The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter VII
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
CHAPTER VII.
TRAITS OF CHARACTER IN LORD BYRON.
Lord Byron’s partiality for practical jokes—Mode of curing
ill-timed gallantry—An artificial earthquake—His shooting amusements—Greek
scolds—His motley regiment—His description of it—Punishment of
polygamy—Lord Byron’s frankness—Tells
Prince Mavrocordato I had abused him—Adventure with the Turkish
women—Anecdote of a Greek peasant woman.
In this chapter I shall bring together a few of Lord Byron’s familiar acts, illustrative of his character.
It may be as well to remind the reader before he peruses them, of the noble birth and neglected
education of Lord Byron. Should he at the same time be acquainted with the
conduct in general of young men of Lord Byron’s rank, he will not I
think find much to censure in some of the practical but harmless jokes
he sometimes played off on others. I mean not to defend such practices, on principle, and I
think nothing is more deserving of reprobation, than for a man in any situation to sport with
the feelings of those who dare not retaliate. If Lord Byron was in one
instance guilty of this, he may well be excused by the
152 | MODE OF CURING GALLANTRY. | |
example of others; and he had what they have not, both
talents and virtues to redeem his faults. He was at his death only a young man, and had not
lost all those buoyant and fervid spirits which distinguished his youth. In Greece, though he
was surrounded with difficulties, they grew not out of his own conduct, and could not be
removed by his efforts. He might have left the country, and thus have escaped from them, but
this his pride or his honour forbade; and we cannot severely condemn him for sometimes having
recourse to a species of amusement to forget them, which, under other circumstances, no man
would approve of. The following specimens of these practical jokes may perhaps satisfy the
reader’s curiosity.
One of Lord Byron’s household had
on more than one occasion involved himself and his master in perplexity and trouble by his
unrestrained attachment to women. In Greece this had been very annoying, and induced
Lord Byron to think of a means of curing it. A young Suliote of the
guard was accordingly dressed up like a woman, and instructed to place himself in the way of
the amorous swain. The bait took, and after some communication, had rather by signs than by
words, for the pair did not understand each other’s language, the sham lady was carefully
conducted by the gallant to one of Lord Byron’s
| AN ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKE. | 153 |
apartments. Here the couple were surprised
by an enraged Suliote, an husband provided for the occasion, accompanied by half a dozen of his
comrades, whose presence and threats terrified the poor lacquey almost out of his senses. The
noise of course brought Lord Byron to the spot, to laugh at the tricked
serving man, and rescue him from the effects of his terror.
A few days after the earthquake, which took place on February 21st, as we
were all sitting at table in the evening, we were suddenly alarmed by a noise and a shaking of
the house, somewhat similar to that which we had experienced when the earthquake occurred. Of
course all started from their places, and there was the same kind of confusion as on the former
evening, at which Byron, who was present, laughed
immoderately; we were re-assured by this, and soon learnt that the whole was a method he had
adopted to sport with our fears.
Over the room where we were sitting, he had placed a number of Suliotes,
who had been instructed, at a given signal, to catch hold of the rafters and jump on the floor
with all their weight, so as to shake the house. They were on this point ready pupils, and
effectually accomplished Lord Byron’s wishes, by
frightening the whole of the persons not let into the secret.
I have been accused of gaining an influence
154 | AN ARTIFICIAL EARTHQUAKE. | |
over Lord Byron, by
submitting to be his butt. The accusation is as injurious to his character as to mine; and,
probably, as, I cannot deny that I was one of the persons with whom he thus sported on this
occasion, it is on this circumstance that the accusation is founded. But I did not submit to
this practical joke without making those remonstrances, threatening to quit his
Lordship’s service, if such jokes were repeated, which were the only arms I could use. I
may say, being a veteran in the service, that when dangers are to be encountered which courage
enables a man to surmount, I am not defective in this moral quality; but I am yet to learn if
it be disgraceful to be terrified at so unlooked-for and so overwhelming a calamity; I am yet
to learn if it be disgraceful to hasten from crumbling buildings, and seek that safety which
flight may, but which nothing else can give. I own that I thought then, as I think now, that
this was carrying a joke somewhat too far; for perhaps of all visitations an earthquake, from
its suddenness, from the almost impossibility of escape, and from the wide-spread devastation
it occasions, scarcely sparing the reason of those who witness it and survive, is the most
terrific. If there be in nature one legitimate source for a panic, it must be the apprehension
of an earthquake. We had all seen the ruins of one at Zante, we had heard of another at Aleppo,
and consequently in Greece, a more unfit subject
for a joke like the one I have described, cannot be conceived. So I told Lord Byron; and I have reason to believe, if he had before met
with similar reproof, when he indulged in similar tricks, he would never have incurred the
disgrace which belongs to him for this.
Opposite to Lord Byron’s quarters
was a house built in the Turkish fashion, having little turrets, on the top of which were a
number of small ornaments. The house was inhabited chiefly by women. One of Lord
Byron’s most frequent amusements was to shoot at these ornaments with his
pistols; and he was so expert, that he seldom missed. Before his death the house was entirely
stripped of all its honours. Every time he fired however, the report brought forth some of the
women, who scolded most vehemently in the Greek language, proving, as he said, that it had not
lost any of its Billingsgate since the time of Homer’s heroes. The women seemed glad of the opportunity of giving free
license to their tongues, and Byron said he liked so much to hear and see
them, that he would not be without the sport for a considerable sum.
The regiment, or rather the brigade we formed, can be described only as he
himself described it. There was a Greek tailor, who had been in the British service in the
Ionian islands, where he
156 | MOTLEY NATURE OF THE BRIGADE. | |
had married an
Italian woman. This lady knowing something of the military service, petitioned Lord Byron to appoint her husband master-tailor of the brigade.
The suggestion was useful, and this part of her petition was immediately granted. At the same
time however she solicited that she might be permitted to raise a corps of women, to be placed
under her orders, to accompany the regiment. She stipulated for free quarters and rations for
them, but rejected all claim for pay. They were to be free of all incumbrances, and were to
wash, sew, cook, and otherwise provide for the men. The proposition pleased Lord
Byron, and stating the matter to me, said he hoped I should have no objection. I
had been accustomed to see women accompany the English army, and I knew that though sometimes
an incumbrance, they were on the whole more beneficial than otherwise. In Greece there were
many circumstances, which would make their services extremely valuable, and I gave my consent
to the measure. The tailor’s wife did accordingly recruit a considerable number of
unincumbered women, of almost all nations, but principally Greeks, Italians, Maltese, and
negresses. “I was afraid,” said Lord Byron, “when I
mentioned this matter to you, you would be crusty, and oppose it,—it is the very thing.
Let me see, my corps outdoes Falstaff’s: there | PUNISHMENT FOR POLYGAMY. | 157 |
are English, Germans, French, Maltese,
Ragusians, Italians, Neapolitans, Transylvanians, Russians, Suliotes, Moreotes, and Western
Greeks, in front, and to bring up the rear, the tailor’s wife and her troop. Glorious
Apollo! no general had ever before such an army.”
Lord Byron had a black groom with him in Greece, an American
by birth, to whom he was very partial*. He always insisted on this man’s calling him
Massa, whenever he spoke to him. On one occasion, the groom met with two women of his own
complexion, who had been slaves to the Turks and liberated, but had been left almost to starve
when the Greeks had risen on their tyrants. Being of the same colour was a bond of sympathy
between them and the groom, and he applied to me to give both these women quarters in the
seraglio. I granted the application, and mentioned it to Lord Byron, who
laughed at the gallantry of his groom, and ordered that he should be brought before him at ten
o’clock the next day, to answer for his presumption in making such an application.
At ten o’clock accordingly he attended his master with great
trembling and fear, but stuttered so when he attempted to speak, that he could not make himself
understood; Lord Byron endeavouring, almost in vain, to
preserve his
* This man died in London a short time back. |
158 | SENTENCE ON HIS BLACK GROOM. | |
gravity, reproved him severely for his
presumption. Blacky stuttered a thousand excuses, and was ready to do any thing to appease his
massa’s anger. His great yellow eyes wide open, he trembling from head to foot, his
wandering and stuttering excuses, his visible dread, all tended to provoke laughter, and
Lord Byron, fearing his own dignity would be hove overboard, told him
to hold his tongue, and listen to his sentence. I was commanded to enter it in his memorandum
book, and then he pronounced in a solemn tone of voice, while blacky stood aghast, expecting
some severe punishment, the following doom. “My determination is, that the children born
of these black women, of which you may be the father, shall be my property, and I will maintain
them. What say you?” “Go—Go—God bless you, massa, may you live great
while,” stuttered out the groom, and sallied forth to tell the good news to the two
distressed women.
Lord Byron was a remarkably sincere and frank man, and
harboured no thought concerning another he did not express to him. Whatever he had to say of or
against any man, that he said, on the first opportunity, openly, and to his face. Neither could
he bear concealment in others. If one person were to speak of a third party in his presence, he
would be sure to repeat
| Lord Byron’s Frankness | 159 |
it the first
time the two opponents were in presence of one another. This was a habit of which his
acquaintance were well aware, and it spared Lord Byron the trouble of
listening to a mob of idle and degrading calumnies. He probably expected by it, to teach others
that sincerity he prized so highly; at the same time, he was not insensible to pleasure, at
seeing the confusion of the party exposed.
This trait in his Lordship’s character has been mentioned by some of
his biographers with dispraise, as a proof of weakness, and even treachery. But I believe
Lord Byron never betrayed any confidence, he only
exposed tattling calumniators, to prove or retract their accusations in the presence of the
party calumniated. Those who have most complained of this trait, have been insincere men, bred
up in what are called polite habits, which mainly consist in telling falsehoods to a
man’s face to flatter him, and telling falsehoods behind his back, to make him appear
ridiculous; such hollow fashionable insincerity, Lord Byron delighted to
expose. Many such instances are not before the public, because the individual dear Friends
concerned have not been very willing to let the world into the secret of their friendships.
They have been contented with blaming this part of his Lordship’s character, and have
wished it to be in-
ferred that he betrayed some
confidence, while he only exposed the hollowness of fashionable lying, and the mutual
insincerity and hatred of some very dear, but pretended friends.
I may give an instance of this part of Lord
Byron’s character, in which I was implicated. At the time, I confess, I
was extremely indignant, but I have since thought the proceeding was calculated to effect two
admirable ends. To me, were it in my nature to be prudent and discreet, it might have taught
caution and discretion. To Prince Mavrocordato and the
Greeks, it probably conveyed a lesson, which Lord Byron could have found
no better means of giving them; and were it possible by teaching to make them energetic and
provident, it might have shewed them that these were qualities in which, according to the
opinions of others, they were deficient.
When the Turkish fleet was lying off Cape Papa, blockading Missolonghi, I
was one day ordered by Lord Byron to accompany him to the
mouth of the harbour to inspect the fortifications, in order to make a report on the state they
were in. He and I were in his own punt, a little boat which he had, rowed by a boy; and in a
large boat, accompanying us, were Prince Mavrocordato
and his attendants. As I was viewing, on one hand, the Turkish fleet attentively, and
reflecting on its powers, and our means of de-
| CENSURE OF MAVROCORDATO. | 161 |
fence; and looking on the other, at Prince Mavrocordato and his
attendants, perfectly unconcerned, smoking their pipes and gossiping, as if Greece were
liberated and at peace, and Missolonghi in a state of complete security; I could not help
giving vent to a feeling of contempt and indignation.
“What is the matter,” said his Lordship, appearing to be very serious,
“what makes you so angry, Parry?”
“I am not angry,” I replied, “my Lord, but somewhat
indignant. The Turks, if they were not the most stupid wretches breathing, might take the fort
of Vasaladi, by means of two pinnaces, any night they pleased; they have only to approach it
with muffled oars, they will not be heard, I will answer for their not being seen, and they may
storm it in a few minutes. With eight gun-boats properly armed with 24-pounders, they might
batter both Missolonghi and Anatolica to the ground. And there sits the old gentlewoman,
Prince Mavrocordato and his troop, to whom I applied
an epithet I will not here repeat, as if they were all perfectly safe. They know their means of
defence are inadequate, and they have no means of improving them. If I were in their place, I
should be in a fever at the thought of my own incapacity and ignorance, and I should burn with
impatience to attempt the destruction
162 | LORD BYRON EXPOSES ME. | |
of those
stupid Turkish rascals. The Greeks and the Turks are opponents, worthy by their imbecility, of
each other.”
I had scarcely explained myself fully, when his Lordship ordered our boat
to be placed alongside the other, and actually related our whole conversation to the Prince. In
doing it however, he took on himself the task of pacifying both the Prince and me, and though I
was at first very angry, and the Prince I believe, very much annoyed, he succeeded. Mavrocordato afterwards shewed no dissatisfaction with me, and
I prized Lord Byron’s regard too much, to remain long
displeased with a proceeding which was only an unpleasant manner of reproving us both.
Lord Byron was very fond of talking with me on national
character and national peculiarities, and seemed, from the manner in which he combated my
English prejudices,—and which, I confess, are very strong, for I love England, and am
proud of the name of an Englishman,—to delight in the praises of his native land. Of
Lord Byron’s writings, and the sentiments expressed in them, I
give no opinion, but I am sure that, in his heart, he was an Englishman, and warmly and deeply
attached to his country. In one of these conversations, some of which are reported in another
place, I had maintained, that there were no other people in the world, but Englishmen, whose
eyes
| ANECDOTE OF TURKISH WOMEN. | 163 |
ever filled with tears of sympathy at
hearing a well-told pathetic tale, or at witnessing distress. Of course it pleased his Lordship
to contend against this opinion, and to say that he was an Englishman, and quite unaccustomed
to shed tears on any such occasion. I told him I was sure of the contrary, and that I should at
some time or other detect him weeping over distress he could not relieve, or with pleasure at
having relieved it. My prediction was verified.
On one occasion he had saved twenty-four Turkish women and children from
slavery and all its accompanying horrors. I was summoned to attend him and receive his orders,
that every thing should be done which might contribute to their comfort. He was seated on a
cushion at the upper end of the room, the women and children were standing before him, with
their eyes fixed steadily on him, and on his right hand was his interpreter, who was extracting
from the women a narrative of their sufferings. One of them, apparently about thirty years of
age, possessing great vivacity, and whose manners and dress, though she was then dirty and
disfigured, indicated that she was superior, in rank and condition to her companions, was
spokeswoman for the whole. I admired the good order the others preserved, never interfering
with the explanation or interrupting the single
164 | LORD BYRON’S STRONG FEELINGS. | |
speaker. I also admired the rapid manner in which
the interpreter explained every thing they said, so as to make it almost appear that there was
but one speaker.
After a short time it was evident that what Lord
Byron was hearing affected his feelings, his countenance changed, his colour
went and came, and I thought he was ready to weep. But he had on all occasions a ready and
peculiar knack in turning conversation from any disagreeable or unpleasant subject; and he had
recourse to this expedient. He rose up suddenly, and turning round on his heel, as was his
wont, he said something quickly to his interpreter, who immediately repeated it to the women.
All eyes were instantly fixed on me, and one of the party, a young and beautiful woman, spoke
very warmly. Lord Byron seemed satisfied, and said they might retire. The
women all slipped off their shoes in an instant, and going up to his Lordship, each in
succession, accompanied by their children, kissed his hand fervently, invoked, in the Turkish
manner, a blessing both on his head and heart, and then quitted the room. This was too much for
Lord Byron, and he turned his face away to conceal his emotion. When
he had recovered a little, I reminded him of our conversation, and I told him I had caught him
at last. Addressing me in the sort of sea
| KINDNESS OF A PEASANT. | 165 |
slang
I sometimes talked to him, and which he liked to repeat, he replied. “You are right,
old boy; you have got me in the bunt—I am an
Englishman.”
I afterwards understood, that when Lord Byron had so
suddenly changed the topic of conversation, he made the interpreter tell the females that I
wanted to form a seraglio, and was looking out for pretty women. The young person I have
mentioned, who seemed sensible that she was most concerned in this, inquired vehemently if I
were a Greek, and protested if I were, she would suffer instant death rather than submit.
Perhaps what Lord Byron said to these unfortunate persons
may appear somewhat unfeeling to the reader. I shall however beg leave to remind him of the
Turkish mode of wooing, that the phrase “forming a
seraglio,” is merely tantamount “to taking a
wife,” and that under ordinary circumstances, a young Turkish female would probably
hear it with the same sort of pleasure that one of our fair countrywomen would learn that a
favourite swain was soliciting for the honour of her hand.
Whether the following little anecdote may be regarded as a proof of the
respect in which Lord Byron was held by the people, or only
of the natural kindness of the peasantry, I will not de-
cide; but as a mere specimen of their manner, it seems
worth mentioning.
He returned one day from his ride more than usually pleased. An
interesting countrywoman, with a fine family, had come out of her cottage and presented him
with a curd cheese and some honey, and could not be persuaded to accept of payment for it.
“I have felt,” he said, “more pleasure this day, and at this
circumstance, than for a long time past.” Then describing to me where he had seen
her, he ordered me to find her out, and make her a present in return. “The
peasantry,” he said, “are by far the most kind, humane, and honest part of the
population; they redeem the character of their countrymen. The other classes are so debased
by slavery; accustomed, like all slaves, never to speak truth, but only what will please
their masters, that they cannot be trusted. Greece would not be worth saving but for the
peasantry.”
Lord Byron then sat down to his cheese, and insisted on our
partaking of his fare. A bottle of porter was sent for and broached, that we might join
Byron in drinking health and happiness to the kind family which had
procured him so great a pleasure.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.