The Life of William Roscoe
Chapter XVI. 1819
William Roscoe to Basil Montagu, [1819]
“I ought long ago to have thanked you for your very kind
remembrance of me in sending me your observations respecting the punishment of
death, which arrived at a moment when I had turned my attention
towards the same subject, with a view to publication. I was, therefore, earnest
to learn your sentiments, which I had flattered myself would, in all points, be
in perfect unison with my own; but judge how I was surprised to find that we
differed on the very threshold,—that you had considered anger and revenge as
not only allowable but necessary, whilst I had contended that kindness and
benevolence were the true principles of penal law. After stating your own
opinion, you have proceeded to sanction it by the authority of several other
distinguished writers, some of whom have carried it to much greater extent.
This subject,
| LIFE OF WILLIAM ROSCOE. | 203 |
thus treated from such a quarter, appeared
to me so important, that I could not proceed further without paying it the
utmost attention, and either admitting its validity or demonstrating its
insufficiency; and, as I found the former impossible, I have been obliged to
undertake the latter,—with what success, I must leave the public to judge.
Having, however, once been obliged to dissent, I have not hesitated to do it
fairly and openly; and, in the little work which I am now about to publish, you will find yourself
placed in the front of the battle, and assailed with such arguments as I have
been able to bring to bear against you. I will, however, confess that in this
opposition, (in which, I trust, nothing unfriendly will be found,) I have it
further in view to attract discussion on the subject; in which case I feel
confident you will sacrifice any personal feeling, (if it were possible what I
have said could give rise to it,) in the hope of doing some substantial good.
That the present moment is of the utmost importance we must all perceive, and,
to say the truth, I am confident you will be much better pleased with any
opposition which may throw light on the subject, than by the greatest honours
that mere authorship could confer.”