The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter V
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
CHAPTER V.
SECOND ILLNESS AND DEATH OF LORD BYRON.
Weather in April—Attack on Missolonghi, by
Cariascachi—Misconduct of our soldiers—Duels—A spy in Lord
Byron’s household—Endeavours to estrange Lord
Byron from Mavrocordato—Conduct of some
Englishmen—Rumour of breaking up the establishment at Missolonghi—Irritation of
Lord Byron—Is prevented leaving Missolonghi—News of the
loan—Lord Byron rides out for the last time—My
opportunities of being with Lord Byron—Opportunities enjoyed by
others—Count
Gamba—Fletcher—Dr.
Bruno—Deplorable state and confusion of Lord
Byron’s household—Proofs of the authenticity of the
narrative—Lord Byron seriously ill—Agrees to leave
Missolonghi—Preparations for this purpose—Prevented by the Sirocco
wind—Confined to his bed—Is delirious—The doctors think there is no
danger—Sirocco continues—His forlorn condition—Is bled—Continued
delirium—A consultation of physicians—Previous treatment of Lord
Byron condemned—Bark administered to him—Is sensible for the last
time—Lies in a stupor for twenty-four hours—His Death—Author’s opinion
as to the causes of his Death—Lord Byron’s prodigious
disappointment—Flattering manner in which he was invited to Greece—What he expected
to perform—Remarks on the physician’s statements—Other disasters in
Greece—Its independence not promoted by our interference.
During the early part of April, the weather continued rainy and most
unpleasant. The disputes among the Greek chieftains and their followers, the effects of which
we always felt, seemed to increase daily, and at length to have broken out into open hostility
and civil war.
102 |
CARIASCACHI’S ATTACK ON MISSOLONGHI. |
|
I am not writing a history of Greece, and therefore the reader will
dispense with my enumerating the names of all the captains who are at the head of different
parties in that country, some openly fighting for themselves, and others clothed with the
authority of government. Their names, their behaviour, their excesses, and their modest
pretensions, have all been a thousand times repeated in the newspapers, and other publications,
and can receive no fame from my pen. My only object is to confine myself to such facts as throw
light on Lord Byron’s situation, and the causes of his
death.
Towards the end of March or beginning of April, he was much annoyed, and
indeed every body was alarmed, by an attack made on Missolonghi by the partizans of one
Cariascachi of Anatolica, under the pretence of
avenging a private insult offered to one of their own people, but in fact undertaken in concert
with that party which wanted to destroy the influence and power of Mavrocordato, and separate him from Lord
Byron. The primates and others flew to his Lordship for protection, entreated
him to order out his brigade, and told him they had no hope, even for the safety of the town
but in him. About the same time, the troops of Cariascachi took possession
of Vasaldi, and seemed resolved to be their own masters, whatever ruin they might bring
| MISCONDUCT OF OUR SOLDIERS. | 103 |
on their country. Driven by the desperate
state of its finances, or rather by its want of resources, the government also had recourse to
violence, and was almost involved in disputes with England, by seizing on some property
belonging to Ionian merchants at Missolonghi. The very moment the Turks were threatening to
make another attack, and were, it may be almost said, before the walls of Missolonghi, was the
time chosen by those who wanted money, and those who wanted power, to embroil all the parties
in this unhappy country.
On our part, we were not without unfortunate occurrences. One of our
soldiers committed an outrage on the Greek family where he lodged; and to restore the
confidence of the Greeks in our discipline, we were obliged to arrest him, and carry him off to
the seraglio. Where there was so little subordination, every event of this kind not only gave a
great deal of trouble, but led to confusion and tumult; another of our soldiers committed a
robbery, was detected and punished. This event, which in a well regulated corps would have
passed as a matter of course, begot a dispute among some of the officers, and some of the
English gentlemen present, and two or three duels would have ensued, had the parties not been
put under arrest by my orders. Count Gamba takes the
merit of this arrest to himself,
104 | EFFORTS OF MAVROCORDATO’S ENEMIES. | |
but he had nothing to do with it, and never
had any power in Greece. There was no military code established and promulgated but the code
Napoleon, which people were not disposed to obey; and every little occurrence of this kind
called forth legislative debates, as well as judicial disputes. The laws were to be made and
applied as the offences arose. It was also discovered, that a relation of the landlord, in
whose house Lord Byron lived, acted as a spy for the
opposite party. He was of course arrested, and given up to the authorities at Missolonghi.
What above all things, however, annoyed Lord
Byron, were the various efforts made to prejudice him against Prince Mavrocordato; and the Prince disclosing to him the
objects of these attempts. In all the intrigues which I witnessed in Greece, and till they fell
under my notice I had no conception that one could think of such crooked
contrivances—nothing surprised me more, than the willingness of some Englishmen to lend
themselves to these deceitful and base purposes. Either much displeased at not finding
themselves the all-engrossing objects of admiration, or careless of every thing but their own
selfish purposes, or willing to obtain that importance, by trick and chicanery, which their own
merits in a country like Greece never could obtain, they made it their express business to sow
| COLONEL STANHOPE’s IMPROPER INTERFERENCE | 105 |
division between
Lord Byron and Prince Mavrocordato. Thus, shortly
after Lord Byron’s first illness, one of them told him, that the
Suliotes at Anatolica had disclosed the circumstance that they were persuaded by
Prince Mavrocordato not to march against Lepanto. With that frankness
which ever distinguished Lord Byron, he communicated this report to the
Prince, who satisfied him, that it originated entirely in the malice of his enemies. In the
then weak state of Lord Byron’s health, this report irritated him
exceedingly, and it required all my efforts, and those of the persons who had most influence
over him, to restore him to calmness.
The irritation of this had scarcely subsided, when we discovered that
intrigues were on foot, to persuade the Greeks, whom I had instructed a little in the art of
preparing ammunition, to go off to Athens. Prince
Mavrocordato and Colonel Stanhope were not
on very good terms; the Colonel had no confidence in the Prince, and indeed openly bearded and
opposed him. It seemed as if the Colonel supposed Greece was a regiment of guards, which might
be put through certain manoeuvres at his pleasure. He wanted to drill it after his own fashion.
His hostility to Mavrocordato had been so marked, that there gradually
arose an opinion, among both Greeks and English, strengthened by the Colonel’s own
106 | LORD BYRON NEGLECTED BY THE COMMITTEE. | |
conduct, that he was
endeavouring to break up the establishment at Missolonghi, and remove all the stores belonging
to the committee to Athens. This report, like the others, was conveyed to Lord Byron, and he not having parted with Colonel
Stanhope on very good terms, it added much to the disagreebleness of his
feelings. He had before attributed both neglect and deceit to the Greek committee or some of
its agents; and this report of the proceedings of their special and chosen messenger, made him,
in the irritation of the moment, regard them as acting even treacherously towards him. To the
cause of Greece he was firmly attached, and resolved never to forsake it; and he was
proportionably both disappointed and angry, that those who pretended to feel a similar
attachment, had it only on their lips, and not in their hearts. “By the cant of
religious pretenders,” he said, “I have already deeply suffered, and now I know
what the cant of pretended reformers and of philanthropists amounts to.” Had his
valuable life been spared, the specious claims of both these sects would have been justly held
up to the derision of mankind.
At this moment then, that is, at the commencement of April, there was a
combination of circumstances, all tending to irritate the naturally sensitive disposition of
Lord Byron, and to
| HIS DEFERENCE TO OPINION. | 107 |
weaken his hopes of a great and glorious result. He was
more a mental being, if I may use this phrase, than any man I ever saw. He lived on thought
more than on food. As his hopes of the cause of Greece failed, and they seem to have been the
last, and perhaps the greatest his mind was capable of forming, he became peevish; and if I may
so speak, little minded. Losing hope, he lost enthusiasm, and became gloomily sensible to his
situation. There was no mental stimulus left to make him bear up against his increasing
perplexities, and nerve his body to resist the noxious effects of a bad climate.
The difficulties of his own situation, and the coming dangers, had the
effect on the obstinate mind of Lord Byron, of compelling
him to remain at Missolonghi. But for these circumstances, he would have left it for a time,
and have found repose and health.
He who has been thought by many to have contemptuously braved the opinion
of the world, was, when it was in harmony with his own convictions, completely and sensitively
under its control. He felt that the Greeks were more than ever in danger, and his high and
proud mind obstinately refused to leave Missolonghi, for a more quiet scene, and a more healthy
abode. He dreaded what the world might say of his desertion;
108 | HIS CONTINUED DEBILITY. | |
his spirit was more powerful than his frame,
and this fell into dissolution before that changed its determination. Had it not been for the
state of Greece, I believe he would, at the commencement of his disorder, have gone to Zante,
but he could not brook the idea of flinching from danger, even to save his life.
From the beginning of April, he had frequently complained to me of violent
head-aches, and of great debility. Both these had remained from the time of the first attack;
but he had felt them particularly, from the time of the bleeding. When these head-aches left
him, his hopes returned that his health would be restored in the summer. To me he often
expressed the great satisfaction he felt, at the probability of being able, by means of his
income alone, to carry his designs in favour of Greece into execution, without adding to his
debts, or alienating any part of his property. He looked forward to the return of fine weather,
and the commencement of the campaign, when he proposed to take the field, at the head of his
own brigade, and the troops which the government of Greece were to place under his orders, for
the recovery of his health and spirits. He was sure he said, to be thoroughly restored, could
he every day get hard exercise in the free air. He wanted to be relieved from his own de-
| RIDES OUT FOR THE LAST TIME. | 109 |
spondency; but time and circumstances
brought no relief, and before the campaign was opened he had perished.
When the news arrived from England, on April the 9th, of the loan for the
Greeks having been negotiated in London, Lord Byron also
received several private letters, which brought him favourable accounts of his daughter. Whenever he spoke of her, it was with delight to
think he was a father, or with a strong feeling of melancholy, at recollecting that her
infantine and most endearing embraces were denied to his love. The pleasant intelligence which
he had received concerning her, gave a fresh stimulus to his mind, I may almost say revived for
a moment a spirit that was already faint and weary, and slumbering in the arms of death. He
rode out after hearing this news twice; and once was caught in the rain. Those who wish to
attribute his death to any other cause, rather than to the general debility occasioned by a
long system of exhaustion, both of body and mind, have eagerly seized hold of this trifling
circumstance, to make the world believe, that he who had swam the Hellespont, who had been
accustomed to brave every climate, and every season, fell a victim to a shower of rain and a
wet saddle. When a man is borne down, almost to death, by continued vexation, and a want of
sufficient nourishment, such trifles may
110 | MY OPPORTUNITIES OF SEEING LORD BYRON. | |
complete his dissolution. In this case they
were only the last grains of the ponderous load of calamities which weighed this noble-minded
man to the earth; and it is my honest conviction, that he might have been saved, had he had
with him one sensible and influential friend, partly to shield him from himself, partly to
shield him from others, and zealous to preserve both his fame and his life.
Before I proceed to describe Lord
Byron’s death, it may be as well to state what opportunities were enjoyed
by those persons who have either supplied the materials for an account of his last moments, or
published it on their own authority, for the task they have undertaken. It will be evident, I
should suppose, to every person who has honoured these pages with a perusal, that I was
necessarily much absent from Lord Byron, after he was taken ill. My duties
carried me out of the house where we lived, and it was only occasionally that I could pay him
any attention, or even ascertain his actual state. Whenever I returned home, before I entered
his room, of course I made inquiries as to his state, and I was generally told that he was
asleep, or quiet, and had better not be disturbed, that there was no danger, and that I might
without apprehension attend to my business. Lord Byron, it will be also
evident I think to the reader, honoured
me with a high
degree of confidence; and yet some of those who were immediately in charge of his person did
what they could to exclude me from his presence. They have themselves, therefore, to thank for
the suspicions which have been generated in my mind as to the accuracy of the reports.
As I do not pretend to have been continually at Lord Byron’s bed-side, it would be wrong in me to deny the accuracy of
any statement, which may possibly relate to times when I was not present; at the same time it
seems to me proper to put the public in possession of some facts, which may enable them to
judge of the credibility of the narratives of Lord Byron’s last
moments which have been given to the world.
Count Gamba, who has just published “A Narrative,”
&c., and who has given a circumstantial detail of every thing that happened to Lord Byron, did not live under the same roof with him. He resided
in another part of the town, and for two or three days, at the most critical period of
Lord Byron’s illness, he was confined to his own room from the
effects of an accident. I believe he was unable to walk. Count Gamba is
still a very young man; I say this with no intention to disparage him, in truth it is with most
men a subject of pride, and in him Lord Byron never placed any marked
degree of confi-
dence. His Lordship protected
and employed him; he may be said even to have provided for him, but he did not confide in him.
Fletcher, Lord
Byron’s valet, I have before observed was not at this time his favourite
servant. He was comparatively seldom in his master’s bed-room, and seemed to me to have
nearly lost his master’s confidence. Tita was
Lord Byron’s constant attendant, and was always in his bed-room.
There were several circumstances also connected with Mr. Fletcher, which
must have unfitted him to be a very correct reporter of what occurred; I shall mention only
one, the influence of which indeed Count Gamba also
felt. Both were so affected, and so unmanned by the situation of Lord
Byron, that whenever I saw them they required almost as much attention and
assistance as Lord Byron himself. It is possible that what they saw they
may have faithfully related; but I cannot say that I feel disposed to borrow any thing from the
narrative of either.
Dr. Bruno I believe to be a very good young man, but he
was certainly inadequate to his situation. I do not mean as to his scientific acquirements, for
of them I pretend not to judge; but he wanted firmness, and was so much agitated, that he was
incapable of bringing whatever knowledge he might possess into use. Tita was
| CONFUSION AMONG THE ATTENDANTS. | 113 |
kind and
attentive, and by far the most teachable and useful of all the persons about Lord Byron. As there was nobody invested with any authority over
his household, after he fell sick, there was neither method, order, nor quiet, in his
apartments. A clever skilful English surgeon, possessing the confidence of his employer, would
have put all this in train; but Dr. Bruno had no idea of doing any such
thing. There was also a want of many comforts which, to the sick, may indeed be called
necessaries, and there was a dreadful confusion of tongues. In his agitation Dr.
Bruno’s English, and he spoke but imperfectly, was unintelligible;
Fletcher’s Italian was equally bad. I speak
nothing but English; Tita then spoke nothing but Italian; and the ordinary
Greek domestics were incomprehensible to us all. In all the attendants there was the
officiousness of zeal; but owing to their ignorance of each other’s language, their zeal
only added to the confusion. This circumstance, and the want of common necessaries, made
Lord Byron’s apartment such a picture of distress and even
anguish during the two or three last days of his life, as I never before beheld, and wish never
again to witness.
Having mentioned circumstances which may probably suggest a doubt to the
reader’s mind as to the fidelity of those narratives which have
114 | PROOFS 0F CONFIDENCE IN ME. | |
been published of Lord
Byron’s last moments, I may allude to those which should inspire him with
confidence in my assertions. From Count Gamba’s
statement, which I have transferred to the title-page of this work, the reader may be satisfied
that I was present with Lord Byron a short time before he became
insensible for ever, and that Count Gamba himself was not present, for he
says, “I had not the heart to go*.” Count Gamba was in fact
overcome by his feelings, and was incapable of going. The reader may therefore judge from this
of the accuracy of conversations which I, who was present, do not pretend to have heard.
“It was to Parry,” Count
Gamba says, “to whom Lord Byron tried to express his
last wishes.” It is plain, therefore, from the statements of other persons, that
Lord Byron had confidence in me, and knowing that he had in a high
degree, I infer, and the reader will grant, I believe, the fairness of the inference, that
Lord Byron would not be anxious to confide secrets to others when I
was on the spot. In fact I believe that for the last seven days of his life Lord
Byron did not speak on any serious topic connected with his own concerns to any
other person but to me. An additional proof of Lord Byron’s
confidence in me may be extracted from another passage of
| WANT OF CONFIDENCE IN THE PHYSICIANS | 115 |
Count Gamba’s narrative. He says at p. 264, “I was sent for
to persuade him (Lord Byron), to allow of blisters being put on, and
returned in all haste with
Mr. Parry.” Why did Count Gamba return with me when he was sent for! Because in fact it was I who was
summoned to persuade his Lordship, and who always was summoned; and
these were the only times that the doctors liked my presence, whenever Lord
Byron was to be convinced or persuaded that the remedies proposed were likely to
be beneficial.
Whenever Lord Byron objected or refused
to follow their prescriptions, then I was sent for to exert my influence over him; at other
times, as I have stated, all sorts of excuses were invented to exclude me from his room.
Whenever I saw him, also, and this is well worthy of attention, he never omitted to complain of
the altercations he had with his doctors, of whose treatment of him he said many harsh things.
I have now stated candidly the means and opportunities I had of witnessing
Lord Byron’s last moments, and the means and
opportunities which others had. What I saw, and what I know, I shall now describe.
A short time after his return from the ride, on April 9th, when he had got
wet, he complained of considerable pain and fever, and his physician, evidently from some
Sangrado theory, im-
116 | CONSENTS TO REMOVE TO ZANTE. | |
mediately proposed
that he should be again bled. To this he objected, and against this, when I heard of it, I
remonstrated. I was confident from the mode in which he had lately lived, and been lately
tormented, that to bleed him would be to kill him. He was worn out, not fairly but unfairly,
and the momentary heat and symptoms of fever were little more, I believe, than the expiring
struggles or the last flashes of an ardent spirit.
On April 11th he was very unwell*, had shivering fits continually, and
pains over every part of his body, particularly in his bones and head. He talked a great deal,
and I thought in rather a wandering manner, and I became alarmed for his safety. To me there
appeared no time to be lost, and I earnestly supplicated him to go immediately to Zante, and
try change of air and change of scene. After some time he gave an unwilling consent, and I
received his orders to prepare vessels for his conveyance†. Count Gamba, Lieut. Hesketh, his
aid-de-camp.
* Count Gamba says he rode out
on this day. Mr. Fletcher’s account, published in the “Westminster Review,” says the last
time he rode out was on the 10th. The latter is correct. † This is a circumstance which could not have been unknown to
Count Gamba; and yet, I believe, it is never
mentioned in his Narrative.
Mr. Fletcher might easily have forgotten
this, or not have known it, as well as many other things. |
| PREPARATIONS FOR THE REMOVAL. | 117 |
M. Bruno, his physician, and his servants Fletcher and Tita were
to accompany him. Of course I was to remain at Missolonghi, and was more especially to take
charge of all his property, and expedite the service as much as lay in my power. I was also to
have a vessel constantly ready to send over to Zante, with information of whatever occurred at
Missolonghi. It was only by pointing out to his Lordship the facility of communicating with
him, and the ease and speediness with which he might return to the spot, should his presence be
necessary, and his health permit, that I wrung from him a reluctant consent to go away, and a
reluctant order to prepare for his departure.
It is perhaps of little consequence to the reader to be told at this time
of what I did; but there is one circumstance connected with Lord
Byron that I may mention, as it took place this day. For his satisfaction, as
well as for mine, I had drawn up a report of my proceedings, as well as of all his military
proceedings since my arrival in Greece. On April 11th, I read this report to him, and it
received his approbation. A more rigid judge, probably, from supposing himself a more
inflexible patriot, and a more enlightened man, or because he was better acquainted with the
matter, I mean colonel Stanhope, did not condescend to
honour this report, at a later period, with his approbation.
But he had a better right than Lord Byron to
condemn it, for he neither smoothed our difficulties nor upheld our courage. He had no hand in
effecting the little good which pleased the noble mind of Lord Byron.
Lord Byron kept his bed all day on the 12th of April, and
complained that he could not sleep, that his bones were very sore, and that the pain in his
head increased. He could eat nothing, and in fact took no nourishment whatever.
On the following day all the preparations for his departure were
completed, but a hurricane ensued, and it was impossible for the vessel to leave the port;
torrents of rain also came down, the country around was flooded, and Missolonghi for the time
became a complete prison. The hurricane was no other than the pestilent sirocco wind; and thus
it seems as if the elements had combined with man to ensure Lord
Byron’s death.
Hitherto he had risen during the day, and for a short time had left his
bed-room; but after retiring on April the 14th, he came out no more. From that time he was
confined to his bed, and nobody was allowed to see him, or permitted to enter his bed-room, but
Count Gamba, the physician, the two servants
Tita and Fletcher, and myself. The confidence with which he had ever honoured me since
my arrival, was shewn
| FIRST SYMPTOMS OF DELIRIUM. | 119 |
even in his last
moments; and, still keeping in view why he and I were both in Greece, he told me to be with him
as much as I possibly could, without thereby retarding the service.
My other occupations unfortunately did not allow me to be always about
him; but whenever they did, I paid him all the attention in my power. To me he seemed even from
April 14th to be occasionally delirious*, and frequently expressed a desire and intention to go
on horseback, or to take an excursion in his boat. I observed also that he sometimes slipped in
an Italian sentence or phrase or two in his conversations with me, as if he were addressing
Tita or Count Gamba. From fulfilling his
intention of riding he was dissuaded, partly by his attendants, but chiefly
* In the account
given in the “Westminster
Review” of Lord Byron’s death, at
page 255, Vol. II., there is a note recording some conversation between Lord
Byron and his physician, from which the reviewer infers that
Byron was delirious in an early stage of the disease. This
strengthens what I have said in the text; I shall only deny that the delirium arose
from inflammation. It was that alienation of the mind, which is so frequently the
consequence of excessive debility. There was no symptom of violence in the early period
of the disease, such as I have frequently seen in other young men attacked with fever,
and such as I believe would, in Lord Byron’s case had, the
disorder been inflammatory, have been most severe. The delirium at every stage arose
from extreme debility. |
120 | THE SIROCCO CONTINUES. | |
by his weakness, which prevented him even from
supporting himself without assistance.
On the 15th of April Lord Byron was
seriously and alarmingly ill; and I am now persuaded, from the manner of his conversation with
me, more than from what he said, that he was then apprehensive his disease was dangerous. The
doctors indeed thought there was no danger, and so they assured me and every body else about
Lord Byron. The sirocco wind continued to blow very strong; and it was
quite impossible to remove him, unless it had abated or changed. The same circumstance would
have prevented us sending for Dr. Thomas, or sending to
Zante for any body or any thing, had such a measure been resolved on.
It was seven o’clock in the evening when I saw him, and then I took
a chair at his request, and sat down by his bed-side, and remained till ten o’clock. He
sat up in his bed, and was then calm and collected. He talked with me on a variety of subjects
connected with himself and his family; he spoke of his intentions as to Greece, his plans for
the campaign, and what he should ultimately do for that country. He spoke to me about my own
adventures. He spoke of death also with great composure, and though he did not believe his end
was so very near, there was something about him so serious and so firm, so
| LORD BYRON’S LAST CALM MOMENTS | 121 |
resigned and composed, so different from any
thing I had ever before seen in him, that my mind misgave me, and at times foreboded his speedy
dissolution.
“Parry,” he said, when I first went to
him, “I have much wished to see you to-day. I have had most strange feelings, but my
head is now better; I have no gloomy thoughts, and no idea but that I shall recover. I am
perfectly collected, I am sure I am in my senses, but a melancholy will creep over me at
times.” The mention of the subject brought the melancholy topics back, and a few
exclamations shewed what occupied Lord Byron’s mind
when he was left in silence and solitude. “My wife!
My Ada! My country! the situation of this place, my
removal impossible, and perhaps death, all combine to make me sad. Since I have been ill, I
have given to all my plans much serious consideration. You shall go on at your leisure
preparing for building the schooner, and when other things are done, we will put the last
hand to this work, by a visit to America*. To reflect on this has been a pleasure to me,
and has turned my mind from ungrateful thoughts. When I left Italy I had time on board the
brig to give full scope to memory and reflection. It was then I came to that
* This was in connexion with his Lordship’s views as to
Greece, stated in another place. |
122 | HIS LAST CONVERSATION. | |
resolution I have already informed you of.
I am convinced of the happiness of domestic life. No man on earth respects a virtuous woman
more than I do, and the prospect of retirement in England with my wife and
Ada, gives me an idea of happiness I have never experienced
before. Retirement will be every thing to me, for heretofore my life has been like the
ocean in a storm.”
Then adverting to his more immediate attendants he said; “I have
closely observed today the conduct of all around me. Tita is an admirable fellow; he has not been out of the house for several
days. Bruno is an excellent young man and very
skilful, but I am afraid he is too much agitated. I wish you to be as much about me as
possible, you may prevent me being jaded to death, and when I recover I assure you I shall,
adopt a different mode of living. They must have misinformed you when they told you I was
asleep, I have not slept, and I can’t imagine why they should tell you I was
asleep.
“You have no conception of the unaccountable thoughts which come
into my mind when the fever attacks me. I fancy myself a Jew, a Mahomedan, and a Christian
of every profession of faith. Eternity and space are before me; but on this subject, thank
God, I am happy and at ease. The thought of living eternally, of again reviv-
| HIS FORLORN CONDITION. | 123 |
ing, is a great pleasure. Christianity is
the purest and most liberal religion in the world, but the numerous teachers who are
continually worrying mankind with their denunciations and their doctrines, are the greatest
enemies of religion. I have read with more attention than half of them the book of
Christianity, and I admire the liberal and truly charitable principles which Christ has
laid down. There are questions connected with this subject which none but Almighty God can
solve. Time and space, who can conceive—none but God, on him I rely.”
I had never before felt, as I felt that evening. There was the gifted
Lord Byron, who had been the object of universal
attention, who had, even as a youth, been intoxicated with the idolatry of men, and the more
flattering love of women, gradually expiring, almost forsaken, and certainly without the
consolation which generally awaits the meanest of mankind, of breathing out his last sigh in
the arms of some dear friend. His habitation was weather-tight, but that was nearly all the
comfort his deplorable room afforded him. He was my protector and benefactor, and I could not
see him, whom I knew to have been so differently brought up, thus perishing, far from his home,
far from all the comforts due to his rank and situation, far too from every fond and
affection-
124 | CONFIDENCE OF THE PHYSICIANS. | |
ate heart, without a
feeling of deep sorrow, such as I should not have had at the loss of my own dearest relation.
The pestilent sirocco was blowing a hurricane, and the rain was falling
with almost tropical violence. In our apartment, was the calm of coming death, and outside, was
the storm desolating the spot around us, but carrying I would fain hope, new life and vigour to
some stagnant part of nature.
This evening was, I believe, the last time Lord
Byron was calm and collected for any considerable period. On the 16th he was
alarmingly ill, and almost constantly delirious. He spoke alternately in English and Italian,
and spoke very wildly. I earnestly implored the doctors not to physic and bleed him, and to
keep his extremities warm, for in them there was already the coldness of coming death. I was
told, there was no doubt of Lord Byron’s recovery, and that I might
attend to my business without apprehension. Half assured by these positive assertions, I did
leave his Lordship, to attend to my duties in the arsenal.
On the 17th, when I saw him in the morning, he was labouring at times
under delirium. He appeared much worse than the day before; notwithstanding this, he was again
bled twice, and both times fainted. His debility was excessive. He complained bitterly of his
want of sleep, as
| BYRON’S CONTINUED DELIRIUM. | 125 |
delirious
patients do complain, in a wild rambling manner. He said he had not slept for more than a week,
when, in fact, he had repeatedly slept at short intervals, disturbedly indeed, but still it was
sleep. He had now ceased to think or talk of death; he had probably, as Count Gamba has said, no idea that his life was so soon to
terminate, for his senses were in such a state, that they rarely allowed him to form a correct
idea of any thing. Yet opinions, uttered under such circumstances, have been given to the
world, by his friends, as Lord
Byron’s settled opinions. “If,” he is made to say,
“my hour is come, I shall die whether I lose my blood or keep it.”
Count Gamba indeed, says he transacted with him a
considerable quantity of business on the 16th, when Lord
Byron was almost insensible, as Mr.
Fletcher has already testified, and as I now testify. Those conversations which
Count Gamba reports, as heard by himself and others, are all of that
rambling character which distinguish delirium. It is particularly necessary, to make this
observation, because a great degree of importance is sometimes attributed to death-bed
speeches. In Lord Byron’s case, whatever may be reported as said by
him, must be taken with the consideration, that he was frequently delirious, for the last five
days of his existence.
On the 18th, it was settled by Prince
Mavro-
126 | A CONSULTATION OF PHYSICIANS. | |
cordato, that I should march with the
artillery brigade and Suliotes to some little distance from the town, and exercise them, in
order to carry the inhabitants along with us. This was Easter day, and the Greeks being
accustomed to celebrate it by firing muskets, we fell on this plan, to prevent their disturbing
Lord Byron. On this account I did not see much of
Lord Byron till towards the middle of the day. I saw him a short time
indeed, in the morning, and then he was very delirious, and alarmingly ill. Such was the
confusion amongst the people about him on my return, that I could learn little or nothing of
what had passed, except that a consultation had taken place, two other medical men having been
called in, and that one of them, Dr. Treiber, a German,
had warmly condemned the mode in which Lord Byron had been treated. It was
by his recommendation and advice, I believe, that it was now resolved to administer bark, and I
was sent for to persuade Lord Byron to take it. I do not know that it is
possible to give a stronger proof of Lord Byron’s complete want of
confidence in his medical men, and of their conviction that he had no confidence in them.
Whether he was to be bled or blistered, or receive stimulant medicines, they felt that he would
not listen to them, and I, who was comparatively a stranger to Lord Byron,
or some one of his household, was obliged | MODE OF TREATMENT ALTERED. | 127 |
to enforce the physicians’ recommendation. At the moment of administering the bark, he
seemed sensible; I spoke to him, and said, “My Lord, take the bark, it will do you good,
it will recover your Lordship.” He took my hand, and said, “Give it me.” He
was able to swallow only a very small quantity, about four mouthfuls I think. Dr. Bruno seemed satisfied, however, and said, “That
will do.” When he took my hand, I found his hands were deadly cold. With the assistance
of Tita, I endeavoured gently to create a little warmth
in them; and I also loosened the bandage which was tied round his head. Till this was done he
seemed in great pain, clenched his hands at times, gnashed his teeth, and uttered the Italian
exclamation of Ah Christi! He bore the loosening of the band passively;
and after it was loosened, he shed tears. I encouraged him to weep, and said, “My
Lord, I thank God, I hope you will now be better; shed as many tears as you can, you will
sleep and find ease.” He replied faintly, “Yes, the pain is gone, I
shall sleep now,” and he again took my hand, uttered a faint good night, and sank
into a slumber; my heart ached, but I thought then his sufferings were over, and that he would
wake no more.
He did wake again, however, and I went to him; Byron knew me, though scarcely. He had
then less of alienation about him than I had seen for some time
before, there was the calmness of resignation, but there was also the stupor of death. He tried
to utter his wishes, but he was incapable; he said something about rewarding his Italian
servant, and uttered several incoherent words. There was either no meaning in what he said, or
it was such a meaning, as we should not expect at that moment. His eyes continued open only a
short time, and then, about six o’clock in the evening of the 18th, he sank into a
slumber, or rather I should say, a stupor, and woke and knew no more.
He continued in a state of complete insensibility for twenty-four hours;
giving no other signs of life, but that rattling in his throat, which indicated the approach of
death. On Monday, April 19th, at six o’clock in the evening, even this faint indication
of existence had ceased—Lord Byron was dead*. Thus
died George Lord Byron, the truest and greatest poet England has lately
given birth to, the
* At the very time Lord Byron
died, there was one of the most awful thunder storms I ever witnessed. The lightning
was terrific. The Greeks, who are very superstitious, and generally believe that such
an event occurs whenever a much superior, or as they say, a supreme man dies,
immediately exclaimed, “The great man is gone!” On the present occasion it
was too true; and the storm was so violent, as to strengthen their superstitious
belief. Their friend and benefactor was indeed dead. |
warmest-hearted of her philanthropists, the
least selfish of her patriots, and unquestionably the most distinguished man of her nobility.
That the disappointment of his ardent hopes was the primary cause of his illness and death,
cannot, I think, be doubted. The weight of that disappointment was augmented by the numerous
difficulties he met with. He was fretted and annoyed, but he disdained to complain. He had
formed, I admit, exaggerated expectations; but had they no foundation, in the unfulfilled
promises of the people of England; and was he not unworthily deceived, either by the ignorant
presumption or the selfishness of those, who were anxious to obtain the weight of his great
name to the cause which was the momentary theme of their declamation?
That he had miscalculated his own power, and the probable resources of
Greece, I also admit; but for the former, we may find a natural excuse, in the very flattering
manner in which he was invited into that country*; and on the latter, no man had, or now has,
any accurate information. He shared with many wise and many ignorant men the wide-spread but
delusive notion, that an indi-
* As a specimen of this, I shall quote the following extract from a
letter of Prince Mavrocordato to Lord Byron; the date is Missolonghi, December 29th.
“Je n’ai pas besoin de vous dire, mi Lord, combien il
me tard de vous voir arriver; à quel point votre presence est desirée
de tout le monde, et quelle direction avantaguese, elle donnera a toutes les
affaires, vos
|
130 | HIS DISAPPOINTED HOPES. | |
vidual limited, as we all are to a portion of
wisdom and power, scarcely commensurate to our individual wants, may bestow great benefits on a
whole nation, or even on the species; and he expected on his appearance in Greece, to reconcile
contending chieftains, to hush the voice of angry ambition, to sooth the disappointed passions
of opposing factions, and to direct all hearts and minds, as his own heart and mind were
directed, to the single object of liberating Greece. This object, beautiful as it is in theory,
is one which a succession of wise men, and a long lapse of time, only can accomplish. That
Lord Byron failed, ought not therefore to surprise us. That he ever
suffered such a chimerical idea to obtain possession of his poetical mind, might be to us a
matter of lasting astonishment, had we not seen those, who are said to be masters of reason,
and patterns of philosophy, expect to accomplish precisely the same object, by a few
instructions
conseils seront ecouté comme des oracles et nous
ne perdrons pas le tems le plus precieux de nos operations contre
l’ennemi.” And also this extract of a letter from Colonel Stanhope to Lord Byron,
dated December 28 and 29, from the same place. “It is right and necessary to
tell you, that a great deal is expected from you, both in the way of counsel and
money.” “All are eager to see you.” “I walked along the
street this evening, and the people asked me after Lord
Byron!!!” “I hope your Lordship will proceed
hither—you are expected with feverish anxiety. Your further delay in coming
will be attended with serious consequences.” L. S.
|
| THE IGNORANCE OF THE PHYSICIANS. | 131 |
dictated in their closets. That the
idea is chimerical is beyond all question; but, were it possible to realize it, Lord
Byron adopted a much more likely method to succeed, than those who drew up
constitutions and codes for Greece; and whose great pride it was, in opposition to him, to
enforce them.
But though, in my opinion, the primary cause of Lord Byron’s death was the serious disappointment he suffered, I must not
therefore be understood to say, that no art could have saved him. From the symptoms of his
disease, as recorded by his medical attendant, and from the state of his body on dissection,
physicians may probably form a different opinion of the immediate causes of his death, from the
one I entertain. They may say, as a writer in the
‘Westminster Review’ has
said, “that he died in consequence of an inflammation of the brain; at least, if the
appearances really were as described. The cause of the attack, was
the exposure to wet and cold, on the 9th of April. By this exposure fever was excited. That
he might have been saved, by early and copious bleeding, is certain. That his medical attendants had not, until it was too late
to do anything, any suspicion of the true nature of his disease, we are fully
satisfied.”
The latter part of this quotation, expresses my opinion. The physicians
knew nothing whatever
132 | HIS DISEASE NOT INFLAMMATORY. | |
of the nature of
his disease. But I shall further say, not only on account of Dr.
Bruno being an interested person, but also on account of the great agitation he
suffered, so as to bewilder him, for the last ten days of Lord
Byron’s life, that he is an incompetent witness, as to the state of the
body after death. But this statement is the only ground for the reviewer’s opinion, that
early and copious bleeding would have saved Lord Byron’s life. In
this statement, be it also remarked, he does not place implicit confidence. Let any man,
therefore, take into account the mode in which Lord Byron lived in Greece,
together with his former habits, and the severe exercise he then took, and I think a conviction
will immediately arise in his mind, as in mine, that Lord Byron’s
disease needed not the remedy of bleeding.
He was, before the fever attacked him, reduced to a mere shadow; and the
slow fever as it is called by Mr.
Fletcher, which terminated his existence, was only the symptom of that general
disease, which, from the time of my arrival in Greece, had been gradually wasting his frame.
However learnedly the doctors may talk and write on the matter, it is plain and palpable to
common observation, that Lord Byron was worried, and starved
to death. A part of his irritation arose from the structure of his own mind; but much of it was
caused by those with whom he was con-
| OTHER DISASTERS IN GREECE. | 133 |
nected, in, and about the affairs of Greece. His diet was dictated by his own will, and for
that he is responsible, but for the medical treatment his physicians must answer.
To pacify the people of this empire, for the loss of one of the greatest,
if not the greatest of their poets, and one of the most ardent champions of rational freedom,
they have been told, that the structure of his frame did not promise a long life. The eagerness
with which this circumstance was put forward, indicates a conviction in other bosoms than mine,
that a different treatment would have saved Lord
Byron’s valuable life. He cannot now be recalled; anger would only disturb
his ashes; but in proportion as we loved and valued him, must we be displeased at those whose
conduct hastened his dissolution.
Before I conclude this chapter, I cannot help adverting to some other
disastrous consequences, which have resulted, from our interfering in the affairs of Greece.
Perhaps Lord Byron’s loss may outweigh all the other
casualties, but it was not the only one. Lord Charles
Murray, an upright and honourable-young-minded man, also fell a victim to his
zeal for Grecian liberty, and died at Gastouni. To say nothing of those who fell by the hand of
the enemy, several, besides Lieutenant Sass, have been
killed in what may be called civil broils. Mr.
134 | CONSEQUENCES OF OUR INTERFERENCE. | |
Gill, the foreman in the laboratory, died of disease; and
Mr. Blackett and Mr.
Winter terminated their existence by their own hands. I have already stated what
was the result of sending out the mechanics. They were of no use to Greece. As the price of our
assistance, whatever may have been our intentions, we have in fact widened the divisions among
the chieftains; we offered to them a prize, which each was eager to gain at the expense of the
others; we introduced plans for codes of laws, and other measures which
had for their object to Anglify Greece; we saddled them with a number of
foreigners, who excited the hatred of the people; and we, I believe, as many intelligent Greeks
believe, have postponed, by our interference, the hour of their final liberation. That the wish
among our people to assist the Greeks was and is ardent and sincere no man can doubt; that the
high and exalted individuals whose names are attached to the Greek committee, were and are
zealous in watching over the management of the funds committed to their charge, is to be
presumed, from their known integrity; but every man must deplore, that the means placed at
their disposal have been applied with so little judgment, or with so little discrimination,
that where it was intended to confer benefits, only mischief has been inflicted.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Mr. Blackett (d. 1824)
An English artisan at Missolonghi to whom Byron advanced money. According to William
Parry he died a suicide.
Edward Blaquiere (1779-1832)
After serving in the Royal Navy he published
Letters from the
Mediterranean, 2 vols (1813); with John Bowring he founded the London Greek
Committee in 1823.
Francesco Bruno (d. 1828 c.)
Byron's physician on his second expedition to Greece in 1823-24; he was afterwards in
Switzerland, and died at Naples.
William Fletcher (1831 fl.)
Byron's valet, the son of a Newstead tenant; he continued in service to the end of the
poet's life, after which he was pensioned by the family. He married Anne Rood, formerly
maid to Augusta Leigh, and was living in London in 1831.
Pietro Gamba (1801-1827)
The brother of Teresa Guiccioli and member of Carbonieri. He followed Byron to Greece and
left a memoir of his experiences.
Mr. Gill (d. 1824)
The foreman of William Parry's munitions factory at Missolonghi; they had previously
worked together as shipwrights. William Henry Humphreys reports that he was with Trelawny
in the cave of Odysseas Androutsos and that he died of disease in Napoli in the autumn of
1824.
Henry Hesketh (1836 fl.)
English philhellene; after service with Admiral Cochrane in South American he was Byron's
aide-de-camp at Missolonghi; he was afterwards agent for the South Australian
Company.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.
Lord Charles Murray (1799-1824)
The youngest son of John Murray, fourth duke of Atholl; he died of disease at Gastouni
while fighting for the Greek Revolution.
William Parry (1773-1859)
Military engineer at Missolonghi; he was author of
The Last Days of
Lord Byron (1825).
Lieutenant Sass (d. 1824)
Finnish soldier who served in the Swedish and Swiss armies before taking up arms against
the Turks, originally with a German troop; he was murdered by the Suliotes at
Missolonghi.
Leicester Fitzgerald Charles Stanhope, fifth earl of Harrington (1784-1862)
The third son of the third earl; in 1823 he traveled to Greece as the Commissioner of the
London Greek Committee; there he served with Byron, whom he criticizes in
Greece in 1823 and 1824 (1824). He inherited the earldom from his brother in
1851.
Dr. Thomas (1824 fl.)
English physician at Zante who treated Byron in his last days.
Heinrich Treiber (1830 fl.)
A German physician who travelled to Greece in 1821 and assisted Julius Millingen in
Byron's brigade at Missolonghi; after the Revolution he became an officer in the Greek
army. A Greek translation of his diary was published in 1960.
Mr. Winter (d. 1824)
An artisan working at William Parry's munitions laboratory at Missolonghi; he died a
suicide.
The Westminster Review. (1824-1914). A radically-inclined quarterly founded by James Mill in opposition to the
Edinburgh Review and
Quarterly Review.