The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter XI
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
CHAPTER XI.
CONDUCT OF COLONEL STANHOPE, AND OF THE GREEK COMMITTEE TO
THE GREEKS.
Important consequences of Colonel
Stanhope’s proceedings—His attacks on me—The Greek Committee
invited to investigate them—He engages in opposition to the Greek government—Goes
to Greece to regenerate it—His qualities for a legislator—Greece to be regenerated
on Mr. Bentham’s principles, and by force—Engages individuals
to write against the British government, and implicates the committee and the Greeks in the
same hostility—Does what he can to involve them in disputes with the Holy
Alliance—His favourable opinion of Mavrocordato—Attachment of
the Greeks to the prince—Change in Colonel Stanhope’s
opinion—Source of the change—His abuse of the prince—The prince opposes his
whims—Former situation of Odysseus—An object of suspicion to
the government—Is favored by Capt. Trelawney and Col.
Stanhope—Sudden change in the opinion of the
latter—Odysseus flatters Colonel
Stanhope—The Colonel wants to put power into his hands—Intrigues to
break up the brigade—Suspicions entertained of Colonel
Stanhope—Intercepted letter of
Sophianopulo—Captain Trelawney’s
recommendation to break up the brigade—Colonel Stanhope’s
order for this purpose—In what respect opposed to the wishes of Lord
Byron—Letter of Mavrocordato—Colonel
Stanhope sets up a new race of Pachas—Colonel
Stanhope’s right to break up the brigade questioned—Formed by
Lord Byron, and placed by him and the committee under Prince
Mavrocordato—My instructions on this head—Insulting language of
Colonel Stanhope—Source of our authority for being in
Greece—Conclusion that Colonel Stanhope had no right to break up the
brigade—His improper mode of transmitting orders for this purpose
266 | COLONEL STANHOPE’S PROCEEDINGS. | |
—Cessation of my services under the Greek
Committee—Charge against Colonel Stanhope of injuring the Greek
cause, and insulting the memory of Lord Byron proved—His injudicious
conduct as to the war—Anger of the Greeks—His encouragement to adventurers—In
what manner the Committee are to blame for approving Colonel
Stanhope’s proceedings—Vote of approbation—Conclusion.
In the last chapter I shewed what an immeasurable distance there was
between Lord Byron and the soldier who has censured him.
That soldier was, however, the agent of the Greek committee, and could scarcely differ from, or
ill-treat the most enlightened and zealous friend of the Greek cause without injuring that
cause; and that he did injure it is what I mean now to shew. It is impossible that the people
of England, who so generously subscribed their money to aid the Greeks, can see with
indifference the manner in which that has been employed. It is impossible, also, that this
country, which, by supplying the Greeks with money as a loan, has become deeply interested in
their success, can see with indifference any man or set of men amongst ourselves pursuing a
series of measures, calculated in my apprehension to ruin Greece. I am personally concerned in
this matter, for it was through me and through the brigade I commanded, that Colonel Stanhope both insulted the memory of Lord
Byron, and injured the cause of the Greeks. It was not enough, also, for this
doughty Colonel to impugn the Greeks
and to
regulate their government, to censure Lord Byron and usurp his power, but
he must even, to his other attacks add an attack on me, humble as I am. In his work on Greece,
I am accused, at page 174, of thwarting the Colonel’s benevolent views as to printing
prospectuses; at page 215, I am accused of “not satisfactorily accounting for certain
sums of money placed in my hands by the Greek committee;” at page 224, I am
accused of “swaggering and blustering;” and at page 184, I am described as going
about with my eyes and hands up, crying, “Horrible, horrible; a conspiracy is formed
against the government, and an Englishman, Leicester Stanhope, is at the
head of it.”
I quote these passages to shew that I am not the original assailant; I do
not, however, mean here to enter into any vindication of my conduct; if my employers, the Greek
committee, are not satisfied with it, and with the account I have given them of the money
intrusted to me, they have redress in their power. I have asked for investigation, I have
supplicated them to meet me. Why have they not done it? Mr.
Bowring can probably answer; but neither he nor any other person can say that I
have avoided investigation, or refused to enter into the fullest explanation of my proceedings.
Colonel Stanhope is a member of that committee; why has
he not procured a public investigation, and caused a public exposure? Why has he, in the
insidious passage quoted above, and
published to
the world, laboured to cast a stigma on the reputation of a man who has nothing but his labour
and his character by which to gain his subsistence? If I were like Colonel
Stanhope, a pensioner on the country, I might be regardless of public opinion;
but I know that if I lose my character, I must starve, and, therefore, I have called for
investigation. Is it not cruel in Colonel Stanhope, thus to accuse me,
while he is one of that body which refuses me all means of vindication? But I repeat, I do not
mean here to defend my conduct, though I have thought it right to refer to Colonel
Stanhope’s public accusation, and to say I have called on the Greek
committee to meet me and investigate the whole business.
The second accusation, of blustering and swaggering, is one of Colonel Stanhope’s usual vague assertions. It is precisely
the same accusation he makes against Lord Byron; so that I
only find myself honoured by his attributing to me a trait of character, common also to that
great man. Lord Byron and myself were, I suppose, among the few persons
who had the skill to see through the charlatanism of Colonel
Stanhope’s political regulations and pretensions, the good sense not to
natter his egregious vanity, and the courage to resist his usurpations. Borrowing a feature,
probably, from his own character, he has on this account attributed bullying to one and
blustering to the other. He will find, however, as he has already
| A CONSPIRACY IN GREECE. | 269 |
found, that I possess too little of either of these qualities
to be frightened by him.
As to his accusation that I said there was a conspiracy, and he was at the
head of it, I have since, unfortunately, seen no reason to alter the opinion I then had formed;
on the contrary, I here repeat what I then said, and shall state the grounds of my opinion. I
trust I shall shew that there was such a conspiracy, that it was conducted by intrigues, that
Colonel Stanhope lent his aid to it, and that its
object was to destroy the influence of Prince
Mavrocordato; I trust I shall also shew that Colonel
Stanhope, by his conduct in this whole business, did incalculable injury to the
Greek cause. If I shew this, the public, or at least all that portion of it interested in the
success of the Greeks, and who have subscribed to assist them, will call on the Greek committee
to account for that vote of approbation with which they hailed the return of Colonel
Stanhope to England. To trace the whole business, I must go a little into
detail, and begin at a period antecedent to my arrival in Greece.
In the first place, it is quite evident that Colonel
Stanhope went out to Greece with the idea of regenerating that country. He
almost says as much. “Money is what I want here; a little from the committee, a little
from the Quakers, schools, presses, posts, hospitals; all will then flourish;
270 | COLONEL STANHOPE A REFORMER. | |
elementary books on education, war,
agriculture, &c., newspapers, useful pamphlets, Greek bibles, the monthly repository,
medical stores, blankets, bandages, matter for the press, and two
schoolmasters, to teach the Lancasterian system, are all much required. I think,
with such means, placed in judicious hands, this nation might be regenerated.”
The italics are Colonel Stanhope’s own, so that he meant to
regenerate Greece by means of two school-masters, and a little money from the Quakers.
Colonel Stanhope carried in his head plans for organizing
the army, regulating the government, establishing schools, setting up newspapers, forming
utilitarian societies, running mails, instructing the people, reforming the rulers, changing
the religion, framing codes of law, regulating judicial proceedings, and in short, for doing
every thing. He had a constitution ready cut and dried; and he set about all these mighty
projects without any of that previous acquaintance with the Greeks which one might expect would
at least be possessed by any man who proposed to legislate for them. He had indeed been in
Hindostan, and had such a correct idea of the mode of treating the Greeks, that he recommended
the Greek committee to consult Anglo-Indians, in order to ascertain the best means of treating
the Greeks. “In all things connected with Greece,” he says,
| WISHES BENTHAMISM ESTABLISHED. | 271 |
“consult those Anglo-Indians, who understand
the character of Asiatic nations. It is thus that I find myself quite at home in
Greece.” What knowledge the committee could obtain from these it is difficult to
guess, except a knowledge of the means practised so successfully in Hindostan, of reducing
nations to slavery, under the guise of being their friends and protectors.
But mere regeneration was not enough for Colonel
Stanhope, it was to be regeneration according to Mr.
Bentham’s principles. His doctrines were recommended to the Greeks on
every occasion; he is called “the first jurist of the age,” “the most
enlightened man of the most enlightened period of the world,” and his books and his
writings are pointed out to the Greeks as the guides of life and the sanctuaries of wisdom. I
know nothing of Mr. Bentham’s principles, and can therefore say
nothing of them; but I do know that they have never yet been reduced to practice. However just
they may be abstractedly, they never can be fit for the adoption of any people, (unless they
are to be governed by the will of Mr. Bentham instead of their own will,)
till they know and appreciate them. It is tyranny to impose any code of laws, however admirable
in themselves, on any country. Mr. Bentham’s principles are not
known and appreciated by the Greeks, and therefore are not proper for their immediate adoption.
272 |
COL. STANHOPE AN IMPROPER AGENT. |
|
Never was there a visionary, therefore, less fit to legislate for such a
rude country as Greece than Colonel Stanhope, loaded and
primed with the legislative tenets of Mr. Bentham, and
ready to enforce them on the most approved Hindostanee method. This single circumstance would,
in every rational man’s estimation, have been quite enough to induce the Greek committee,
which had nothing whatever to do with reforming Greece, and did not require a resident there,
such as the East India Company maintains at the courts of its tributary sovereigns, to pause
before they sent such a man as their representative. It is, however, to be apprehended, that
their own plans too much resembled those of Colonel Stanhope. In addition,
also, to his being a visionary and a theorist, he was a soldier—a man bred up in habits
of severe command and rigid obedience. He was a sort of Mussulman legist, ready to thrust
freedom down the throats of the common herd of mankind at the point of the sword, and ready
both to expound and enforce his theories. It was scarcely possible to have selected a worse
description of person to intrust with power. After he had proved by his conduct what were the
objects he had in view, the influential and managing members of the Greek committee, being
either visionaries like himself, or ignorant of the most common characteristics of human
nature, and in either case unfit
| STANHOPE ATTACKS THE IONIAN GOVERNMENT. | 273 |
for that high office they had taken on
themselves, continued to repose confidence in him, and even honoured him with their
approbation.
As proofs of his unfitness, which must have been known to the Greek
committee, for I take them from his own letters addressed to the honorary secretary of that
committee for its information, I shall quote a few specimens of his conduct. At Milan, he
engages a Monsieur M. to write a short historical pamphlet on the conduct
of our government in the Ionian islands. “I have recommended
him,” he says, “to select a number of strong facts, and
to state them in so soft a tone that even the sensitive nerves of delicate politicians may
not shrink from their perusal. This pamphlet will be sent over to the Greek committee for dispersion in the newspapers,” p. 18. “All
public bodies, and eminent men I have conversed with, agree in the expediency of changing the character of the government of the Ionian
Islands”, p. 23. From Ancona, he tells Mr.
Bowring, that a Greek settled there is to send him (of
course for the Greek committee) all the acts of mal-administration in the
Ionian Islands. Here, then, before we have reached the twentieth page in Colonel Stanhope’s book, before he has arrived at Greece,
we find him engaging in intrigues against the government of the Ionian Islands, and implicating
the Greek committee in the same sort of conduct. They were to
274 | HIS HOSTILITY TO THE HOLY ALLIANCE. | |
be the recipients of the calumnies which could be
collected by Mons. M. and the abettors of Colonel
Stanhope, in spreading them over the country. Thus did he and the committee do
what was in their power to put the Greek cause in hostility with the British government, and
that government kindly disposed towards the Greeks, and more than any other capable of
benefiting or injuring them.
When Colonel Stanhope was so little
inclined to be prudent towards his own government, which had much power to hurt him, though he
probably relied on his family influence for protection, it cannot be expected that he should be
more kindly disposed towards Austria, Russia, and the Holy Alliance. Every page of his book
shews his hostility to these governments. To that hostility no man can object, but it was
acting in a most unfriendly manner to the Greeks, to send, as the representative of the English
committee, a man who was sure to involve them in disputes with these powers; who was prompt to
act on those feelings of hatred towards the Holy Alliance, which, however justifiable in an
Englishman, are quite unsuitable to the Greeks. After seeing such proofs of Colonel
Stanhope’s hostility to the Austrians, as his book contains, and when we
know that the press at Missolonghi was under his control, we are at no loss to account for the
origin of
| HIS ATTACHMENT TO REVOLUTION. | 275 |
those attacks, both on the
Ionian government, and on the government of Austria, which he so warmly supported, and which
gave so much chagrin and uneasiness both to Lord Byron and
Prince Mavrocordato.
At page 63, we find him recommending the committee to send authors out to
Greece; “men,” he says, “who could speak French, German, or Italian, and
who could write strong articles in plain language, would do incalculable good
here.” The press was not, therefore, for the Greeks to speak their sentiments to
one another, but for foreigners to endoctrine them with those strong articles in plain
language, which have stirred up so much strife in some parts of Europe. At page 89, he
recommends “the committee to send out a few men of political acquirements to write for
the public journals.” At another place, they are desired to send out the articles
ready written; so that Colonel Stanhope thought every thing
might be done by using the political jargon which is common to political declaimers.
These partisan feelings, so conspicuous in Colonel Stanhope’s book, must have been known to the committee before he
reached Missolonghi, and yet they appear to have encouraged him in all his wild schemes; but
particularly in that wildest of all schemes, setting up a press in Greece, by which all the
defeated partisans of revolution, by
force and not
by knowledge, might abuse all the governments of Europe. The Greek committee and
Colonel Stanhope certainly forgot that men of all persuasions and
sects were subscribers to their funds; and that the purpose for which they subscribed was to
relieve some of the miseries of. the cruel warfare in which the Greeks were engaged, and enable
them to resist the Turks. Those subscriptions had no European political object, and it was a
desertion of principles for the committee to have any thing in view but merely to assist the
Greeks.
With such mighty projects in his head, it was to be expected that
Colonel Stanhope would not agree very well with those who had most
influence in Greece, and who would like least to be dictated to. The parties in Greece,
although every chief had a party of his own, were principally two. A party that sought, by
organizing and consolidating civil institutions and civil power, in the manner most suitable to
the situation and wants of Greece, to ensure government, and order, and military strength. At
the head of this party was and is Prince Mavrocordato.
It engages in many intrigues, as every body admits; it would like to make Greece a monarchy and
perhaps have a foreign sovereign, who would be obliged to rule through the individuals who are
its chiefs. It liked no rival, and of course dreaded that influence which
| MAVROCORDATO THE CHIEF OF ONE PARTY. | 277 |
might be obtained by any person having money;
and it wished to keep the press under control, lest it should be directed contrary to its
views. The other party was that of the military chiefs, each of whom wished to obtain power,
and have plunder; and, therefore, though they were united in their opposition to the party
seeking civil order, they were the rivals and enemies of each other.
Of all the chiefs, however, no one was more generally respected than
Mavrocordato. He was the best known in Europe, and
the most relied on. To him, in conjunction with that body called the general government, though
it had but little power, had Lord Byron united himself. To him, also, as
the most efficient executive organ of this government, had the Greek committee consigned the
stores intended for the use of the Greeks. By his influence also and his name, more than those
of any other individual, was the loan negotiated in England. Unquestionably he was and is the
first statesman in Greece, though, from not having any armed hordes at his command, living on
plunder, he has not been so much distinguished as a military leader, as some of the other
chiefs. If there is one individual in Greece, capable by his knowledge of appreciating the
general wants of his countrymen, and by his skill of uniting them under one form of government,
that individual is Mavrocordato. He was destitute, however, of money
278 | ATTACHMENT OF THE GREEKS TO THE PRINCE. | |
and of troops; and therefore
it was that Lord Byron, and also the committee in the first
instance, did what they could to strengthen him, and to preserve for him that influence in the
councils of his country, which he merits by his abilities and his virtues. The stores which I
accompanied to Greece, and all the men, were sent to assist him at Missolonghi, which had no
other temptation as a place of residence but its utility as one of the outworks of Greece, and
the necessity of defending it. Mavrocordato was there with the best and
most patriotic intentions; and in this swamp, to second these intentions, Lord
Byron took up his residence.
The general estimation in which the Prince was held, may be known by the
following extracts from Colonel Stanhope’s own
work:—“The Hydriots and Spezziots, in virtue of a promise formerly made
them, wished to settle their families at Napoli di Romania. Colocotroni, it seems, opposed this measure, upon which the islanders
refused to act. Mavrocordato was, in consequence,
sent to Hydra to conciliate them, and to persuade them to equip their fleet. He succeeded;
they set sail, had a naval engagement with the Turks, between Tenedos and Mitylene, and
took or burnt five or six vessels” page 20. “The Hydriots and Spezziots
are also much attached to Mavrocordato. In short, the whole nation
seem to look up to him as their friend”, page 35.
“Mavrocordato is a favourite
| SOURCE OF STANHOPE’S QUARREL WITH HIM | 279 |
with the islands, the people of
Western Greece, and the legislative body. He is now president of that body, and is sent
round here to settle affairs in this quarter. I find him good-natured, clever,
accommodating, and disposed to do good. He has rather an ingenious than a profound mind. He
seems at all times disposed to concede and to advance every good measure; and I consider it
a great advantage for Greece, that he is now in power at Missolonghi,” page
41—42. At page 55, Mavrocordato is described as the “idol of
the people.” Here, then, we have Colonel Stanhope’s own
testimony to the high character of Mavrocordato. So esteemed as he was and
is, surely he, if any individual in Greece should know what is required for that country, and
surely he of all men there deserves confidence. I have already stated, however, on the
authority of Lord Byron, that Colonel Stanhope
bearded the Prince; and that, conceding and ready to promote every good measure as he was, on
Colonel Stanhope’s own shewing, he was obliged to oppose much
which the latter did or wanted to do.
Before Colonel Stanhope had been six
weeks at Missolonghi, the following scene occurred. It is described by Colonel
Stanhope, and therefore he will not object to its
authenticity:—“The press is not yet in motion; I will explain to you the
cause. When I arrived here I found
280 | ARROGANT PROCEEDINGS OF THE COLONEL. | |
that Mavrocordato had brought a press with him, and that Dr. Meyer had undertaken to conduct it. I immediately
endeavoured to rouse the several persons concerned to commence the work; but a thousand
obstacles were thrown in the way. At last a house was procured and put in order: a
prospectus, partly written by Dr. Meyer and partly by myself, was
prepared, a list of the members of the three Parliaments, the Primates, Capitani, &c.
was made out, and a circular letter ready to forward to them. In short, when I thought that
the matter was actually printed, the redacteur declared that the
language of the prospectus was not good; that he had received one from the prince that was
all excellent; in short, that he would not print the prospectus.
Mark well that he is the only printer here. It is necessary to mention to you that, during
this most important struggle, the treaty or contract, which I had guaranteed relative to
the small loan of £100 for the fleet, had been violated. Instead of seven ships being
retained here, only five, and two fire-vessels, remained. The prince’s secretary came
to explain the matter to me; but sophistry would not do from one who was slily acting as
censor over the press, and attempting to suppress the thoughts of the finest genius of the
most enlightened age—the thoughts of the immortal Bentham. I told the secretary that contracts were sacred things, and if
they were broken in one | SCOLDS BOTH THE PRINCE AND HIS SERVANTS. | 281 |
instance, what security was there for Lord Byron’s
loan or the expected English loan. The next morning I met the redacteur at Dr. M.’s, and rated him
roughly. I declared that I would set up a press in the Morea, and expose the whole
intrigue. I then asked whether it was intended to establish an inquisition in Greece.
‘What,’ said I, ‘will Prince Mavrocordato say to
you; he who is the idol of the people, the governor they have forced the executive to
adopt, and the president of the representatives of a free people, should he hear that you
have acted so basely?’ He shuffled, and agreed to publish what Dr.
M. had written, but said that the translation from
Bentham was not in good Greek, and could not appear. I gave him
another sound rating, and he yielded. Since that time, the
prince has called upon me. I told him how infamously the printer had behaved, and repeated
all that I had said to him. I told him, further, that no man’s reputation could be
safe without a free press; and, as an instance of it, I mentioned that he was accused of
wishing to sell the Morea to England, and of aspiring to the throne of Greece. The high and sturdy tone assumed in these two conversations produced the
desired result:—the prospectus is printed; and I feel proud that in Greece, as in
Hindoostan, I have contributed to the first establishment of a free press.”
From his interview with Colonel
Stanhope,
282 | STANHOPE THANKED FOR CONCILIATION. | |
Mavrocordato retired silent and humiliated. This
foreigner assumed the direction of affairs; rates this man roughly;
gives him “another sound rating,” assumes a “high and sturdy tone;” and carries his business through in
opposition to that very authority of which he was only to be the auxiliary! This man is
described in the vote of thanks of the Greek committee, as “having
acted with sound discretion,” and as “having a conciliatory spirit;”
and here is evidence of his having set himself up in opposition to the native authorities
before he had been two months in Greece.
At this time Mavrocordato depended
on the supplies of that committee to maintain himself at Missolonghi, and preserve this
important post. Was it generous, or was it prudent in Colonel
Stanhope to humiliate the prince in this manner, or to make use of the power
which circumstance gave him to enforce a whim of his own? Was it not an evidence, and a strong
evidence, that our pretensions to assist the Greeks were only founded on a wish to obtain
influence in their country? From that time forward, as might be expected, there was a coolness
and opposition between Colonel Stanhope and
Mavrocordato. The prince constantly objecting to his violence, and
endeavouring, by those arts of intrigue so common among all classes of the Greeks, to check the
circulation of writings he had not the power to suppress. On the other
| HIS CALUMNY OF MAVROCORDATO. | 283 |
hand, Colonel Stanhope knowing
these underhand methods, grew constantly more imbittered against
Mavrocordato, and accused him of wanting to suppress all discussion,
and of desiring no other press but that which should speak his own sentiments. Before one month
after this first dispute, Colonel Stanhope describes
Mavrocordato, for no other reason that I could ever learn, than
because he objected to the violent tirades of the Colonel, “as no friend to liberty in a large sense,” page 63. Before another month elapsed,
Mavrocordato was accused of having “ambition, but not the
daring or self-confidence required to play the first part in the state. His game,
therefore, is to secure the second character, either under the commonwealth or under a
king.” And then the Colonel asks, sneeringly, “What can you expect from
a Turk or a Greek of Constantinople?” page 100. We are afterwards told, however,
that Mavrocordato is a good man. “Greece,” says
Colonel Stanhope, at page 147, “is split into factions, which
are enrolled into two great parties. The one consists of Mavrocordato,
the islands, a large portion of the legislative body, of the Primates, and of the people.
The other consists of Ipsilanti, Petrombey, Colocotroni, and the principal part of the soldiery. Odysseus professes neutrality, but leans to the latter
party. Mavrocordato is a good man, but cannot go
straight. He is, secretly, for a mild monarchy.—A
thing as 284 | SOURCE OF THE CHANGE IN HIS OPINION. | |
easy to be obtained in
Greece as a mild tigerarchy.” Four months later,
Mavrocordato is described as one from whom no good could be expected,
he having been sent to Greece and patronised by the metropolitan Ignatius,
who is a mongrel of Turkish, Russian, and Greek breed, and a pensioner of Russia—page
212. Of both, Colonel Stanhope says, “what can you expect, but
that each will play the republican or the slave, as circumstances may require or ambition
dictate?”
From these passages, it is plain a complete change had been effected in
Colonel Stanhope’s sentiments towards Prince Mavrocordato; and for this change there was no reason
whatever, but the discovery made by Colonel Stanhope that the prince was
not as great an enthusiast and visionary as himself. He does not, he cannot, alledge one act
against him. He does not attribute to him any loss of popularity or power. He does not say that
the islanders had ceased to love and respect him. He convicts him of no intrigues, and does not
even prove that he was guilty of any follies. The prince still remained at the post he occupied
when Stanhope went to Greece, and was engaged in the same pursuits as when
he described him as the general favourite, and as ready to engage in every good work. The whole
course of the change in the Colonel’s mind is as clear as if it were a stream lying at
our feet. He respects Mavrocordato at
| INJURY EFFECTED BY HIS CALUMNY. | 285 |
first for his good conduct and great exertions, but
he wants to do a number of things in Greece, which, in
Mavrocordato’s opinion are not beneficial to Greece.
Mavrocordato, unable to resist him without injuring Greece, and
unwilling to offend one who has so much in his power, opposes his violent proceedings in an
underhand way, and the Colonel’s respect is changed to contempt, and then comes calumny
and opposition.
Had the accusations of Colonel
Stanhope been only breathed into the ear of the secretary of the Greek
committee, however much this might have been lamented, and whatever harm they might have done
the Greek cause, they would not have been noticed here; but they are published to the world;
and after Colonel Stanhope has been one of the instruments for
transferring that portion of the loan into the pockets of the Greeks, which was ever destined
to enter them, he puts forth statements calculated to deprive the most capable man in Greece of
confidence, and thus by injuring the Greek cause, to take from the Greek government the means
of fulfilling its engagements. Had Colonel Stanhope’s opposition
been confined to what he printed in the newspapers in Greece, and what he published in his
book, I should have left to far abler pens than mine the task of punishing him and defending
the Greeks. He has exposed his conduct so completely in his own book that every
body interested for the Greeks must see a
want of wisdom in all his proceedings, and among the enlightened friends to their cause, some
will be found to avenge them. But he has done more than print and publish; he broke up the
brigade which Lord Byron had formed; he destroyed all the
fruits of my exertions at Missolonghi; he did irreparable injury to the Greeks by breaking up
that brigade, and this it is which calls on me to expose his conduct. Whatever may have been
the results of his proceedings, I honestly believe they were all caused by his having been
thwarted in his newspaper views by Lord Byron and Prince Mavrocordato.
Now for the proofs of his improper proceedings. It has been already
mentioned, that the Greek government, Prince
Mavrocordato, and Lord Byron, were all
apprehensive of what would be the conduct of Ulysses,
Colocotroni, and the other military leaders, if they
had power. It was Lord Byron’s opinion, which he signified to the
government, that as small a portion of the loan, and as few of the stores as possible, should
be placed at the disposal of these chiefs. Such an opinion was fully justified by their
previous character and conduct. Ulysses had been a servant of Ali Pacha, and a captain of an organized band of plunderers.
Colocotroni was a mere adventurer, who had been guilty of all sorts of
oppression in the Morea, and
| COLONEL STANHOPE’S LIKING FOR ULYSSES. | 287 |
had collected a considerable body of
troops, by allowing them to commit almost unheard-of enormities. He even took and plundered
some part of the stores belonging to the Greek committee. Since that period, both these chiefs
have openly rebelled against the government, and have been defeated.
Colocotroni has been deprived of his power, and
Ulysses has again taken up his abode in an impregnable, and to
strangers inaccessible, pass in the mountains. Thus the event has fully justified the
suspicions which the government entertained of these mercenary soldiers, and done more than any
language can do to condemn the conduct of those Englishmen who supported them in opposition to
that government. It is very natural for military men to admire military virtues.
Colonel Stanhope, like other officers, is fond of commanding, or of
carrying things with a high hand, and he would probably admire, more than a mere civilian would
do, a similar disposition in another person. From some reason of this kind, Colonel
Stanhope was much more attached to the military chiefs, particularly to
Ulysses, than to the cautious and even wily
Mavrocordato. Captain
Trelawney, a romantic kind of adventurer, had also been much with
Ulysses, and was personally attached to him. He liked the free and
energetic character and mode of living of this mountain robber. His communications to
Colonel Stanhope
288 | THE ROBBER CHIEF’S FLATTERY. | |
may probably have had some
influence on the Colonel’s opinions. In addition to this, Ulysses,
knowing Colonel Stanhope’s
penchant for newspapers, professed to assist him in setting up his press
at Athens. From these various causes, Colonel Stanhope was quite smitten
with him, and threw all his weight into the scale of this mountain robber, almost the instant
he got to Athens.
Only a fortnight after leaving Missolonghi, and after knowing Ulysses or Odysseus, about half that time,
he writes of him thus, “I have been constantly with Odysseus. He
has a very strong mind, a good heart, and is brave as his sword; he is a
doing man; he governs with a strong arm, and is the only man in Greece that can
preserve order. He puts, however, complete confidence in the people. He is for a strong government, for constitutional rights, and for vigorous
efforts against the enemy. He professes himself of no faction, neither of Ipsilante’s, nor of Colocotroni’s, nor of Mavrocordato’s, neither of the primates, nor of the Capitani, nor of
the foreign-king faction. He speaks of them all in the most undisguised manner. He likes good foreigners, is friendly to a small body of foreign troops,
and courts instruction. He has established two schools here, and has allowed me to set
the press at work. He complains that the press at Missolonghi does not insert articles
that do not suit the politics of the editor.” Five days after this
Colonel Stanhope writes as follows:
| ITS INFLUENCE ON COLONEL STANHOPE. | 289 |
“The Chief Odysseus has been a mountain robber, has never bowed
in bondage to the Turks, has served under Ali Pacha,
has been chosen governor of Eastern Greece, has refused to give up Athens to a weak
government, and has lately sympathized with the people, and taken the liberal course in
politics. He is a brave soldier, has great power, and promotes public liberty.—Just
such a man Greece requires.”
Here is strong and decisive evidence of Colonel
Stanhope embracing, with all the warm feelings of a partisan, the party of the
mountain robber; and of the man who had refused to give up Athens to a weak
government. Odysseus was at that very moment
opposed to the party with which Lord Byron was
united,—the party of the government and Prince
Mavrocordato, (as is evident from Colonel Stanhope’s
own shewing) and what is more, the party with which the committee was connected, the party with
which the loan had been negotiated, the party to which the artisans, and all the stores, had
been sent. For taking this decided part, Colonel Stanhope appears to have
had no reason whatever, but that he was flattered by Odysseus. The very
language and opinions he puts into the mouth of this chief, were the language and opinions he
himself held. “He promotes public liberty; he has allowed me to set the press at work;
he has established two schools; he complains of the press at Missolonghi; and, withal, he
possesses great power, does this
mountain
robber, and he governs with a strong hand.” It is quite plain that this frank
soldier had more cunning than Mavrocordato, and gave into all the
Colonel’s whims for the sake of obtaining his support. What respect can a mountain
robber, a Captain of Ali Pacha’s, have for a free
press; or what can such a man know of the nice safeguards of civil and political liberty? His
conduct had undergone no alteration; and, merely by professing the same
principles as Colonel Stanhope, he instantly won his confidence. It could
not, however, be unknown to Colonel Stanhope at the time, that
Odysseus was an object of suspicion to the general government; nor
that letters had frequently been intercepted, which had justified these suspicions. While he
was cajoling Colonel Stanhope, by pretending to be of no party, and to
have a great partiality for the freedom of the press, he was carrying on intrigues with
Ipsilanti and Colocotroni, to put an end to the
influence of Mavrocodato, and overturn the party of civil order, so that
Greece might be delivered up entirely to the strong government of the Capitani, and be placed under their swords.
The first practical result of this new attachment of Colonel Stanhope’s, was a demand on Lord Byron to send powder, guns, shot, and other stores, from Missolonghi to
Athens; that is, to take them from the government to which they had been sent, and consign them
to Odysseus. When
| INTRIGUE AT MISSOLONGHI. | 291 |
Colonel Stanhope wrote, on March the 8th, to Lord
Byron, he also suggested that the English mechanics, if they had not departed
from Missolonghi, should be sent to Athens, as well as myself, or Mr. Gill, or Mr. Hodges. Thus, as far as
depended on Colonel Stanhope, he would at once have weakened, even during
Lord Byron’s lifetime, his resources, and the resources of
Prince Mavrocordato. As this request was known, both
to the Prince and to Odysseus, it had the immediate effect of exciting the
hopes and encourageing the intrigues of the latter, and making the former dread the influence
of Colonel Stanhope more than ever.
The next result was, that intrigues were set on foot to seduce some of
those from our service whom Lord Byron would not send. I do
not say that Colonel Stanhope himself engaged in this low
dirty business: but I am sure, lending himself to the party of Odysseus gave it a credit at Missolonghi it would not otherwise have acquired,
and enabled his partisans to use Stanhope’s name, in a way they
would not otherwise have dared to do. Soon after the request for stores arrived, in consequence
of the numerous saint and holy days on which the Greeks would on no account work, I procured,
through Lord Byron, permission) from the clergy, for the Greeks in the
arsenal to work on Sunday, to which generally they had no objection. They were to receive
more pay for working on that day than on any
other. But on stating this circumstance to the workmen, I found there existed among them an
unwillingness I had never before perceived. This surprised me, and pursuing the inquiry, into
which I was led by some hints, I ascertained that these men had been tampered with by the party
at Athens, who had used Colonel Stanhope’s name, and that discontent
had in consequence got amongst them. They thought they should be better off at Athens, and
wished to leave Missolonghi. Under the sanction of Colonel
Stanhope’s example, and tempted by selfishness and ambition, they joined,
in their wishes, the party arrayed against Missolonghi, and did what they could to break up the
establishment there, and ruin Mavrocordato, for the
benefit of Odysseus.
By Colonel Stanhope embracing so
openly the party of the latter, he gave an opportunity to the partisans of Odysseus, to represent him as wholly attached to the
Athenian Chief. Thus Sophianopulo, one of Odysseus’s friends, writing
from Athens to Demetrius Ipsilanti, says, “The
English took the part of the Cranidi people in the first instance, only because they were
deceived by Mavrocordato, but having been since
persuaded that Mavrocordato, and those of Cranidi, instead of seeking
the independence of Greece, are endeavouring without the consent of the people, to invite kings and to demand the protection of
foreign | SUSPICIONS IT GENERATED. | 293 |
powers, they have
quitted the party of Mavrocordato and those of Cranidi, and now
panegyrize the conduct of the Tripolitza people, with whom they are desirous of entering
into a correspondence, seeing that they desire only a national assembly, union, and a
cessation of faction. Mavrocordato had so prejudiced the English
against Ulysses, Niketas, and
Colocotroni, that they could not listen to their
names with pleasure; but the conferences of Col. Stanhope with
Ulysses, although very brief, and his acquaintance with
Goortho, and other persons of good sentiments, have compelled him to declare that the fall of Mavrocordato
, the introduction of D. Ipsilanti into the national government,
and the reinforcement of the government with Colliopulo and Goortho, are the only means of securing
the independence of Greece, and the consolidation of her laws, by putting a stop to civil
war and intestine disturbances,” p. 308. This letter was intercepted by the government and sent to Missolonghi, where it arrived shortly after we
had discovered the intrigues set on foot, in Colonel Stanhope’s
name, to seduce our people, and shortly after he had made those requisitions which, if complied
with, would have put Missolonghi in the power of any body who chose to attack it. These
circumstances, which all occurred shortly before Lord Byron’s death,
begot an opinion at Missolonghi, that Colonel Stanhope was openly lending
himself to
294 | STANHOPE IN A CONSPIRACY. | |
the intrigues of
Ulysses—whom he describes in another place as a consummate
intriguer, and of course they had a powerful effect on the minds of all the persons, both
foreigners and Greeks, at Missolonghi. This was, I believe, one strong motive for
Mavrocordato not meeting a congress called by
Odysseus, and recommended by Stanhope. Thus, the
violent partisan feelings betrayed by Colonel Stanhope had the immediate
effect of preventing that meeting, which might have promoted the union of the whole, had it
been properly managed.
That Sophianopulo was engaged in a
conspiracy to destroy the power of Mavrocordato is
admitted. That Colonel Stanhope had fully lent himself to
the views of this man, whom his own friends describe as a detestable character, is evident from
his recommending, in the passage already quoted, p. 246, two of the very measures which this
Sophianopulo wished to have executed, viz., the introduction of
D. Ipsilanti and Colliopulo into the government. The opinion that Colonel
Stanhope was engaged with Odysseus in his
rebellious projects against the government was strengthened, also, by what this letter said of
Colonel Stanhope’s opinions, as to Prince
Mavrocordato wishing to invite a King, and place the Greeks under the protection
of foreign powers, because it was known that Colonel Stanhope, however
unjustifiable such opinions were by any circumstances in the conduct of
Mavrocordato,
| CORRESPONDS WITH MY SUBALTERNS. | 295 |
did entertain them. This intercepted letter, therefore, shewed that Colonel
Stanhope had at least made Sophianopulo his confidant, and
had entered into his views. So strong was the opinion at Missolonghi, that he had joined the
opposing chiefs in all their views against the government, that his own partisans there, for he
had partisans, write to him thus: “Considerable pains are taken by some person or
persons, to make it appear, that you are supporting a faction in opposition to the government,
and this is not a little increased, by a letter written by Mr.
Hastings (a friend of Colonel Stanhope’s) to an
American gentleman here, of the name of Jarvis, in which
he says, “that in spite of all his remonstrances, he is afraid your mind is biassed by a
person, named we believe Sophianopulo, whom Hastings
states to be one of the most execrable villains that ever existed.” p. 184.*
* This extract is part of a letter from Messrs. Hodges and Gill, two
persons under my orders at Missolonghi: it bears no date, but it is mentioned in a letter
written by the Colonel from Salona, on April the 18th, and is described as having been just
received. The independent and upright-minded Colonel
Stanhope, had engaged my subalterns therefore to write to him, and the
tenour of their correspondence is somewhat remarkable. This letter begins. “In respect to what has been done since our arrival, as we cannot say
what we wish, we will decline saying any thing.” So that Colonel
Stanhope did not choose to be informed of what was doing, or of what had
been done, by Lord Byron, Count Gamba, or me; no, he had recourse to my subalterns, whom he thus
employed and encouraged to transmit reports of the conduct of their superiors. That was the
sort of information Stanhope asked and wanted.
|
296 |
RECOMMENDATION OF CAPT. TRELAWNEY. |
|
After Colonel Stanhope had been
informed of the suspicions excited by his conduct, it might have been expected that he would
have taken some steps to remove them. He persevered, however, in giving power to the robber
chief, who has since been obliged again to take to the mountains; and, in weakening Mavrocordato and the government, thus he identified his views
with the conduct of Odysseus. He had been warned of the
consequences, he knew of the suspicions, knew of the imputations which had been made against
him, and yet he persevered in breaking up the establishment at Missolonghi. On April the 28th,
not ten days after Lord Byron’s death, his friend, and
the friend of Odysseus, Captain
Trelawney writes to Colonel Stanhope from Missolonghi,
thus: “Every one here, I mean the English artificers and brigade, now wish to join
Odysseus; or, at least, to leave this hole; I know you will say I
have seduced them.” On the 29th he writes, “Every one says, Gamba and all, that neither Byron,
nor any one else, has given the committee’s stores to
Mavrocordato. I have ascertained, that you are legally and
indisputably now in full possession, and full power. Hodges and Gill will not stay here.
All the English wish to be off. Do, my dear Sir, take some prompt and decisive steps. I
will, if you like, execute them. You know the wants of Eastern Greece. Could you not
consign some portion of
| ORDER SENT BY STANHOPE. | 297 |
these stores to
that part, on condition of the Greek government’s approval?
Divide the artillery brigade in two, for it is, in force, two brigades.”
In consequence of such representations seconding his own wishes,
Colonel Stanhope wrote from Zante, under date May 18th,
to Mr. Hodges, one of those subalterns with whom he had
previously been corresponding, desiring him “to deliver over to Captain Trelawney’s charge, who, be it remembered,
had no official character whatever, one howitzer and three three-pounders, with cartridges
and every thing complete for field service. These guns and this ammunition he will place in
the custody of General Odysseus, during the pleasure
of the general government of Greece. You will also be pleased to deliver to
Captain Trelawney, a spy glass and a map of Greece, for
General Odysseus. Unless Mr.
Gill’s presence is necessary or useful at Missolonghi, of which he
must be the best judge, I wish him to proceed to Athens with Captain
Trelawney. He will take such working tools with him as he may consider
necessary.” p. 214.
This order broke up the brigade, and completely blighted the fruits of
all Lord Byron’s exertions. In consequence of it three
long three-pounders, two short three-pounders, mountain guns, and the howitzer complete, were
sent to Odysseus, under the charge of Captain Trelawney. This was in fact the decisive measure which
this gentleman recommended Colonel Stanhope to order, and
298 | NOT APPROVED BY LORD BYRON. | |
which he volunteered his services to
execute. I was at Zante when the order was given, and remonstrated against it, but
Colonel Stanhope would not listen to me. My remonstrances he termed
swaggering, and my reminding him of Lord Byron’s intentions, and the
government orders, he denominated blustering. In his letter to Prince Mavrocordato, dated Zante, December 7th, he describes himself
“as deputed to act in concert with Lord Byron, and further
his views in favour of Greece,” p. 37. In all his proceedings which fell under my
cognizance, he acted in opposition to Lord Byron, and did any thing but
promote his views. The very step he took about the brigade and the stores, was directly in
opposition to Lord Byron’s views. It was in vain that I represented
this to him; that I had received Lord Byron’s, Prince
Mavrocordato’s, and the government’s orders, not to allow any stores
to be sent away: it was in vain that I represented Lord Byron’s
opinion on the necessity of adhering to the general government, (which he had felt so strongly,
that he had withdrawn the orders he had once given, as I have already stated, to send some
supplies to his old friend Longa, and those supplies
were never sent,) it was in vain that I represented to Colonel Stanhope
the mischief which might ensue by taking the supplies from under the control of the government
and giving them into the hands of the chiefs: Colonel Stanhope would
persist, and he sent those | NOT APPROVED OF BY THE GOVERNMENT. | 299 |
supplies to Odysseus, which, for aught I know, may since have been
recaptured by the general government.
I had received orders from Lord Byron,
at my peril, not to deliver any article whatever, unless the delivery was sanctioned by the
general government. Col. Stanhope in his letter does mention
the general government, but it is impossible that this government could have given permission
to remove these stores, or to place them under the control of Odysseus, whom at that very moment it suspected of hostility. It is very
amusing, also, to see with what facility this robber chief is transformed by Colonel Stanhope into General Odysseus. I am
persuaded that under no circumstances would the government have sanctioned the plan of
strengthening its opponent Odysseus, at the expense of its friend
Mavrocordato. At least the measure would never have
been adopted without his sanction. About the same period however, on May 22d,
Mavrocordato wrote to Mr.
Blaquiere, who was then at Zante, objecting in the strongest manner to sending
any artillery from Missolonghi, or in any way weakening that important post. He also complains
of wanting ammunition, and he says the people will not see the removal of these things from
Missolonghi with indifference.
At the time this letter was written Colonel
300 | MAVROCORDATO’S SENTIMENTS. | |
Stanhope was still at Zante, and as it is published in his
book, the probabilities are that he was there when it arrived, and that it was communicated to
him at the moment.
There is indeed reason to believe that it was written either with a view
of its being shewn to him, or of being made public in some way or other; and it casts much too
clear a light on the manner in which the friend of Lord
Byron and the first statesman of Greece was treated by a few meddling and
overbearing captains and colonels, not to have all the publicity possible given to it; I shall
insert it, therefore, in the Appendix, under the letter F. A letter containing similar
sentiments was also addressed to Count Gamba, and it
also will be found in the appendix marked G.
The reader will see by these letters, how completely the above order of
Colonel Stanhope was in opposition to the wishes of
Prince Mavrocordato, and of the general government
of Greece; he will learn, too, how completely the colonel took the arrangement of every thing
of this description on his own responsibility; and from Colonel
Stanhope’s own book, he may learn how sincerely he despised and condemned
that government and people he, and others like him were calling on the British people to
subscribe their money to support. Col. Stanhope’s conduct on this
occasion may be considered,—as to his right
| COLONEL STANHOPE’S POWER QUESTIONED. | 301 |
to do what he did, and as to the
expediency of his proceedings. I deny that he had any authority to break up the brigade, but
the expediency of his doing so I must leave to others more competent than I am to decide; I
may, however, observe, that to make the brigade of artillery effective, it was essential to
keep it undivided. A mountain gun or two might have been of great service to Odysseus; but, independent of his being a mere armed chieftain,
in opposition to the government, it may well be doubted how far one gun here, and one gun
there, taken from under the management of those who were acquainted with this species of force,
could tend to the defence of Greece. Distributing the force and the resources of the committee
in this manner, was but setting up a new race of Pachas, to lord it for another three centuries
over the poor inhabitants of Greece. The government of the sword, or rather in this case of the
gun, was, however, the sort of government which, under the name of a strong government, this
Anglo-Indian Colonel was particularly desirous of establishing in Greece.
As to Colonel Stanhope’s right
to break up the brigade, I may observe that it was very doubtful to me whether Captain Trelawney’s information as to the extent of
Colonel Stanhope’s power to dispose of the stores was correct;
setting aside the remarkable circumstance of Colonel Stanhope,
302 | ORDER OF THE GREEK COMMITTEE | |
who held an official situation, not
knowing whether he had such power or not, and deriving information that he had from a person
who was quite unacquainted with all the circumstances of the case. Soon after the arrival of
the laboratory establishment in Greece, this was expressly notified to Prince Mavrocordato, by a joint letter of Lord Byron and Colonel Stanhope, in which the
prince is expressly required to state forthwith, “in what manner he wishes it to be
employed,” p. 107. If this is not placing it under his orders, I scarce know any form of
language which would do so. It gave him the control of these stores, unless the letter were
meant as a mockery; at least it must be admitted that after such an offer it was not possible,
more particularly after Lord Byron’s death, and particularly after
the slighting manner Colonel Stanhope had treated the prince, to withdraw
the laboratory and stores from under his control without insulting him.
The instructions and orders given to me by Mr. Bowring, the secretary to the Greek committee, (and it will be recollected
that the whole of the guns and stores were placed immediately under my care) were, first, to
obey the orders and directions of the chief commissioner Lord
Byron; secondly, to deliver an account of the stores to Prince Mavrocordato, governor of Western Greece, who would be responsible that the stores should be ex- | SANCTIONED BY LORD BYRON. | 303 |
pended for the service of Greece.” On my
arrival, I obeyed these instructions, and from that time till the time of my leaving Greece,
the whole expense of carrying on the service was defrayed by Lord Byron.
Not one farthing had the committee supplied; not one farthing was at the command of the Greek
government; so that, in point of fact, the expense of all our labours, from the time of our
arrival in Greece, was defrayed by Lord Byron. This nobleman not only
sanctioned my placing myself, agreeably to Mr. Bowring’s
instructions, under the orders of Prince Mavrocordato, but his whole
conduct shewed that he placed the greatest confidence in the prince. The money which he had
laid out he had placed at the disposal of the prince, and unquestionably Colonel Stanhope had no power to take it, or the stores which had
been preserved at Lord Byron’s cost, (for they would have fallen a
prey to the Suliotes, but for him,) out of the power of Mavrocordato. Even
if he had, common decency—common respect for the wishes and intentions of Lord
Byron, whose views he said he came to further,—should have taught
Colonel Stanhope to have abstained from insulting Lord
Byron’s friends, and from diverting the supplies he had given, to a
purpose he would have condemned. But while that corpse was yet un-buried, which he afterwards
followed to the grave as a mourner, did he insult Lord Byron’s
friend,
304 | SOURCE OF COLONEL STANHOPE’S POWER. | |
and endeavour to
cast odium on his memory, by tacitly condemning his measures.
At Zante, he asked me who gave me authority to call Mavrocordato a prince. So far did this passively-obedient
soldier carry his democratical notions, that he could not bear, I suppose, to hear any man
called prince in his presence. He seems to have forgotten that from this very prince did he, as
well as I, derive any right we possessed to be in Greece, in any other capacity than as mere
travellers; and but for his sanction and the sanction of the government which he chiefly
administered, we both deserved to be treated as common buccaneers. The instant Colonel Stanhope rejected that authority, he divested himself of
all right to serve Greece. The committee could give him no power whatever in that country, and
he was there either as the servant of the government, or he had no right there whatever. He had
not even over those warlike stores the common right of property, and could have no business to
take them from under the control of that government which alone could legally use them.
Before Colonel Stanhope began to
break up the brigade at Missolonghi, he should have recollected that all the commissions and
appointments had been issued by the prince; without them, all the foreigners must be considered
as mere land-pirates; and removing it from his
| OUR RIGHT TO CARRY ARMS. | 305 |
control, was taking from it every recognised and legitimate character. What right had any of
us to carry arms but these commissions? The Greek committee could give us none; and if we did
not derive it from the Greek government, we might commit murder every time we drew a trigger.
Mavrocordato, I have stated, was in the habit of
receiving deserters from the corps of some other chiefs, as if they were at open war; and they
therefore could not, and would not, recognize his authority. To remove
any of the individuals from under his control, without the authority of the Greek government,
was either making them deserters or depriving them of all legal claims to act in Greece. I
deny, therefore, notwithstanding what Captain Trelawney
said, that Colonel Stanhope was competent to break up the brigade, or that
he had or could have any right whatever to send away stores from under the control of
Prince Mavrocordato to Ulysses.
In fact, also, the brigade, stores and all, were wholly under my orders after Lord
Byron’s death; I was responsible for them both to the committee and to
Prince Mavrocordato. Certainly I had been obliged to leave Missolonghi
for the moment, on account of my health, and had given up the charge to others, but I was at
Zante, and Colonel Stanhope might have communicated his wishes through me
to those who were bound to obey no other person’s 306 | STANHOPE’S CONDUCT TO ME. | |
orders but mine. In spite, however, of his having no
right to dispose of any part of the stores, or of the brigade, and in spite of the commandant
of both being within his reach, he broke it up by his own orders, and, as I have said, in
defiance of my representations.
I was at Zante when Colonel Stanhope
gave the orders; and when I found out that he was breaking up the brigade at Missolonghi, and
sending away stores, without consulting me, in whose power they had been placed, I thought it
was time to take precautions for my own security, under such sort of conduct no man was safe,
and under so many masters it was impossible to serve with credit and honour. Colonel
Stanhope had even the impudence, I can give it no softer name, to appropriate to
other purposes the money I had received from Lord Byron, for
carrying on certain parts of the service at Missolonghi; and for which I alone was responsible,
having given receipts for it to Laga, Lord
Byron’s Secretary. He thus placed it out of my power, either to carry on
the service, or even to serve at all under the Greek committee, its numerous agents, and
contradictory proceedings, and at once, I shook myself clear of any dependence on so assuming
and imprudent a man. I wrote to Prince Mavrocordato,
stating all the particulars of Colonel Stanhope’s proceedings, and
informing him, that under such
circumstances,
it would be of no use for me to return to Missolonghi. I professed my willingness to serve
Greece, but I was fully resolved not to serve under Colonel Stanhope. The
Prince sent me an answer, and requested me to wait at Zante, till the arrival of Colonel Gordon, who was then expected, or till the loan should
be remitted, when he hoped it would be in his power to employ me in the immediate service of
the Greek government, for the purpose of inspecting and repairing the fortifications. To this
proposal I willingly acceded. When at a later period, I saw no probability of this hope being
realized, saw no chance of Mr. Gordon’s arrival, saw
Colonel Stanhope depart, and leave the Greeks destitute of money; and
when his conduct had been such, as to make it impossible to serve with credit, as well as
dangerous to serve at all, I was obliged to return to England. Thus was the whole expense, to
which the Greek committee had been put in sending me out, as well as the expense of sending out
the mechanics, also thrown away. This was Colonel Stanhope’s doing,
and for this conduct he received the approbation of the committee.
Colonel Stanhope persisted in sending, by Captain Trelawney, the guns and stores to Odysseus. Since that period, this chief, elated probably by
these additional means of warfare
giving him
additional power, has declared open war against the government, and has been obliged, with his
admirer, Captain Trelawney, to take refuge in the mountains. Every
particle of force he acquired by reason of the guns and stores so sent, was so much added to
the enemies of that government Colonel Stanhope was sent to assist; and
for this also he has received the approbation of the Greek committee.
I trust I have now fully made out my charge against Colonel Stanhope. He went to Greece, an admirer of Prince Mavrocordato, and he returned home his decided
opponent, and the patron of a man, whom he himself describes as having been the chief of a band
of robbers. Because he was not permitted by Prince Mavrocordato to
establish a press, and abuse all the governments of Europe after his own fashion; because he
was not allowed to govern Greece, as the representatives of the India Company govern the
tributary states in which they reside; and, because Lord
Byron resisted this assumption of power, and supported Prince
Mavrocordato, in opposing the wild schemes of Colonel
Stanhope, he did whatever he could to ruin Mavrocordato,
and injure the reputation of the man he called his friend, and whose corpse he followed to the
grave. In the pursuit of his own schemes, he broke up the brigade Lord
Byron had been at so much pains
| REASONS FOR WITHHOLDING THE LOAN. | 309 |
in forming; he in a manner reversed and destroyed
all Byron had done, and not only cast, as far as lay in his power, odium
on the memory of his noble friend, but did a great injury to the Greek cause. Directly in the
teeth of his own declarations, he disposed of the stores without the sanction of the Greek
government; and disposed of them in favour of one Greek chief. He did what he could to set up a
rival power, and to ruin the very government he went to Greece to support. Under any
circumstances, rival commissioners would have been an unfortunate occurrence; but when there
were different parties in the country, and these commissioners took different sides, what could
possibly be the consequences but increased difficulties, increased animosities, and increased
dangers? If the independence and courage of Greece have outlived the campaign of 1824, it has
not been owing to the succour afforded by the Greek committee and by Col.
Stanhope, but to the folly and imbecility of its barbarous antagonist.
I say nothing of the loan being withheld, by the recommendation of
Colonel Stanhope, after it had been contracted for and
sent out to Zante, as that probably may be explained by the circumstance of Lord Byron’s death invalidating the commission for issuing
the money. It is a remarkable circumstance, however, that Colonel Stanhope
says, “his reasons for recommending that the
money should not be issued, are, that the government is not
sufficiently organized, and that the necessary measures have not as yet been taken for the
proper appropriation of the money.” Was Col. Stanhope then
ignorant of the plan which had been agreed on between Lord Byron and
Prince Mavrocordato, as mentioned at page 97 of this work? If he were
ignorant, can it be attributed to any other circumstance than to his withdrawing from them and
acting in opposition to them! If Col. Stanhope had acted in conjunction
with these two persons, instead of joining Ali
Pacha’s mountain robber, this plan would have been matured, and the loan
might have been, as far as that was concerned, issued immediately.
But Col. Stanhope also objects to the
want of organization in the government; and what individual, so much as Col.
Stanhope, by embracing first of all one party, and then another, had impeded
this organization? I am entitled to conclude, that the two reasons on which Col.
Stanhope grounds his objections to deliver the loan would never have had any
existence but for his own conduct. Be this as it may, the fact is certain and well known that
the Greeks, relying on this loan, had not adopted any other means of endeavouring to obtain a
supply of money, and, consequently, had none for fitting out their fleet. The strongest
representations were made on this point, both to
Colonel Stanhope and Mr. Blaquiere,
but still the money was not advanced in time*.
Unfortunate men will sometimes be unjust; the Greeks, therefore, may do
Col. Stanhope wrong; but when they knew the first
instalment of the loan had arrived at Zante, when they saw him on the spot, when he went away
without making it over to them, and when they afterwards suffered the terrible disaster at
Ipsara, which the loan would have enabled them to avert, they did not hesitate to affirm, that
the whole guilt of that belonged to
* What was expected from Colonel
Stanhope may probably be inferred from the following extract of a letter
from the government to Mavcorordato:— Extract de la lettre du Government. “Nous avous reçu votre lettre en date du 18, ainsi que
les pièces y incluses. “Monsieur Palyroides est encore à Hydra, et
l’honorable Colonel Stanhope n’a
pas paru jusqu’à present, nous esperons qu’il ne tardera pas
d’arriver, persuadé qu’il est que son retard ameneroit les plus
grands entraves aux operations militaires, et des resultats bien malheureux pour
cette campagne. Nos batiments sont deja prets; mais il est impossible d’y
embarquer un seul homme, sans que la solde soit prealablement payée. La flotte
Turcque est, en attendant, arrivée à Negropont, et le blocus par terre de
cette place s’est immediatement levè. La flotte ennemie est composee de
cinquante et quelques batiments. Nous n’avons aucune nouvelle de Salone.
Ulysse en addressant au Gouvernement des
lettres ecrit
|
312 | OPINION OF THE GREEKS. | |
him. “Had the money,” they said,
“which they had borrowed, and for the payment of which they had made themselves
responsible, been made over to them, Ipsara would have been saved;” and when they said
this, they vowed, did it ever lay in their power, to take vengeance on the individual to whom
they attributed the delay.
The proceeding may probably be justified, but it appears very strange to
promise money to a nation, to transmit it till it is almost within their grasp, to know they
had relied on it for preparing
en même tems aux Generaux Colocotroni, Coliopulos, et Nikita; on decouvre dans ses lettres le stile obscur
et malin de Monsieur Negri
. “Des Moulins de Napoli, le 27 Avril, (9 Mai). “G. Condouriotti, “C. Botaichi, “J. Colletti, “A. Spiliotachi. “P.S. M. Palyroides vient d’arriver
en ce moment de retour d’Hydra.” (TRANSLATION.) “We have received your letter, dated the 18th, as well as the
enclosed communications. Mr. Palyroides is still at Hydra and the
Honourable Colonel Stanhope has not yet made his
appearance. We hope he will not be long in arriving, persuaded as he is that his delay
will very much hamper the military operations, and produce the most unfortunate results
during the present campaign. Our vessels are ready, but it is impossible to put a
single man |
| COLONEL STANYHOPE’S FEAR OF CENSURE. | 313 |
their means of defence,
and at the opening of the campaign, at the very moment the enemy was at the door, to mock the
hopes which had been excited, and to deprive the poor Greeks of their means of defence.
Colonel Stanhope judged rightly when he said, he
“calculated on being, both in Greece and in England, duly burdened with odium.” As
to Greece, Colonel Stanhope was quite right; he is still remembered in
Greece, but with feelings very different from the love and veneration with which Lord Byron is remembered. As to England, it would appear that he
was incorrect; but he did not calculate on the confidence which his countrymen repose in great
names, and did not expect to have a shield thrown over him
on board them unless the wages is previously paid.
The Turkish fleet has in the mean time arrived at Negropont, and the blockade of that
place by land was immediately raised. The enemy’s fleet consists of upwards of
fifty sail. We have no news from Salona. Ulysses
has addressed copies of letters to the government, which he has sent at the same time
to Generals Colocotroni,
Colliopuli, and Nikitas;
in these letters the obscure and malignant style of M.
Negris is discernible. “Mills of Napoli, April 26, (May 9.) “G. Conduriottis, “C. Botaki, “J. Colletti. “P. S. Mr. Palyroides has arrived this
instant, on his return from Hydra.” |
in the shape of a vote of thanks by the Greek committee.
I say nothing of Colonel Stanhope
empowering half a dozen adventurers, such as Captain
Trelawney, Mr. Humphreys, Captain Hastings, &c. to dispose of the committee’s
stores, to form plans for the regulation of Greece, and to dictate to the Greek government;
moreover, I say nothing of the committee itself sending out agent after agent, and controller
after controller; they are answerable on these points to the public they represent, but I am
certain that the little assistance we have given has assumed too much the appearance of
interference, and that our pecuniary aid has lost the character of generosity, by being coupled
with too many recommendations and conditions. Independent of any agents sent out by the
committee, there were persons on the spot who might have supplied them with correct
information, I was accustomed to state to Mr. Bowring
such facts as fell under my notice, and the reader will see in the Appendix H. the copy of a
letter or report, addressed to Mr. Bowring, on March 20th, which received
Lord Byron’s approbation, and is referred to by
him in a note appended to a letter of Colonel Stanhope’s, to be
found at page 127 of that gentleman’s work on Greece. I shall also place in the Appendix
some letters from different persons in Greece, which may serve to throw light on Colonel
Stanhope’s and Captain Trelawney’s
proceedings, as well as on the state of affairs at that time. They are marked I. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7.
If the view I have given be correct, the conduct of Colonel Stanhope was highly wrong from the very commencement of
his embassy, and continued during the whole time he was in Greece to be guided by most improper
principles. The Greek committee were in the first instance to blame, for empowering a man of
his opinions and habits to represent them in Greece. They were still more to blame when every
communication of his brought evidence of his improper interference with the internal affairs of
that country, and of his dictating to its government, for not then recalling him and protesting
to the Greek deputies here, and to every authority in Greece, against being implicated by his
rash and presumptuous proceedings. After he had committed all these errors, the Greek committee
made his cause their own, by publicly approving of his conduct; and thus did they, too, take on
themselves the character of officious meddlers, and under the name of friends, swell the long
list of the enemies of the long-suffering and deeply-oppressed Greeks. This appears to me such
a consummation of silliness, that I hardly expect the reader will credit my assertion. To
convince him, and satisfy him as to my veracity, I shall here
insert the vote of thanks given by the Greek committee, as recorded
in Colonel Stanhope’s own book:—
Greek Committee Room, 17th July, 1824.
“JOHN SMITH, Esq. M.P. in the Chair.
“Colonel Stanhope’s Report was
read.
“Resolved,
“That the Honourable
Colonel Stanhope is entitled to the most
grateful thanks of the committee, for the unwearied zeal, sound discretion, and
extensive benevolence, manifested by him, while acting as their agent in Greece;
and that the committee anticipates great benefits to Greece from the exertions and
suggestions which distinguished his visit to that country, and desires particularly
to record and to communicate its high approbation of his efforts to promote harmony
and a good understanding among the different leaders in Greece: a result greatly
advanced by his conciliatory spirit and superiority to party considerations.
With these remarks, I shall now lay down the pen. What I have said of the
conduct of other persons has seemed to me necessary, either in my own vindication, or in
vindication of the memory of my highly-valued and deeply-lamented patron
and friend. By the account I have given of Colonel Stanhope’s conduct, something too I hope has been done to
vindicate the cause of the Greeks in the opinion of Europe, and to inspire its friends with
more hopes than ever of its success. It is still, thank God, triumphant, and I have shewn that
it has had to contend, not only with numerous external and barbarous foes, but that the
exertions of the Greeks have been crippled by the injudicious and uncalled-for interference of
pretended friends.
POSTSCRIPT.
Since this sheet was sent to press, Mr.
Blaquiere’s second narrative has appeared. From this we learn that he also
was an authorized independent agent of the Greek Committee, making the third representative or
ambassador this mighty body had in Greece; and all of whom they meant should be there at one
time. If any thing more were required to shew the injudicious nature of their proceedings,
particularly in approving of the conduct of Colonel
Stanhope, it may be found in the circumstance that this conduct was at the time
disapproved of by Mr. Blaquiere. The work just published by that gentleman
justifies, I am happy to say, all which I have stated of the conduct of Colonel
Stanhope and of the Greek Committee.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Ali Pasha of Yannina (1740-1822)
Albanian warlord who expanded his territories during the Napoleonic wars but was
eventually suppressed by the Ottoman Turks; he entertained Byron in 1809.
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
The founder of Utilitarianism; author of
Principles of Morals and
Legislation (1789).
Edward Blaquiere (1779-1832)
After serving in the Royal Navy he published
Letters from the
Mediterranean, 2 vols (1813); with John Bowring he founded the London Greek
Committee in 1823.
Sir John Bowring (1792-1872)
Poet, linguist, MP, and editor of the
Westminster Review. He was
the secretary of the London Greek Committee (1823) through which he was wrongly accused of
having enriched himself.
General Colliopulo [Κολιοπουλος] (1825 fl.)
A Greek chieftain associated with Theodore Colocotronis and favored by Leicester Stanhope
of the London Greek Committee.
Pietro Gamba (1801-1827)
The brother of Teresa Guiccioli and member of Carbonieri. He followed Byron to Greece and
left a memoir of his experiences.
Mr. Gill (d. 1824)
The foreman of William Parry's munitions factory at Missolonghi; they had previously
worked together as shipwrights. William Henry Humphreys reports that he was with Trelawny
in the cave of Odysseas Androutsos and that he died of disease in Napoli in the autumn of
1824.
Thomas Gordon of Cairness (1788-1841)
Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford; he was a member of the London Greek
Committee and major-general in the Greek Army; he published
History of
the Greek Revolution (1832).
Frank Abney Hastings (1794-1828)
After service in the British Navy where he fought at Trafalgar he was a notably
successful commander of the Greek Navy during the Revolution.
J. M. Hodges (1831 fl.)
An artisan who worked under Lord Byron in William Parry's munitions factory at
Missolonghi. He returned to England in late 1824 and Edward Trelawney reports that he was
living in London in 1831.
William Henry Humphreys (d. 1826)
English philhellene who traveled with William Parry's party; he was an associate of
Leicester Stanhope and Edward John Trelawny who died at Zante on a third expedition to
Greece.
George Jarvis (1798-1828)
Son of the American consul in Hamburg who enlisted in the Greek Revolution in 1822 as a
companion of Frank Abney Hastings, later joining Byron's regiment at Missolonghi. His
Journal was published in 1965.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.
Johann-Jacob Meyer (1798-1826)
Swiss republican who edited
Hellenica Chronica; he died during the
siege of Missolonghi.
Theodoros Negris [Θεοδορος Νεγρις] (1790-1824)
He was Ottoman charge d'affaires at Paris, a position he resigned upon joining the Greek
Revolution against Turkish rule. He was aligned with Odysseas Androutsos.
Nikitas [Νικετας] (1784 c.-1849)
A Greek chieftain and leader of the partisans in 1823; he was the nephew of Theodoros
Kolokotronis.
Odysseas Androutsos [Οδησευς] (1788-1825)
The son of Andreas Androutsos; he was the principal chieftain in eastern Greece and
political opponent of the constitutional government of Alexander Mavrocordatos, who was
instrumental in having him assassinated.
Dr. Sophianopulo [Σοφιανοπουλος] (1824 fl.)
Secretary to the Greek commandant at Athens, aligned with the chieftains against Prince
Mavracordato; he corresponded with Leicester Stanhope.
Leicester Fitzgerald Charles Stanhope, fifth earl of Harrington (1784-1862)
The third son of the third earl; in 1823 he traveled to Greece as the Commissioner of the
London Greek Committee; there he served with Byron, whom he criticizes in
Greece in 1823 and 1824 (1824). He inherited the earldom from his brother in
1851.
Edward John Trelawny (1792-1881)
Writer, adventurer, and friend of Shelley and Byron; author of the fictionalized memoirs,
Adventures of a Younger Son (1831) and
Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron (1858).
Demetrius Ypsilantis [Δεμητριος Ίπσαλαντις] (1793-1832)
After service against Napoleon in the Russian Army he became an early leader of the Greek
Revolution whose interests were opposed to Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos.
Lega Zambelli (1827 fl.)
Count Guiccioli's steward, afterwards steward to Lord Byron; he married Teresa
Guiccioli's confidant Fanny Sylvestrini.