The Life of William Roscoe
Chapter IV. 1788-1796
William Roscoe to Lord Lansdown, [December? 1793]
“The event which has pressed upon me with more weight than
almost any other I ever as yet experienced, either of a public or private
nature, is the execution of the Deputies in France,—
| LIFE OF WILLIAM ROSCOE. | 111 |
men
whom I had long been accustomed to look up to as the best friends of their
country and of mankind; and for whom, if affection be acquired without a
personal acquaintance, I may say I had a real esteem. Of these men, Verniaux was the most particular object of my
regard. He seems to have possessed a grandeur and sublimity of imagination,
coupled with an accuracy of judgment, beyond any of his associates; and if ever
the love of his country was apparent in any man, it was so in him. In lamenting
the fate of these great men, I cannot, however, forget their errors, which, I
am convinced, they themselves discovered when too late. Their graves were dug
on the 10th of August, and the 2d of September passed their sentence. The
remainder of their lives was a struggle to repair either their mistake in
assenting to, or their want of energy in resisting, the violence that then took
place. Fatal day! that overthrew the labour of years, and placed the fortunes
of the human race on the chance of a die. Surely, nothing less than absolute
despotism can admit of the application of the principle of force.
“Wherever the sense of a whole community can be peaceably
taken, the insurrection of a part is treason. This forms the distinction
between the destroyers of the Bastile and the heroes of the 10th of August, or
their rivals of the 2d of September.
112 |
LIFE OF WILLIAM ROSCOE. |
|
“As to the great point which the French think they have
gained by the destruction of their monarchy, I think it of little consequence;
not that I am become a believer in the maxim, that ‘whate’er is
best administered is best,’ but because I think that a monarchy
is capable of being as well constituted for the happiness of a people as a
republic. And though, I hope, not superstitious, I cannot help thinking that
the voluntary and solemn oath of a whole nation, to abide by a constitution
which they took three years in framing, ought, if there be any thing serious or
binding in human affairs, to have some weight. I will not trouble your Lordship
with my feelings on the conduct of the French rulers subsequent to this
shocking event. The horrid industry employed in the discovery of the other
proscribed Deputies, the deliberate mockery of their trial, and the bloody
indifference of the people at large, on the execution of such men as Rabaut, who first rescued them from despotism,
freezes my affections, and gives me a dislike, not only to the French, but to
my species. Sorry am I to say, that this dislike is not much removed by any
thing I can see in my own country, where the same selfish and slavish spirit
that has contributed to bring on the enormities of France is apparent in the
prosecution of all those who aim, by a cool, rational, and deliberate reform,
to prevent a similar catastrophe here. With
| LIFE OF WILLIAM ROSCOE. | 113 |
what face can
our present administration commit Thomas
Muir to the hulks, preparatory to his transportation to Botany
Bay, when it is apparent to all the nation, that if he has been guilty,
Mr. Pitt and the Duke of Richmond ought to accompany him? But the
leaders have apostatised, and the disciples perish. This is enough. The
founders of a sect become its persecutors! To whom shall we compare those who
punish what they have themselves endeavoured to promote?
“I cannot conceive what can be the views of the people
assembled in Edinburgh, under the name of the British Convention; but the whole
is so ill-timed, and so ill-conducted, that I should easily be persuaded it was
intended to bring additional odium on the cause of reform, did I not know, that
one person appeared amongst them whose motives are beyond suspicion. I mean
Lord Daer, whom I have seen in
Liverpool, and whose heart, I am sure, is right. Why has he committed himself
in such a business, and nipt his usefulness in the bud? Great harm has been
done by the doctrine, so industriously inculcated by a sect of which I am a
professing member, that whatever is ultimately right is to be pursued at all
times. Perhaps, however, this arises rather from a misapprehension of the
precept, than from the precept itself. It might be admitted in its general
purport, but then, what-
114 | LIFE OF WILLIAM ROSCOE. | |
ever is right is always to be
sought for by means likely to obtain it, and not by such as can directly tend
only to the injury of the cause, and the ruin of the individual. If I wish for
a prosperous voyage, I must wait for the wind and the tide; but if I resolve to
attempt it in spite of both, I become the unpitied cause of my own
destruction.”
Thomas Douglas, fifth earl of Selkirk (1771-1820)
The son of the fourth earl (d. 1799); he settled Highland colonists in Prince Edward
Island, quarreled with the Northwest Fur Company, and published
Observations on the Present State of the Highlands of Scotland (1805). He was an
acquaintance of Walter Scott.
Charles Lennox, third duke of Richmond (1735-1806)
Son of the second duke (d. 1750); educated at Westminster School, he was a military
officer, diplomat, Rockingham Whig, and supporter of the elder Pitt who became a Tory in
his later years.
Thomas Muir (1765-1799)
Scottish advocate educated at Glasgow University; in 1793 he was convicted of sedition
and sentenced to transportation; he escaped from New South Wales and died in France.
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
Jean-Paul Rabaut Saint-Étienne (1743-1793)
A member of the French Constitutional Assembly who was executed along with other members
of the Girondist faction.