The Autobiography of William Jerdan
Ch. 19: Club Law
CHAPTER XIX.
CLUB LAW—UNIVERSAL INTERCOURSE—FALL AMONG THIEVES AND UPON EVIL
DAYS—DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES—IDLENESS—DICKENS—THACKERAY—J. FORSTER—PENSION—TESTIMONIAL.
Oh! that man might know
The end of this day’s business, ere it come,
But it sufficeth that the day will end,
And then the end is known.
* * *
Come what come may,
Time and the hour ride through the roughest day.
|
So much of literature and literary plots and literary plagues:
there must be some relaxation, and during all the years of my pilgrimage I acknowledge to
have received continual and intense pleasures from the enjoyments of little clubs or unions
of congenial friends, meeting at stated times either in good hotels or at their own
residences. I could fancy myself now restored to the elder dates of these “feasts
of reason and flows of soul;” which, when well assorted, are susceptible of
high delight in the communion of social sentiment, the interchange of instructive
intelligence and ideas, the freedom of thought, and even the gaiety and hilarity which
attend the unbending of the busy or abstracted being in those rosy hours. Of one
limited party of this kind, which met monthly at the
Freemasons’ Tavern, and lasted long, I bear a lively remembrance. We called ourselves
the Anonomi, and were so pleased with the company of each other,
that we would admit no visitors to interrupt or divert the usual current of conversation,
which we found so entertaining and instructive. Mr. Robert
Clarke, already mentioned in these memoirs, was an excellent chairman, and
under his wise and temperate sceptre, sat his well-mixed subjects; F. Fladgate, also already mentioned; Vice-chancellor Stuart; Mr.
Stewardson, artist; Mr. Cosmo Orme,
publisher; Mr. Turner, secretary to the
Horticultural Society; Mr. Thomas Clarke, solicitor;
Mr. W. H. Watts, reporter; Mr. Simon Gray, an odd character, clerk in the War Office,
and author of several pamphlets on “Finance;” Mr.
Mudford, editor of the “Courier;” (for a while Curwood,
barrister, and Charles Knight, bookseller;) and
lastly, W. Jerdan, croupier. From these various
sources there never lacked a good supply of intelligence, which it was useful to receive
and delectable to comment upon. As I have praised literary associations and discussions for
youth, I would as warmly recommend, both for recreation, the acquisition of knowledge, and
the culture of salutary affections, such associations as I have indicated for riper years.*
Another society, held together by social entertainments, included
James Stuart, of the “Courier,” who died Inspector of Factories;
MacCulloch, of the State Paper office, and eminent Author;
Sam Anderson, of facetious memory; Seaton and
Annondale, surgeons, and other worthies, well calculated to give a
zest to such friendly intercourse. Out
* “What, do you philosophers eat dainty
food?” said a pert Marquis to Des
Cartes. “Do you think,” replied the philosopher,
“that God made all the good things for fools?” |
of the Royal Society of Literature was
created a circle with Burgess, Bishop of Salisbury;
Gray, Bishop of Bristol; the Right Hon. C. Yorke, Archdeacon Nares, and other learned men; out of my political relations
another circle, with the Foreign ambassadors, English ministers, and officials of public
note; out of my peculiar pursuits a third wide circle, or rather series of circles,
consisting of distinguished authors, artists, scientific celebrities, actors, and gentlemen
connected with the press; out of concerns with publishers and booksellers, a large visiting
community; out of sheer good-fellowship, other numerous social bands, as, for example, the
“Juveniles,”* in which the majority of the members were nearly or quite my own
age, and which very lively society was only partially broken up some twelve-months ago by
some of the young dogs getting married, and so being domesticated, and (as usual in such
cases) estranged from their bachelor friends and habits; and the Britton Club, happily still flourishing in exuberant
vigour, under the patronage of an upright Judge, and (since the loss of the late J. C. Humphery, Q.C., and the retirement of Mr. S. Gibbons into Devon, and Mr. Thomas Cubitt into Surrey) still boasting of the companionship of the
respected author and antiquary whose name it bears, of Alderman
William Cubitt and his worthy co-sheriff, Mr.
Charles Hill, of Mr. Grissell, the
present High Sheriff of Surrey, and owning the classic mansion, Norbury Park, of Mr. Nathaniel Gould, an eminent merchant, of Mr. William Tooke, well-known to the literary and
benevolent world, of Mr. Peter Cunningham, a rising
writer, and Mr. George Godwin, also rising in his
profession as an
* Only one member was under fifty, and it was generally imputed
by the orderly and consistent adherents left, that the matrimonial unions, which
had so disastrous an effect in dissolving their jocund body, were absolutely
prompted by, and the result of, the extraordinary sense of juvenility which their
refreshing meetings produced.—W. J.
|
architect, and editor of the popular periodical, “The Builder.” Nay, into the very heart of the
City itself, in giving my best support to its charitable and patriotic institutions, I had
so extended my agreeable relations, and attained so much favour, that I have been in the
good usage of shaking hands, on meeting, with all the Lord Mayors, Aldermen, and other
magnates, and of imbibing, even to the present hour, as fair a share of their turtle and
other good things as falls to the lot of any outsider of Temple Bar; which I therefore hope
may long stand open, to mark the boundary of an ancient and impregnable corporation, whose
walls are note so terribly battered at, and still leave it the munificent giver of fétes and feasts, in secula
seculorum.
But, in truth, my acquaintance with the population of London was (owing to
my position and diversified engagements) of really ludicrous universality, and embraced all
the classes of men I have mentioned, and with whom I mixed in every possible or imaginable
way. Frequenting public meetings of every kind, theatres, exhibitions, learned societies,
lectures, conversazioni, et cætera, et
cætera, filled up a measure of crowded personal intercourse, such
as, I am sure, was never approached by any other individual. I rejoice to add, at the close
of my prolonged career, that enow still remains for every distinction, gratification, and
happiness, which my utmost desire could covet.
I must, however, revert to more important matters, and speak of an epoch
on the turn of which the tides of my future life greatly depended for their ebb or flow. At
the period of the general election in 1831, I stood so well in the opinion of government
that, chiefly through the friendly offices of Lord
Ripon, it did me the honour to select me as a candidate for the
representation of Weymouth, respecting which borough there had arisen a disagreement
| PARLIAMENTARY AMBITION. | 355 |
with Mr.
Fowell Buxton. I was, of course, only too glad to aspire to such elevation,
and forthwith set to work to do all I could for myself in aid of the ministerial patronage.
I enjoyed at the time a large and not overpoweringly encumbered income, and, at fifty years
of age, was neither deficient in mental nor bodily vigour, to fight for and sustain the
victory. I consequently embarked heart and soul in the cause (a Mr. Clayton East retiring); and thus it “progressed!” I had
some real property, but subject to family arrangements, and, at any rate, not enough for a
qualification. But my good and most worthy friend and neighbour, Dr.
Anderson, of Brompton, came forward to my aid, and I had assigned to me
several houses in Alexander Square, and some lands and tenements on the river, near
Richmond. I had also a chaise and posters at the Fulham-bridge livery-stables, to be always
ready for a start; and I never left home without leaving a carte of my whereabouts, so that
I could be found at a moment’s notice in the event of a sudden message from the
Treasury represented by Mr. Edward Ellice, at whose
abode in Richmond Gardens, Pall Mall, I was a daily attendant. During the month of May,
through the medium of private friends, I was put into communication with Sir — Johnstone, one of the representatives of Weymouth
(1832), and Major Weyland, and other parties
possessed of leading influence in the place; and the result was on the whole so encouraging
to my prospects, that it was resolved I should proceed thither and commence a canvass. On
the eve of taking this step, I addressed a letter to Mr.
Barnes, the then editor of the “Times,” with whom I was on a very friendly footing, stating what my
intentions were, and soliciting such assistance as he could conscientiously extend to my
undertaking. But, alas! my confidence was sadly abused. Whether it
was owing to the fierce heat of the Reform question, in which the paper took so strenuous
an interest, or some other over-riding reason, I never could ascertain; but the next
morning after receiving the information from my letter, there appeared one of the stinging
leaders of the “Times,” in which any pretensions of
merely “literary men” to he returned to the new Parliament were deprecated in
the strongest terms, and ministers were menaced with popular odium, if they dared to
countenance such preposterous doings. I was hoist with my own petard. Like poor betrayed
Samson, my secret was ploughed out through the
means of my own heifer. On calling as usual, I found Mr. Ellice with a
long face, and, to cut the story short, he did not at this stormy and trying era, relish a
quarrel with the “Times.” A peace was patched up with
Mr. Buxton, my post-chaise was counter-ordered, and after lots of
conferences and conversations, I ceased to be even a still-born candidate for the borough
of Weymouth! Barnes and I met afterwards, without alluding to the sore
subject; but his able and honourable colleague, James
Murray, wrote me a long letter, expressive of great regret for what had been
done.
One whimsical circumstance followed this transaction. Tumbling over
papers, some ten years after, I fell upon a bundle, on examining which I found that I was
still legal proprietor of certain houses in Alexander Square, and an estate and tenements
on the Thames. Neither Mr. Gray, the mutual friend and drawer of the
deeds, nor the doctor, nor I had ever thought of cancelling these documents; and in the
events of a few deaths in twenty or thirty years, there might have arisen, out of
ignorance, a doubt as to the ownership of these very pretty properties. We had a hearty
laugh at their obsequies by fire, and I rejoice to say that their rightful lord, at the
great age of ninety-two, still
lives to
enjoy them in excellent health and perfect possession of his mental faculties.
But in gravely reflecting on such chances as these, and, indeed, in
estimating the) probabilities from many contingencies which generally occur in every active
life, and on the turn of the scale, in which prosperity or adversity, high advancement or
low depression, may be weighed for all the future; it is curious to observe how much
depends on accident and how little on ourselves. Thus, at one time, my brother Colonel Jerdan ranked among the foremost and most
promising officers in the Indian service. He died on his passage home. His noble career was
cut short, or else, where would he have been within a few years in the army, where he had
laid the foundations of so much honour and military reputation. He never reached the home
that longed for him with a yearning not to be described, but yet not commensurate with his
deservings as a son and a brother. If he had, with the affection and means to enhance the
actual powers of my situation, who can tell how different my fate would have been. How a
lift could have defied injury and commanded fortune, and how circumstances would have been
avoided which unfortunately led to very ruinous consequences. On the “turn,”
both in his case and my own, there was the fair prospect of raising the name and family to
consideration and rank: he would have been a General, and I might have been a Legislator
with all avenues open to our ambition; but alas, it was not so ordered in the inscrutable
decrees of Providence: he moulders in a distant tomb, and I am a baffled struggler in the
sore battle of literary life.
The heaviest of the blows that struck me down was given within three years
of the time of my parliamentary hopes, and must be touched on (however guardedly) in this
personal
history. Two young gentlemen, the sons of a wealthy father,
who, after many years spent in India, settled in London to enjoy the fortune he had
honourably acquired, were the cause. He lived in a handsome square and in a style suitable
to his fortune. His sons consequently entered the world under the most favourable auspices.
They were both gifted with almost brilliant talents, possessed of very gentlemanly and
insinuating manners, and emulous of literary fame. It need hardly be told that their
reception was as flattering as could be bestowed, and that they speedily became the
cherished comrades and guests of many persons of similar rank and kindred pursuits. With me
they established a most intimate friendship, and I witnessed rejoicingly their mounting,
gaily and gallantly, step by step, up the mountain to an eminence of literary repute and
adequate reward. Alas, the foundations were hollow, and after filling a prominent station
for years, establishing and embarking in undertakings of considerable value and successful
results, being the recipients of sincere attachments and substantial regards, and in every
possible point of view enjoying all they could expect or wish for, the whole superstructure
fell miserably to the ground, and the sunny times were lost in painful darkness. It will
not do to dwell on the theme. Among the enterprizes produced during their connection with
literary concerns, I had entered into several with ardour, but more as a friend than a
coadjutor. I was, however, so far committed, and an admirer of cleverness and abilities
they displayed. With one I was induced, for certain reasons, to negociate a contract for
his relieving me of a portion of my labours in the “Gazette,” and my partners were brought into treaty about
the arrangements, which embraced the transfer of considerable sums of money. It was whilst
engaged in this important business that the other brother entered into a copartnery with
one of a reputedly very rich Jewish family in the
city, and the alliance was painted in such glowing colours to me that, in an evil hour, I
put my name on several large bills, to enable him to show something against the leviathan
fortune in the administration of which he was about to participate as a broker. To be
short, the “Gazette” negociation was never completed,
the brokers soon failed, and I was sued for between three and four thousand pounds for
indorsements or acceptances. It is not in my nature to press hard upon the fallen, but the
ruin which these unfortunates brought on themselves, their family, myself, and others,
assuredly may point a moral. My nearest connection of the two was spirited, engaging, and
liberal, altogether a person happily formed to be welcomed wherever he went with a cordial
and kindly feeling, and this he met with everywhere. Neither was he vicious nor of an evil
disposition. What, then, caused his downfal! Vanity! Vanity alone led to boasts and
falsehoods—some quite innocuous—till the habit grew to be so confirmed as to merge into an
utter disregard of truth. I am really inclined to believe into an utter unconsciousness of
the difference between that virtue and lying. The consequence was worthy of the father of
lies. The bankers who held my bills, among other securities for advances, when informed of
the real state of the case, and my liabilities being entirely without a farthing of value
received by me in any shape, very humanely offered to give them up on an acknowledgment to
that effect from the principal. With elated mind I wrote to him to send this statement,
which he could have done, on a page of note paper; but he had told so many and such
enormous falsehoods on depositing the bills, that he could not muster resolution to write
himself what he was, and fled to the continent, leaving me to bide the brunt of my
unpardonable imprudence.
And my punishment was severe. My establishment was broken up. The contents
of Grove House sold by auction, and the produce less than I had paid Mr. Wilberforce for the fixtures alone, so that I had
nearly another thousand pounds to add to my losses, besides being obliged myself to take up
my residence in the Westminster-bridge Road, in a locality with which I was acquainted,
from having visited George Colman a few doors off,
years before.
By every possible sacrifice I so far surmounted this crash, as to settle
all just, and some unjust, debts; but the act loaded me with incumbrances; and I had the
uphill work to achieve with gradually diminishing means. The circulation of the
“Literary Gazette” was
considerably affected by the “Athenæum” lowering its charge to half the price, and following up
that sagacious measure by the most diligent adoption of all business resources, so
essential to successful publishing. There was no longer any laughing at the fainting
competition, and my witty correspondents’ squibs on the subject became rather less
amusing.*
People, especially people engaged in the publishing trade, instead of
putting more energy into a drooping concern, are apt to get languid and tired of it, and
therefore leave it to its own destiny. It so happened with the “Gazette.” The sustaining punctuality of my partners,
Messrs. Longman & Co.,
* Here is, nevertheless, a couple of samples to divert my
readers from these uncomfortable statements, and at which the parties may now laugh
in their turn. One writes— “Mr.
Buckingham’s paper, notwithstanding Colburn’s puffs, is sad stuff—heavy as
unleavened bread, it cannot rise.” And another sends in the annexed impromptu! Tho’ the Novice you bilke, Be not hasty to sing the Te Deum, No reader will quit A print that has wit, |
|
indeed, suffered no change; but they became more
indifferent to the task of forwarding its interests. Our publisher, too, had grown older,
and got more to do than he could deftly manage; and though he got through the work somehow
or other, it was after a fashion of his own, hieroglyphic and perfectly unintelligible to
any other living being, and thus neglect and irregularity crept into every department.
Ultimately, while I was losing more and more from week to week, one of my employés, at a guinea a-week wages, contrived, as I am informed, to save
enough to purchase houses!!
For a few years it was like the children’s play at hide and seek,
only it never was hot but ever colder and colder, till at last, with the aid of my family connections, I
purchased their third shares of the “Gazette” from Messrs. Longman
& Colburn; and set out again, sanguine, hopeful,
uncontradicted, and uncontrolled, on my own capital. For a good season the efforts were
crowned with a degree of success; but still there was not much to boast of. The counting by
thousands, which had been reduced to hundreds, did not rise to thousands again. We went on,
however, respectably, if not so very profitably, and I believe I may say that the journal
did not fall off much, if at all, from the character which had raised it so high in public
estimation.
Thus matters proceeded, in a sort of even course, till changes in the
publishing office and printing, occasioned by death and retirement, rendered new
arrangements necessary. I was by this means most unfortunately betrayed, yet by the best
intentions of one of my best and dearest friends, into contracts with parties, who proved
every way unworthy of trust. An aim to attain an ulterior object, and supplant me in my
copyright property, was from the beginning cunningly and systematically pursued. Neither
subterfuges nor
falsehoods were spared, and in the meanwhile needful
engagements were unperformed and violated. More dependent than ever on the fidelity and
regularity of others, the mismanagement and endless failures which were engrafted on this
state of things, contributed rapidly to my being sunk into “the lower still.”
My habitual dislike to examine into business affairs, which I generally succeeded in
confusing instead of comprehending, was converted into perfect antipathy. I had been so
long used to rely on those with whom it was “all right,” when they were right,
that it unfitted me the more to be a match for the intrigue and plotting to which I was now
exposed; and the consequence was a final contest, from which the much-damaged “Gazette” was rescued, but I fell a victim
to as gross malignity as ever was foully resorted to in revenge for disappointed roguery.*
In consequence of such untoward circumstances, the “Gazette,” in spite of all my continued
exertions, dwindled, became small by degrees and beautifully less. Still it was an object
of ambition in another quarter, and by a succession of acts, which I will not describe, I
was finally and foully done, not only out of the property, but out of the editing and
income attached to it by a regular written agreement.
I am obliged, in an account of my life, to state these facts, which I
have done as cursorily as I could, and without comment. What I might consider dishonour or
swindling could have little interest for readers, and long-winded tales of wrongs seldom
awaken even as much attention as the
* An envenomed injury was done me, not as a gentleman, a man of
honour, but as a trader, under which denomination, it seemed
I barely fell according to the rigid legal rule; and the sternest Procrustean
measure was meted out to me because I had not kept account books—every account in
which I was ever concerned (and voluminous enough they were) having been kept in
the large and unproducible folios of the largest publishing houses in London, and
in the hieroglyphic jottings of a publisher, mixed up with all his other extensive
business, over which I had no control. |
accounts of sufferings consequent thereon excite
sympathy. The least said is the soonest mended; and a time may come for more circumstantial
revelations touching such as— Full of fraudful arts, The well-invented tale for truth imparts. |
Not three years ago, I was thus thrown out of harness, and with the Moor
could exclaim, “Othello’s
occupation’s gone!” And it was a very poor case to he in, after all the
busy turmoil I had gone through for nearly half a century. I was too old to expect to be
softly treated, as a shorn lamb, and my quiver was stuffed with anxieties and cares. From
my pen I could now only derive a precarious revenue (to use a grand name for a wee matter);
but some employments have turned up, and I have wrought at them manfully as long as they
continued. Others, I trust, will happen to provide for the remainder of my numbered days,
and then let
Faith build my bridge across the gulf of death To break the shock blind Nature cannot shun, And land me safely on the farther shore. |
Till about six weeks ago, I superintended a newly started weekly journal,
which rose to a wide circulation, at fourpence; but it requires so very large a sale,
little short of 20,000, to make a publication of this class, and at this price, profitable,
that though we got above 10,000, it did not pay, and the experiment was tried of raising
the price to sixpence. It fell more than half, and has since passed into new hands,
Pharaohs who knew nothing of Joseph, and so I once more became a free
man. If, after such vicissitudes, I appeal to the book-buying world to take my Life, and
they respond to the appeal as they ought, it is evident that Virtue will not suffer, and
that I may take a new lease, and continue to live all the better.
When the “Hic
jacet” arrives, and a Marble bust by my young
friend and feeling sculptor (I mean full of feeling as well as genius for his art),
Joseph Durham, is put up by subscription, with a
suitable panegyric upon the grateful Clay below, I hope that some weeping eyes may read the
lines, and some fond and faithful regrets embalm the memory of the sleeper, who can never
wake more to participate in a sorrow and bestow a solace, listen to distress and bring it
relief, serve a friend and forgive a foe, perform his duties as perfectly as his human
frailty allowed, never wilfully do injury to man, woman, or child, and love his
neighbours—of one sex as himself, and of the other better.
But, my readers, you are tired with hearing, and I am sick of saying so
much about myself; but it is autobiography, and my misfortune now is, that I have not time
and space to draw the conclusions from the premises, which would be so instructive. But I
throw myself on your mercy, and flee from self to better subjects. In recent times I have
enjoyed the same good fortune which attended my earlier literary course, and lived on
intimate terms with the popular writers of the day. With Dickens I can claim long friendly relations, and with Thackeray hardly less amicable intercourse. In the first
morning beam of public delight upon the former, I felt the full glow, and looked with
prophetic gladness to the bright day which I was sure must follow so auspicious a dawning.
When Sam Weller appeared on the canvass, I was so
charmed with the creation that I could not resist the impulse to write to the author,
express my admiration, and counsel him to develop the novel character largely—to the
utmost. My urgency was taken in good part, and we improved our alliance so genially, that
when “Pickwick” was
triumphantly finished, and a “semi-business, Pickwickian sort of dinner”
ensued, I was invited
to be of the party, with
the compliment from the author, “I depend upon you above everybody. Faithfully
yours, always, Charles
Dickens.” I cannot describe my gratification. The party was
delightful, with Mr. Sergeant Talfourd as V.P., and
there the pleasant and uncommon fact was stated (all the individuals being present, and
toasted), that there never had been a line of written agreement, but that author, printer,
artist, and publisher had all proceeded on simply verbal assurances, and that there never
had arisen a word to interrupt or prevent the complete satisfaction of everyone. On a later
occasion of the same kind, at the Albion, I was flattered by the nomination to occupy the
post of honour at the bottom of the table, and am happy to remember that I acquitted myself
so creditably of its onerous duties, as to receive the approbation of the giver of the
feast, his better half,* and the oi polloi
unanimously. One other example of the happiness which has fallen to my lot, in reward for
my devotedness to the cause of literature and literary men, and I bid a fare-thee-well
(which I trust will never meet a cross) to Dickens and his genius. On
an entertainment given to its friends, on the “Literary Gazette” attaining its majority (twenty-five years, à la periodical chronology), I received this answer to the
invitation of my celebrated compatriot:—
“Doughty Street, Friday Morning.
“My dear Jerdan,
“I was going into Yorkshire on Monday morning, but
having fortunately been able to take a place for Tuesday, can accept your kind
invitation.
* I slily introduced in something I had to say, a hint
ahout a portrait of her husband which I knew she longed to possess; and the
hint was taken in the right quarter, and the painting presented to
her.—W. J.
|
“Be assured that among all the congratulations which
will be offered to you on the delightful occasion of our meeting, there will be
none more cordial and warm-hearted than mine. By the time we dine together
again, to celebrate the fiftieth birthday of your healthy offspring, I shall
study to find appropriate language to clothe them in; till then, however, I
fear they must remain locked up in my breast—where they will, at any rate, keep
warmer than on the lips of, my dear Jerdan,
Of the other luminary I have named, I have not so much to say, in
consequence of such litera scripta of his as have
escaped my confusion and destruction of MSS. being, I see from a few strays, marked
“private;” and therefore I shall content myself with a pretension, which I hope
he will not repudiate, of being one among the first of his familiar friends, and the
greatest admirers of his talents; which, after a hard and persevering fight, have asserted
for themselves the rank and popularity I always anticipated, if the obstacles in the way
were overcome.
The name of Dickens connects my
thoughts with a numerous array of individuals with whom I have tasted many unalloyed
pleasures, and for whom I entertain, severally, sentiments of warm esteem. Among these (but
also for themselves) I may cite Macready and
M’Clise, and Mr. John Forster among the foremost, I have not, or have only slightly
mentioned, in my preceding pages. The last of the three, I take the most interest in
venturing to introduce among these personal sketches, on account of the friendly part he
has taken in the testimonial to my honour, particu-
larised a little further on. I fear I superabound with proofs
of one of my pet opinions, that good turns are not only repaid by the internal satisfaction
they afford, but are almost always essentially rewarded by good and serviceable offices.
That I have not been unobservant of Mr. Forster’s literary
achievements, nor failed to do them justice, the “Literary Gazette” sufficiently proves; and my
cosmopolitan love of literature has, in his instance, been particularly gratified by seeing
success attend on merit. And yet the more, if private feelings accord with public duties.
How intimately these have agreed and contributed to our union the annexed notes will
show:—
“It is proposed to dine Dickens at the Trafalgar, Greenwich, on Wednesday, 19th June,
at 6 for half-past 6, on occasion of his leaving us for Italy. Lord Normanby will take the chair.
“You know the pleasure it will give Dickens to see you among his entertainers, and
that you will be able to join us, I sincerely hope.
“Ever and always truly yours,
“58, Lincoln’s Inn Fields,
“Saturday
Morning.
“My dear Jerdan,
“I am just starting in much haste for Eton College,
but I cannot deny myself the pleasure of acknowledging, in this hurried but
most cordial line, your great kindness in the ‘L. G.’ this morning. I am very deeply
sensible of it, believe me. It only adds another to the many
pleasant associations I have with you (some of them not
less cherished because now something touched with pain) that you have so
generously assisted me in my first appearance in a character I once thought
very grand, and am taught by you to think still not very contemptible, as the
‘author of a book.’
“Again, let me sincerely thank you, and beg you to
believe me, dear Jerdan,
Having alluded to the testimonial, to promote the most advantageous
disposition of which Mr. Forster, as one of the
delegated committee, took so friendly and influential a part, I will conclude this
penultimate chapter of my biography (leaving of necessity a mass of its later materials
unused for the present) with an account of its origin, progress, and halt.
When it was known that my connection with the press had been violently
and disgracefully terminated, two suggestions arose, and were enforced from so many
quarters, that I may say they were generally entertained with good feeling among my
friends, and approbation throughout the country, acquainted with my literary life. One was
that I had merited, and ought to receive, a pension; and the other that a subscription
should be set on foot for a public testimonial to me on the same grounds.
In pursuance of the first object, the annexed memorial was presented in
July, 1850, to Lord John Russell, then Prime Minister,
and as it is not consistent with the etiquette of high judicial functions for a judge to
sign such applications, my friend the Lord Chief
Baron wrote a
private letter to his
lordship on the subject, which the noble Premier acknowledged in a letter, regretting the
scanty fund left at his disposal for 1850; and afterwards (through his secretary) answered
Mr. Tufnell, who had interested himself warmly
in promoting the claim, in the following note:—
“I have mentioned your wishes in behalf of Mr. Jerdan to Lord
John, and he has desired me to say that the pension fund for the
present year is all but exhausted; but that he will consider his claims with
those of others at the commencement of the next year. He can, however, make no
promise that it will be in his power to comply with your recommendation.”
COPY OF THE MEMORIAL.
“We, the undersigned, having witnessed the literary labours of
Mr. Jerdan, and deeming them well entitled
to the favourable consideration of Lord John
Russell, as highly beneficial to the cause of literature, in token of
our approbation of his meritorious efforts during a long series of years, subscribe our
names to this memorial, accompanying the statement of his writings and
publications.
Signed—Colborne, Londesborough, Willoughby de
Eresby, Brougham, Henry Hallam, John P.
Boileau, C. Winton.;” with the
following voluntary addition by the bishop, in his own hand. “With special
reference to the conduct of the ‘Literary
Gazette,’ as regards its moral tendencies during a long course of
years.”
The Earl of Clarendon, the Marquis of Normanby, and other individuals of high station,
whose praise (like that of Shakspeare’s Sir Hubert
Stanley) “is praise indeed!”
also
endeavoured to interest the Minister in my behalf, and wrote to me, particularly
Lord Clarendon, in a style so grateful to my heart and flattering
to my self-love, that I shall never cease to estimate their kindness to my dying breath.
But the Lord of the National Purse and author of “Don Carlos,” a tragedy, would not be
persuaded that his old critic had done enough to deserve a dispensation of his favourable
notice; and during the succession of the Derby
administration, I had succeeded to literary occupation, and did not think it worth while to
have the application renewed. On the Earl of Aberdeen
coming into power, a very early opportunity was taken by that noble lord and elegant
scholar, in the handsomest manner, to recognise the validity of the good opinions put
forward on my behalf. A pension of one hundred guineas was conferred upon me; and the small
fund on which it was charged was at the period so exhausted that I believe the Prime
Minister had not as much more to draw upon.
Previous to this, however, the idea of a testimonial had been espoused by
a distinguished phalanx of friends, as the following brilliant list will testify:—
The Right Hon. Lord
Brougham. |
Francis Bennoch, Esq.
|
The Lord Chief Baron. |
B. Bond Cabbell, Esq., M.P.
|
Lord Warren De Tabley. |
Joseph Cauvin, Esq.
|
H. Tuffnell, M.P.
|
Robert Chambers, Esq., Edinburgh. |
Lord Lindsay. |
James Colquhoun, Esq., Minister |
Vice Chancellor Sir John Stuart. |
Hanseatic Towns. |
Hon. Francis Scott, M.P.
|
Patrick Colquhoun, Esq., D.C.L.
|
Sir E. L. Bulwer-Lytton, Bart. |
Walter Coulson, Esq.
|
Sir R. I. Murchison, F.R.S.
|
Rev. George Croly, D.D.
|
Sir Peter Laurie, Kt., Alderman. |
George Cruikshank, Esq. |
Sir Charles Barry, R.A.
|
Peter Cunningham, Esq., F.S.A.
|
W. Francis Ainsworth, Esq.
|
Rev. John Davis. |
Joseph Arden, Esq., F.S.A., Treas- |
J. C. Denham, Esq.
|
urer.
|
Charles Dickens, Esq.
|
John Barrow, Esq., F.R.S., F.S.A.
|
Henry Drummond, Esq., M.P.
|
Wm. Beattie, M.D.
|
Joseph Durham, Esq.
|
Robert Bell, Esq. |
Professor Edward Forbes, F.R.S.
|
Alfred Forrester, Esq.
|
W. Mackinnon, Esq. M.P.
|
John Forster, Esq.
|
D. Maclise, Esq. R.A.
|
Geo. Godwin, Esq. F.R.S., F.S.A.
|
R. Monckton Milnes, Esq. M.P.
|
Thomas Grissell, F.S.A., Esq.
|
W. C. Macready, Esq.
|
Wm. Grove, Esq., V.P. F.R.S.
|
Francis Mills, Esq.
|
S. Carter Hall, Esq., F.S.A.
|
F. G. Moon, Esq. Alderman |
Henry Hallam, Esq., F.R.S.,
F.S.A., |
James Prior, Esq., M.D.
|
&c., &c. |
B. W. Procter, Esq.
|
J. O. Halliwell, Esq., F.R.S.,
F.S.A.
|
Frederick Salmon, Esq.
|
Charles Hill, Esq.
|
J. Shillinglaw, Esq. Hon. Sec. |
Leigh Hunt, Esq.
|
C. Roach Smith, Esq., F.S.A.
|
Thomas Hunt, Esq.
|
Clarkson Stanfield, Esq., R.A.
|
Douglas Jerrold, Esq.
|
Charles Swain, Esq.
|
J. H. Jesse, Esq.
|
Lieut.-Col. Sykes, F.R.S., &c. |
John Laurie, Esq.
|
Admiral Smyth, R.N., F.R.S.
|
P. Northall Laurie, Esq.
|
V.P.S.A. |
John Gibson Lockhart, Esq.
|
J. G. Teed, Esq., Q.C.
|
Samuel Lover, Esq.
|
W. M. Thackeray, Esq.
|
The Chevalier Isidore de
Lowen-
|
Thomas Wright, Esq., M.A., F.S.A.
|
stern. |
Hon. Sec.
|
Dr. Charles Mackay. |
|
In April, 1851, the “Globe” newspaper correctly quoted the circular upon which this committee
was summoned to act, and it met accordingly, on the stated grounds,
“‘That the literary labours of such a man are well
deserving of a special mark of public estimation;’ and
that it had been ‘resolved to open a subscription for the
expression of this opinion by all friends of Literature, Arts, and Sciences,
who may have appreciated the devotedness of the Editor of the “Literary Gazette” and the influence of his writings
during this long period’ (thirty-four years); and farther, ‘To acknowledge
his services in a gratifying and suitable manner by presenting him
with a lasting token of the esteem in which he is held by the literary
world.’”
And to this the editor of the journal liberally added:—
“This task, so honourable to all concerned, has been undertaken
by a committee of nearly seventy noblemen and gentlemen, representing every high order
and class of intellectual society, and especially by Mr.
Jerdan’s distinguished literary contemporaries, who thus
unanimously unite in
recommending his services in the Press to
the notice of the country which has profited by them. In few words we may assert that
the example of the ‘Literary
Gazette’ opened the way to, and effected a complete revolution in,
periodical publications. Previous to its appearance, literature, the fine arts, and the
sciences, were very rarely mentioned in the journals; but now they have not only
separate organs, but form prominent parts and portions of every periodical throughout
the British Empire. Need we stop to observe the consequences of this system on their
diffusion, encouragement, and improvement.”
It would be an encroachment on my part to trouble the reader with an
account of the committee meetings and proceedings which ensued. After the first, at which
nearly twenty members were present, the attendance was but scanty, and indeed uncalled for,
as the management of the design had been devolved on a sub-committee of five, a number much
more eligible for business than any more numerous and fluctuating body. But alas, there is
always a but, a difference of opinion unfortunately sprung up as to the best appropriation
of the subscription fund, which crippled it, notwithstanding the zealous personal exertion
of the sub-committee, and a too rigid economy in advertising it, had, as I have thought and
ventured to represent, a still more obstructive effect. In fact, the list of subscribers
has never yet been published, and volunteer offers of co-operation from various populous
towns and the provinces have not been accepted and acted upon. It is now, however, my own
grateful duty to seize this appropriate opportunity for acknowledging the generous support
the proposal has received. The annexed is the list as far as I am able to give it, and I
shall be happy to supply any omissions and make any corrections that may be requisite.
JERDAN TESTIMONIAL.*
Royal Society of Literature,
No. 4, St. Martin’s-place.
As a public acknowledgment of Mr.
Jerdan’s services to Literature, Science, the fine and useful arts,
and benevolent institutions of his country, animating to many, and instructive to all,
during a long period of years, and especially since the commencement of the “
Literary Gazette” in 1817 to the close of last year.
The Lord Chief
Baron £26 5s |
Robert Chambers,
Esq. £3 3s |
Lady
Pollock 5 5 |
J. O. Halliwell,
Esq. 2 2 |
Lord Willoughby de
Eresby 50 0 |
Thomas Hunt,
Esq. 10 0 |
Lord Warren de
Tabley 20 0 |
E. Foss,
Esq. 3 0 |
Lord
Londesborough 10 10 |
Francis Mills,
Esq. 5 0 |
Messrs. Longmans
50 0 |
Henry Foss,
Esq. 3 0 |
S. Carter Hall,
Esq. 25 0 |
James S. Willes,
Esq. 5 5 |
John Murray,
Esq. 25 0 |
T. Stewardson,
Esq. 5 0 |
Sir E. Bulwer Lytton,
Bart. 20 0 |
Capt. Sir J. C. Ross,
R.N. 5 0 |
John Dickinson,
Esq. 21 0 |
Lady
Ross 5 0 |
Lord Colborne
10 10 |
Rev. J. M.
Traherne 5 0 |
James Colquhoun, Esq. 5 0 |
J. C. Denham,
Esq. 3 3 |
Sir R. J. Murchison,
Bart. 10 10 |
J. Prior, Esq., M.D. 5 5 |
Sir Peter
Laurie 10 10 |
George Godwin,
Esq. 2 2 |
Northall Laurie,
Esq. 5 5 |
Daniel Ball, Esq. 2 2
|
W. Cubitt, Esq.,
M.P. 5 5 |
Robert Gray,
Esq. 2 2 |
Charles Hill,
Esq. 5 5 |
Dr.
Mackay 2 2 |
Henry Hallam,
Esq. 10 0 |
Geo. Cruikshank, Esq. 2 0 |
John Laurie,
Esq. 5 5 |
D. Roberts, Esq.,
R.A. 5 5 |
Robert Ferguson, Esq. 5 0 |
Dr. P.
Colquhoun 3 3 |
Dr.
Beattie 5 5 |
J. E. Sanderson, Esq. 5 0
|
Wm. Thackeray, Esq. 3 0 |
J. W. Butterworth,
Esq. 2 2 |
* At a Meeting of the Council of the Royal Society of Literature the
apartments of the Society were handsomely granted for the accommodation of the
Testimonial Committee Meetings; and Mr. Nathaniel Hill, its very
meritorious housekeeper and collector, gave his useful services not only to the
meeting, but to considerable correspondence, and to the authorised reception of
subscriptions, as at the several bankers who liberally opened their books for that
purpose, viz.: Sir Claude Scott and Co.;
Coutts and Co.; Barnard,
Dimsdale, and Co.; Masterman and Co.; and
Prescott, Grote, and Co.
|
B. B. Cabbell, Esq.
MP. £10 0s |
— Holt,
Esq. £2 2s
|
Walter Coulson,
Esq. 5 5 |
John Braham,
Esq. 2 0 |
T. Elde Darby,
Esq. 2 2 |
Thomas Tooke,
Esq. 2 2 |
Joseph Durham,
Esq. 3 3 |
A Friend to Literature, per |
John Barrow,
Esq. 10 0 |
F. Bennoch,
Esq. 5 5 |
Dr.
Croly 2 0 |
Messrs. Blackwood 20 0 |
Cap. J. Mangles,
R.N. 5 0 |
Sir T. D. Acland,
M.P. 10 10 |
R. Oakley, Esq. 1 1 |
Bolton Corney,
Esq. 2 2 |
George Grote,
Esq. 5 0 |
Sir Charles Barry,
R.A. 5 5 |
William Tooke,
Esq. 10 0 |
W. R. Grove,
Esq. 5 5 |
Mrs.
Bray 5 0 |
D. Maclise,
R.A. 3 3 |
Fr. Hodgson,
Esq. 5 0 |
Thomas Gaspey,
Esq. 2 2 |
Lord
Lindsay 5 5 |
W. A. Mackinnon, Esq.
|
B. W. Procter,
Esq. 5 0 |
M.P. 5 5 |
W. F. Ainsworth,
Esq. 3 0 |
“Invitation to Malvern,” A |
T. Wright, Esq.
M.A. 3 0 |
Poem by Dr. Prior, pub- |
P. Cunningham,
Esq. 3 0 |
lished for the benefit of |
Thomas Grissell,
Esq. 10 0 |
the
Fund 17 6 |
Joseph Arden,
Esq. 5 0 |
Farther Sale 7 9 |
John Forster,
Esq. 5 0 |
Sir T. N. Talfourd,
J.C.P. 10 0 |
R. M. Milnes, Esq.,
M.P. 5 5 |
C. Stanfield, Esq.
R.A. 5 5 |
J. R. Taylor, Esq. 1 1 |
Prof. M.
Faraday 2 2 |
A. B. Richards, Esq. 1 1 |
Sir Gardner
Wilkinson 4 0 |
Joseph Cauvin,
Esq. 5 5 |
Henry Drummond, Esq., |
Dr. J.
Conolly 10 10 |
M.P. 10 0 |
Frederick Salmon,
Esq. 10 10 |
J. H. Jesse,
Esq. 3 0 |
Francis Bennoch,
Esq. 10 10 |
Miss How 1 0 |
Mrs. Bennoch 3 3 |
W. A. Scripps,
Esq. 5 0 |
C. Roach Smith,
Esq. 2 0 |
Decimus Burton,
Esq. 2 2 |
J. Shillinglaw,
Esq. 2 0 |
J. G. Lockhart,
Esq. 5 5 |
Mrs. Taylor 1 1 |
C. P. Roney,
Esq. 5 5 |
Ld. Bp. of
Winchester 10 10 |
G. R. Corner,
Esq. 5 5 |
D. Nicholl, Esq. 5 5 |
C. Barber, Esq., by
same 1 1 |
Beriah Botfield,
Esq. 5 0 |
W. R. White, Esq. 1 1 |
W. H. Fox Talbot,
Esq. 5 0 |
Henry Ottley,
Esq. 1 1 |
G. H. Virtue,
Esq. 1 1 |
The Earl of
Clarendon 10 10 |
Thomas Cubbitt,
Esq. 5 5 |
Mr. Alderman
Moon 10 0 |
R. Stephenson, Esq.,
M.P. 4 0 |
Dr. Bemays 1 1 |
Col. J. Owen, C.B. 1 1 |
Henry Vaughan, Esq. 5 5 |
W. Martin Leake,
Esq. 10 0 |
Vice-Chancellor Sir John |
Sir J. E. Tennent,
M.P. 5 5 |
Stuart 20 0 |
Hudson Gurney,
Esq. 25 0 |
C. M. Willich,
Esq. 2 2 |
J. Charles Swain,
Esq. 3 3 |
John Kenyon,
Esq. 5 5 |
M. A. Lower, Esq.,
Lewes 2 2 |
Listor Parker,
Esq. 1 1 |
Herbert Ingram,
Esq. 5 0 |
Cosmo Orme,
Esq. 10 10 |
Dr. Daubeny,
Oxford 3 0 |
Wm. Read,
Esq. 2 2 |
Charles Dickens,
Esq. 10 10 |
C. A. Smith,
Esq. 1 1 |
W. V. Fox, Esq. 1 1 |
Sir John Boileau,
Bart. 5 0 |
John Hogg, Esq.,
F.R.S. 2 0 |
Sir J. E. Tennent 5 5
|
Well may I be proud and grateful for such a testimonial, and I beg only
to add my sincere thanks to the committee and sub-committee who gave so much of their time
and countenance to promote and accomplish the end in view.
It might be deemed an involuntary compliment to the honour and
independence of the “Gazette,” that
this tributary testimonial to its services to literature has not been signed by a number of
publishers; but I am forced by truth to say that their public abstinence is of a different
colour from their private assurances. I have quires of letters asking favours, and piles of
letters returning thanks for them when they could be granted, from nearly every member of
“the Trade;” but Messrs. Longman and
Co., and John Murray, in London, and Blackwood and
Robert Chambers, in Edinburgh, are the only
exceptions to the rule of economic oblivion. I confess that I looked for many a token, and
that the slightest would have been the most agreeable to me; but I reconcile myself to the
condition of the world by re-perusing a few of the olden epistles, expressive of such
everlasting gratitude. They are very edifying, and would make an amusing olio for
publication.
Sir Thomas Dyke Acland, tenth baronet (1787-1871)
Tory politician and philanthropist, educated at Harrow and Christ Church, Oxford; he was
MP for Devon (1812-18, 1820-31) and North Devon (1837-57). He was a founder of Grillion's
Club and active in religious causes.
William Francis Ainsworth (1807-1896)
Geographer and travel-writer, author of
Researches in Assyria,
Babylonia and Chaldaea (1838). He was the cousin of the novelist.
Joseph Arden (1799-1879)
Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries who travelled in Egypt in 1847 and donated materials
to the British Library.
Charles Barber (1784-1854)
English landscape painter who worked in Liverpool and supported the Literary and
Philosophical Society.
Thomas Barnes [Strada] (1785-1841)
The contemporary of Leigh Hunt at Christ's Hospital; he was editor of
The Times from 1817.
Sir John Barrow, first baronet (1764-1848)
English traveler, secretary of the Admiralty, and author of over two hundred articles in
the
Quarterly Review; he is remembered for his
Mutiny on the Bounty (1831).
Sir Charles Barry (1795-1860)
English architect who travelled in Greece, Turkey, and Egypt (1817-20) and won the
competition for rebuilding the Houses of Parliament (1836).
William Beattie (1793-1875)
Scottish physician and poet, friend of Thomas Campbell and Lady Byron; he published
The Life and Letters of Thomas Campbell, 3 vols (1849).
Francis Bennoch (1812-1890)
Scottish poet and head of the publishing firm Francis Bennoch and Co.
William Blackwood (1776-1834)
Edinburgh bookseller; he began business 1804 and for a time was John Murray's Scottish
agent. He launched
Blackwood's Magazine in 1817.
Beriah Botfield (1807-1863)
Educated at Harrow and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a member of the Roxburghe Club who
published in
Archaeologia, the
Gentleman's
Magazine, and the
Philobiblon Miscellany.
John Braham (1777 c.-1856)
English tenor who began his career at the Covent Garden and Drury Lane theaters; he
assisted Isaac Nathan in setting Byron's
Hebrew Melodies.
Anna Eliza Bray [née Kempe] (1790-1883)
Devon novelist who corresponded with Robert Southey; her
Autobiography was published in 1884. Her first marriage was to the artist Alfred
Stothard (1786-1821), son of the illustrator.
John Britton (1771-1857)
English autodidact, antiquary, and topographer; he published
Beauties
of Wiltshire (1801) and
Autobiography, 2 vols (1850,
1857).
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
James Silk Buckingham (1786-1855)
Traveler, crusading journalist, and MP for Sheffield (1832-37); he edited the
Oriental Herald (1824-29) and founded the
Athenaeum (1828).
Thomas Burgess, bishop of Salisbury (1756-1837)
Educated at Winchester and Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was domestic chaplain to
Shute Barrington, bishop of St. David's (1803) and Bishop of Salisbury (1825).
Decimus Burton (1800-1881)
English architect; educated at Tonbridge School and the Royal Academy Schools, he was the
designer of Hyde Park.
Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton, first baronet (1786-1845)
Brewer and advocate for prison reform; as MP for Weymouth (1818-37) he called for the
abolition of slavery. He was created baronet in 1840 and accorded a monument in Westminster
Abbey
Benjamin Bond Cabbell (1781 c.-1874)
Educated at Westminster, Oxford, and the Middle Temple, he practised law and was
Conservative MP for St Albans (1846-47), and Boston (1847-57). He was vice-president of the
Royal Literary Fund.
Joseph Cauvin (1853 fl.)
Author and secretary to Lord Brougham; he published
Dictionary of
Science, Literature and Art (1848).
Robert Chambers (1802-1871)
Scottish miscellaneous writer and journalist; his chief works are
Cyclopaedia of English Literature, 2 vols (1841-43) and
Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844). He partnered with his brother
William (1800-1883).
Robert George Clark (1771 c.-1839)
Printer of the
London Gazette and editor of
The
Sun newspaper before 1811.
Thomas Clarke (1789-1854)
English barrister in partnership with William Fynmore; he was solicitor to the Board of
Trade (1845) and F.S.A.
Henry Colburn (1785-1855)
English publisher who began business about 1806; he co-founded the
New
Monthly Magazine in 1814 and was publisher of the
Literary
Gazette from 1817.
George Colman the younger (1762-1836)
English poet, playwright and censor of plays; manager of the Haymarket Theater
(1789-1813); author of
The Iron Chest (1796) taken from Godwin's
novel
Caleb Williams.
James Colquhoun (1780-1855)
The son of Patrick Colquhoun, lord provost of Glasgow; he was appointed representative of
the Hanseatic Republics to London in 1825 and was chargé d'affaires of the king of
Saxony.
John Conolly (1794-1866)
English physician who studied in Edinburgh and was physician to the Hanwell Lunatic
Asylum.
George Richard Corner (1801-1863)
Southward attorney and antiquary; he contributed to
Archaeologia
and the
Gentleman's Magazine.
Bolton Corney (1784-1870)
English antiquary and editor of Thomson and Goldsmith who contributed to the
Literary Gazette,
Gentleman's Magazine,
Athenaeum, and
Notes and Queries.
Walter Coulson (1795-1860)
English barrister and journalist for the
Morning Chronicle, the
Traveller, and the
Globe; he was tutored
by Jeremy Bentham and was an associate of William Hazlitt and Charles Lamb.
George Croly (1780-1860)
Anglo-Irish poet, novelist, and essayist for Blackwood's; his gothic novel
Salathiel (1828) was often reprinted.
George Cruikshank (1792-1878)
English caricaturist who illustrated the satirical periodical
The
Scourge (1811-16) and later Dickens's
Sketches by Boz
(1836).
Thomas Cubitt (1788-1855)
Originally a carpenter, he developed residential squares in West London and undertook
projects for the royal family.
William Cubitt (1791-1863)
London building contractor, the younger brother of Thomas Cubitt; he was Conservative MP
for Andover (1847-63).
Peter Miller Cunningham (1789-1864)
The younger brother of the poet Allan Cunningham; he was a naval surgeon and pioneer in
Australia.
Peter Cunningham (1816-1869)
Son of the poet and biographer Allan Cunningham; he was a miscellaneous writer and chief
clerk in the Audit Office.
John Curwood (d. 1847)
English barrister educated at the Middle Temple; he was called to the bar in 1796 and
defended Arthur Thistlewood and members of the Cato Street Conspiracy.
Thomas Elde Darby (1780 c.-1854)
Educated at Cambridge, he was held a prisoner in France during the wars and afterwards
worked as a diplomat in Paris for forty years; he was married to the poet Eleanor
Darby.
Charles Giles Bridle Daubeny (1795-1867)
Educated at Winchester College and Magdalen College, Oxford, he was professor of
chemistry (1822-55) and botany (1834) and rural economy (1840) at Oxford.
J. C. Denham (1853 fl.)
The elder brother of the explorer Dixon Denham (1786-1828); he was apparently a friend of
William Jerdan.
Albert Denison, first Baron Londesborough (1805-1860)
The third son of Henry Conyngham, first Marquess Conyngham, educated at Eton College; he
served as a diplomat and was Liberal MP for Canterbury (1835-41, 1847-50), at which point
he changed his name. He was an author, antiquary, and collector.
René Descartes (1596-1650)
French philosopher and mathematician, the author of
Discours de la
méthode (1637).
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
English novelist, author of
David Copperfield and
Great Expectations.
John Dickinson (1782-1869)
Of Abbott's Hill near Hemel Hempstead; he was a paper-manufacturer, F.R.S. (1845) and a
registrar of the Royal Literary Fund.
Charles Wentworth Dilke (1789-1864)
In 1816 he settled in Hampstead and befriended Leigh Hunt, John Hamilton Reynolds, and
John Keats; he contributed antiquarian material to periodicals and was editor of the
Athenaeum (1830-46).
Henry Drummond (1786-1860)
MP and brother of Charles Drummond, one of Byron's Harrow classmates and correspondents.
He founded a professorship of political economy at Oxford in 1825.
Joseph Durham (1814-1877)
English sculptor who came to public attention with his portrait bust of Jenny Lind in
1848.
Edward Ellice (1783-1863)
British merchant with the Hudson's Bay Company and Whig MP for Coventry (1818-26,
1830-63); he was a friend of Sir Francis Burdett and John Cam Hobhouse.
Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Natural philosopher who began as an assistant to Sir Humphry Davy; he published
History of the Progress of Electro-Magnetism (1821).
Francis Fladgate junior (1799-1892)
London solicitor and member of the Garrick Club; he was the friend of Thackeray and John
Hamilton Reynolds, and at one time editor of
The Sun.
Edward Forbes (1815-1854)
Scottish naturalist educated at Edinburgh University; he was professor of botany at
King's College, London (1842).
John Forster (1812-1876)
English man of letters and friend of Charles Lamb and Leigh Hunt who was editor of
The Examiner (1847-55) and the biographer of Goldsmith (1854),
Landor (1869), and Dickens (1872-74).
Edward Foss (1787-1870)
Educated under Dr Charles Burney at Greenwich, he practiced law and contributed to the
Monthly Review,
London Magazine,
Gentleman's Magazine, and
Morning Chronicle,
and was active as an antiquary and member of learned societies.
Henry Foss (1790-1868)
London bookseller in Pall Mall; apprenticed in 1806, he partnered with Thomas Payne
1815-33.
Thomas Gaspey (1788-1871)
English journalist, novelist, and man of letters who wrote for the
Morning Post,
Courier, and
Literary
Gazette; he published
The History of England from George III to
1859, 4 vols (1852-59).
George Godwin (1813-1888)
Architect, playwright, and friend of John Britton; he published
The
Churches of London (1838).
George Hamilton- Gordon, fourth earl of Aberdeen (1784-1860)
Harrow-educated Scottish philhellene who founded the Athenian Society and was elected to
the Society of Dilettanti (1805); he was foreign secretary (1841-1846) and prime minister
(1852-55).
Nathaniel Gould (1853 fl.)
London merchant and director of the London Dock Company; he was a member of the John
Britton Club.
Robert Gray, bishop of Bristol (1762-1834)
Educated at Eton and St Mary Hall, Oxford, he was patronized by Shute Barrington; as
bishop of Bristol (1827) he was an opponent of parliamentary reform.
Robert Gray (1789 c.-1852)
Of Brompton Crescent and New Inn, an attorney and friend of William Jerdan.
Simon Gray (d. 1842)
Clerk in the War Office and friend of William Jerdan; he published on political economy
and wrote a tragedy,
The Spaniard (1839, composed 1788).
Thomas Grissell (1801-1874)
Of Norbury Park, building contractor; he was educated at St. Paul's school and had the
contract for rebuilding the Houses of Parliament; he was a friend of John Britton.
Sir William Robert Grove (1811-1896)
Educated at Brasenose College, Oxford, he was vice-president of the Royal Institution
(1844), professor of experimental philosophy at the London Institution (1847), and judge of
the court of common pleas (1871).
George Grote (1794-1871)
English historian, a member of Bentham's circle and writer for the
Westminster Review; he was a founder of London University, of which he was
president in 1868, and MP for London (1832-41).
Hudson Gurney (1775-1864)
Descended from Quaker families, he was a banker, poet, and antiquary; he was
vice-president of the Society of Antiquaries (1822-46).
Samuel Carter Hall (1800-1889)
Journalist and art critic; he was editor of
The Amulet from 1826
and was at different times sub-editor and editor of the
New Monthly
Magazine.
Henry Hallam (1777-1859)
English historian and contributor to the
Edinburgh Review, author
of
Introduction to the Literature of Europe, 4 vols (1837-39) and
other works. He was the father of Tennyson's Arthur Hallam.
James Orchard Halliwell-Phillipps (1820-1889)
Antiquary and Shakespeare scholar; he published
Dictionary of Archaic
and Provincial Words (1847) and
Life of Shakespeare
(1848).
Charles Hill (1812-1895)
Member of the Society of Antiquaries and Noviomagus Club; he was a stockbroker, sheriff
of London (1847-48) and friend of John Britton and William Jerdan.
Frederick Hodgson (1795 c.-1854)
London brewer and Conservative MP for Barnstable (1824-30, 1831-23, 1836-47).
John Hogg (1800-1869)
The younger brother of Thomas Jefferson Hogg; educated at Peterhouse, Cambridge, he was a
classical scholar, antiquary, and naturalist.
James Francis Hollings (1806-1862)
Poet, biographer of Cicero, historian, and prolific contributor to the literary annuals;
he died a suicide.
Lebbeus Charles Humfrey (1797 c.-1852)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and Lincoln's Inn, he was made Queen's Counsel in
1846; at the time of his death he was reportedly earning £6000 a year.
James Henry Leigh Hunt (1784-1859)
English poet, journalist, and man of letters; editor of
The
Examiner and
The Liberal; friend of Byron, Keats, and
Shelley.
Thomas Perkins Lowman Hunt (1802-1851)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, from 1827 he operated a school for curing speech
disorders in Regent Street. He was a friend of William Jerdan.
Herbert Ingram (1811-1860)
English journalist, founder of the
London Illustrated News
(1842).
John Stuart Jerdan (d. 1822)
The eldest brother of the journalist William Jerdan; he was lieutenant-colonel of the 5th
Bombay Regiment.
William Jerdan (1782-1869)
Scottish journalist who for decades edited the
Literary Gazette;
he was author of
Autobiography (1853) and
Men I
have Known (1866).
Douglas William Jerrold (1803-1857)
English playwright and miscellaneous writer; he made his reputation with the play
Black-eyed Susan (1829) and contributed to the
Athenaeum,
Blackwood's, and
Punch.
John Heneage Jesse (1809-1874)
Son of the naturalist Edward Jesse; he attended Eton College, published poems, frequented
the Garrick Club and Lady Blessington's salon, and published
Memoirs of
the Court of England during the Reigns of the Stuarts, 4 vols (1840).
John Kenyon (1784-1856)
Educated at Peterhouse, Cambridge, and Lincoln's Inn, he was a one-time neighbor of
Coleridge, Southey, and Wordsworth who became a London host and patron and published
several volumes of poems.
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
John Laurie (1797-1864)
Born in Scotland, he was a London merchant and coach-builder, sheriff of London and
Middlesex (1845-46) and MP for Barnstaple (1857-59).
Sir Peter Laurie (1778-1861)
Originally an Edinburgh saddler, he was Sheriff of London 1823, Alderman of the
Aldersgate ward in 1826, Lord Mayor in 1832, and Master of the Saddlers’ Company in
1833.
Peter Northall Laurie (d. 1877)
Barrister, son of Alexander Laurie of East Lothian; he was educated at Peterhouse,
Cambridge and Lincoln's Inn.
William Martin Leake (1777-1860)
The British envoy to Ali Pasha in Albania; author of, among other titles,
Researches in Greece (1814),
Travels in the
Morea, 3 vols (1830) and
Travels in Northern Greece, 4 vols
(1835).
John Gibson Lockhart (1794-1854)
Editor of the
Quarterly Review (1825-1853); son-in-law of Walter
Scott and author of the
Life of Scott 5 vols (1838).
Thomas Norton Longman (1771-1842)
A leading London publisher whose authors included Southey, Wordsworth, Scott, and
Moore.
Samuel Lover (1797-1868)
Irish artist, writer, and composer, a founder of the
Dublin University
Magazine (1833); he wrote and illustrate
Legends and Stories of
Ireland (1831).
Mark Antony Lower (1813-1876)
Antiquary and schoolmaster at Lewes; he published
English Surnames
(1842) and was F.S.A.
Charles Mackay (1787-1857)
Scottish actor who performed characters from Walter Scott's novels, notably Bailie Nichol
Jarvie.
Charles Mackay (1812-1889)
Scottish poet and journalist who wrote for
The Sun and the
Morning Chronicle; he published
Memoirs of
Extraordinary Popular Delusions, and the Madness of Crowds, 3 vols (1841).
William Alexander Mackinnon, of Mackinnon (1784-1870)
The chief of clan Mackinnon, he was F.R.S., F.S.A., a founder of the Literary Union Club
and MP for Dunwich (1819-20), Lymington (1831-32, 1835-52), and Rye (1853-65).
Daniel Maclise (1806-1870)
Irish painter who exhibited at the Royal Academy and executed a famous series of
portraits of literary celebrities that appeared in
Fraser's Magazine
from 1830 to 1838.
James Mangles (1786-1867)
After naval service in the Napoleonic wars he toured Egypt, Syria, and Asia Minor and was
a member of the Royal Geographical Society; he published
The Floral
Calendar (1839) and other works.
Francis Mills (1793 c.-1854)
Connoisseur, writer, speculator in timber and railroads, and founder of the Garrick
Club.
William Mudford (1782-1848)
Originally a parliamentary reporter for the
Morning Chronicle, in
1817 he succeeded Street as editor of
The Courier; he wrote novels,
contributed fiction to
Blackwood's, the
Literary
Gazette, and other periodicals, and in 1841 succeeded Theodore Hook as the editor
of
John Bull.
James Murray (d. 1835)
Journalist; he managed the foreign department at
The Times
newspaper during the editorship of Thomas Barnes.
John Murray III (1808-1892)
The son of the Anak of publishers; he successfully carried on the family publishing
business.
Robert Nares (1753-1829)
Educated at Westminster School and Christ Church, Oxford, he was editor of the
British Critic from 1793 and keeper of manuscripts in the British
Museum.
Cosmo Orme (1780 c.-1859)
London bookseller of Scottish origin; he was a partner of Thomas Longman before his
retirement in 1841.
Henry Ottley (1811-1878)
Member of the Camden Society and author of
A Biographical and Critical
Dictionary of Recent and Living Painters and Engravers (1866).
Thomas Lister Parker (1779-1858)
Of Browsholme Hall, Yorkshire, antiquary and art collector, educated at Christ's College,
Cambridge. He patronized British artists.
Constantine Henry Phipps, first marquess of Normanby (1797-1863)
The son of Henry Phipps, first earl of Mulgrave; educated at Harrow and Trinity College,
Cambridge, he was a Whig MP, governor of Jamaica (1832-34), lord privy seal (1834),
lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1835), and ambassador at Paris (1846-52).
Sir Jonathan Frederick Pollock, first baronet (1783-1870)
The son of a saddler, he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and was MP for
Huntingdon (1831-44); he succeeded Lord Abinger as lord chief baron of the exchequer in
1844.
Sir James Prior (1790 c.-1869)
Irish biographer, originally a naval surgeon; he contributed to the
Literary Gazette and published biographies of Edmund Burke (1824) and Oliver
Goldsmith (1837).
Bryan Waller Procter [Barry Cornwall] (1787-1874)
English poet; a contemporary of Byron at Harrow, and friend of Leigh Hunt and Charles
Lamb. He was the author of several volumes of poem and
Mirandola, a
tragedy (1821).
William Read [Eustace] (1795 c.-1866)
Irish poet who was an early contributor to the
Literary Gazette.
He was lieutenant-colonel in the Royal North Down Rifles.
David Roberts (1796-1864)
Scottish-born artist employed as a scene-painter before travelling in the Middle-East and
exhibiting at the Royal Academy from 1826.
Frederick John Robinson, first earl of Ripon (1782-1859)
Educated at Harrow and St. John's College, Cambridge, he was a Tory MP for Carlow
(1806-07) and Ripon (1807-27), Chancellor of the Exchequer (1823-27), and prime minister
(1827-28) in succession to Canning.
Sir Cusack Patrick Roney (1810-1868)
He was secretary to the Literary Fund (1835-37), clerk in the Admiralty (1840-45) and
secretary to the Dublin Exhibition (1853); he published
Rambles on
Railways (1868).
Lady Ann Ross [née Coulman] (d. 1857)
The daughter of Thomas Coulman of Whitgift Hall, Yorkshire; in 1843 she married the
arctic explorer James Clarke Ross.
Sir James Clark Ross (1800-1862)
Arctic explorer with William Parry, FRS 1828; he discovered the magnetic pole in
1831.
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
Frederick Salmon (1796-1868)
Surgeon and founder of St Mark's Hospital, London; he published in
The
Lancet.
Hon. Francis Scott (1806-1884)
The fifth son of Hugh Scott, sixth Lord Polwarth; he was a Scottish barrister and
MP.
William Armiger Scripps (1772-1851)
Born in London, he was publisher of
The Sun newspaper (1801-20)
and the
Literary Gazette (1820-51).
Charles Augustin Smith (d. 1869)
Of Groom's Hill, Greenwich, solicitor and member of the Royal Literary Society.
Charles Roach Smith (1806-1890)
An authority on Greek and Roman antiquities, he published in
Archaeologia and the
Gentleman's Magazine.
William Henry Smyth (1788-1865)
Naval officer, surveyor, and author of
The Cycle of Celestial Objects
for the Use of Naval, Military, and Private Astronomers, 2 vols (1844).
Clarkson Stanfield (1793-1867)
After service in the Navy he became a scene-painter for Drury Lane and was afterwards a
marine and landscape painter and Royal Academician (1835).
Robert Stephenson (1803-1859)
English civil engineer who studied at Edinburgh University and designed railroads and
bridges.
Thomas Stewardson (1781-1859)
Portrait painter born at Kendal, Westmorland, who began exhibiting at the Royal Academy
in 1803; among his subjects was Byron's mother.
James Stuart of Dunearn (1775-1849)
Scottish politician and book-collector who killed Alexander Boswell in a duel over
slanderous material in the
Glasgow Sentinel; he was editor of
The Courier in the 1830s.
Sir John Stuart (1793-1876)
Of Lincoln's Inn; he was Queen's Counsel (1839), MP for Newark (1846-52) and
vice-chancellor (1852-71).
Charles Richard Sumner, bishop of Winchester (1790-1874)
The younger brother of John Bird Sumner, archbishop of Canterbury; he was educated at
Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge; he was bishop of Llandaff and dean of St. Paul's
(1826) and bishop of Winchester (1827).
Charles Swain (1801-1874)
Manchester poet, bookseller, and engraver admired by Robert Southey; he published several
long poems, including
The Mind (1832) in Spenserian stanzas.
William Henry Sykes (1790-1872)
After retiring from military and government service in India in 1833 he served in several
learned societies and was lord rector of Marischal College.
William Henry Fox Talbot (1800-1877)
Scholar, MP, and pioneering photographer, son of William Davenport Talbot, educated at
Harrow and Trinity College, Cambridge. He was a friend of Thomas Moore.
Sir Thomas Noon Talfourd (1795-1854)
English judge, dramatist, and friend of Charles Lamb who contributed articles to the
London Magazine and
New Monthly
Magazine.
John Godfrey Teed (1794-1871)
Of Gray's Inn; he was judge of the Lincoln County Court, a Queen's Counsellor, and a
member of the Royal Society of Literature.
Sir James Emerson Tennent, first baronet (1804-1876)
Originally Emerson; educated at Trinity College, Dublin, he met Byron in Greece and
published
A Picture of Greece in 1825 (1826), a collections of
memoirs; he was MP for Belfast (1832-45) and civil secretary in Ceylon (1845-50). He
contributed to the
New Monthly Magazine.
Thomas Tooke (1774-1858)
Political economist, son of the writer William Tooke (1744-1820); he was FRS and a
founder of the Political Economy Club (1821).
William Tooke (1777-1863)
Son of the Russian historian of the same name; a London solicitor, he was a founder of
University College, London, active in the Royal Society for Literature, and MP for Truro
(1832-37). He contributed to the
New Monthly Magazine and
Gentleman's Magazine. Charles Knight described him as
“kind-hearted man of moderate abilities—somewhat fussy.”
John Montgomery Traherne (1788-1860)
Educated at Oriel College, Oxford, he was chancellor of the diocese of Llandaff and
active as an antiquary and member of learned societies.
Henry Tufnell (1805-1854)
Politician and translator, educated at Eton College, and at Christ Church, Oxford; he a
lord of the Treasury under Lord Melbourne's administration and Whig MP for Ipswich
(1837-38) and Devonport (1840-54) and secretary to the Treasury (1846-50).
Thomas Hudson Turner (1815-1852)
English antiquary; after working for the printer William Nicol he was employed at the
record office in the Tower of London. He published in the
Literary
Gazette.
Abraham John Valpy (1787-1854)
Son of the Reading schoolmaster Richard Valpy, he was a London printer who specialized in
classical texts. With the poet George Dyer he published 141 volumes of Delphin classics
(1819-30).
Henry Vaughan (1809-1899)
The heir of a Quaker hat-manufacturer, he collected prints and drawings by J. W. M.
Turner and was a member of the Burlington Fine Arts Club.
George Henry Virtue (1827 c.-1866)
Son of the London publisher George C. Virtue; he was a partner in the firm of Hall and
Virtue, F.S.A. and treasurer of the Royal Numismatic Society.
George Fleming Warren, second baron de Tabley (1811-1887)
Originally Leicester; he was the son of the first baron, educated at Eton and Christ
Church, Oxford. He changed his name by royal license in 1832 and held court offices.
Walter Henry Watts (1776-1842)
Miniature painter and journalist who wrote for the
Morning Post,
Morning Chronicle, and
Literary
Gazette.
Richard Weyland (1780-1864)
Educated at St. John's College, Cambridge, he was major in the 16th Light Dragoons, and a
Whig MP for Oxfordshire (1831-37).
William Wilberforce (1759-1833)
British statesman, evangelical Christian, and humanitarian who worked for the abolition
of slavery. He was an MP for Yorkshire aligned with Fox and Sheridan.
Sir John Gardner Wilkinson (1797-1875)
Egyptologist, author of
Topography of Thebes and General View of
Egypt (1835) and other works.
James Shaw Willes (1814-1872)
Educated at Trinity College, Dublin and the Inner Temple, he practised law in England and
was judge of the Common Pleas (1855).
Thomas Wright (1810-1877)
English antiquary and editor for the Camden and Percy societies; among the earlier of his
many publications was
Queen Elizabeth and her Times (1838).
Charles Philip Yorke (1764-1834)
Tory politician, the son of Charles Yorke (1722–1770); he was MP for Cambridgeshire
(1790-1810), secretary at war (1801-03), home secretary (1803-04), first lord of Admiralty
(1810-11). He was F.S.A. and vice-president of the Royal Society of Literature.
The Athenaeum. London Literary and Critical
Journal. (1828-1921). The
Athenaeum was founded by James Silk Buckingham; editors
included Frederick Denison Maurice (July 1828-May 1829) John Sterling (May 1829-June 1830),
Charles Wentworth Dilke (June 1830-1846), and Thomas Kibble Hervey (1846-1853).
The Courier. (1792-1842). A London evening newspaper; the original proprietor was James Perry; Daniel Stuart, Peter
Street, and William Mudford were editors; among the contributors were Samuel Taylor
Coleridge and John Galt.
The Globe. (1803-1922). London evening newspaper; the original proprietor was Sir Richard Phillips; George Lane
was among its later editors.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.