The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter I
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
THE
LAST DAYS OF LORD BYRON
&c.
CHAPTER I.
VOYAGE TO GREECE.—FIRST INTERVIEW WITH
LORD BYRON.
Public Meeting in London in behalf of the Greeks—My
services engaged by Mr. Gordon—His generous
offer—Unaccountable delay of the Committee—Mr. Gordon
retracts—Formation of a small Brigade—Terms of my agreement—Sail from the
River—Arrival at Malta—Delay there, and at Corfu—Arrival at
Dragomestri—Send the Stores to Missolonghi—Arrival there—Meeting with
Colonel Stanhope—Take up my Quarters in Lord
Byron’s House—Introduction to Lord
Byron—His kind manner, and warm reception of me—His
appearance—Furniture of his room—Conversation.
The noble struggle of the Greeks to shake off the yoke of their
Mahomedan tyrants having excited much interest in Great Britain, and produced a strong wish,
among many enlightened persons, to contribute to the success of so good a cause, a Public
Meeting was called at the Crown and Anchor Tavern, London, on the 15th day of May, in the year
1823. A subscription was entered into at the meeting, and a committee appointed to carry the
intentions of those who sub-
scribed their money
into effect, by providing such supplies as were most likely to be of effectual service to the
Greeks. Having been known to several members of the committee, by my services on another
occasion, I was sent for by Mr. Hume, to ascertain if I
were willing to be again employed. I accordingly waited on this gentleman, and met with him
Mr. Blaquiere and Mr.
Gordon. Nothing particular passed, except that the latter gentleman put several
questions to me concerning the formation of a brigade of artillery. I gave him all the
information in my power, at the moment, as to the number of men, the quantity of stores of
different kinds, and the various species of ammunition which would be required to form a small
brigade; and I concluded by tendering an offer of my services to prepare one, under his
auspices and direction.
Mr. Gordon being extremely anxious, and even
enthusiastic, to promote the cause of the Greeks, readily accepted my offer, and engaged me
immediately. I accompanied him to Scotland, at his request, and remained at Cairness, the place
of his residence in that country, until the committee came to a determination as to the course
of proceedings they would adopt. At length, it being ascertained that the subscriptions would
enable the committee to pay the expenses incurred in England, and send some effectual
assistance to the Greeks, Mr.
Gordon ordered me to make out an estimate of the expense of a corps of
artillery, consisting of mountain guns and howitzers, with all the necessary ammunition and
stores. A small laboratory, foundry, and establishment for making and repairing gun-carriages,
were also to be added. According to his directions, I immediately made out an estimate of all
these matters, on the most economical plan, and the sum I concluded they would cost was
10,500l.
My employer approved of this statement, and, with that devotion to the good
cause of Greece which has so long distinguished him, he immediately made an offer to the
committee to pay the third of this expense from his private purse, if the committee would pay
the remainder. He also offered to give up his own time, and proceed immediately to Greece with
this most needed and necessary supply, could his wish for the formation of a brigade of
artillery be accomplished. He thought no sacrifice, short of consistency and honour, too great
to promote the cause of the Greeks. It was plain, in his opinion, that artillery was the arm of
war in which they were most deficient, and which, if properly organized, might render them the
most beneficial services.
To further his views, he immediately sent me to London to form a small brigade
on his own account, and to stimulate the committee to pro-
ceed as fast as possible. From some causes, which I cannot
explain, and which have never been explained, a delay of nearly four months took place. Every
day did I attend on the committee, to give them every information in my power, and receive
their orders, and during all this time I noticed little or no progress in the actual
preparations for assisting Greece. Mr. Gordon can, most
probably, explain this matter far better than I can, and to him and the committee I willingly
leave it, remarking merely, that the latter are responsible to the warm-hearted people of our
country who confided in them, and to the great interests of humanity, religion, and liberty,
with which they were intrusted, for this injurious and fatal delay. The first consequence of it
was, that Mr. Gordon retracted his offer, and notified his intention to
relinquish his excellent plan. At the same time; he made a present to the committee, for the
use of the Greeks, of the small brigade I had formed, together with all the carriages, limber
and forge carts, complete; exclusive of contributing a very handsome sum of money.
The same circumstance put me to much inconvenience, and to a considerable
expence. Under the notion that Mr. Gordon’s
proposition would be promptly acted on, I went among some of my old acquaintance connected with
the Artil-
lery, and selected upwards of fifty
veterans, both artillery-men and artificers, all of excellent character, who would readily have
engaged themselves in the service of Greece. Of course, I had to enter into an engagement with
them, to make them promises, and point out to them the advantages they would obtain. Some of
them not having a present means of subsistence in London, I was obliged to provide them with
both food and lodging, and being also obliged to give the men something to whom I had held out
hopes and made promises, I was put to an expense altogether of upwards of thirty pounds, not
one farthing of which I was ever paid by the Greek committee, or by any other persons. But
whatever I may have lost and suffered appears to me as nothing, compared to what the cause of
Greece has lost and suffered by that sort of management which was so vexatious and injurious to
me.
When Mr. Gordon withdrew, my
connexion with him, in this official relation, of course, ceased, and very sorry I was to lose
the stimulus of his advice and encouragement. I was, however, too far embarked in the business,
to give it up, and the committee having engaged my services, I continued in attendance on them
till the month of August. They then resolved to send out an expedition, or a quantity of
supplies
on a small scale. Taking wages, freight
out, and every other expense, it was to cost about £4,500, and to consist of certain
military stores, and a certain number of artificers and mechanics. I undertook to superintend
the manufacture of the various pieces of artillery ordered; and to carry the whole into
execution. Contracts were accordingly entered into with several tradesmen, to supply the
different species of stores; the whole to be completed in ten weeks. For my services the
Committee agreed to pay me four pounds sterling per week. The reader will find in the Appendix,
A, a detailed account of the number of men, and quantity of stores, sent out to Greece under my
orders.
These supplies were calculated to form a mountain brigade of artillery,
with the munitions of war, materiel, tools, &c. necessary for a small establishment. With
this as a foundation, it was calculated, should proper assistance be given in Greece, that an
arsenal might gradually be formed, sufficient to manufacture all the minor implements of war,
and most of the ammunition and stores which would be requisite for that country. It was also
supposed, that it would be of great service to introduce among the Greeks some of those
mechanic arts connected with war, in which they are most deficient. Sensible as I am of the
great utility of every species of practical
| DELAY IN THE PROCEEDINGS. | 7 |
mechanical skill, it did appear to me that this plan, which originated with Mr. Gordon, was one of the most effectual means which could be
devised for assisting Greece.
The Greek committee agreed to pay me for my services, the sum of £400
for one year, from the time of my departure, I being to find my own passage back, after that
period, if I thought proper to return. For this sum, stipulating for customary and proper
usage, according to my rank and behaviour, I entered into a contract to perform certain
specific services. Not to interrupt my narrative, I shall place this document also in the
Appendix; and the reader will find it marked B.
When the stores were prepared, and the men engaged, I represented to the
committee the many advantages which would accrue from forwarding them by a fast-sailing vessel,
having nothing else on board, and to touch only at one port for orders. My advice was not
followed; and both stores and men were shipped on board a vessel, partly laden with government
stores to be delivered at Malta and Corfu, at both which ports, of course, the vessel would
have to stop, and must necessarily be detained a considerable time to unload. The utility of
the advice which I gave was made very evident to me when we arrived at Greece, where there was,
at that time, a great want of stores and ammunition of
every description. There was a great scarcity of powder; and
the success, if not the salvation, of Greece depended on our speedy arrival.
The men and stores were all shipped on board the brig “Ann,” of 250 tons, Capt. Langridge, and we
sailed from Gravesend on November 10, 1823. We had a favourable voyage from London to Malta,
arriving there in thirty-seven days (December 15), and six weeks is not considered to be an
unusual passage. Our vessel was, however, more crowded than was consistent with our comfort.
The cabin was calculated only to accommodate four persons; and there were nine cabin
passengers, besides nine persons in the steerage. I had to provide for eighteen persons,
exclusive of two Greek servants, most of whom had not been at sea before, and required much
attention. They consisted of three English adventurers, sent out under the auspices of the
Greek committee; four foreigners, among whom was Lieut.
Sass; two respectable Greeks, six mechanics, a foreman and clerk, with myself.
My trouble and expense were both greater than I had expected, the number of persons stipulated
for having been only fourteen, and for this number only had provisions been laid in.
At Malta we were detained no less than nineteen days. The cabin passengers
went on shore, and I made them an allowance for subsisting them-
selves there. The steerage passengers, particularly the
mechanics, whose conduct had not been very good, remained on board, and we were the whole time
under apprehensions on their account. We had brought them into the lion’s mouth; and had
an information been laid on oath that English mechanics, hired for a foreign service, were on
board, both they and the stores would have been detained. The carpenter of the brig, an
Irishman, having quarrelled with some of my men, threatened, indeed, to inform against them,
and he was only prevented by his ignorance of the mode of proceeding. Without a formal
information, the government would not interfere; and the friends of Greece at Malta exerted
themselves to prevent this being laid. The alarm on this account was, however, very great; and
I was not easy till the Anne was again at sea, and away from Valletta.
My men knew all these circumstances, and took advantage of them. They asked for every thing in
the way of food and drink which could be procured, and to content them, I was obliged to supply
them with whatever the market would afford.
We at length departed from Malta, on January 3, and, after a boisterous
passage of six days, we reached Corfu. Here we were again detained no less than ten days, and
were subject to the same sort of apprehension as at Malta; but
here, as there, though the authorities knew what our
vessel was laden with, they did not interfere. They were satisfied in overlooking us, as the
Custom-House clearance at London exonerated them from all responsibility on this point.
From Corfu we proceeded to Ithaca, and were nearly lost on the way, by the
pilot running the brig into a small cove in the island of Cephalonia, not large enough for a
vessel of her description. We remained at Ithaca seven days, waiting for orders, and had to pay
five pounds five shillings a day demurrage. We then received orders to
proceed to Dragomestri, in Western Greece, where we arrived on the same day, January 29th. I
had necessarily been very impatient through the whole voyage, but more particularly after
reaching Malta, and seeing the manner in which the vessel was detained; and I calculated, over
and over again, the days and weeks the committee had lost, by not following my advice. At
length, our voyage, for the conclusion of which I was so anxious, had been successfully
completed, but I found my labours and anxiety were only beginning.
On January 31st, a messenger arrived from Missolonghi, at Dragomestri, and
delivered me the following letter of instructions.
|
COLONEL STANHOPE’S ORDERS. |
11 |
Missolonghi, Jan. 30, 1824.
Dear Sir,
The Turkish fleet returned into the Gulf of Lepanto
yesterday morning; as they are slow in all their movements, there is no chance of
their putting to sea again for many days.
Under these circumstances, Prince
Mavrocordato, Lord Byron, and
myself, think it desirable, that you should discharge your cargo at Scrofeo. Boats
will be in readiness there to receive the articles, and to bring them on direct to
Missolonghi.
It will, I fancy, be necessary for you to procure a pilot, but
Martin will be able to afford you every information on
this and other subjects.
Should you have already, on the receipt of this letter, commenced
your disembarkation at Dragomestri, you had better go on with that work; but, in
that case, you would do well to load as many boats for this place as may be there
procurable.
I beg of you, by the first occasion, to forward to Missolonghi all
the lithographic presses, and articles connected with the
printing apparatus; also, one person that is acquainted
with the art of lithographic printing.
Be pleased, also, to forward my trunk, saddle, sword, letters,
&c. forthwith to Missolonghi.
The Artillery Corps, of which you are the Inspector, and every
thing, will be ready for you here on your arrival. I expect you here with the
greatest impatience;—your services will be most important to the independence
and liberties of Greece.
We immediately began, and unloaded the ship with all the haste in our
power; putting the stores in small vessels, which had been hired to convey them to Missolonghi.
This cost us eight days more. There was a great difficulty in procuring small vessels; but when
all was ready, we divided our men into two parties, to take care of the stores, and then
proceeded in these boats to Missolonghi, where we arrived on February 7th, with all our charge,
in good order. On my landing, I was met by Colonel
Stanhope: this gentleman introduced me to Prince
Mavrocordato, and informed me that a place had been procured for a laboratory or
ordnance-establishment, as conformable as possible to the memorandum he had received of me in
England. Great difficulty, he said, had been encountered in getting this accommodation, as
there was no subordination among the Greeks; and the soldiers had at first objected to quitting
the barracks. The place appropriated to us was called the Seraglio, and being at some distance
from the water, we had a great deal of trouble in getting the stores removed thither. We
received very little assistance; there was no regular organization, and the people who helped
us one day rarely came a second. After much labour and vexation, we did, however, succeed in
getting all the stores into a place of safety.
Having been consulted by Colonel
Stanhope, prior to his leaving England, as to the sort of building we should
require, I had given him the following memorandum;—I subjoin it here, that the reader may
see I asked for no palace, that I was not fastidious as to architecture, and required only what
was indispensable, either for our labours, our safety, or the safety of the stores.
MEMORANDUM
The buildings, if possible, should be connected. One should be a
store-house for the different articles brought out from England, and what might be
supplied by the Greek Government. The building to be appropriated as the magazine
for the gunpowder and other stores liable to explosion, is to be separate from the
other. Remark—This building must be clear of the manufactory.
The number of men required for the guns and howitzers to be
instructed, should be ten men to a gun, giving a total of one hundred and twenty
men, exclusive of officers. These men should be armed with a brace of pistols and a
sabre, and might be disciplined immediately on my arrival, as I could attend to
this part of the service at the same time the different manufactures were in
progress.
Fire-master.
G. C.
After seeing our men established in their new quarters, I went to my own,
which were under the same roof with Lord Byron. Immediately
on reaching Missolonghi, I began to suffer from
14 | LORD BYRON’S KINDNESS TO THE MEN. | |
another effect of our protracted voyage. From
the long time our vessel remained at Malta and Corfu, as well as from the expense I had been at
in procuring vessels to bring forward the stores, my money began to grow short. I had expended
from my own funds, in supplying the artificers and other passengers, and on the public service,
every farthing I could spare, and it was necessary, for the sake of the men, as well as my own,
and even to enable me to get the stores conveyed to a place of safety, that I should obtain an
immediate supply. I accordingly applied to Colonel Stanhope
for pecuniary assistance, but he told me he had no means of supplying me, and no public funds
at his command. He added, Lord Byron would probably supply me, he knew his
Lordship would at least be glad to see me, and he would introduce me.
I was somewhat impatient to see Lord
Byron, and readily accepted this offer. Two of our men, who had arrived in the
first boat, had already seen him, and had told me, with great warmth, of his kind and
condescending behaviour. He had seemed, they said, overjoyed to see some of his countrymen; he
told them he was glad they had arrived in safety, and behaved to them in the most hospitable
and friendly manner. This cheered my spirits, which were much depressed by severe fatigue, and
the information
| FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | 15 |
I had received from
Colonel Stanhope, that he had no money at his command.
Without this it was impossible for me to carry on the service, and I felt abashed and ashamed
to come before Lord Byron for the first time in the character of a beggar.
He was a nobleman, a stranger, and a man of exalted genius. I had understood I might be of
service to him and to Greece, but, on the contrary, I found myself immediately obliged, that I
might be enabled even to subsist my men, to have recourse to him for pecuniary aid.
It was under these mingled feelings of regret and expectation, that I had
my first interview with Lord Byron. In five minutes after
Colonel Stanhope had introduced me, every disagreeable
thought had vanished; so kind, so cheering, so friendly was his Lordship’s reception of
me, that I soon forgot every unpleasant feeling. He gave me his hand, and cordially welcomed me
to Greece. “He would have been glad,” he said, “to have seen me before; he
had long expected me, and now that I was come, with a valuable class of men, and some
useful stores, he had hopes that something might be done.” This was highly
flattering to me, and I soon felt a part of that pleasure which beamed from his
Lordship’s countenance.
On getting somewhat more at ease, I had time
to look about me, and notice the room in which I was. The
walls were covered with the insignia of Lord Byron’s
occupations. They were hung round with weapons, like an armoury, and supplied with books.
Swords of various descriptions and manufacture, rifle-guns and pistols, carbines and daggers,
were within reach on every side of the room. His books were placed over them on shelves, and
were not quite so accessible. I afterwards thought, when I came to know more of the man and the
country, that this arrangement was a type of his opinion concerning it. He was not one of those
who thought the Greeks needed education before obtaining freedom: as I can now interpret the
language, there was legibly written on the walls,—“Give Greece arms and
independence, and then learning; I am here to serve her, but I will serve her first with my
steel, and afterwards with my pen.”
Lord Byron was sitting on a kind of mattress, but elevated
by a cushion that occupied only a part of it, and made his seat higher than the rest. He was
dressed in a blue surtout coat and loose trowsers, and wore a foraging-cap. He was attended by
an Italian servant, Tita, and a young Greek of the name
of Luca, of a most prepossessing appearance. Count Gamba, too, came in and out of the room, and Fletcher, his servant, was also occasionally in attendance.
His Lordship
| FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | 17 |
desired me to sit down
beside him: his conversation very soon became animated, and then his countenance appeared even
more prepossessing than at first.
He began to rally me on the length of my voyage, and told me he had
supposed I meant to vie with my namesake, and that I was
gone to explore the South Pole instead of coming to Greece. My arrival at length, he added, had
taken a load off his mind, and he would not complain, if he at last saw Greece nourishing and
successful. “Why,” he asked, observing that I did not share his satisfaction,
“was I not as well pleased as he was?” Then, with a hint at my sailor habits, he
said he knew I wanted refreshment, and sent Tita to
bring me some brandy and water. This, however, had not all the effect his Lordship wished, and
he still rallied me on my dissatisfied appearance, bade me be at home, and explain to him why I
was not contented.
I told his Lordship, that I felt my situation very irksome; that I had
come to render assistance to the Greeks, and found myself, on the instant of my arrival,
obliged to ask him for assistance; that his Lordship’s kindness, and what he had said to
me, had heightened my regret, and that if he had received me haughtily and proudly, I should
have had less objection to
18 | FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | |
trouble
him; “for,” I added, “Colonel Stanhope
informs me that he has no funds to assist me, and has recommended me to ask your Lordship for
money,” On hearing this, he rose, twirled himself round on his heel, (which I afterwards
found was a common, though not a graceful practice of his,) and said, “Is that
all?—I was afraid it was something else. Do not let that give you any uneasiness; you
have only to tell me all your wants, for I like candour, and, as far as I can, I will
assist you.” When his Lordship rose, I observed that he was somewhat lame, but
his bust appeared perfectly and beautifully formed. After a few moments’ reflection, he
again took his seat, and said, he would take some brandy and water with me, on condition that I
should tell him all the news in England, and give him all the information in my power.
I accordingly endeavoured to recollect all the events of any importance
which had occurred, or of which I had heard before leaving England; I told him of the
proceedings of the committee, and of every thing which I thought would be interesting. In
return, his Lordship said I had come to a place where I should encounter many difficulties, and
if I were the man I had been represented to him, I should be exposed to some dangers. Mr. Bowring, he said, had informed him, that I was a person of
violent passions;
| FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | 19 |
he did not, for his
own part, exactly dislike those who were quick to feel and prompt to act; though such men might
easily get into embarrassments in a country like Greece. Perhaps, indeed, he added, he felt a
greater interest in me on this account, than he otherwise should; and, if he found me worthy of
his confidence, he would do what lay in his power to make me acquainted both with men and
things in Greece, so that I might know how to steer clear of the dangers which threatened me.
I was much surprised that any person, particularly Mr. Bowring, should have given himself the trouble to
prejudice Lord Byron against me; and to satisfy his
Lordship, I handed over to him the following letter from Mr.
Gordon. I shall insert it here,—apologizing at the same time, for speaking
to the reader of myself, when Lord Byron is a much more interesting
topic,—because I have that to say, in describing my intercourse with him, which will
impeach, at least, the prudence and discretion of some highly respectable persons; and
therefore I wish to shew, that Lord Byron did not place the confidence
with which he immediately honoured me in one wholly untried and unrecommended. I also wish to
inspire the reader with that reliance on all my subsequent statements, which will arise from a
conviction, that those who have known me have
20 | FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | |
relied on my integrity. From the moment
Lord Byron read this letter, he was satisfied that the delay of which
he complained had not originated with me; and during the short remainder of his valuable life,
he had me always about him, and placed almost every thing he possessed in Greece under my
control. Mr. Gordon wrote to me as follows:—
Cairness, October 18th,
1823
Dear Sir,
I had the pleasure of receiving both your
letters;—that of Mr. Robertson was intended as an answer
to the first, I am much obliged to you for all the trouble you have taken, and am
happy to hear that my train of artillery is soon to arrive. I should already have
sent you the letters, were it not that all the friends to whom I would have
recommended you in Greece have quitted that country.
Nothing could give me more concern or surprise, than the
intelligence you conveyed to me in your last; viz., that the committee had resolved
to send out the expedition in a vessel carrying government stores, to touch at
Malta and the Ionian Islands. Had it been their intention to defeat the object of
the subscription by one masterly stroke, no better plan could have been devised.
From the known character of the Powers that be in these Islands, there is nothing
to be expected but fine or imprisonment for the individuals composing the
expedition, and seizure of the stores belonging to it. And should the committee
persist in this plan of despatching you, I would advise you
to give them a direct refusal to be accessory to a proceeding which would entail
ruin on yourself, and cause disappointment to the friends of the Greeks.
I have been more particular in mentioning this, from your
| FIRST INTERVIEW WITH LORD BYRON. | 21 |
conduct having always met
with my approbation, and from the interest I shall always take in your welfare. I
shall be happy to hear from you again,
And I remain,
Dear Sir, yours truly,
My first interview with Lord Byron
lasted nearly three hours, and his Lordship repaid my candour, and the information I had given
him, by explaining to me how much he had been harrassed and disappointed since his arrival in
Greece. Of these subjects, I shall hereafter have more to say, and shall enter more into
details; I shall therefore now only observe, that his Lordship, when speaking on these topics,
displayed a great degree of sensibility, not to say irritation,—that his countenance
changed rapidly, and expressed great anxiety. He seemed almost to despair of success, but said
he would see the contest out. There was then a pallidness in his face, and knitting of his
brows, that indicated both weakness and vexation. I have since thought, that his fate was
sealed before my arrival in Greece; and that even then he was, so to speak, on his death-bed.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Edward Blaquiere (1779-1832)
After serving in the Royal Navy he published
Letters from the
Mediterranean, 2 vols (1813); with John Bowring he founded the London Greek
Committee in 1823.
Sir John Bowring (1792-1872)
Poet, linguist, MP, and editor of the
Westminster Review. He was
the secretary of the London Greek Committee (1823) through which he was wrongly accused of
having enriched himself.
William Fletcher (1831 fl.)
Byron's valet, the son of a Newstead tenant; he continued in service to the end of the
poet's life, after which he was pensioned by the family. He married Anne Rood, formerly
maid to Augusta Leigh, and was living in London in 1831.
Pietro Gamba (1801-1827)
The brother of Teresa Guiccioli and member of Carbonieri. He followed Byron to Greece and
left a memoir of his experiences.
Thomas Gordon of Cairness (1788-1841)
Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford; he was a member of the London Greek
Committee and major-general in the Greek Army; he published
History of
the Greek Revolution (1832).
Joseph Hume (1777-1855)
After service in India he became a radical MP for Weymouth (1812), Aberdeen (1818-30,
1842-55), Middlesex (1830-37), and Kilkenny (1837-41); he was an associate of John Cam
Hobhouse and a member of the London Greek Committee. Maria Edgeworth: “Don't like him
much; attacks all things and persons, never listens, has no judgment.”
Loukas [Λουκας] (1824 fl.)
A young Suliote Byron took into service at Missolonghi.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.
William Parry (1773-1859)
Military engineer at Missolonghi; he was author of
The Last Days of
Lord Byron (1825).
Sir William Edward Parry (1790-1855)
Admiral in the Royal Navy and arctic explorer; he was the author of
Journal of a Voyage for the Discovery of a north-west Passage from the Atlantic to the
Pacific (1821).
Lieutenant Sass (d. 1824)
Finnish soldier who served in the Swedish and Swiss armies before taking up arms against
the Turks, originally with a German troop; he was murdered by the Suliotes at
Missolonghi.
Leicester Fitzgerald Charles Stanhope, fifth earl of Harrington (1784-1862)
The third son of the third earl; in 1823 he traveled to Greece as the Commissioner of the
London Greek Committee; there he served with Byron, whom he criticizes in
Greece in 1823 and 1824 (1824). He inherited the earldom from his brother in
1851.