The Last Days of Lord Byron
Chapter VIII
THE
LAST DAYS
OF
LORD BYRON:
WITH HIS
LORDSHIP’S OPINIONS ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS,
PARTICULARLY ON THE
STATE AND PROSPECTS OF GREECE.
BY WILLIAM PARRY,
MAJOR OF LORD BYRON’S BRIGADE, COMMANDING OFFICER OF ARTILLERY,
AND ENGINEER IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREEKS.
“Lord Byron awoke in half an hour. I wished to go to him, but I had
not the heart.
Mr. Parry went, and Byron knew him again, and squeezed his hand,
and tried to
express his last wishes.”—Count Gamba’s Narrative.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR KNIGHT AND LACEY,
PATERNOSTER-ROW;
AND WESTLEY AND TYRRELL, DUBLIN.
MDCCCXXV.
CHAPTER VIII.
LORD BYRON’S OPINIONS AND INTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO GREECE.
His injunctions to speak the truth as to
Greece—His anxiety not to be instrumental in deluding the people of England—Claims
the cause of Greece has on our sympathy—Country and people of Greece—Disadvantage
of their character as insurgents—No plan or system amongst them—What form of
government they should adopt—A federation of states—People give energy to
government—Presidents of the Greek government—Peasantry—Poverty and
intelligence of the Greeks—Greece might spread a revolution to Hindostan—Character
of the Greek chiefs—Lord Byron’s final intentions as to
Greece—Purity of his ambition.
One of the sentiments constantly uppermost in Lord Byron’s mind, and affording decisive evidence how
deeply he felt his own disappointment, was caution in not lending himself to deceive others.
Over and over again did he, in our conversations, dwell on the necessity of telling the people
of England the truth as to Greece; over and over again did he condemn the works which had been
published on the state of Greece. Lying, hypocritical publications he was accustomed to call
them, deceiving both the Greeks
168 | LORD BYRON MAKES NO FALSE REPORTS. | |
and the English. To tell the truth on every thing relating to Greece, was one of his most
frequent exhortations. It was his opinion that without English assistance, more particularly as
to money, the Greeks could not succeed; and he knew that if the English public were once
imposed on to a considerable amount, no assistance could afterwards be expected, and Greece
would either return under the Turkish yoke, fall under the sceptre of some other barbarian
Power, or remain for many years the prey of discord and anarchy. While the loan was
negotiating, and after it was contracted for, he frequently congratulated himself that he had
never written a single line to induce his countrymen to subscribe to it; and that they must
hold him perfectly guiltless, should they afterwards lose their money, of having in any way
contributed to delude them. “I hope,” he was accustomed to say, “this
government which has enough on its hands, will behave so as not to injure its credit. I
have not in any way encouraged the people of England to lend their money. I don’t
understand loan-jobbing, and I should make a sorry appearance in writing home lying
reports*.”
* This cautious conduct may perhaps excite some suspicions in the mind of
those who have subscribed to the Greek loan; or who are now holders of Greek bonds.
Lord Byron, even when his existence was of such
material service in assisting
|
Lord Byron undertook to instruct me in the nature of Greek society, and
his opinions being intended to guide my conduct, on which his own welfare, in some measure,
depended, there can be no doubt of his perfect sincerity. He, of all modern English travellers,
was probably the best capable of giving a correct opinion on this subject; and what he said is
therefore particularly deserving of attention. It is so much opposed also to what might be
expected from the poet of Greece, so completely free from all
the Greeks, concluded, I suppose, that the chances
for the payment either of the principal or the interest of the loan were not great, and
therefore he congratulated himself that he had been in no wise instrumental in
persuading, by any sort of representations, the people of this country to lend their
money to the Greeks. Since Lord Byron’s death,
however, though they have met with some terrible disasters, their government seems to
have triumphed over its domestic opponents, and to be now more than ever in a fair way
of uniting all the Greeks in the pursuit of the one great object. The Turkish power
also is evidently growing weaker, and cannot sustain even against this feeble opponent
a protracted contest. When we see the ill-organized state of Turkey, the anarchy of its
councils, the discontent of its soldiers, and the rebellion of its chiefs, our wonder
is rather excited that so much time should have elapsed before the Greeks have
completely achieved their independence! than that they should have struggled so long.
This is partly explained by the division among their chiefs; and by some circumstances,
not to the honour of some individuals in our country, which will be adverted to
subsequently. |
170 | COUNTRY AND POPULATION. | |
romance and delusion, that it was plainly the
dictate of close observation and mature reason.
“The cause of Greece,” said Lord Byron,
“naturally excites our sympathy. The very name of the country is associated in our
minds with all that is exalted in virtue, or delightful in art. From it we have derived our
knowledge, and under the guiding hand of its wisdom, did modern Europe make its first
tottering and feeble steps towards civilization. In every mind at all embued with
knowledge, she is regarded with the affection of a parent. Her people are Christians
contending against Turks, and slaves struggling to be free. There never was a cause which,
in this outline view of the matter, had such strong and commanding claims on the sympathy
of the people of all Europe, and particularly of the people of England. But we must not at
the same time forget what is the present state of the Greek population.
“We must not forget, though we speak of Greece and the Greeks,
that there is no distinct country and no distinct people. There is no country, except the
Islands, with a strongly-marked boundary separating it from other countries, either by
physical properties, or by the manners and language of the people which we can properly
call Greece. The boundaries of ancient Greece are not the boundaries of modern Greece,
| GREEKS ARE INSURGENTS. | 171 |
or of the countries inhabited by those to
whom we give the name of Greeks. The different tribes of men, also, to whom we give this
one general name, seem to have little or nothing in common more than the same faith and the
same hatred of the Turks, their oppressors. There is the wily money-making Greek of the
islands, the debased, intriguing, and corrupted Greek of the towns on the continent, and
there is the hardy Greek peasant, whose good qualities are the redeeming virtues of the
whole population. Under their chiefs and primates, under their captains and magistrates,
they are now divided by more local jealousies, and more local distinctions, than in the
days of their ancient glory, when Greece had no enemies but Greeks. We must not suppose
under our name of Greeks, an entire, united, and single people, kept apart from all others
by strongly-marked geographical or moral distinctions. On the contrary, those who are now
contending for freedom are a mixed race of various tribes of men, having different apparent
interests, and different opinions. Many of them differ from and hate one another, more even
than they differ from and hate the Turks, to whose maxims of government and manners some of
them, particularly the primates, are much attached. It is quite erroneous, therefore, to
172 | INSURRECTION CAUSES DISSENSIONS. | |
suppose under the name of
Greece, one country, or under the name of Greeks, one people.
“The people whom we have come to assist have also the name of
insurgents, and however just their cause, or enlightened their own view of the principles
on which they contend, they must and will be considered by the government of Europe as
insurgents, with all the disadvantages belonging to the name, till they are completely
successful. At the beginning of the insurrection, all the Turks in authority and their
adherents were indiscriminately massacred, their property plundered, and their power,
where-ever the insurrection was successful, annihilated. Their places of worship were
destroyed; the storks, a bird they reverence with a sort of idolatry, were everywhere shot,
that no remembrance except hatred of the Turkish name, should exist in the country. Such
acts are the natural consequences of long-suffering, particularly among men who have some
traditional knowledge of the high renown of their ancestors; but they have not contributed
to soften the Greek character; nor has the plunder of their masters failed to sow for the
time the seeds of dissension and ambition among themselves. The insurrection was literally
a slave breaking his chains on the head of his oppressor; but in es-
| GOVERNMENT RECOMMENDED. | 173 |
caping from bondage, the Greeks acted without a plan.
There was no system of insurrection organized, and the people, after the first flushing of
their hatred was over, were easily stirred up to animosity against each other, and they
fell again under the dominion of some ambitious chiefs, who had before been either the
soldiers or the civil agents of the Pachas. They now want all the energy and the unity
derived from an organized system of government, taming some of the passions and directing
others to the public good. Time will bring such a system; for a whole nation can profit by
no other teacher. A system of government must and will arise suitable to the knowledge and
the wants of the people, and the relations which now exist among the different classes of
them.
“I do not mean to say that they are not to profit by the
experience of other people; on the contrary I would have them acquire all the knowledge
they can, but they cannot be a book-learned people for ages;—they cannot for ages
have that knowledge and that equality amongst them which are found in Europe, and therefore
I would not recommend them to follow implicitly any system of government now established in
the world, or to square their institutions by the theoretical forms of any constitution. I
am still so much attached to the constitution
of England personally, that were it to be attacked,—were any attempts made by any
faction or party at home to put down its ancient and honourable aristocracy, I would be one
of the first to uphold their cause with my life and fortune. At the same time I would not
recommend that constitution to another country. It is the duty of every honourable man to
assist every nation and every individual, as far as he can, in obtaining rational freedom,
but before we can do this we must know in what freedom consists.
“In the United States of America there is more practical freedom,
and a form of government both abstractedly better and more suited to the situation of the
Greeks than any other model I know of. From what I have already said of the different
interests and divisions which prevail in Greece, it is to me plain that no other government
will suit it so well as a federation. I will not say a federation of republics; but a
federation of states; each of these states having that particular form of government most
suitable to the present situation and wishes of its people. There is no abstract form of
government which we can call good. I won’t say with Pope, that “whate’er is best administered is
best;” but I will say, that every government derives its efficiency as well
as its power from the people. Despotism cannot exist where they are not sluggish,
inert, insensible to political rights, and
careless of any thing but animal enjoyment. Neither can freedom flourish where they confide
implicitly in one class of men, and where they are not one and all watchful to protect
themselves, and prevent both individual and general encroachment.
“In the Islands and on the Continent wealth and power are very
differently distributed, and the governments are conducted on different principles. It
would be absurd, therefore, and perhaps impossible, to give the islands and the continent
the same sort of government. I say, therefore, the Grecian confederation must be one of
states, and not of republics. Any attempt of an individual or of any one state to gain
supremacy will bring on civil war and destruction. At the same time the federation might
have a head like the United States of America. Each state might be represented in a
congress, and a president elected every four years in succession, from one of the three or
four great divisions of the whole federation. The Morea might choose the first president,
the second might be elected by the Islands, Western Greece might select the third, and
should Candia be united with Greece, which is necessary for the permanent independence of
the whole, its inhabitants should in their turn elect a fourth president. On some plan of
this kind a federation of the States of Greece might
176 | EFFECTS OF CIVILIZATION. | |
be formed, and it would be recommended to the Greeks by
bearing some faint resemblance to the federation of their glorious ancestors; but any
attempt to introduce one uniform system of government in every part of the country, however
excellent in principle, will only embroil the different classes, generating anarchy, and
ending in slavery.
“No system of government in any part of Greece can be permanent,
which does not leave in the hands of the peasantry the chief part of the political power.
They are warmly attached to their country, and they are the best portion of the people.
Under a government in the least degree equitable, they must increase rapidly both in
numbers and wealth; and unless they are now placed, in a political point of view, on an
equality with other classes, it will soon be necessary to oppress them. They are not now
sensible of their own importance, but they soon will be under a Greek government, and they
can only be retained in obedience by gaining over their affections.
“Though the situation and climate of Greece are admirable, it has
been impossible for the country to prosper under the yoke of the Turks. Their idleness,
ignorance, oppression, and hostility to improvement, have nearly excluded the Greeks from
any participation in the general progress
| CHARACTER OF THE GREEK CHIEFS. | 177 |
of civilization. Where they have had the least
opportunity of gaining either knowledge or wealth, they have eagerly embraced it. The
inhabitants of the Islands are much better informed than those of the continent, and they
are the most skilful as well as the boldest seamen, and the most acute traders, to be found
in the whole course of the Mediterranean. The people are naturally as intelligent as their
ancestors, but they have been debased and brutified by the tyrannical government of the
Turks. Now there is some hope of their living under a better system, they will soon become
both industrious and enterprising. Not only will they be more happy and flourishing as a
nation, but having within them the elements of improvement, they must increase in power as
the Turkish empire decays. There are numerous tribes in Asia connected with them by
language and manners; which would be incorporated with them in their progress, and they
might extend European civilization through the ancient empire of Cyrus and Xerxes, till they again met
on the borders of Hindostan with those people who held out to them the right hand of
fellowship in their first struggles for freedom and independence. This is what Greece might
do, what in fact she formerly did. Not that I want to see the Greeks gaining power by
conquest, they have territory enough;
but, as I have said, the divisions among her different tribes, the want of unity in their
views, the discord of her chieftains, are now so great that I am afraid all we can
rationally hope for is, that by dint of hard fighting against the Turks in summer, and
quarrelling among themselves in winter, they may preserve a troublesome sort of national
independence till the Turkish empire crumbles into ruins. They may then have a chance of
forming a distinguished province of some one of those mighty European monarchies which seem
destined gradually to supplant the despotisms of Asia with a more regular and milder
despotism.
“The Greek chiefs taken collectively,” said Lord
Byron, “are a very respectable body of men. With one of them,
Londa, I am particularly acquainted. I stopped
at his house for some time when I was formerly in Greece, and he would not accept of a para for the trouble and expense I put him to. He presented me also
with a very pretty horse at my departure. (This I shall not forget). The only chiefs who
are particularly suspected of ambitious views are Colocotroni and Ulysses.
Colocotroni, I am informed, was a captain in the Greek light
infantry in the Ionian Islands; and at the commencement of the Greek contest, went over to
the Morea with a number of adventurers. Whilst there was Turkish property to plunder, and
whilst he could exact supplies from the poor
peasantry, his force was respectably kept up. Of himself he has taken good care, having
forwarded to the Islands, for his own private use, all the plunder he has been able to
amass. He is said to have acquired great wealth. Except the power this may give him, and it
will keep him afloat for some time, he will soon exhaust his resources. The peasantry are
now bare: he has swept their houses cleaner than ever the Turks did; and his mercenary
followers, finding they can get nothing more under his standard, will soon leave him. Mark my word, Napoli di Romania will soon be evacuated by him; and
either the Greek cause will not flourish, or he will fail.
“Ulysses is suspected by the
Greek government. A short time back two messengers were sent to him with orders from the
government, and he put them both to death. He has been a robber, and was brought up in the
service of Ali Pacha; both which circumstances excite
suspicion. These difficulties will probably be surmounted when the government gets funds,
for it is quite true in Greece that he who has money has power. I have experienced this
since my arrival, and have had offers* that would surprise you were I to tell
* I should have left this part of the subject in the obscurity of
the text, had I not seen it stated in the “London Magazine,” I think, that Lord Byron had a bad motive for his exertions in the
cause of Greece. It is insinuated that he was ac- |
you of them, and which would turn the head of any
man less satiated than I am, and more desirous of possessing power than of contributing to
freedom and happiness.
“To all these offers, and to every application
tuated by the vulgar ambition of a conqueror,
and wished to be something like a king in Greece. No insinuation was ever more
unfounded. He had offers of this kind made to him, but he refused. With his
pecuniary resources, such is the mercenary disposition of the Greeks, it was, I am
persuaded, only necessary for him to have devoted his fortune to the purpose, and
he could have formed an army that would have incorporated in it all that was brave
and ambitious in Greece. No single chieftain could have resisted; and all of them
would have been obliged, because they could not trust one another, to join their
forces with his. The whole of the Suliotes were completely at his beck. He could
have commanded and procured the assassination of any man in Greece for a sum too
trifling to mention. The task would have been full of danger undoubtedly, but what
attempt to gain such power is not? It was not however beyond his abilities, had his
inclination inclined him to undertake it. He was too certain of commanding the
respect of mankind by his admirable talents, to hunt after their admiration by any
kind of vulgar atrocity. He never wished to possess political power in Greece,
though he fought for her freedom; and he might have been the head man of the
country, had he chosen to oppose the government. That he was sensible of his power is quite evident from what he
frequently said to me. “Any man who had money,” he said, “may
arrogate consequence to himself. What prevents me, if I were so minded, from
forming a large military force in Greece. I might send to England and procure a
set of veteran practical non-commissioned officers and practical mechanics, by
whose
|
| ADVICE TO THE GOVERNMENT. | 181 |
made to me, which had a tendency to
provoke disputes or increase discord, I have always replied, I came here to serve Greece;
agree among yourselves for the good of your country, and whatever is your united resolve,
and whatever the government commands, I shall be ready to support with my fortune and my
sword. I am here to act against the external enemies and tyrants of Greece and will not
take part with any faction in the country. We who come here to fight for Greece have no
right to meddle with its internal affairs, or dictate to the people and government; since I
have been here, I have seen and felt quite enough to try the temper of any man, but I will
remain here, while there is a gleam of hope.
“Much is expected from the loan, and I know that without money it
is impossible to succeed, but I am apprehensive this foreign assistance will be looked on
by each of the chiefs, as a prize to be obtained by contention, and may lead to a civil
means, and my own resources, I could set many things in motion. If I had only
men to teach the Greeks some of the necessary arts, and were able to supply
their want of warlike stores, I could find plenty of men; and an army might be
at my command. The fortifications I could repair so as to make them secure
against all attacks. The navy I could set afloat, and if I liked, have my own
way in Greece; but I repeat I came here to serve the Greeks on their own
conditions and in their own way, and I will not swerve while life remains from
this intention.” |
182 | MR. CANNING AND GREECE. | |
war. The government, which has contracted
for the loan, looks with no favourable eye on Colocotroni and Ulysses, and yet they
are, probably, two of the bravest and most skilful of the military chieftains. I have
advised Mavrocordato to recommend the government to
supply these chiefs with money, but to keep them as short as possible. I have also
recommended him, and if this advice is followed, much good may be effected, immediately on
the receipt of the loan, to pay up the arrears of the troops, particularly of the Suliotes,
and to take care that their families are provided for. They are the best mountain-soldiers
in Greece, and perhaps in the world; but they are without a country, and without a home. I
know that an offer has been made, to restore them to their former country, if they will
forsake the Greek cause, and I see no means of firmly attaching them to it, but to pay them
regularly, and, by providing for their families, to secure hostages for their continued
services.
“Mr. Canning may do much
for Greece; I hope he will continue in office. He is a clever man, and has an opportunity
beyond all his predecessors, of effecting great things. The ball is at his feet, but he
must keep a high hand, and neither swerve to the right nor left. South America will give
him an opportunity of acting on sound principles; on this point he will not be shackled.
The
great mechanical power of England, her
vast ingenuity, gives him the control of the world; but the very existence of
England’s superiority hangs on the balance of his decision. This minister bears all
the responsibility. With respect to Greece it is different. The Turkish empire is our
barrier against the power of Russia. The Greeks, should they gain their independence, will
have quite sufficient territory in the Morea, Western Greece, and the islands.
“It will take a century to come, to change their character.
Canning I have no doubt will proceed with
caution—he can act strictly honourable to the Turks. I have no enmity to the Turks
individually, they are quite as good as the Greeks; I am displeased to hear them called
barbarians. They are charitable to the poor, and very humane to animals; their curse, is
the system of their government, and their religion or superstition.
“I hope England will keep possession of the Ionian Islands; with
them and Malta, she may preserve her naval superiority for ages to come.”
As the advances which Lord Byron had
made to the Greeks were to be paid out of the loan, he was on this account also anxious that
the money might arrive; otherwise his own resources and his own projects would be crippled.
When the money arrived, he would be at liberty, he said, to follow his own plans. He could
obtain what
184 | INTENDS TO GO TO AMERICA. | |
supplies he pleased from
Ancona, and then with his own brigade, the Suliotes, and the force to be put under his orders,
we should be fully competent to invest Lepanto, and take both it and Patrass. “This
shall be my first object,” he said, “at the beginning of the campaign; Patrass
and Lepanto being in our possession, the Morea will be secure, and we may think of more
offensive warfare.” For this particular service, his own brigade was to be ready,
as I have already stated, by May 7th.
“My future intentions, as to Greece may be explained in a few
words; I will remain here, till she is secure against the Turks, or till she has fallen
under their power. All my income shall be spent in her service, but unless driven by some
great necessity, I will not touch a farthing of the sum intended for my sister’s
children. Whatever I can accomplish with my income, and my personal exertions, shall be
cheerfully done. When Greece is secure against external enemies, I will leave the Greeks to
settle their government as they like. One service more, and an eminent service it will be,
I think I may perform for them. You shall have a schooner built for me, or I will buy a
vessel; the Greeks shall invest me with the character of their ambassador or agent; I will
go to the United States, and procure that free and enlightened government, to set the
example of
| PURITY OF HIS AMBITION. | 185 |
recognising the Federation of
Greece, as an independent state. This done, England must follow the example, and then the
fate of Greece will be permanently fixed, and she will enter into all her rights, as a
member of the great commonwealth of Christian Europe.”
This was Lord Byron’s hope, and
this was to be his last project in favour of Greece. Nothing, I think, within the power of an
individual to accomplish, could be better conceived, or would have tended more to the advantage
of Greece, than this simple and noble plan. Into it no motive of personal ambition entered,
more than that just and proper one, the basis of all virtue and the distinguished
characteristic of an honourable mind; the hope of gaining the approbation of good men. As an
author, he had already attained the pinnacle of popularity and of fame; but this did not
satisfy his noble ambition. He hastened to Greece, with a devotion to liberty, and a zeal in
favour of the oppressed, as pure as ever shone in the bosom of a knight, in the purest days of
chivalry, to gain the reputation of an unsullied warrior, and of a disinterested statesman. He
was her unpaid, but the blessings of all Greece, and the high honours his own countrymen bestow
on his memory, bearing him in their hearts, prove that he was not her unrewarded, champion.
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Literary Magnet
Vol. 4 (June 1825)
“More last words of John Baxter!” our readers will exclaim: we have already Medwin’s Conversations; Dallas’s Recollections; Gamba’s Residence; Childe Harolde’s Wanderings; and a host of others, in
all shapes and sizes, from the ponderous quarto, to the pigmy “pocket edition.” If
we required any further evidence of the extent of the illustrious subject’s talents, or
the probability of his immortality, than what his works are capable of bestowing, we should
regard the never-dying interest that is attached to every thing concerning him, as the
completest evidence of the permanency of his literary fame. Mr.
Parry writes in a bold seaman-like style, and his work bears with it a very
evident air of identity. In Medwin’s and
Dallas’s books, we have too much of the poet; in the volumes
before us, the man stands upright in the various lights and shades of his character. Lord Byron neither required the fulsome adulation of the Dragoon
Captain, nor the sage apologies of Mr. Dallas, to make us believe, that at
the bottom he was a really good, but dreadfully misled, man; and that had his life been spared,
there was no doubt but what the finer qualities of his soul would have endeared him to the
world which he so eminently adorned. From the intelligence Mr.
Parry’s book affords us, we entertain no doubt, that had medical aid been
procured at the period of the lamentable catastrophe, the life so dear to Greece, liberty, and
song, would have been saved. . . .
[Henry Southern],
“Personal Character of Lord Byron” in London Magazine
Vol. 10 (October 1824)
It is said that his intention was not to remain in
Greece,—that he determined to return after his attack of epilepsy. Probably it was only
his removal into some better climate that was intended. Certainly a more miserable and
unhealthy bog than Missolonghi is not to be found out of the fens of Holland, or the Isle of
Ely. He either felt or affected to feel a presentiment that he should die in Greece, and when
his return was spoken of, considered it as out of the question, predicting that the Turks, the
Greeks, or the Malaria, would effectually put an end to any designs he might have of returning.
At the moment of his seizure with the epileptic fits prior to his last illness, he was jesting
with Parry, an engineer sent out by the Greek committee,
who, by dint of being his butt, had got great power over him, and indeed, became every thing to
him. Besides this man there was Fletcher, who had lived with
him twenty years, and who was originally a shoemaker, whom his Lordship had picked up in the
village where he lived, at Newstead, and who, after attending him in some of his rural
adventures, became attached to his service: he had also a faithful Italian servant, Battista; a Greek secretary; and Count
Gamba seems to have acted the part of his Italian secretary. Lord
Byron spoke French very imperfectly, and Italian not correctly, and it was with
the greatest difficulty he could be prevailed upon to make attempts m a foreign language. He
would get any body about him to interpret for him, though he might know the language better
than his interpreter. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
This man now tells his story of what he saw and heard of Lord Byron’s behaviour and conversation while in Greece. He makes no
ridiculous professions of accuracy. He plainly says, the idea of noting down what
Lord Byron was pleased to say to him in private conversation never
once entered his head. But he adds, and who can doubt it, that finding himself thrown into
close contact of this sort with a man of Lord Byron’s extraordinary
genius and celebrity, whatever things of any importance were said by Lord
Byron did make a strong, an indelible impression on his mind. And, with-
out pretending to give the words—unless when there is something very
striking indeed about them—he does profess himself able and determined to give the
substance. We need, indeed, but little of such professions, to make us
believe, that the conversations which he relates did substantially take place between him
and Lord Byron. They carry the stamp of authenticity upon their front.
The man that said these things was a man of exquisite talent—of extraordinary reach
and compass of reflection—of high education and surpassing genius. This is enough for
us. Mr Parry is an excellent person in his own way,
but he is plainly as incapable of inventing these things, as if he had written himself down
on his title-page, “Author of Ahasuerus, a Poem.”
. . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Mavrocardato was, and is, universally admitted to be the
most accomplished of the Greek statesmen, and he was at this period the President of the
Provisionary Government; yet this agent of the Greek committee rates Major Parry, for giving Mavrocordato the
title by which he had always been distinguished, and which Lord
Byron, nay, even Sir Thomas Maitland,
never thought of refusing him. But this was not all. He openly took part with the faction
opposed to Mavrocordato and the existing Greek government; and why? Why,
because Mavrocordato, a man of sense and education, who has travelled in
Western Europe, and speaks her languages, and has read her books, was thoroughly aware of the
unfitness of a free press for Greece in her actual condition, and accordingly discountenanced
the setting up of a paper at Missolonghi; whereas Odysseus, a robber captain, in arms in reality against the Greek government as much
as against the Turks, had no objections to let Stanhope
print as many papers as he liked in Athens, which city the said Odysseus
refused, according to the language of Colonel Stanhope’s own eulogy,
“to surrender to a weak government;” in other words, was keeping possession of, in
opposition to the authorities which he had the year before sworn to
obey—the very authorities, too, be it observed, under which alone Colonel
Stanhope was at the time acting. Odysseus knew that his
wild barbarians could no more read a Greek newspaper than they could fly over Olympus, and
therefore he cared not what Stanhope printed, so he and his people got,
through Stanhope’s means, a part of the loans transmitted from
England, for the support of the Greek government and cause. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
These passages cannot, we think, fail to gratify our readers. The view
they give of Lord Byron’s kind, natural temper,
frank and engaging manners, and noble self-possession in the midst of all the irritations
of disease and disgust, must go far we think to convince the most sceptical, that the
epithet of Satanic was not the happiest which a contemporary poet
might have applied to the author of Child
Harold. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
The following is a most important passage indeed. In it we have Lord Byron
detailing, in a manner the sincerity of which it is impossible to doubt, his own views
concerning the ultimate prospects of Greece; and surely the exposition is such, that it could
have come from no mind in which sense, wisdom, and genius, were not equally inherent. It
is the only thing upon the subject that we have ever been able to think worth a second reading. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Our readers must turn to Mr Parry’s
own page for a great deal more of Lord Byron’s table
talk. They will find many sound English sentiments, even in regard to the English politics of
the day—they will find views as to America equally just and liberal—they will find
the most contemptuous allusions to the soi-disant
liberals with whom Lord Byron had come into personal
contact, such as old Cartwright, Leigh Hunt, &c.; and upon every occasion an open avowal of the deepest
respect for the aristocracy of Britain, which these poor creatures have spent their lives in
endeavouring to overthrow. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
Of all this, and also of the affecting narrative which Mr Parry gives of Lord
Byron’s last days, strictly so called, we shall quote nothing. The main
outline of his illness is already sufficiently before the public; and these new details are so
painful, that though we do not wish not to have read them, we certainly shall never torture
ourselves with reading them again. The spectacle of youth, and rank, and genius, meeting with
calm resolution the approach of death, under external circumstances of the most cheerless
description, may afford a lesson to us all! But Mr Parry has painted this
scene with far too rude a pencil; and, indeed, the print which he has inserted of Byron on his miserable bed, and almost in the agonies of death,
attended by Parry himself and Tita,
ought to be omitted in every future edition. It is obviously a got-up thing—a mere
eyetrap—and for one person whose diseased taste it pleases, will undoubtedly disgust a
thousand who ought to be acquainted with this book. . . .
[John Gibson Lockhart],
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 18
No. 103 (August 1825)
In order that our article may terminate pleasantly, we have reserved wherewithal
to wind it up, Parry’s description of an interview
which he had with the personage whom Colonel Stanhope
mentions as “the finest genius of the most enlightened age, the immortal Bentham.” We shall give the sailor’s rough sketch
of the Patriarch without note or comment—in truth it needs none; and, we have no doubt,
posterity will not disdain to hang it up alongside of the more professional performance of that
other fine genius of our enlightened century—the immortal Hazlitt—in his noble gallery of portraits,
entitled “The Spirit of
The Age.” . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The Author before us appears to be a man of strong natural sense, with an honest
old soldier’s heart, and all that John Bullism about him, which evinces a sturdy
determination to speak his mind, in utter disregard of person or party. Now as we like to
see good rather than evil, we are glad to find that though Byron was often politically tipsy, and talked nonsense about his country, the
King, America, &c.; yet in his conduct on the Greek subject, the usual wisdom of the
hereditary Senator was conspicuous. There was not a fault in his advice concerning the Greek
cause. He stands, as a Statesman, as superior to the rest, as the Trajan column does to a
milestone. He avowed an intention to study the art of war, probably to become another Napoleon; at all events to be a Washington. All this was in his nature. He was a charger of high blood, and men
rail at him because he was unfit for a cart-horse. It is to men of such a character that the
world is to look for the enthusiasm and perseverance requisite to effect great objects; and
whatever may be the results of their ambition, it is certain that Providence only works grand
changes by single men, not by bodies of men, and ultimately merges all in monarchy. Republics
have only short lives, and seldom merry ones. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
The work opens with a long account of clumsy mis-management in transmission of
the stores; and the introduction to Lord Byron. His
behaviour to the Author was kind and condescending. The room was hung round with weapons like
an armoury, abore which were shelves furnished with books, an hieroglyphic of his
Lordship’s politics, which were to furnish Greece with arms and independence, and then to
leaven it with learning. His politics were very simple, but truly wise. Let one single object,
(he said,) the expulsion of the Turks, be first regarded. Newspapers and
the press would now only create faction, and do mischief. They are only to be considered as
secondary things. Col. Stanhope’s opposite sentiments
created the coolness between them. Bloodshed and anarchy, said the wise Member of the Upper
House, will be the consequence of discussing theories of government, before independence is
obtained. His Lordship was perfectly correct, for in a short time the wiseacres published a
Tirade against Kings, which, said the Peer, was the very way to bring the
Holy Alliance down upon them. Add to this, that the German Officers who came to assist, were
men of punctilious etiquette, and always quarrelling about rank; and mechanics sent out at an
expence of three hundred and forty pounds, did only fourteen days work, at the cost of
something more than four pounds one shilling a day. Pp. 66, 67. . . .
Anonymous,
“The Last Days of Lord Byron” in The Gentleman’s Magazine
Vol. 95 (June 1825)
For every object, public or private, his Lordship was expected to be paymaster;
a mutiny might cost him his life; what he received from England were a Wesleyan preacher,
bugle-horns, printing presses, and religious tracts. Arms, powder, and shot, were inferior
considerations*. With all his noble-minded sacrifices, he was harassed with crazy counsels;
worried out of his patience and sleep; and doomed to eat nothing for several days but cheese,
fish, vegetables, and bread. In short, at his outset in life, he was all but murdered by
calumniators; and now he had to encounter the insanity of his countrymen, who employed the
funds collected for the liberation of Greece, in propagating their own political and religious
tenets, instead of furnishing the indispensable materials of war. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
William Fletcher—I was in the service of the late
Lord Byron upwards of 20 years, and was with him up to
the time of his death. I now receive a pension from his family for my services. I first saw
Parry at Greece, at Missollonghi. He lived in the
same house with Lord Byron. I was not much in the habit of seeing him, and
had not an opportunity of knowing whether he was drunk, more than I heard from report. He
sometimes appeared the worse for liquor. I have seen him in Lord
Byron’s company; he generally called him Captain
Parry. I have heard Parry speak of Colonel Stanhope. Some men were sent to attack a Turkish brig off Missolonghi.
Parry came home to his house on that occasion, and did not get out
again, but said he wanted to shave and dress. This was early in the evening, and it was a
considerable time before he came down again. He went into his room at the back of the house. I
don’t know where he went when he had shaved. The brig was afterwards in flames.
Parry was sent to, and discovered to be asleep. I did not see him go
out before the brig was in flames. I have seen Parry once since my return
to England. Since I have been subpœnaed here as a witness, I have seen him frequently.
Having been here in attendance a long time, and feeling a want for something to eat, I went to
get some bread and cheese. Zambelli was with me, and
Parry came in, and was very polite to us. I do not know whether the
word rogue was used. Parry addressed himself to me, but I do not recollect
the words he made use of; they were meant to imply that he had always been my friend. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
I remember a Turkish
brig coming a-ground off Missolonghi. We were then all in that place. I heard that
Parry was applied to on that occasion to lend his assistance. He
was at Lord Byron’s house. Several of us were ordered by him to
go in a couple of boats, with guns, to attack the brig. Parry did not
go with us; was to come round by land with some Greek soldiers. He did not come round. He
said he would come to our assistance when he sent us out. He had a blue coat on, but I do
not know whether he was shaved or not. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
— Zambelli, a Hungarian.—I
lived in the service of Lord Byron at Missolonghi, and had
the care of liquors and provisions in his house. I knew Parry at Missolonghi, and have twice known him absolutely intoxicated. He was,
on those occasions, asleep with the bottle by his side lying on the floor, and Lord
Byron called to me to take him away. Those are the only times when I have known
him affected by liquor. I cannot say how many bottles he drank on those occasions. I recollect
a Turkish brig being on shore when Parry came into the house and went up
stairs. He did not go out of the house again that day. The brig was not burning before he came
into the house. It was burned while he was in the house. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Colonel Stanhope.—I am a Lieutenant-Colonel in the
army. I went out to Greece, and saw Parry there; he
lived in my room, and ate his meals at my table. He was in the habit of drinking to excess. He
was a sot, and a boaster, and frequently spoke of making Congreve rockets, in which, he said,
he had made an improvement, of which Colonel Congreve
had taken the merit. He said he would take Lepanto by a fire-kite, and destroy the Turkish
fleet. He never carried any of his plans into execution. I have read the Last Days of Lord
Byron. Parry is not capable of writing such a work.
He is a man of a strong natural mind, but uneducated. He does not speak grammatically correct.
He frequently spoke of his great science as an engineer. I saw the brig on shore, and was
there. The brig was on shore four or five miles from Missolonghi, and the Greek officers
applied to Lord Byron and myself to lend assistance; we
despatched artillery and the greater part of the soldiers and townspeople immediately proceeded
there; we were for some time under the bombardment of this vessel. After having been stranded
for two days, and seeing the impossibility of getting her off, her crew set her on fire, and
escaped in their boats to another Turkish vessel which had been hovering in the offing.
Parry never made his appearance all the time. Lord
Byron treated him as a fool, a buffoon—not as one of these fools that have
so often graced the tables of the great. Parry called Lord
Byron Hal, and
he called him Falstaff.
. . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Bowring.—I acted as Secretary to the Greek
Committee. Parry was recalled by a vote of the committee
of the 3d of July. I should consider him incapable of writing such a book without some
assistance. I have not seen him in a state of actual drunkenness, but when he has drunk rather
too much. After his return, he showed me the materials from which this work was formed, but I
did not look them over. I should think them, however, insufficient to have made the book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Knight.—This book was published by Knight and
Lacy. I am not of that house. Parry applied to me early in 1825. He was announced as
Captain Parry, and I fully expected to have seen that Captain Parry who had been so frequently towards the North
Pole. He, however, undeceived me, and said he came from Greece, and that he wished to publish
something relative to Lord Byron. Having said this, he left
a portfolio for my perusal, and we had no further conversation at the time. In a few days he
called again, and I returned the papers. They consisted of a few official documents, containing
technical particulars, terms of war, and estimates of ammunition, and several Greek newspapers,
with a few sheets, purporting to be the journal of Captain Parry. They
amounted altogether to about 40 or 50 folios. I have read the book which he has published, and
towards the end, in the appendix, there are some expressions similar to those I saw in the
papers he brought to me. The body of the book does not contain a line of what was in those
papers. If he were the writer of the journal put into my hands, he could not be the author of
this book. My interview with him was very short; but from what I saw of him, and from his
conversation, I should not think him capable of writing this book. . . .
Anonymous,
“Parry v. Hunt” in The Times
No. 13,306 (15 June 1827)
Mr. Lacy.—I am a partner in the house of Knight
and Lacy. We published this book for Mr. Parry. He said
he had received some assistance in the arrangement of the work from another gentleman. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
* In one of the editions of Shakspeare is an engraving (after Stothard) representing Antient Pistol cudgelled by Fluellen. Perhaps as humorous a
subject might be found for that admirable artist’s pencil in some of the
situations attributed by the witnesses to our valiant Major; for instance, the lying
asleep after a debauch, embracing the bottle, as described with significant gestures by
the witness Zambelli; or the elaborate shaving
and dressing, while his men were proceeding to assault the Turkish brig. . . .
Anonymous,
“Verdict against the Examiner in the Case of William Parry” in The Examiner
No. 1011 (17 June 1827)
The Chief Justice too, observing on
Parry’s conduct in the
affair of the Turkish brig, intimated, that one neglect of duty ought not to fix the character
of cowardice on any man:—but his Lordship knows, that a single neglect on the day of
battle cost the unfortunate Byng his life, and that Lord Sackville
was disgracefully driven from the service for once imputed fault on the field of Minden; yet
both these men had given repeated proofs of noble courage. Where, however, are William Parry’s proofs? . . .
Ali Pasha of Yannina (1740-1822)
Albanian warlord who expanded his territories during the Napoleonic wars but was
eventually suppressed by the Ottoman Turks; he entertained Byron in 1809.
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
Cyrus the Great (d. 530 BC)
Son of Cambyses, he was the founder of the Persian Empire. His life is celebrated in
Xenophon's
Cyropædia.
Prince Alexander Mavrocordatos [Αλεξανδρος Μαβροκορδατος] (1791-1865)
Greek statesman and diplomat with Byron at Missolonghi; after study at the University of
Padua he joined the Greek Revolution in 1821 and in 1822 was elected by the National
Assembly at Epidaurus. He commanded forces in western Central Greece and retired in 1826
after the Fall of Messolonghi.
Odysseas Androutsos [Οδησευς] (1788-1825)
The son of Andreas Androutsos; he was the principal chieftain in eastern Greece and
political opponent of the constitutional government of Alexander Mavrocordatos, who was
instrumental in having him assassinated.
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Xerxes I, king of Persia (d. 465 BC)
King of Persia (485-465 BC); the son of Darius whose fleet was destroyed by the Greeks at
the battle of Salamis in 480 BC.