The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter IV
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
CHAPTER IV.
LORD BYRON, AS GENERAL AND COMMISSIONER.
Mutiny among the Suliotes—The mechanics embark for
Zante—Shock of an Earthquake—Superstitious custom of the Greeks—Mutiny
amongst the Germans—Lord Byron’s Corps disbanded—Is
re-organized—Business of the Laboratory—Lord Byron’s
Suliote guard—His dog Lyon—His guard attend him in his
rides—Specimen of the state of Missolonghi—Lord Byron’s
daily occupations—His food, and manner of living—His partiality to curious
weapons—State of the weather—Requisitions by Ulysses and
General Londa—Improper articles in
Newspapers—Colonel Stanhope goes to Athens—His
requisitions—Proceedings in March—An alarm of plague—Discipline of the
Brigade—Must pay the Greeks for doing their own work—Divisions among the Greek
chieftains—Lord Byron invited to quit
Missolonghi—Colocotroni wishes to get him into the
Morea—Opposing views of Mavrocordato—His hopes of effecting a
union of the chiefs—Prospect of a Congress at Salona—Lord
Byron obliged again to interfere about a newspaper—Receives the freedom of
Missolonghi—Numerous applications to him for Money—Further defence’ of
Missolonghi—Desertions from Colocotroni’s forces—News of
the Greek loan—Plan for the campaign—Difficulties of Lord
Byron’s situation in Greece.
From the time when Lieutenant
Sass was killed up to Lord Byron’s own
death, all his lordship’s thoughts and time were actively occupied with the affairs of
Greece. For this reason I shall confine this part of my narrative to his lordship’s
proceedings in his military and civil capacity, as
connected with Greece. With these proceedings, too, I
was intimately connected, Lord Byron not having taken any step without
informing me of it, and very often honouring me by asking my advice as to his plans, and always
requiring my assistance to carry them into execution.
On February 21st, there was a
sort of mutiny amongst the Suliotes, who refused to march, on account of their arrears not
having been paid up. Lord Byron was, as usual, instantly
applied to by Prince Mavrocordato, and advanced 4,800
dollars to enable him to pay up the arrears. On this the Suliotes promised to march in two days
to Arta, and scour the country. At the same time Lord Byron notified to
them that they must not henceforward consider him as personally, responsible for their pay.
The mechanics, though they had not yet departed, had entirely given up
working, and the town was in a complete state of tumult; all our labours were, therefore, for
the moment, suspended. Lord Byron had frequent, almost
daily, conferences with Prince Mavrocordato; and
numerous communications with the Suliote and other chiefs; but they all ended, as might have
been expected, in nothing.
On the evening of this day we had a smart shock of an earthquake. All the
inhabitants who possessed fire-arms, and all the Suliotes, im-
70 | SUPERSTITIOUS CUSTOM OF GREEKS. | |
mediately ran for their carbines, and began firing
away as fast as they could. They did this, from entertaining a sort of superstitious notion
that they might by it avert the effects of the earthquake, or check its progress. Having so
many subjects of alarm, we supposed, on hearing this unusual firing, that the Suliotes and the
inhabitants had at length actually come to blows, and were attacking each other. Our
apprehension was changed into a hearty laugh, when we learnt that they were never more united,
and were all, as if directed by one mind, waging fierce hostility against the aerial prince of
earthquakes. This intelligence came timely also to relieve us from the effects of our own
fears. I was sitting, with two or three young Englishmen, at our quarters, when the earthquake
took place. None of us knew at first what it was, and being naturally much alarmed, for the
shock was violent, we all made for the door as fast as we could, and some confusion ensued as
to who should be the first to make his escape. Perhaps, too, a quarrel might have been the
consequence, but for the Greek musketry. This circumstance coming to Lord Byron’s knowledge, gave him an opportunity of laughing at us, and
putting a sort of joke on us which I shall mention in another place.
On the 22d, the mechanics embarked for Zante, which was the only event that
distinguished this
| LORD BYRON’S CORPS DISBANDED. | 71 |
from the other
days of confusion we were now compelled to witness.
On the 23d, our other misfortunes were augmented, by a mutiny among the
German officers sent out from England by the committee. Each wanted to command, and none would
obey. Lord Byron became sensible of the inutility, if not
the folly, of employing this sort of etiquette-soldiers in Greece, and seeing all his wishes,
and all his hopes, disappointed by those who came out to further the cause he was so zealously
struggling to advance, he resolved to break up his corps, and after getting rid of these men,
to form it anew. The corps was accordingly disbanded; all the officers and men received a
month’s pay each, and were at liberty to retire where they pleased.
Lord Byron formed what I thought a correct notion on this
subject. He said, when we possessed the materials of war, such as money, ammunition, and guns,
the Greeks might be taught and disciplined, and would make far better soldiers than the barons
and knights who came out to Greece only to be colonels and generals. “Besides,”
his lordship remarked, “there is an inveterate hatred amongst the Greeks of all these
foreigners; and sending them here has done the Greek cause far more mischief, than ever the
little, and unfortunately misapplied, assistance
given by the Germans and English has done good.”
Here again arose another difficulty: What were the foreigners to do? the
Suliotes in particular were highly irritated against them; if they remained disorganized they
might all be massacred, and in fact, on the following day, February
24th, there was every appearance of a general tumult. Prince Mavrocordato was alarmed, and apprehended bloodshed
would ensue. The foreigners petitioned to be retained in service, the Primates and the prince,
dreading the Suliotes; and afraid they should be left quite unsupported, enforced the prayer of
the petition by their own representations and requests. However unwilling his lordship was
again to bring on himself the burden of a disobedient regiment, he was, in some measure,
obliged to comply; and on the 26th, it was settled that the corps should be immediately
re-organized.
Lord Byron did me the honour to impose this service on me;
and I accepted it, on condition that the officers selected should consent to be drilled, that
they might learn their duty as soldiers, and the more necessary duty of obedience. Selecting,
accordingly, from among those who had petitioned to be kept, such as we thought most likely to
answer our views, we re-organized the corps. They consented to the drilling, and pro-
| BUSINESS OF THE LABORATORY. | 73 |
mised afterwards to act as squad-serjeants
to drill the men. Prince Mavrocordato sent me a
commission as captain-commandant of the corps, and accompanied it by a flattering letter,
approving of my services, from the time of my arrival in Greece.
All this time the most material part of the service, that of the
laboratory and arsenal, was unfortunately suspended. On the 26th, however, I found time to
engage a few tradesmen, such as they were, and ten active seamen, to make wads, &c. With
their assistance, the preparation of materials was again commenced, but unfortunately with
limited advantages.
Even on this subject, which Lord Byron probably
thought, as he had to supply all the funds,—the government having none, and the committee
not having provided a farthing for this purpose,—was his and my peculiar province, he had
to complain of the interference of Colonel Stanhope.
Without consulting his lordship, the colonel advertised for a number of young men to be
instructed in the business of the arsenal and laboratory; which was quartering a number of
hands on his lordship’s purse, whether he liked it or not. Such petty vexations were a
great annoyance to Lord Byron. He had never before been
engaged in any such business of detail, and had probably never met this sort of opposition and
74 | LORD BYRON’S SULIOTE GUARD | |
unpleasant kind of controlling
interference. Colonel Stanhope imagined also that he was a much wiser man
in all such matters than Lord Byron, and added to the unpleasantness of
the circumstance by his manner of interfering.
Lord Byron had taken a small corps of Suliotes into his own
pay, and kept them about him as a body-guard. They consisted altogether of fifty-six men, and
of these a certain number were always on duty. A large outer room in his lordship’s house
was appropriated to them, and their carbines were suspended against the walls. Like other
soldiers, they found various means to amuse themselves when on guard. While some were walking
about, discoursing violently and eagerly, with animated gestures, others were lying or sitting
on the floor, playing at cards.
In this room, and among these rude soldiers, Lord
Byron was accustomed to walk a great deal, particularly in wet weather. On such
occasions he was almost always accompanied by his favourite dog Lyon, who was perhaps his dearest and most affectionate friend. They were, indeed, very
seldom separated. Riding or walking, sitting or standing, Lyon was his constant
attendant. He can scarcely be said to have forsaken him even in his sleep. Every evening did he
go to see that his master was safe, before he lay down himself, and then he took his
station close to his door, a guard certainly as faithful,
though not so efficient, as Lord Byron’s corps of Suliotes. This
valuable and affectionate animal was brought to England after Lord
Byron’s death, and is now, I believe, in the possession of Mrs. Leigh, his Lordship’s sister.
With Lyon
Lord Byron was accustomed, not only to associate, but to
commune very much, and very often. His most usual phrase was, “Lyon, you are no rogue, Lyon;” or “Lyon,” his Lordship would say, “thou art an honest fellow,
Lyon.” The dog’s eyes sparkled, and his tail swept
the floor, as he sat with his haunches on the ground. “Thou art more faithful than men,
Lyon; I trust thee more.” Lyon
sprang up, and barked and bounded round his master, as much as to say, “You may trust me,
I will watch actively on every side.” “Lyon, I love
thee, thou art my faithful dog!” and Lyon jumped and kissed
his master’s hand, as an acknowledgement of his homage. In this sort of mingled talk and
gambol Lord Byron passed a good deal of time, and seemed more contented,
more calmly self-satisfied, on such occasions, than almost on any other. In conversation and in
company he was animated and brilliant; but with Lyon and in stillness he was
pleased and perfectly happy.
When Lord Byron rode out, he was also
at-
tended by his Suliote guards. The
captain, and a certain number, all on foot, preceded his Lordship. Then came Lord
Byron on horseback, accompanied on one side by Count
Gamba, and on the other by the Greek interpreter. Behind him rode two
attendants; generally, these were his black groom and Tita, both dressed like the chasseurs usually seen
behind the carriages of ambassadors, and another division of his guard closed the cavalcade. It
was to me very surprising to see the swiftness of the Suliotes. Though they carried their
carbines, they were always able to keep up with the horses, and Lord Byron
sometimes put his cattle to their utmost speed. If their activity may be considered as at all
resulting from the races in which their ancestors were so distinguished, we should find it
difficult to bestow too much praise on such gymnastic exercises. But it should probably rather
be attributed to their climate, their habits of life, and their frames being originally nervous
and well formed. Whatever may have been the source of their fleetness, they were able to keep
up with Lord Byron in his rides, and whenever he quitted the town on
horseback, they accompanied him, being answerable both to Greece and Britain for his safety.
They were tall men, and remarkably well formed; and perhaps, take them altogether, no sovereign
of Europe | EMPLOYMENT OF HIS TIME. | 77 |
can boast of having a finer set of
men for his body-guard.
It may serve to give the reader some idea of the state of Missolonghi, if
I here mention the circuitous route which Lord Byron was
obliged to use to get out of the town. Such was the wretched state of the pavement, and such
the condition of the streets, that it was impossible to ride through them without the risk of
breaking one’s neck. Lord Byron’s horses were therefore
generally led to the gate of the town, and his Lordship, embarking in his little punt, was
rowed along the harbour, and up what is called the military canal. This terminating not far
from the gate, his Lordship again landed, mounted his horse, and rode away.
The mode in which Lord Byron disposed
of his time may be sketched in the history of a single day. In whatever manner he may formerly
have lived, during the time that I knew him in Greece, he was perfectly regular and systematic
in his habits.
He always rose at nine o’clock, or a little later, and breakfasted
about ten. This meal consisted of tea without either milk or sugar, dry toast, and water
cresses. During his breakfast, I generally waited on him to make any reports which were
necessary, and take his orders for the labours of the day. When this business was settled,
I retired to give the necessary directions to the
different officers, and returned so as to be back by eleven o’clock, or a quarter before.
His Lordship then inspected the accounts, and in conjunction with his secretary, checked and
audited every item in a business-like manner.
If the weather permitted, he afterwards rode out; if it did not, he used
to amuse himself by shooting at a mark with pistols. Though his hand trembled much, his aim was
sure, and he could hit an egg four times out of five at the distance of ten or twelve yards.
It was at this period of the day also, if he did not ride out, that he was
generally visited by Prince Mavrocordato and the
Primates. If he rode out, the latter visited him towards three or four o’clock, and the
former came later in the evening, like one of his private friends. His rides were seldom
extended beyond two hours, as he then returned and dined.
The reader may form an idea of the fever of which
Lord Byron died, when I mention his food. He ate very
sparingly, and what he did eat was neither nourishing, nor heating, nor blood-making food. He
very rarely touched flesh, ate very little fish, used neither spices nor sauces, and dined
principally off dried toast, vegetables, and cheese. He drank a very small quantity of wine or
cider; but indulged in the
| PRIVATIONS HE SUBMITTED TO. | 79 |
use of no
spirituous liquors. He took nothing of any consequence during the remainder of the day, and I
verily believe, as far as his own personal consumption was concerned, there was not a single
Greek soldier in the garrison who did not eat more, and more luxuriously, than this tenderly
brought-up, and long-indulged English gentleman and nobleman. He who had fed only on the
richest viands of the most luxuriant parts of Europe, whose palate had been tickled, from his
earliest days, with the choicest wines, now, at the call of humanity and freedom, submitted to
live on the coarsest and meanest fare. He was ready, like some general of old Rome, to share
the privations of the meanest soldier; and he shewed, both by what he submitted to, and by the
dangers he braved, that his love of liberty and of the good cause of mankind was not limited to
writing a few words in their favour from a comfortable well-warmed library; or to sending from
a table, smoking with all the superfluities of French cookery, a small check on his banker. The
propriety and utility of some of his measures may possibly admit of a doubt, as, in fact, they
have been censured; but of the purity of his intentions, and the intenseness of his zeal, the
dangers he encountered, the privations he submitted to, the time and money he bestowed, and the
life he for-feited, there are such proofs as no
other man in this age and country has given.
After his dinner Lord Byron attended
the drilling of the officers of his corps in an outer apartment of his own dwelling. Here again
he set an admirable example. He submitted to be drilled with them, and went through all those
exercises it was proper for them to learn. When these were finished, he very often played a
game of single-stick, or indulged in some other severe muscular exertion. He then retired for
the evening, and conversed with friends, or employed himself, using the little assistance I was
able to give him, studying military tactics. At eleven o’clock I left him, and I was
generally the last person he saw, except his servants, and then he retired, not however to
sleep, but to study. Till nearly four o’clock every morning he was continually engaged
reading or writing, and rarely slept more than five hours; getting up again, as I have already
said, at nine o’clock. In this manner did Lord Byron pass nearly
every day of the time I had the pleasure of knowing him.
Lord Byron had one little hobby, which he has shared, I
believe, with many distinguished men. He had a great fondness for curious arms of every
description. He never saw a handsome or a useful sabre, a curious or a good pair of
| PARTIALITY FOR CURIOUS WEAPONS. | 81 |
pistols, or a carbine of a peculiar
construction, but he coveted it, and generally contrived to obtain it, at however great a cost.
He had consequently a perfect magazine of curious and extraordinary, but at the same time
useful, weapons; and though his armoury could not compare with that at the Tower, it probably
was not surpassed by the collection of any private man.
The reader will perhaps think a minute journal of our proceedings only
tiresome, when every day nearly brought forward the same exertions in disciplining and drilling
the men, the same contests among the Suliotes and the foreigners, the same sort of disputes
among the individuals of the latter, and the same sort of discord among those who should have
known better, which I have already described. I shall therefore only mention those days on
which any thing occurred worthy of notice. The general features of the scene I have already
sketched, and I have just described how Lord Byron passed
his time. For the future I shall only mention such events as serve to throw light on the state
of Greece, or on Lord Byron’s character.
Lord Byron’s health was somewhat better, and he rode
out once or twice towards the latter end of February. But very soon heavy rains again occurred;
the weather was both cold and wet, and though a fire in the apartment would have
certainly been acceptable, none was made. I do
not remember to have seen a thermometer at Missolonghi, and I cannot therefore say what was the
temperature, but I am confident, from a recollection of my own feelings, that it was at times
fully as cold as the west of England at the same season. The place was naturally damp, and
this, with the season of the year, made precautions necessary, which unfortunately
Lord Byron would not take himself, and which nobody took for him.
In the latter end of February, General
Londa, an old personal friend of Lord
Byron’s, who was then in the Morea, sent to ask us to give him two
mountain guns. Lord Byron acceded to his request, and not only promised
Londa the guns, but undertook to have two officers and twelve men
taught the artillery service, if Londa would send proper persons to
Missolonghi. The chieftain named Ulysses, or
Odysseus, also made an application for gunpowder and small stores,
which Byron complied with, and sent him, with other stores, six barrels of
powder, packed up, as such things are in Greece, in sheep skins.
About the same period also Lord Byron
received notice from the Ionian Islands, that the newspaper printed at Missolonghi would no longer be permitted to circulate there
without some restriction, as the last number contained a
| GREEK NEWSPAPER STOPPED AT ZANTE. | 83 |
tirade against kings in general. This gave
Lord Byron a great deal of vexation. In answer Lord
Byron explained, that it was neither his nor the Prince’s fault. The
printer of the paper was a German, and those who
wrote the articles never submitted them for inspection. They were persons possessing power and
authority, who could not well be controlled, and who had unfortunately more zeal than
discretion. He promised, however, that he would do what lay in his power to prevent such
articles appearing in future. Though his Lordship had contributed to establish this paper, he
was not at that time aware what would be its consequences; and though he was far from wishing
to check discussion among the Greeks themselves, he had a great aversion to a parcel of
adventurers mingling up the politics of Europe with the affairs of Greece. The latter he wished
to be considered, what it really was, a contest on the frontiers of civilization and barbarism,
to extend the dominion of the former. What this had to do with theories of government, which
may well employ the speculations of men when their lives and property are secured,
Lord Byron did not comprehend; and he was proportionably annoyed at
seeing his endeavours to preserve a good understanding with the authorities of Zante, and to
hold up the Greek Cause to the respect and sympathy of Europe, 84 | DEPARTURE OF COLONEL STANHOPE. | |
thwarted in this manner by the rude interference of
some theoretical zealots. The paper, he said, was intended for any body but the Greeks, as not
one in a thousand of them would or could read it, and without being of the least benefit to
them, it constantly tended to involve the already weak and divided authorities of Greece in
disputes with the government of the Ionian Islands. He repeated that he did not know why
Greece, which had no interest in the contest of the parties of Europe, should be made the arena
where those who were defeated elsewhere, might renew the contest, or even boast of a triumph.
Towards the end of February, however, Colonel
Stanhope departed for Athens; and though this relieved Lord Byron from some personal altercations, and from the remonstrances of a
would-be Mentor, it made a sort of open division among the English in Greece. Henceforth there
were two head-quarters for them, two commissioners from the Greek committee having different
views, and steering different courses, and each attached to a different interest and different
party among the Greeks. Lord Byron, who had no love for theories of
government in the then condition of Greece, attached himself to the party of Mavrocordato and practical civil order; Colonel
Stanhope, the champion of liberal opinions, the great man for a press and
newspaper, united
| REQUISITIONS FROM ATHENS. | 85 |
himself at Athens with
Odysseus and the other military chieftains, and seemed
to wish that all the supplies sent out from England might be placed under their control.
Henceforth all that Byron had done was to be undone; and what he was doing
was to be opposed.
The first fruits of this division was a requisition in the early part of
March from Colonel Stanhope, directed to Lord Byron, to send him 30 whole barrels of gunpowder, a brigade
of guns, with remounts, paper, and other stores, from Missolonghi to Athens. He also requested
that Mr. Hodges or Mr.
Gill, two persons connected with the laboratory department, might be sent to
Athens.
Lord Byron refused the gunpowder. Prince Mavrocordato, who seems generally to have looked with
an eye of some suspicion on Odysseus, particularly
requested that Lord Byron would not send any more powder from Missolonghi
and Anatolica, as the whole supply was not adequate to the defence of these places, only
sixty-one barrels having ever been sent from England. Missolonghi and Anatolica he represented
as of the utmost importance; and this opinion had before been generally acceded to. Were these
places captured, it was said the whole sea coast would be in the hands of the Turks, all the
trade between Western Greece and the islands destroyed, and a free passage
opened for the Albanians in the service of the Turks to proceed
into the Morea. It was therefore settled between Prince Mavrocordato and
Lord Byron, that they would on no account weaken their means for
defending Missolonghi.
As to Mr. Hodge or Mr. Gill, Lord Byron permitted either or
both to proceed to Athens as they pleased; we had now got some intelligent Greeks in the
laboratory department, and it was hoped they, with my instructions, would be sufficient to
carry on this part of the service. The demand for paper Lord Byron also
refused, as it could not be granted without taking from us the means of making cartridges, and
breaking up the laboratory department; and his Lordship thought the defence of Greece not yet
so far advanced, that he should be justified in wholly confiding it to the exertions of the
press.
Through the whole month of March there was very little occurred to
Lord Byron of general interest. His time was occupied as
I have already described; but heavy rains commencing about the middle of the month, almost
totally precluded him from riding out. At the same time he never neglected his evening
exercises, and became very expert in handling his sword and single stick. The drilling of the
corps and preparations for defence were all carried on as I have already described.
Lord Byron’s health
appeared not thoroughly re-established, and he frequently complained of slight pains in the
head, shivering fits, confusion of thoughts, and visionary fears, all of which indicated to me
increasing debility. I consequently endeavoured to persuade him to live a little better, to eat
more meat, and drink more wine. But as his physician had instilled a notion into him that his
disorders all arose from too much blood, and that his system required to be still further
reduced, he was deaf to my advice, and probably thought, by neither submitting to be again
blooded, nor indulging in the pleasures of the table, that he was taking the safer, because the
middle, course. The event proved unfortunately that his Lordship was wrong.
About the middle of the month an alarm was spread, in consequence of a
merchant coming from Gastouni being taken suddenly ill and dying, that the plague prevailed in
that place. This report excited apprehensions to an alarming degree; and people either shut
themselves up in their houses, or took special care not to touch one another. Lord Byron made preparations for leaving Missolonghi, as there did
not seem, from the low situation and filth of the place, the least chance of subduing the
disorder, should it make its appearance there. Fortunately our alarm was unfounded. No other
person was attacked,
88 | LORD BYRON’S HOPES—WANT OF STORES. | |
and we learned, that the scarlet fever was the only disorder prevalent at Gastouni.
Our labours in disciplining the brigade went on successfully, and there
was every probability of its being quite ready for actual and active service at the beginning
of May. The idea of having so efficient a corps to bring into the field, formed under his own
eye, and chiefly at his expense, delighted Lord Byron beyond measure; and
when the sort of enemies with whom the Greeks had to contend is taken into consideration, the
hopes which he entertained, that the corps would perform some brilliant and distinguished
service, gaining him reputation, both as a commander and a statesman, seem to have been
rational and well grounded. How fatally these hopes were deceived, the reader knows in part;
for Lord Byron never led his brigade to the field; and since
his death, it has not been heard of, neither under his distinguished name, nor under any other
more ignoble one.
We were so badly off for dry or seasoned wood for our various purposes, it
not being possible to procure any at Missolonghi, that we pulled down the old buildings round
the seraglio or arsenal to obtain it. This afforded us a small supply, and shews to what
straits we were reduced, and how very improvident and destitute were all the Greek authorities.
|
OFFER A REWARD FOR COLLECTING SHOT. |
89 |
I have before mentioned, that I had tried in vain to persuade Prince Mavrocordato to order the shot lying about to be
collected; another expedient to accomplish this was now had recourse to: I offered to pay from
two to four paras for every shot or shell, large or small, which should
be brought to the arsenal; and in a short time we obtained, by this means, about two thousand.
Before this was done there was, so to speak, a total want of these necessary articles. The
Greeks were not content with our assistance, but when we pointed out what they should do, they
could not be got to assist themselves unless we paid them for doing it.
The Turks had left, at the time of their last attack on Missolonghi, some
gun-carriages outside the walls. These also were transported to the arsenal; such as were
serviceable were retained, and those which were not, were broken up. The shafts we converted to
wad-hook, and sponge-staves, handspikes and other useful instruments, so that we applied our
chance-sent supplies to the best use. At the same time a number of the men were employed in
making entrenching tools, &c. A supply of bread and biscuit was also in part procured, and
in part ordered, that no impediment might arise, on the score of wanting provisions, to our
taking the field at the proper time.
90 |
DIVISIONS AMONG THE GREEKS. |
|
I mention all these details, because Lord
Byron interested himself in them all. It could not be expected, that he should
of himself know what was proper on all these petty, though neither unimportant, nor unnecessary
parts of the service; but he readily appreciated their utility, when they were mentioned to
him, and promoted them by all the means in his power. He was quick in apprehension even in
these matters, so foreign to his habits and pursuits, and zealous in having them performed,
when he perceived their probable usefulness.
Through the whole of March, we felt the influence of that division among
the Greek chieftains which I have already hinted at, and which I cannot but think our own
divisions tended to promote and perpetuate. Had all the English adhered to Prince Mavrocordato and the government with Lord Byron’s steadiness, the Prince would probably have
acquired and maintained that preponderance which, from his superior wisdom in the civil
departments of administration, he seems to have merited. Lord Byron was
himself a host in favour of the party he espoused; and though he had no wish, but the general
good of Greece, and contributed to the wants of all the chieftains equally, as far as lay in
his power, yet as they were split into factions, and it was impos-
| ATTEMPTS TO GET POSSESSION OP LORD BYRON. | 91 |
sible he could reside with more than one, it
became with them all an object of no trifling importance to obtain possession of him.
The first attempt that was made to get him from Missolonghi, was a letter
which he received about the 10th of March, inviting him into the Peloponessus, and offering, as
a flattering motive for him to come, the possibility that by doing so, he might effect a
permanent union among all the chieftains. The person who first wrote to him on this subject,
was I believe of no importance himself, and was unauthorized by any very conspicuous men, and
therefore Lord Byron had no hesitation in immediately
sending a polite refusal. In reply to the flattering expectations held out to him, of being
able by his presence to heal all the divisions of Greece, he expressed of course his ardent
wish to contribute all in his power to so desirable an object, but he declined quitting western
Greece for the Peloponessus, unless it should be particularly desired by the general
government.
The next attempt was made by Colocotroni, whose envoy, Lambro, made
several sly insidious attacks on the good faith which Lord
Byron reposed in the Greeks about him. His own patron he represented as entirely
devoted to Lord Byron, and ready to submit to his judgment in all things.
When the character of Colocotroni is considered,
92 | INTRIGUES OF NATIVES AND FOREIGNERS. | |
and the great influence he then possessed, this
was a much more flattering invitation even than the former. It was coupled too with the
expression of a wish that a national council might be assembled, by the judgment of which
Colocotroni promised to abide. The presidency of such a council was
not expressly offered to his lordship, but his presence as a mediator was earnestly and warmly
pressed.
On such points Lord Byron consulted
Prince Mavrocordato, and the prince knowing the
character of his countrymen, unfolded some of their views to his Lordship. It was not the
interest of Mavrocordato to separate from Lord Byron,
and his lordship declined either attending such a general assembly in person, or deputing any
commissioner to attend for him. All parties professed to place the utmost confidence in him,
and him alone; and there was not one chieftain, I believe, with whom he communicated, who did
not endeavour to infuse suspicions into his mind of the sincerity of every other.
Unfortunately, too, there were some Englishmen in Greece who seemed to be
as strong partizans as any of the followers of the chiefs. Some of these at Missolonghi took
great pains, about the middle of March, to instil suspicions into Lord
Byron’s mind of Prince
Mavrocordato; and did every thing which lay in their power to
| HOPES OF UNION AMONG THE CHIEFS. | 93 |
destroy the harmony which existed between the
prince, Lord Byron, and the general government. On the other hand
Mavrocordato distinctly stated to him that the general government had
discovered a plan which had been formed by some of the chiefs, aided by some of the English and
other foreigners, to remove all the stores from Missolonghi, to break up his Lordship’s
brigade, and to thus put an end to the influence of Mavrocordato. Of this
party Ulysses was the idol, and was to be the sole chief.
Lord Byron, notwithstanding this sort of experience, was at
times sanguine in his hopes of effecting a union amongst all the chiefs. This delusion, for I
cannot but consider it such, arose from the purity of his own views, and his sincere wishes for
the success of the Greeks. He saw clearly and forcibly, that to attain this object, union
amongst them was necessary, and he supposed, placing some reliance on the professions of the
chieftains, that they would entertain the same conviction, and would be disposed to sacrifice
their individual hatred and individual ambition to the general good. He did not reflect that
men hate a rival, who succeeds to the authority of an oppressive master, more than they ever
hated the oppressor, and that most of the Greek chiefs would prefer
their ancient masters, to submission to a rival chief.
About the 20th of March news reached us, that a large Turkish force was
expected to march into Greece, by way of Larissa. At the same time we heard, that a congress or
general meeting was to take place at Salona, to concert the best means of defence. To this
congress Lord Byron was formally invited by General Ulysses. He was at the same time informed that the
government would appoint him governor-general of Western Greece, if he would accept the office.
This shews how highly they valued the continuance of his services, and how eager they all were
to get him immediately, each into his own neighbourhood. It was agreed, I believe, that
Mavrocordato and Lord Byron
should proceed to Salona; but before they could carry this resolution into practice,
disturbances ensued at Missolonghi, the Turkish fleet made its appearance, and it would have
looked like running from danger, to have gone then to Salona. I believe, however, neither his
Lordship, nor the Prince, was very sorry to have so good an excuse for remaining where they
were. Mavrocordato entertained apprehensions for his own safety, and
Byron had been told that a plot was laid to seize and confine him, and
murder the Prince. Perhaps he did not believe all this, but I know he believed enough to make
him suspicious and apprehensive.
In the very latter end of March the magistrates
| LORD BYRON A CITIZEN OP MISSOLONGHl. | 95 |
of Missolonghi conferred on Lord Byron what we should call the freedom of their town. Had his
Lordship belonged to some craft or mystery, as trades are sometimes called, which can only be
practised in certain places by the permission of the guild brethren, this might have been of
some value to him. But being of no money-making trade, this honour seems to have been conferred
on him only that he might spend more: at least it had this effect, and like admission to many a
corporation in England, was by no means worth what it cost in fees.
Applications were made to Lord Byron
about the end of March, for money to the amount of 50,000 dollars in one day; and what with the
trouble of granting and the pain of refusing, his Lordship found this penalty belonging to his
exalted situation so unpleasant, that he was glad to get another to pay it for him. He
transferred the management of this part of his financial arrangements also to me. The Greeks
seemed to think he was a mine from which they could extract gold at their pleasure. One person
represented that a supply of 20,000 dollars would save the island of Candia from falling into
the hands of the Pacha of Egypt; and there not being
that sum in hand, Lord Byron gave him authority to raise it if he could in
the islands, and he would
96 | TURKISH FLEET—DESERTION FROM COLOCOTRONI. | |
guarantee its repayment. I believe
this person did not succeed.
The Turkish fleet made its appearance off Missolonghi in the beginning of
April, which made us bestir ourselves more than ever in repairing the fortifications. Lord Byron and Prince
Mavrocordato took me with them to visit the fortifications of Vasiladi; and we
settled what further repairs should be immediately begun.
In the beginning of April a number of Colocotroni’s men deserted, for want of pay, they said, and came into
Missolonghi, and some of them were taken into the brigade. I, who am old in the service, and
accustomed to the discipline of the army, could not comprehend very well this state of things,
under which the soldiers who deserted from one general were gladly welcomed by another, as if
they were enemies, and not serving under one banner, and engaged in one cause. But
Colocotroni and Mavrocordato
were not the generals of one republic, nor the servants of one state; they were rival
chieftains contending for power and superiority.
On April 10, Lord Byron
communicated to me the news, that the loan for the Greeks had been contracted for in London;
and that the money might soon be expected. In the evening Prince
Mavrocordato and his Lordship had some conversation, as
| NEWS OF THE LOAN—FUTURE PROJECTS. | 97 |
to the plan of operations for the ensuing
campaign. The Prince accordingly drew up a sketch of what he supposed should be immediately
performed, and Lord Byron ordered me to put on paper in a
definite form the assistance he offered to the Greeks. This was accordingly done; and the plan
sketched out by Prince Mavrocordato and Lord
Byron’s offer will both be found in the Appendix D.E.
As soon as this was settled, Lord Byron
being more master of his own resources, the Greek government now having money of its own, began
assiduously to employ them in repairing the fortifications of the town, and completing in the
most effective manner his own brigade. In fact these were among the first and the last of his
labours for Greece. Soon after the arrival of the news that the loan had been taken, and just
as he was priding himself on being liberated from the thousand demands that were daily made on
his purse and his time, he was seized with that illness from which he never recovered. The last
of his exertions and the last of his orders for the good of Greece, were directed to forming an
effective body of soldiers, who he knew would, if well disciplined, be the most useful present
he could make to his favourite cause.
The circumstances I have mentioned in this chapter may have thrown some
additional light
98 | INCREASING EMBARRASSMENT FOR LORD BYRON. | |
on the
situation of Lord Byron; and may perhaps explain some parts
of his conduct which have hitherto been only known through the medium of partial, and in my
opinion unfair, reports. Lord Byron was on one hand courted and flattered
publicly by every man in authority in Greece; on the other, there was not one of the chiefs who
did not endeavour to infuse suspicions into his mind of the integrity of all the others. He
also appeared in the character of representative of the Greek committee, and of the English
people; but in this character he had rivals, who were jealous of his ascendency. While he had
probably lost some share of the confidence of those who were the managing persons in the Greek
committee, and they were disposed to place more reliance on others than on him; yet up to the
date of his death, as those others had no personal resources equal to the occasion, he stood
pre-eminent in the esteem of most of the Greek chiefs. There was nothing but embarrassment for
Lord Byron, nothing but trouble and confusion from these different
persons, all of them possessing power, endeavouring each to influence his mind in the direction
most suited to his own views.
As another specimen of the manner in which he was called on to interfere
between these opposing interests, I may mention that again, to-
| HUNGARIANS EXORTED TO REBEL. | 99 |
wards the latter end of March, Prince Mavrocordato pointedly and positively requested
Lord Byron to stop the circulation of a newspaper which had been struck off during his absence, and which
contained an exhortation to the Hungarians to rebel against the House of Austria.
Lord Byron was highly incensed that such a paper should have issued
from Missolonghi, and he promised to do all in his power to prevent its circulation in the
islands. He knew it had been said that the Greek insurrection was the offspring of the
revolutionary principles to which the sovereigns of Europe were so resolutely opposed. He knew
that wherever they suspected the existence of these principles, no appeal to honour, to
justice, or even to religion, was of any avail, and that they directed all their energies to
stifle in every part of the world every germ of popular independence. He therefore saw in this
denunciation, and in most of the political doctrines which were broached in Greece, an
invitation to these powers, more particularly to Austria, to take part against the Greeks. It
was moreover a justification of their doing so. Lord Byron saw this was
hazarding the success of that cause which wholly engrossed his mind, and he was proportionably
energetic in his reprobation of what appeared to him both inexpedient in practice, and
indefensible in principle.
100 |
LORD BYRON NOT INCONSISTENT. |
|
After this sketch of Byron’s
situation in Greece, the reader may form some idea of the difficulties which surrounded him. I
have endeavoured to bring them distinctly under notice; because imputations of vacillating
policy, of conduct guided by caprice, of unfitness for the task he had undertaken, of a
childish love of change, have all been made against him; and he who laid down his life in proof
of the integrity of his principles, and of the intenseness of his love of liberty, has not
escaped the censures of men, who have been only a little more consistent than he was,—and
that merely in opinion, because their opinions were all theory, and never were made the rule
either of their own conduct or of the conduct of others. If these difficulties do not afford an
ample justification for many trifling circumstances in Lord Byron’s
proceedings, we may at least infer from them that none of his calumniators would have been in
his situation more consistent or more successful.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Pietro Gamba (1801-1827)
The brother of Teresa Guiccioli and member of Carbonieri. He followed Byron to Greece and
left a memoir of his experiences.
Mr. Gill (d. 1824)
The foreman of William Parry's munitions factory at Missolonghi; they had previously
worked together as shipwrights. William Henry Humphreys reports that he was with Trelawny
in the cave of Odysseas Androutsos and that he died of disease in Napoli in the autumn of
1824.
J. M. Hodges (1831 fl.)
An artisan who worked under Lord Byron in William Parry's munitions factory at
Missolonghi. He returned to England in late 1824 and Edward Trelawney reports that he was
living in London in 1831.
Hon. Augusta Mary Leigh [née Byron] (1783-1851)
Byron's half-sister; the daughter of Amelia Darcy, Baroness Conyers, she married
Lieutenant-Colonel George Leigh on 17 August 1807.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.
Johann-Jacob Meyer (1798-1826)
Swiss republican who edited
Hellenica Chronica; he died during the
siege of Missolonghi.
Mohammed Ali Pasha (1769-1849)
The Pasha of Egypt from 1805; he defended the Turkish rule in Greece until his defeat of
his navy at the battle of Navarino.
Odysseas Androutsos [Οδησευς] (1788-1825)
The son of Andreas Androutsos; he was the principal chieftain in eastern Greece and
political opponent of the constitutional government of Alexander Mavrocordatos, who was
instrumental in having him assassinated.
Lieutenant Sass (d. 1824)
Finnish soldier who served in the Swedish and Swiss armies before taking up arms against
the Turks, originally with a German troop; he was murdered by the Suliotes at
Missolonghi.
Leicester Fitzgerald Charles Stanhope, fifth earl of Harrington (1784-1862)
The third son of the third earl; in 1823 he traveled to Greece as the Commissioner of the
London Greek Committee; there he served with Byron, whom he criticizes in
Greece in 1823 and 1824 (1824). He inherited the earldom from his brother in
1851.
Hellenica Chronica. (1824-26). A biweekly Greek language newspaper edited by Jean Jacques Meyer; most of the subscribers
lived outside of Greece.