancellor of the Exchequer (1823-27), and prime minister
(1827-28) in succession to Canning.
Peter Mark Roget (1779-1869)
English physician and professor of physiology at the Royal Institution; he was a nephew
of Samuel Romilly well-connected in Whig circles, best remembered for inventing the
thesaurus that bears his name.
Sir George Smart (1776-1867)
Trained as chorister at the Chapel Royal, he was a conductor and organist who gave the
first performance of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony in London.
James Smith (1775-1839)
Solicitor and author; with his brother Horace he wrote
Rejected
Addresses (1812) and
Horace in London (1813).
William Henry Smyth (1788-1865)
Naval officer, surveyor, and author of
The Cycle of Celestial Objects
for the Use of Naval, Military, and Private Astronomers, 2 vols (1844).
Germaine de Staël (1766-1817)
French woman of letters; author of the novel
Corinne, ou L'Italie
(1807) and
De l'Allemagne (1811); banned from Paris by Napoleon, she
spent her later years living in Germany, Britain, and Switzerland.
William Samuel Stratford (1790-1853)
After naval service in the Napoleonic wars he was secretary to the Astronomical Society
(1826-31); he published
An Index to the Stars in the Catalogue of the
Royal Astronomical Society (1831).
Michael Angelo Taylor (1757 c.-1834)
Educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was MP (1784-34) for a variety of
constituencies; originally a Tory he gravitated to the Whigs over the course of his long
career.
Martin Farquhar Tupper (1810-1889)
The eldest son of the physician Martin Tupper (1780-1844), educated at Charterhouse,
Christ Church, Oxford (where he befriended W. E. Gladstone) and Lincoln's Inn. He published
the best-selling
Proverbial Philosophy: a Book of Thoughts and
Arguments (1838).
Nicholas Vansittart, first Baron Bexley (1766-1851)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford, he was a Pittite MP for Hastings (1796-1802), Old
Sarum (1802-12), East Grinstead (1812), and Harwich (1812-23); he was Chancellor of the
exchequer (1812-23).
Nicholas Aylward Vigors (1785 c.-1840)
Educated at Trinity College, Oxford, he served in the Peninsular War, was an Irish MP for
Carlow (1832-35, 1837-40), and published papers on zoology.
Sir Henry George Ward (1797-1860)
The son of the novelist R. P. Ward; after education at Harrow he pursued a diplomatic
career and was minister to Mexico (1823-24, 1825-27), a liberal MP for St. Albans (1832-37)
and Sheffield (1837-39) and was governor of the Ionian Islands (1849-55), Ceylon (1855-60)
and Madras (1860).
Sir George Warrender, fourth baronet (1782-1849)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was MP for
Haddington (1807-12), Truro (1812-18), Westbury (1826-30) and Honiton (1830-32). He was
Lord of the Admiralty (1812-22).
William John Williams (1854 fl.)
He was a correspondent for the
Foreign Literary Gazette (1830) and
afterwards inspector of prisons.
James Winston (1774-1843)
Originally James Bown; actor, theater manager, antiquary, and secretary of the Garrick
Club.
Charles Philip Yorke (1764-1834)
Tory politician, the son of Charles Yorke (1722–1770); he was MP for Cambridgeshire
(1790-1810), secretary at war (1801-03), home secretary (1803-04), first lord of Admiralty
(1810-11). He was F.S.A. and vice-president of the Royal Society of Literature.
Charles Mayne Young (1777-1856)
English Shakespearean actor who began his professional career in 1798; he was admired in
Hamlet. He was a friend of Sir Walter Scott.